ML051680147

SAMA 8 RAI Supplement Information

ML051680147
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	05/16/2005
From:	Kozyra J Progress Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy Co
To:	Emch R NRC/NRR/DRIP/RLEP
References
Download: ML051680147 (3)

Text

Richard Emch - SAMA 8 RAI Supp. Info Page 1 il From: 'Kozyra, Jan" <jan.kozyra@pgnmail.com>

To: 'Richard Emch <RLE~nrc.gov>

Date: Mon, May 16, 2005 10:52 AM

Subject:

SAMA 8 RAI Supp. Info The attached will be used as the content of letter providing supplemental information regarding our response to BSEP SAMA RAI 8.

<<sama 8 additional.doc>>

-I c:\temp\GWJ00001.TMP Page 1

.o ,_33 Mail Envelope Properties (4288B391.070: 21: 53360)

Subject:

SAMA 8 RAI Supp. Info Creation Date: Mon, May 16, 2005 10:51 AM From: "Kozyra, Jan" <jan.kozyra@pgnmail.com>

Created By: jan.kozyra@pgnmail.com Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 RLE (Richard Emch)

Post Office Route OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 159 Monday, May 16,2005 10:51 AM TEXT.htm 599 sama 8 additional.doc 28160 Mime.822 1 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard

Richard Emch - sama 8 additional.doc Pagie Paae 11I'1 Richard Emch sama 8 additional.doc DRAFT Progress Energy Carolinas (PEC) letter dated April 21, 2005, Serial: BSEP 05-0051, "Response to Request for Additional Information - License Renewal,"

provides information about PEC plans to further evaluate SAMAs that are potentially cost-beneficial. The letter states in the response to RAI SAMA 1-8 that an assessment will be performed to make recommendations based upon further evaluations of the potentially cost-beneficial SAMAs. However, the assessment would focus on Phase II SAMA 1, and those (baseline case) SAMAs (15, 25, and 29) that remain cost-beneficial if SAMA 1 were implemented.

In discussions with the NRC, it was noted that SAMAs other than those in the baseline case may become cost-beneficial when uncertainties are considered.

Specifically, these are SAMAs 6, 16, 17, 18, 30, 31, 32, and 34. PEC will include these SAMAs in the assessment that will make recommendations for the further evaluations of SAMAs. Completion of the evaluations is being tracked in the BSEP action tracking system. Decisions about possible implementation of the SAMAs will not be made upon probabilistic risk benefits and cost alone. Such decisions will also involve, in part, engineering judgment, and management judgment regarding operational and administrative burdens, practicality, and best use of scarce capital resources, etc.