ML050630070

January Monthly Report on the Status of Open TIAs Assigned to NRR

ML050630070
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek, Surry, Turkey Point
Issue date:	03/02/2005
From:	Stephen Monarque NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD2
To:	Holden C, Lyons J NRC/NRR/DLPM, NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD1
Monarque, S R, NRR/DLPM, 415-1544
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0134
Download: ML050630070 (11)

Text

` March 2, 2005 MEMORANDUM TO: James E. Lyons, Deputy Director Division of Licensing Project Management THRU: Cornelius Holden, Project Director /RA/

Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management FROM: Stephen Monarque, Project Manager, Section 1 /RA/

Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management

SUBJECT:

JANUARY MONTHLY REPORT ON THE STATUS OF OPEN TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR The attached graph and tables give the status of open TIAs assigned to NRR as of January 31, 2005.

Since the last status report, no draft TIAs were sent to the Regions, one TIA (Hope Creek) was closed, and no new TIAs were opened. Of the three open TIAs (Turkey Point, Surry, and Salem), the following divisions are the current action holders: DIPM - 1, DE - 1 and DSSA - 1.

On January 10, 2005, Region I and NRR participated in a conference call to discuss the Regions proposal to submit a TIA in order to address an issue regarding TS operability of the offsite power system at FitzPatrick. The main issue concerned the manner in which the licensee was interpreting the Limiting Condition for Operation requirements for operability of the offsite power sources. The licensee considered the offsite power sources operable if there was sufficient voltage at the two reserve station transformers. The NRR staff informed the Region that the TS and TS Bases were clear in that both offsite power lines had to be operable, even though the 115 kV lines are cross-connected on site. Because of the licensee's incorrect interpretation, it had developed a TRM requirement that allowed one line (source) to be out of service for 14 days. Proper interpretation of the TS would only have allowed a 7 day allowed outage time. In addition, a second issue was discussed about the inability of one of the sources (i.e., line 3) to handle full accident loads during certain periods of high load on the offsite power grid. Based on these discussions, NRR and Region I DRP agreed that the TS requirements were clear and adequate and that the issue was really one of enforcement of the TS requirements. As a result, there was no need for NRR to evaluate or interpret the requirements through the TIA process. Therefore, the TIA was not submitted and the TS operability issue was deferred to the inspection process.

There are no draft responses due for the month of February 2005.

Attachments: 1. Graph of TIA Status - FY 2005

2. Table 1 - Summary Data FY 2005

3. Table 2 - Open TIAs Assigned to NRR (by plant name)

4. Table 3 - Closed TIAs Assigned to NRR - FY05 YTD (by TIA Number) cc w/atts: See next page

There are no draft responses due for the month of February 2005.

Attachments: 1. Graph of TIA Status - FY 2005

2. Table 1 - Summary Data FY 2005

3. Table 2 - Open TIAs Assigned to NRR (by plant name)

4. Table 3 - Closed TIAs Assigned to NRR - FY05 YTD (by TIA Number) cc w/atts: See next page ADAMS Accession Number: ML050630070 NRR-106 OFFICE LPM PDI-1/SC PDI/PD NAME SMonarque RLaufer CHolden DATE 02/ 24 /05 03/ 02 /05 03/ 02 /05 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Date: March 2, 2005

SUBJECT:

REPORT ON THE STATUS OF OPEN TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC PDI-2 R/F J. Wiggins, RI G. Matakas, RI R. Blough, RI W. Lanning, RI J. Barnes, RII V. McCree, RII L. Plisco, RII J. Caldwell, RIII R. Lanksbury, RIII G. Grant, RIII J. Grobe, RIII C. Pederson, RIII D. Chamberlain, RIV T. P. Gwynn, RIV A. Howell, RIV NRR BCs, SCs and PDs (by e-mail)

B. Boger D. Matthews M. Johnson C. Carpenter C. Grimes L. Marsh M. Kotzalas B. Sheron C. Holden E. Brown D. Roberts J. Lamb C. Lyons S. Monarque E. Hackett P. Milano D. Collins F.Tobler TABLE 1 -

SUMMARY

DATA FY2005 New TIAs Closed TIAs Closed TIAs Open Draft TIAs Late*  % by (Final response (Draft response TIAs Scheduled TIAs Due Date*

issued) issued) to meet (B) A/(A+B)

Due Date

• • (A)

Jan 05 FY-05 Jan 05 FY-05 Jan 05 FY-05 Jan 05 Jan 05 Jan 05 Jan 05 Region 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 I

Region 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 II Region 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 III Region 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IV Total 0 2 1 1 0 1 3 3 0 100%

• An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.

• • (A) This number includes: a) TIAs currently under review but not late b) TIAs closed this month c) Draft TIAs sent to region this month by latest agreed upon due date.

Attachment 2

TABLE 2 - OPEN TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR (by Plant Name)

PLANT TIA # - TAC No. And INITIAL CURRENT ACTION AGE SE STATUS/ BILLED MEMO TITLE AGREED AGREED HOLDER (mo's) EVAL. OTHER REMARKS TO DATE COMPL. COMPL (DIVISION) INPUT DATE DATE DATE* (HRS)

TURKEY POINT 2003-03 MB8728/29 - 12/31/03 12/31/03 DSSA 21 EEIB On 11/16/03 staff sent RAI. 295.3 3&4 04/30/03 Review of 04/30/04 SRXB Response received 11/19/04.

Region II SBO strategy/ 10/30/04 SRXB is reviewing licensees analysis 03/31/2005 response. EEIBs evaluation will depend on outcome of SRXBs review.

Surry 1&2 2004-04 MC4331/32 12/31/04 12/31/04 DIPM 5 IROB Under review by IROB 47.5 Region II 08/26/04 50.54X 03/31/05 Clarification Salem Unit 1 2004-05 MC4985 03/31/05 03/31/05 DE 4 EMEB Review in progress 1 Region 1 10/31/04 SFP Boric EMCB Acid Leakage a

D.C. Cook 1&2 2004-02 MC3428/29 09/07/04 09/07/04 DE/DLPM N/A EEIB Draft TIA issued 09/02/04, N/A Region III 06/07/04 Degraded 12/31/04 DLPM received response from Voltage Region III Protection Indian Point 2 a 2004-03 MC3372 07/30/04 07/30/04 DE/DLPM N/A EEIB Draft TIA issued 08/20/04, N/A Region 1 06/17/04 Electrical 08/30/04 DLPM Received response from Cable Region 1 Separation Average Age 10 Average Hours 114.60 (Months) Billed

• An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.

a Not part of completion goal because draft TIA response issued. However, TIA is still considered open until final response is issued.

Attachment 3

TABLE 3 - CLOSED TIAs ASSIGNED TO NRR - FY05 YTD (By TIA Number)

DATE OF DATE

• TIA NO. TAC NO. INITIAL COMPLETED AGE PLANT HOURS REQUEST (Months) BILLED 2004-006 MC5111 12/13/200 01/12/2005 1 Hope Creek 428.00 4

Average Age 1.00 Average Hours Billed 428.00 (Months)

Note: Completion dates are within the original agreed-upon date unless otherwise noted.

• An NRR goal is to complete 80% by latest scheduled due date. TIA Office Instruction COM-106, Rev. 1, issued December 24, 2002 states, The TIA response date or scheduled due date is considered to be the date when the draft TIA response is provided to the requesting organization.

Attachment 4