ML061020224

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commitment Change Evaluation Report for 2005
ML061020224
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/03/2006
From: Jamil D M
Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Power Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NEI 99-04
Download: ML061020224 (6)


Text

_Dukne t9Power, A Duke Energy Company D.M. JAMIL Vice President Duke Power Catawba Nuclear Station 4800 Concord Rd. / CN01 VP York, SC 29745-9635 803 831 4251 803 831 3221 fax April 3, 2006 U.'S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:

Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

.

Duke Power Company LLC d/b/a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.Catawba Nuclear Station, Unit 1 and Unit 2 Docket Numbers 50-413 and 50-414 Commitment Change Evaluation Report for 2005 Attached is a summary of commitment change evaluations completed during the 2005 calendar year for Catawba Nuclear Station. These evaluations and subsequent commitment changes were made based on the guidance defined in NEI 99-04, Guidelines for Managing NRC Commitments, and have no adverse effect on compliance with NRC rules and regulations.

Questions regarding this report should be directed to Kay Nicholson at 803.831.3237.

Sincerely, D. M. Jamil Attachments A CD www. dukepower.

con' 7 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ap:il 3, 2006 Page 2 xc: W. D. Travers, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Sarm Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 23T85 61 rorsyth St., SW Atlanta, GA 30303 J. F. Stang, Jr. (Addressee only)NRR Project Manager (CNS)U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ma'l Stop 0-8 H4A Wa3hington, DC 20555-0001 E. f. Guthrie NRC Senior Resident Inspector (CNS)CN31NC Catawba Nuclear Station Annual Commitment Change Summary Report for 2005 Dockets Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 NRC Notification Number Source Document Original Commitment Modified Commitment' Required Yes 2005-C-001 Response to GL 82-33, Supp. Reference Attachment A Reference Attachment B NUREG 0737 Yes 2005-C-002 SER for License Amend 128 Section #.4.4 states that Duke would Perform calorimetric heat balance (Unit 1) and 122 (Unit 2); "continue to perform calorimetric determination of reactor coolant flow RCS Flowrate Measurement, heat balance testing as before." on a continuous basis using the PMAX February 17, 1995 performance monitoring program and importing the results to the PI system for long term archiving in lieu of PT/1(2)/A/4150/013B.

This revised commitment will be incorporated into the NC System Design Basis Document (CNS-1553.NC-00-0001).

v Attachment A Existing Commitment

==

Description:==

Letter from Hal B. Tucker to HR Denton (USNRC), September 26, 1983, Response to Generic Letter 82-33 (Rev. 2) (Supplement I to NUREG -0737) regarding the Catawba Station conformance to Regulatory Guide 1.97, Rev. 2.CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97, REV. 2 REVIEW iE17 Variable: Range: Category: Existing Design: Compliance:

Display: Position: Implementation Schedule: Atmospheric Stability-50 to 10 0 C 3 The Indicated range for atmospheric stability is"4o to 80C for a 30 meter interval.This instrumentation is In compliance with Duke's Interpretation of RG 1.97, Rev. 2 as clarified in Section 5.5.One computer point.One channel recorded This instrumentation was specified to have an accuracy of +/-0.1 0 C which is considered adequate for the intended monitoring function.Not Applicable.

5-_4 Revision 2 Attachment B -Revised Commitment Wording: Proposed new wording for Regulatory Guide 1.97,Rev 2 -Supplement 1 NUREG-0737 Response and Instrumentation E-17 in UFSAR Table 1-11 and Section 2.3.3.3 E-17 Variable: Range: Category: Existing Design: Compliance:

Display: Position: Atmospheric Stability-50 to 10 0 C 3 The indicated range for atmospheric stability is -4° to 8 0 C for a 50 meter interval.This instrumentation is in compliance with Duke's interpretation of RG 1.97, Rev. 2 as clarified in Section_1.8.1.29.1, with the exception of the instrument accuracy.One computer point. One channel recorded The instrumentation loop has an accuracy of+0.27 0 C through and including the digital or analog display. This minimum loop accuracy is considered adequate for the intended monitoring function of dose assessment.

Page 1 of 2 Attachment B Revised Commitment:

Catawba Nuclear Station UFSAR Chapter 2 2.3 Meteorology 2.3.3.3 June 13, 1996 through Present Instrument accuracies and schedules for calibration and maintenance are listec below. The instrument loop has an accuracy of i 0.27 0 C through and including the digital or analog display. This minimum loop accuracy is consicered adequate for the intended monitoring function of dose assessment..

4. Delta-Temperature
a. Operating Range: -4.00° C to 8.00C b. Time-averaged digital accuracy +/- 0.27 0 C c. Time-averaged analog accuracy i 0.27 0 C Note: Actual UFSAR changes will be completed using the 50.59 process and the USFAR change process outlined in NSD 220, "UFSAR Revision Process".Page 2 of 2