ML051920036

U1R28 OCC Interactive Turnover

ML051920036
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	04/10/2004
From:	Nuclear Management Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2004-0282
Download: ML051920036 (6)

Text

6-+4 WC, -

committed to Nuclear Erecolcncrcnc Point Beach Nuclear Plant U1R28 OCC Interactive Turnover Meeting Agenda Saturday, April 10, 2004 Start Time: 0600 /8 NSB 217 Attendees: Shift Outage Directors (SOD) Rad Protection Manager (RPM)

Shift Outage Managers (SOM) Chemistry Manager Operations Coordinators (SOC) IC General Supervisor Maintenance Coordinators (MOC) Electrical General Supervisor Engineer Coordinators (EOM) Mechanical General Supervisor Major Project Coordinators (MPC) Supply Chain Manager Installation Services General Expected Duration: 30 Minutes Agenda: 1. Safety Issue Discussion (SOD)

2. RP Status (RPM)

3. Plant Status / Operations Coordinator Tumover (SOC)

4. Shutdown Safety Assessment (SOC)

5. Maintenance Coordinator Turnover (MOC)

6. Engineering Coordinator Turnover (EOC)

7. Major Projects Coordinator Turnover (MPC)

8. Rapid Trending Assessment (NOS)

9. Action Item Review (SOM)

10. Critical Path (SOM)

11. Shift Goals (SOM)

12. ACEMAN Assessment (SOM)

13. Final Comments (SOD)

Items Included in Daily Package:

- Safety Snippet

- Outage Alara Report

• Daily Outage Status Report

• Shutdown Safety Assessment

- Workdown Curves

- Contractor Mobilization/Demobilization

• Medium/High Risk Activities

• Defined Critical Path Review

• Daily Outage OE Information Inthis record was deleted in accordance with t Freedom of Information Act, exudations FOt&/H

NMC Commifted to Nuctler Excelienc - D R E y OF

_WlE~rELLEfIrE POlIAT *11RES K1RCN Point Beach Nuclear Plant UIR28 Refueling Outage

- df~~o" d1~ ~b(Wdt r~ll 471O440I

.:vgr;:~.j2  :: -.  ::  ; -. "-Thelme for the%eek-::'._-_:::-_

This week's theme is Close Calls or more specifically, what we call near misses. Leaming from close calls should be looked on as golden opportunities to prevent actual accidents. Lets not miss out on this opportunity.

- - Sunday

'Fix the danger-save a stranger' OE from Ul R27 - A compressed gas cylinder Incontainment stored In a walkway, was not secured. The cylinder was bumped by a worker and fell over. Fortunately a co-worker noticed the situation and caught the cylinder before any damage could be done. Are all of our compressed gas cylinders secured?

. _ , , ,_: R:' - .''Monday . ;

'When you fail to report a hazardous condition, you may contribute to employee attrition" Near-miss failure story:

A co-worker Is using a ladder. It seems fine, but as he comes down, one of the rungs sags as he steps on It He notices a crack. He puts the ladder back without tagging it as needing repairs. The next day you grab the same ladder. As you start to climb you put your foot through the rung, lose your balance and fall, spraining your ankle.

Do you check your ladder before you climb?

.. ,,, . ...  :. ' . - Tuesday -:  :;

'Report and repair or someone may despair" OEI 7263 Comanche Peak - A worker leaned back In his chair when the screws holding the back of the chair to the body separated and he fell back to the floor. Examination of the chair found that only a single screw was holding it together. By someone not reporting this situation, a lost time accident occurred.

-. .. :-~>  ;.Wednesday..-:, ..;:

"Sidestepping a hazardouscondition leaves others of risk of hospital admission" A worker was attempting to remove a water tank from a piece of heavy equipment. He was removing some bolts not realizing that they were the only support for the heavy tank Itself. When the last bolt came out, the 1 200-pound tank fell on the victim, crushing his chest. He never regained consciousness, and died of the Injuries.

Investigation showed two years before, a similar Incident had occurred Involving another worker. The worker involved had escaped with only a bad scare but the condition was not corrected.

a- ; l.;

. .- . i.- - ..-- ' -LThursday -

"Your negkect could result in his broken neck" OE1 7264 Comanche Peak - Truck entering the parking lot struck a pedestrian, knocking him to the ground.

Luckily the person was not injured. The pedestrian was walking In an open area and thought the driver had given him the right of way. However the driver of the truck did not see him. Has a near miss like this happened at PBNP?

.Friday

't2gnoring safety in any way may cause someone else to pay" OE17626 TMI - During the disassembly of a RCP snubber a technician suffered the loss of the fingertip. A coworker shifted the position of the snubber cylinder and did not realize the technician's finger was in the assembly.

- Saturday - - .

"Most obituaries would not be recorded ff all close cal/s were reported" It havDened at Prairie Island:

A year ago, somebody damaged one of the roll-up doors with a hydraulic lift. Unfortunately the employee failed to report this mishap and later the door fell narrowly missing another employee. This time we were lucky however the whole thing could have been avoided If only the damaged door were Identified and repaired.

L.OSE

~ ALS

Point Beach Nuclear Plant Outage 1R28 Path Picture DAY 6 Meets Supporting Operational Excellence Outage Radiation Performance Doesn't Meet Exceeds

.

• A I This indicator measures cumulative dose radiation exposure and IDay 6.-April.9 Actual = 5.718 total number of personnel-contamination events (PCE's > 5000 Cumulative = 22.252 cpm) during refueling outages. The dose indicator is measured in Cumulative Forecast = 20.913 Rem and individual PCE events.

Meets: <=75 Rem Actual Cum.

Exceeds: <=71 Rem Dose: 22.252 REM Meets: <=18 Exceeds: <= 12 Actual PCE's: 4

- -gmm

• e6I g E.e Sj Stu Thomas I Personnel Contamination Events Cummulative Dose Exposure 20 --__ _ __ 0_ _ .- _ _ _

18

,~ i, 16 60 . _ _

U'1 E +-4-Actual 14- -- Aciual Itr ."o' i 6

aa 12  ;

.Forecast 0 An ...

10- -- Goal i - Goal a0 40 I 8! a

• ., II co 6-0 20 i 02 0 I 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 1416 1820 2224 2628 30 3234 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 28

Cotinidfed to Nuclear Excellence I Outage Status Report Plant: Point Reach Unit I Day: Saturday Today's Date/ Time: 4/10/04 / 1500 Outage Duration: Day 7 of 28 Safety Status industrial OSHA Recordables in last 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> 0 First Aid cases in last 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> 0 Significant near misses 0 Total for this outage 0 Summary:

Radiological Dose outage to date 22.252 Projected to date 20.913 Outage Goal *75 R Difference +1.339 Number of PCEs 4 Summary:

Nuclear Significant human performance errors and events in last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 0 Summary:

Plant Status Mode: El Hot Standby (Mode 3) El Hot Shutdown (fode 4) El Cold Shutdown (Alode 3)  ? Refueling Shutdown (xrode 6)

RCS: Temperature: 100 Pressure: Vented to Atmosphere RV Level: 70%

Time to Boil: 37 Minutes Shutdown Safety Assessment Reactivity: Green Core Cooling: Yellow Power Availability: Green Containment: Green Inventory: Yellow Spent Fuel Pool Cooling: NIA

_ Protected Equipment:

Major Activities Completed In Last 24 Hours Critical Path and Near Critical Path Activities (Next 24 Hours)

Exited Reduced Inventory at 1554 Schedule: Point Beach Human Performance & Communications Timeout Refilled RCS to 70% RX Vessel Level Signficant Outstanding Issues Date Issue Due Date Responsibility 4/03104 Repair Blowdown Tank Leakage 4/15/04 Scott Manthei 4104104 IP2A Charging Pump Troubleshooting (After Orange Path) 4/10/04 Mike Schug 4/08/04 Incorporate Lessons Learned from IST Reduced Inventory Orange Path 4/18104 Dave Dyzak 4108/04 B RCP Motor Oil Sludge 4/12/04 Jim McGough Upcoming M for Milestones Scheduled Actual Scheduled Actuld Date Time Date Time Date Time Date Time Cooldown <200° 4103/04 2100 4/03/04 2230 Heatu >2000 4125/04 0900 Head Lift 4/09/04 0900 Initial 4/28/04 1100 Refueled 4/14/04 0300 On-Line 4130/04 0100 Page I of I

Point B3each Nulearr Pllant PBNP SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT ANI) FIRE CONDITION CHECKIJST OUTAGE SAFETY ASSESSMIENT UNIT: I DATE: April 10, 2004 TIME: I 0(X)

KEY SAFETY FUNCTIONS:

REACTIVITY: GREEN CORE COOLING: YELLOW' POWER AVAILABLE: GREEN INVENTORY: YELLOW CONTAINMENT: GREEN SFP COOLING: NA PROTECTED EQUIPMENT:

Fire Protection Condition ll: Credit taken for existing lire rounds

]1CS Time to o31ilis 37 minutes RCS is al 70% lleactor 'es.sel Level PBF 1562 Rerccnces: NP I1.:3 6 Revisitn 2 ICV30'02 Page 5 of 9 NP 10 2.1

NMC Committed to Nuclear Exceclence } ;OIIRflEY DF W1IEJXELLEnrE Point Beach Nuclear Plant U11R28 Operating Experience Saturday, April 10, 2004 (for work Monday, AprIl 12, 2004)

OE subject:

OE17955 - Loss of Offsite Power Circuit

Purpose:

Visual inspections may be the first indication of degraded cables.

Why we chose this OE for today:

Cable Determination and Doble testing on lX-04 is scheduled for Monday April 12 th, 2004 Discussion:

On March 6, 2004, Wolf Creek experienced a loss of one offsite power circuit. The initial indication was a loss of power from the west switchyard bus. Following the loss of this offsite circuit, a signal to start the 'B' emergency diesel generator (EDG) was initiated. The 'B' train essential loads were then loaded back onto the bus being carried by the EDG. These loads include the essential service water (ESW),

centrifugal charging and motor driven auxiliary feedwater pumps. The required technical specification (TS) action to restore the offsite circuit to operable within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> was entered.

A visual inspection of the start-up transformer identified one damaged cable requiring replacement. The damaged cable accumulated water inside the cable insulation. The apparent cause is that this moisture caused the cable to short to ground, resulting in the damage.

The damaged cable and five other similar cables on the start-up transformer were replaced. Doble testing was performed on the transformer to identify if there are other damaged components - such as bushing damage that would not be seen in a visual inspection - or damage to the transformer internal windings. The Doble testing was completed satisfactory indicating the transformer did not sustain any detectable damage internally to the windings nor to the low side bushing.

Questions:

Have we reviewed the acceptance criteria for these inspections?