ML063610280

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notification of Catawba Nuclear Station - Component Design Bases Inspection - NRC Inspection Report 05000413-07-006 and 05000414-07-006
ML063610280
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/27/2006
From: Ogle C
Division of Reactor Safety II
To: Morris J
Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Power Co
References
IR-07-006
Download: ML063610280 (5)


See also: IR 05000413/2007006

Text

December 27, 2006

Duke Power Company LLC

d/b/a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

ATTN:

Mr. J. R. Morris

Site Vice President

Catawba Site

4800 Concord Road

York, SC 29745-9635

SUBJECT:

NOTIFICATION OF CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION - COMPONENT DESIGN

BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000413/2007006 AND

05000414/2007006

Dear Mr. Morris:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection at your Catawba Nuclear

Station during the weeks of March 19-23, 2007, April 2-6, 2007, and April 16-20, 2007. The

inspection team will be led by Randy Moore, a Senior Reactor Inspector from the NRC's Region

II Office. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection

procedure, Procedure 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection, issued June 22, 2006.

The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk significant / low margin components to function

as designed and support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review of

selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications.

During a telephone conversation on December 21, 2006, Mr. Moore confirmed with

Mr. G. Strickland of your staff, arrangements for an information gathering site visit and the three-

week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows:

Information gathering visit: Week of March 5-9, 2007

Onsite weeks: March 19-23, 2007, April 2-6, 2007, and April 16-20, 2007

The purpose of the information gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify

risk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to

support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. Rudy Bernhard, a Region II Senior Reactor

Analyst, may accompany Mr. Moore during the information gathering visit to review probabilistic

risk assessment data and identify risk significant components which will be examined during the

inspection.

The enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the information gathering visit. Please

contact Mr. Moore prior to preparing copies of the materials listed in the enclosure.

The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only

those documents required for the inspection preparation.

DPC

2

During the information gathering visit, the team leader will also discuss the following inspection

support administrative details: office space, supplemental documents requested to be made

available to the team in the Region II office prior to the inspection preparation week of

March 12-16, 2007; arrangements for site access; and the availability of knowledgeable plant

engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the

information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Moore at (404) 562-4628 or me at

(404) 562-4605.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Charles R. Ogle, Acting Deputy Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.: 50-413, 50-414

License Nos.: NPF-35, NPF-52

Enclosure

cc w/enc/: (See page 3)

DPC

2

cc w/encl:

Randy D. Hart

Regulatory Compliance Manager

Duke Power Company LLC

d/b/a/Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

Electronic Mail Distribution

Lisa F. Vaughn

Associate General Counsel

and Managing Attorney

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

526 South Church Street-EC 07H

Charlotte, NC 28202

Kathryn B. Nolan

Senior Counsel

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

526 South Church Street-EC 07H

Charlotte, NC 28202

David A. Repka

Winston & Strawn LLP

Electronic Mail Distribution

North Carolina MPA-1

Electronic Mail Distribution

Henry J. Porter, Asst. Director

Div. of Radioactive Waste Mgmt.

S. C. Department of Health

and Environmental Control

Electronic Mail Distribution

R. Mike Gandy

Division of Radioactive Waste Mgmt.

S. C. Department of Health and

Environmental Control

Electronic Mail Distribution

Elizabeth McMahon

Assistant Attorney General

S. C. Attorney General's Office

Electronic Mail Distribution

Vanessa Quinn

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Electronic Mail Distribution

North Carolina Electric

Membership Corporation

Electronic Mail Distribution

Peggy Force

Assistant Attorney General

N. C. Department of Justice

Electronic Mail Distribution

County Manager of York County, SC

Electronic Mail Distribution

Piedmont Municipal Power Agency

Electronic Mail Distribution

R. L. Gill, Jr., Manager

Nuclear Regulatory Issues

and Industry Affairs

Duke Power Company LLC

d/b/a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

526 S. Church Street

Charlotte, NC 28201-0006

_________________________

OFFICE

RII:DRS

RII:DRS

RII:DRP

SIGNATURE

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

NAME

R. Bernhard

R. Moore

J. Moorman

DATE

12/27/2006

12/27/2006

12/27/2006

12/ /2006

12/ /2006

12/ /2006

12/ /2006

E-MAIL COPY?

YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO

Enclosure

December 21, 2006

Please provide the information electronically in .pdf files, Excel, or other searchable format on

CDROM. The CDROM should be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Lists

should contain enough information to be easily understood to someone who has a knowledge

of pressurized water reactor technology.

1.

From your most-recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) excluding external events and

fires:

a.

Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific probabilistic safety analysis

(PSA): one sorted by Risk Achievement Worth (RAW), and the other sorted by

Birnbaum Importance.

b.

A list of the top 500 cutsets.

2.

From your most-recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) including external events and

fires:

a.

Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific probabilistic safety analysis

(PSA): one sorted by Risk Achievement Worth (RAW), and the other sorted by

Birnbaum Importance.

b.

A list of the top 500 cutsets..

3.

Risk ranking of operator actions from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW. Provide

copies of your human reliability worksheets for these items..

4.

Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and calculations with low design margins

(i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design

required output, heat exchangers close to rated design heat removal, MOV risk-margin

rankings, etc.).

5.

A list of operating experience evaluations completed within the last two years, sorted by

associated component and/or system. Note this includes applicability evaluations for OE

items not just those found to be applicable to Catawba.

6.

A list of safety related SSC design modifications implemented within the last two years,

sorted by affected system.

7.

This item deleted. Corrective action lists will be requested after the component sample is

determined.

8.

A list of common-cause failure of components that have occurred at Catawba and have

been identified within the last five years.

9.

A list of operability evaluations completed within the last two years, sorted by associated

component or system.

10. Contact information for a person to discuss PRA information prior to bag man trip: name,

title, phone number, and e-mail address

11. List of equipment currently on the sites Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including

a description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list and summaries (if

available) of your plans to address those reasons.

12. List of equipment currently in GL 91-18 status.

13. List of equipment currently in MR (a)(1) status.