ML050740005

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Meeting Handouts for Meeting with Duke Energy to Discuss Plans for Possible COL Application
ML050740005
Person / Time
Site: Oconee, Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/14/2005
From:
Duke Energy Corp
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Cubbage A, NRR/DRIP/RNRP, 301-415-2875
Shared Package
ML050740003 List:
References
Download: ML050740005 (16)


Text

Planning Related To Possible COL Application Duke Energy Corporation March 14, 2005

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 22 Meeting Objectives Q Discuss Dukes plans for a possible Combined License (COL) application Q Discuss Combined License Application (COLA) scenarios being studied by Duke Q Identify NRC review schedules and resources Q Identify COLA preparation and review strategies

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 33 Overview of Dukes Plans Q Dukes system planning indicates additional generating capacity required over next 10 -

15 years Q Current evaluation of generation options indicates that nuclear power could be advantageous to our customers Q Duke is currently performing a study to establish the scope of work, schedule and cost for obtaining a COL

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 44 Overview of Dukes Plans Q Dukes plans for a possible COLA support maintaining the option to bring a new nuclear power plant into service during the next decade Q Contingent upon study results and management approval, Duke plans to proceed with developing a COLA Q Dukes COL efforts do not supplant our involvement with NuStart Q Duke is working closely with NEI on finalizing NEI 04-01 to improve industry guidance for COL applications

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 55 Overview of Dukes Plans Tentative milestones for a possible COLA:

Q Site selection by the end of 2005 Q Reactor technology selection by the end of 2005, presently considering:

GEs ESBWR Framatome ANPs EPR Westinghouses AP1000 Q COL application submittal to NRC in early 2008

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 66 COLA Scenarios Q Base case: certified design with greenfield site Q Alternatives to the base case:

Scenario 1: certified design with previously characterized site Scenario 2: certified design with existing reactor site Scenario 3: non-certified design with greenfield site

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 77 NRC Review Schedule and Resources Base case: certified design with greenfield site Q Identify critical path activities on NRC review schedule Q Discuss estimate of NRC review schedule required to prepare:

Draft Safety Evaluation Report Draft Environmental Impact Statement Q Discuss estimate of overall schedule duration of NRC review schedule Q Identify estimate of review resources (NRC FTEs and contractor support)

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 88 NRC Review Schedule and Resources Scenario 1: certified design with previously characterized site Q Identify critical path activities on NRC review schedule Q Discuss estimate of NRC review schedule required to prepare:

Draft Safety Evaluation Report Draft Environmental Impact Statement Q Discuss estimate of overall schedule duration of NRC review schedule Q Identify estimate of review resources (NRC FTEs and contractor support)

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 99 NRC Review Schedule and Resources Scenario 2: certified design with existing reactor site Q Identify critical path activities on NRC review schedule Q Discuss estimate of NRC review schedule required to prepare:

Draft Safety Evaluation Report Draft Environmental Impact Statement Q Discuss estimate of overall schedule duration of NRC review schedule Q Identify estimate of review resources (NRC FTEs and contractor support)

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 10 10 NRC Review Schedule and Resources Scenario 3: non-certified design with greenfield site Q Identify critical path activities on NRC review schedule Q Discuss estimate of NRC review schedule required to prepare:

Draft Safety Evaluation Report Draft Environmental Impact Statement Q Discuss estimate of overall schedule duration of NRC review schedule Q Discuss estimate of review resources (NRC FTEs and contractor support)

Q Discuss impacts on schedule and resources for:

Non-certified design with Final Design Approval (FDA)

Non-certified design with Design Certification review in progress

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 11 11 NRC Review Schedule and Resources General schedule and resource topics:

Q Identify what NRC review activities can typically be worked in parallel Q For a COLA referencing a non-certified design, identify how design issues would be resolved Q Identify how many work hours are associated with an NRC FTE

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 12 12 COLA Preparation and Review Drivers for schedule optimization Q Additional generation capacity required in future Q Cost control during licensing process Q Minimize risk associated with placing order for long lead time components

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 13 13 COLA Preparation and Review Strategies for schedule optimization Q Frequent interactions with NRC during COL application preparation Q Resolution of issues with other COL applicants Q Discuss options for satisfying regulatory requirements for meteorological data Q Discuss possible topics and approach for early submittal of portions of COLA as topical or technical reports (see next slide)

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 14 14 COLA Preparation and Review Example: early submittal of portion of COLA as topical or technical report Submit Emergency Planning Report NRC Review NRC RAIs Duke Response and NRC Review NRC SER 12/05 11/06 4/07 10/07 Site Selection Prepare Emergency Planning Report

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 15 15 COLA Preparation and Review Q Discuss pre-application submittal interactions with the NRC Quality Assurance Program Review Site Characterization and Data Collection Engineering Design Verification Q Identify other pre-application submittal interactions Q Describe current NRC inspection plans for Engineering Design Verification Q Identify any NRC inspection modules for design and construction review during the COLA process

March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005 Duke COLA Study Duke COLA Study 16 16 Closure Q Review any outstanding follow-up actions for Duke and the NRC Q Duke appreciates the support of the NRC staff in meeting today and providing information to support Dukes COLA study Q Duke is prepared to work closely with the NRC staff to support a thorough and effective review Highest quality application Innovative approaches to support schedule optimization for COLA preparation and review