ML071630521

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Response to NRC Questions Regarding Kewaunee Request for Approval of Topical Report DOM-NAF-5, Application of Dominion Nuclear Core Design and Safety Analysis Methods to the Kewaunee Power Station (Kps).
ML071630521
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 06/12/2007
From: Gerald Bichof
Dominion, Dominion Energy Kewaunee
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
06-578D, DOM-NAF-5
Download: ML071630521 (11)


Text

k Ilominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.

v W O O [ ) o m i n i o n Boulevard, Glen Allcn, VA 13O1,O 'Dominion June 12, 2007 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No. 06-578D Attention: Document Control Desk NL&OS/CDS: R4 Washington, DC 20555 Docket No. 50-305 License No. DPR-43 DOMINION ENERGY KEWAUNEE. INC.

KEWAUNEE POWER STATION RESPONSE TO NRC QUESTIONS REGARDING KEWAUNEE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF TOPICAL REPORT DOM-NAF-5. "APPLICATION OF DOMINION NUCLEAR CORE DESIGN AND SAFETY ANALYSIS METHODS TO THE KEWAUNEE POWER STATION (KPS)"

In a January 31, 2006, public meeting with Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff, Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. (DEK) presented a conceptual approach and implementation strategy for application of existing NRC-approved nuclear core design and safety analysis methods to Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) (reference 1). These design and analysis methods are already in use within the remainder of the Dominion fleet. Fundamental to the proposed approach was creation of a composite topical report (DOM-NAF-5) that would document the application of the relevant methodologies to KPS.

On August 16, 2006, DEK submitted Dominion Topical Report DOM-NAF-5 without attachments A and B (reference 2). Attachment A to DOM-NAF-5, containing Core Management Systems benchmark analysis results, was submitted on December 6, 2006 (reference 3). On April 16, 2007, DEK submitted Attachment B to DOM-NAF-5, containing RETRAN benchmark analysis results (reference 4). This submittal, in conjunction with References 2 and 3, provided the complete contents of DOM-NAF-5.

On May 4, 2007, DEK submitted the KPS plant specific application of the NRC approved Dominion Topical Report VEP-NE-2-A, "Statistical DNBR Evaluation Methodology," for KPS cores containing Westinghouse 422V+ fuel assemblies with the VIPRE-DNVRB-1 code correlation (reference 15).

Subsequently, the (NRC) staff communicated two questions regarding these submittals.

These questions and DEKs responses are provided in Attachment 1.

Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Craig D. Sly at 804-273-2784.

Very truly yours, G. T. Bischof w Vice President - Nuclear Engineering

Serial No. 06-578D Response to NRC Questions Page 2 of 4

References:

1. Summary of Meeting on January 31, 2006,, "To Discuss the Applicability of Dominion Safety and Core Design Methods to Kewaunee Power Station (TAC No. MC 9566),"

(ADAMS Accession Number ML060400098).

2. Letter from G. T. Bischof (DEK) to NRC, "Request for Approval of Topical Report DOM-NAF-5, 'Application of Dominion Nluclear Core Design and Safety Analysis Methods to the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS),"' dated August 16, 2006 (ADAMS Accession Number ML062370351).
3. Letter from G. T. Bischof (DEK) to NRC, "Attachment A to Topical Report DOM-NAF-5, 'Application of Dominion Nuclear Core Design and Safety Analysis Methods to the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS),"' dated December 6, 2006 (ADAMS Accession Number ML0063410177).
4. Letter from G. T. Bischof (DEK) to NRC, "Request for Approval of Topical Report DOM-NAF-5, 'Application of Dominion Nuclear Design and Safety Analysis Methods to the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS),"' dated April 16, 2007.
5. Letter from G. T. Bischof (DEK) to NRC, "Implementation of the Dominion Statistical DNBR Methodology with VI PRE-DNVRB-1 at Kewaunee Power Station," dated May 4, 2007.

Attachment:

1. Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Kewaunee Request for Approval of Topical Report DOM-NAF-5, "Application of Dominion Nuclear Core Design and Safety Analysis Methods to the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS)."

Commitments made in this letter: None

Serial No. 06-578D Response to NRC Questions Page 3 of 4 cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region Ill 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 210 Lisle, Illinois 60532-4352 Ms. M. H. Chernoff Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 8 G9A Washington, D. C. 20555 Mr. S. C. Burton NRC Senior Resident Inspector Kewaunee Power Station

Serial No. 06-578D Response to NRC Questions Page 4 of 4 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA )

1 COUNTY OF HENRICO 1 The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the County and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by Gerald T. Bischof, who is Vice President - Nuclear Engineering of Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. He has affirmed before me that he is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing document in behalf of that Company, and that the statements in the document are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

Acknowledged before me this /a* clay of 9- ,2007 My Commission Expires: &t 31. ado8 I

MARGARET 8. BENNE I T Notory Publlc Commonwealth of Virginla My Commlulon Explrer Aug 3 1 . 2008 i

(SEAL

Serial No. 06-578D ATTACHMENT 1 Response to NRC Questions Regarding Kewaunee Request for Approval of Topical Report DOM-NAF-5, "Application of Dominion Nuclear Core Design and Safety Analysis Methods to the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS)"

KEWAUNEE POWER STATION DOMINION ENERGY KEWAUNEE, INC.

Serial No. 06-578D Attachment 1 Page 1 of 6 R ~ S D Oto~NRC S ~ Questions Reaardina Kewaunee Reauest for A D D ~ Oof V~~

To~icalReDot't DOM-NAF-5. " A ~ ~ l i c a t i oofnDominion Nuclear Core Desian and Safetv Analvsis Methods to the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS)"

On August 16, 2006, Dominion Energy Kew,aunee (DEK) submitted Dominion Topical Report DOM-NAF-5 without attachments A and B (reference 2) to the NRC. On December 6, 2006, Attachment A to DOIM-NAF-5, containing Core Management Systems benchmark analysis results, was submitted (reference 3). On April 16, 2007, DEK submitted Attachment B to DOM-NAF-5, containing RETRAN benchmark analysis results (reference 4). This submittal, in conjlunction with references 2 and 3, provided the complete contents of DOM-NAF-5.

On May 4, 2007, DEK submitted the KPS plant specific application of the NRC approved Dominion Topical Report VEP-NE-2-A, "Statistical DNBR Evaluation Methodology," for KPS cores containing Westinghouse 422V+ fuel assemblies with the VI PRE-DNVRB-1 code correlation (reference 15).

Subsequently, the (NRC) staff communicated two questions regarding these submittals.

These questions and DEKs responses are provided below.

NRC Question 1 In the August 16, 2006, submittal, a brief explanation (on page 12 of 34), and a summary (on page 14 of 34) is provided for the relaxed power distribution control methodology. However, no analysis results are provided. Please provide "before" and "after" results of the bounding analyses cond'ucted with the VEP-FRD-42 methodology, demonstrating continued adherence to the respective limits.

Dominion Response The question above was clarified during a teleconference with NRC staff members on May 15, 2007. During the teleconference it was determined that before and after analysis results are not currently available and providing them was not practicable.

Dominion agreed to provide a comparative analysis showing the Dominion relaxed power distribution (RPDC) methodology, when applied to Kewaunee Power Station, will produce similar results to those provided by the Westinghouse relaxed axial offset control (RAOC) methodology currently in US~-(WCAP-I 0216-P, Revision 1A (reference 7)).

Dominion expects that the cycle-specific RPDC analysis to be performed for KPS will support similar delta4 limits to those that are calculated using the Westinghouse RAOC methodology. Delta-l is defined as the difference in power generated in the top and

Serial No. 06-578D Attachment 1 Page 2 of 6 bottom halves of the core (in percent of rated thermal power). The two methodologies are very similar to each other and the physics codes (ANC (Westinghouse) and CMS (Dominion)) used in the main calculations should generate a similar set of axial power shapes. This expectation is based on Dominion's experience with RPDC implementation for the North Anna units and informal comparisons to generic RAOC analysis results.

To further illustrate the similarity of the two methods, Table 1 presents a side-by-side comparison of key elements for both meth~d~ologies.This table provides greater detail about items a) through h) listed on page 14 of 34 of the August 16, 2006 submittal (reference 2). Since Table 1 illustrates that the key elements of the RPDC methodology are directly comparable to the elements of the RAOC methodology, it may be concluded that the RPDC results obtained during the KPS reload analysis will be essentially the same.

Serial No. 06-578D Attachment 1 Page 3 of 6 Table 1 Comparison of Key Elements of Dominion Relaxed RPDC and Westinghouse ROAC Methodology Category Element Westing house RAOC Dominion RPDC Comparison Technical Specification /

COLR Limits Operating Axial Flux Difference (AFD) limits Axial Flux Difference (AFD) limits Same Limits versus reactor power versus reactor power FQ Surveillance Non- RAOC applies a cycle specific RPDC applies a cycle specific N(z) Essentially the equilibrium W(z) factor to the measured FQ to factor to the FQ limit to account for same conditions account for non-equiiiisrium non-equiiibrium operation.

operation.

Condition I Analysis RAOC methodology populates a The RPDC xenon shape library is xenon shape library using a built by reducing Doppler feedback xenon reconstruction model. Both in the base neutronics model and The reconstruction model is methodologies allowing a divergent xenon dependent on several parameters generate axial oscillation to occur. Actual xenon Xenon whose ranges are determined by xenon distributions are sampled and Distributions xenon transient analysis. distributions that saved from this transient. No Parameters for a given xenon cover essentially consideration is given during the shape are retained only if Delta-l the same delta4 transient calculation to whether or control can be maintained for space.

not the shapes are obtainable those shapes within a tentative during normal operation limit.

Serial No. 06-578D Attachment 1 Page 4 of 6 Category Element Westinghouse RAOC Dominion RPDC Comparison A range of power levels between 50% and 100% power with small Minimum of three power levels, Power enough increments to ensure an Essentially the 100%, 50%, and an intermediate Levels adequate number of power same power are required.

distributions are being analyzed (typically 10% power intervals).

Range of control rod positions Range of control rod positions from Control Rod from ARO to power dependent ARO to power dependent Rod Same Rod Insertion Limits (RILs). Insertion Limits (RILs).

Burnups BOL, MOL, EOL BOL, MOL, EOL Same FQ Analysis Each power shape generated for The FQ x Power for each shape is Condition I is analyzed to compared to the LOCA FQ x Power Loss of determine if LOCA constraints are x K(z) limit at each power level to Coolant met or exceeded. For each Essentially the determine which axial shapes Accident power level the results of this same approach the LOCA limit, thereby (LOCA) analysis will indicate a tentative establishing a preliminary allowable range of delta-l in which there are delta-l versus power band.

no violations of the LOCA limits.

The entire set of axial power Normal operation power distributions from the normal distributions are evaluated relative Loss Of Flow operation analysis are evaluated to the assumed limiting normal Essentially the against the 1.55 cosine design axial Accident operation power distribution, same (LOFA) power distribution for the LOFA typically the 1.55 cosine, used in analysis with the applicable the accident analysis thermal-hydraulic code(s) and correlation(s).

Serial No. 06-578D Attachment 1 Page 5 of 6 Category Element Westinghouse RAOC Dominion RPDC Comparison Condition II Analysis Analyzed Cooldown Accident, Control Rod Cooldown Accident, Control Rod Accidents Same Withdrawal, Boration 1 Dilution Withdrawal, Boration 1 Dilution Initial statepoints for Condition II statepoints for Condition II analysis are limited to the Shape analysis are limited to the Condition Condition I axial power Same Selection distributions that fit within I axial power distributions that fit within tentative delta4 bands.

tentative delta-I bands.

Serial No. 06-578D Attachment 1 Page 6 of 6 NRC Question 2 On page 26 of 34, Section 3.6.1 addresses the conditions and limitations associated with VIPRE-D. In section 3.6.2, parts 1.C and 1.D allude to various models being used without stating when and how these models are used. Please provide additional information regarding the model selection process, e.g., when one particular model is chosen, how that choice is made, and who makes the decision.

Dominion Response The model selection process is controlled by NRC approved Dominion Fleet Report DOM-NAF-2-A, "Reactor Core Thermal-Hydraulics Using the VIPRE-D Computer Code" (reference 6). Dominion will develop and use VIPRE-D models for Kewaunee cores that strictly follow the modeling guidelines and usage requirements specified in DOM-NAF-2-A. DOM-NAF-2-A prescribes the specific constitutive models to be selected for use in the VIPRE-D models for two-phase flow models and correlations, heat transfer correlations, and turbulent mixing models. DOM-NAF-2-A allows no flexibility to select different options for these constitutive models. These VIPRE-D models are used to analyze the non-LOCA, DNB-related transients and accidents as listed in DOM-NAF A.

References:

1. Summary of Meeting on January 31, 2006, "To Discuss the Applicability of Dominion Safety and Core Design Methods to Kewaunee Power Station," (TAC No. MC 9566),

(ADAMS Accession Number ML 0604OOO!38).

2. Letter from G. T. Bischof (DEK) to NRC, "Request for Approval of Topical Report DOM-NAF-5, 'Application of Dominion Nuclear Core Design and Safety Analysis Methods to the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS),"' dated August 16, 2006 (ADAMS Accession Number ML062370351).
3. Letter from G. T. Bischof (DEK) to NRC;, "Attachment A to Topical Report DOM-NAF-5, 'Application of Dominion Nuclear Core Design and Safety Analysis Methods to the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS),"' dated December 6, 2006 (ADAMS Accession Number ML0063410177).
4. Letter from G. T. Bischof (DEK) to NRC, "Request for Approval of Topical Report DOM-NAF-5, "Application of Dominion Nuclear Design and Safety Analysis Methods to the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS)," di3ted April 16, 2007.
5. Letter from G. T. Bischof (DEK) to NRC, "Implementation of the Dominion Statistical DNBR Methodology with VIPRE-DNVRB-1 at Kewaunee Power Station," dated May 4, 2007.
6. Dominion Fleet Report DOM-NAF-2-A, "Rteactor Core Thermal-Hydraulics Using the VIPRE-D Computer Code," August 2006.
7. WCAP-10216-P-A, Revision 1A, "Relaxation of Constant Axial Offset Control FQ Surveillance Technical Specification," February 1994.