ML050700108
| ML050700108 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/2005 |
| From: | Jung Y - No Known Affiliation, Korea Hydro Nuclear Power Co, Ltd |
| To: | NRC/ADM/DAS/RDB |
| References | |
| 69FR53472 00001 | |
| Download: ML050700108 (2) | |
Text
NRCREP-Response from 'Cornrnent on NRC Documents" Paae 1 I NRCREP -
es pqise from "Commrent on NRIC Documents" Ra q,a le 3/ 7I'S From:
Yeonsub Jung <ysjung khnp.co.kr>
To:
<nrcrepXnrc.gov>
Date:
Tue. Mar 1, 2005 9:04 PM
Subject:
Response frorni "Comment on NRC Documents" 9,4 /@.
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Yeonsub Jung (ysjung khnp.co.kr) on Tuesday, March 01, 2005 at 21:04:33
-6
)
DocumentTitle: NUREG-0800 18.0 Human Factors Engineering(Revised 2004)
Comments: After TMI, Chapter 18 have been written in FSAR.
The chapter is regarding about main control room, SPDS, and remote shutdown room.
When I looked at the Reg. Guide 1.70 which defined contents of SAR, there is no chapter 18 as espected.
Therefore there is no framework to describe chapter 18.
However, I assumed that the contents of original SRP ch.18 exactly corresponds to the the contents of FSAR ch.18. Thus there seems no conflict between FSAR and SRP.
But NRC revised the SRP chapter 18. The revised chapter looks different from original SRP with deleting SPDS. I think that it is good approach to remove SPDS because SPDS can be decribed in main control room.
What I don't understand is that SRP ch.18 describe the process of human factor evaluation like NUREG-071 1. This means that FSAR chapter 18 should describe design team and the process of design, not main control room design itself. As we know FSAR is living document with present MCR. If MCR changes, then FSAR should change according the design modification.
The evaluation report is important for licence, and regulatory body should evaluate the report. But I am not sure that the evaluation report could replace the design of man machine interface of chapter 18.
Thank you.
organization: KHNP address1:
address2:
city:
state: ---
zip:
country:
phone:
}0
^Vel/y uzfew
,yrZ5-X Cm-)
a-----
c:\\ternp\\GW}OOOQ1.TMP PaaeThI qA.\\tep\\GWY}00001.TMP Page 1 AIl i
Mail Envelope Properties (42251F32.364:10: 25444)
Subject:
Response from "Comment on NRC Documents" Creation Date:
Tue, Mar 1, 2005 9:04 PM From:
Yeonsub Jung <ysjung@khnp.co.kr>
Created By:
ysjung@khnp.co.kr Recipients nrc.gov twf2_po.TWFNDO NRCREP Post Office Route twf2_po.TWFNDO nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1723 Tuesday, March 1, 2005 9:04 PM Mime.822 2422 Options Expiration Date:
None Priority:
Standard Reply Requested:
No Return Notification:
None Concealed
Subject:
No Security:
Standard