ML051680176

SAMA RAI 8

ML051680176
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	05/04/2005
From:	Kozyra J Progress Energy Carolinas
To:	Emch R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML051680176 (3)

Text

Richard Emch - SAMA RAI 8 _:;Page 1l From: "Kozyra, Jan' <jan.kozyra©pgnmail.com>

To: "Richard Emch" <RLE~nrc.gov>

Date: Wed, May 4, 2005 11:08 AM

Subject:

SAMA RAI 8 Here is some proposed wording to hopefully the concern re: SAMA RAI 8.

<<sama 8 additional.doc>>

c:\temp\GWJ00001.TMP  ; . Page 1;l Mail Envelope Properties (4278E54B.DEB: 0: 44523)

Subject:

SAMA RAI 8 Creation Date: Wed, May 4, 2005 11:06 AM From: "Kozyra, Jan" <jan.kozyra@pgnmail.com>

Created By: jan.kozyra@pgnmail.com Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 RLE (Richard Emch)

Post Office Route OWGWPO02.HQGWDO0 l nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 101 Wednesday, May 4, 2005 11:06 AM TEXT.htm 532 sama 8 additional.doc 28160 Mime.822 1 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard

Richard Em ch - s amna 8 addition al .doc Pagqe 1 I Richard Emch sama 8 additional.doc PaQe 1 Progress Energy Carolinas (PEC) letter dated April 21, 2005, Serial: BSEP 05-0051, "Response to Request for Additional Information - License Renewal,"

provides information about PEC plans to further evaluate SAMAs that are potentially cost-beneficial. The letter states in the response to RAI SAMAl -8 that an assessment will be performed to make recommendations based upon further evaluations of the potentially cost-beneficial SAMAs. However, the assessment would focus on Phase II SAMA 1, and those (baseline case) SAMAs (15, 25, and 29) that remain cost-beneficial if SAMA 1 were implemented.

In discussions with the NRC, it was noted that SAMAs other than those in the baseline case may become cost-beneficial when uncertainties are considered.

Specifically, these are SAMAs 6, 11, 13, 16, 18, 21, 30, 31, and 32. PEC will include these SAMAs in the assessment that will make recommendations for the further evaluations of SAMAs. Completion of the evaluations is being tracked in the BSEP action tracking system. Decisions about possible implementation of the SAMAs will not be made upon probabilistic risk benefits and cost alone.

Such decisions will also involve, in part, engineering judgment, and management judgment regarding operational and administrative burdens, practicality, and best use of scarce capital resources, etc.