ML051680176
| ML051680176 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 05/04/2005 |
| From: | Kozyra J Progress Energy Carolinas |
| To: | Emch R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML051680176 (3) | |
Text
_:;Page 1 l From:
"Kozyra, Jan' <jan.kozyra©pgnmail.com>
To:
"Richard Emch" <RLE~nrc.gov>
Date:
Wed, May 4, 2005 11:08 AM
Subject:
SAMA RAI 8 Here is some proposed wording to hopefully the concern re: SAMA RAI 8.
<<sama 8 additional.doc>>
c:\\temp\\GWJ00001.TMP Page 1;l Mail Envelope Properties (4278E54B.DEB: 0: 44523)
Subject:
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
SAMA RAI 8 Wed, May 4, 2005 11:06 AM "Kozyra, Jan" <jan.kozyra@pgnmail.com>
jan.kozyra@pgnmail.com Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 RLE (Richard Emch)
Post Office OWGWPO02.HQGWDO0 l Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm sama 8 additional.doc Mime.822 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
Size 101 532 28160 1
Date & Time Wednesday, May 4, 2005 11:06 AM None Standard No None No Standard
Richard Em ch - s amna 8 addition al.doc Pagqe 1 I Richard Emch - sama 8 additional.doc PaQe 1 Progress Energy Carolinas (PEC) letter dated April 21, 2005, Serial: BSEP 05-0051, "Response to Request for Additional Information - License Renewal,"
provides information about PEC plans to further evaluate SAMAs that are potentially cost-beneficial. The letter states in the response to RAI SAMAl -8 that an assessment will be performed to make recommendations based upon further evaluations of the potentially cost-beneficial SAMAs. However, the assessment would focus on Phase II SAMA 1, and those (baseline case) SAMAs (15, 25, and 29) that remain cost-beneficial if SAMA 1 were implemented.
In discussions with the NRC, it was noted that SAMAs other than those in the baseline case may become cost-beneficial when uncertainties are considered.
Specifically, these are SAMAs 6, 11, 13, 16, 18, 21, 30, 31, and 32. PEC will include these SAMAs in the assessment that will make recommendations for the further evaluations of SAMAs. Completion of the evaluations is being tracked in the BSEP action tracking system. Decisions about possible implementation of the SAMAs will not be made upon probabilistic risk benefits and cost alone.
Such decisions will also involve, in part, engineering judgment, and management judgment regarding operational and administrative burdens, practicality, and best use of scarce capital resources, etc.