ML042940226

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Engineering Work Request No. 02-0217-00
ML042940226
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse 
(NPF-003)
Issue date: 05/16/2002
From: Siemaszko A, Swim T
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2003-0187 02-0217-00
Download: ML042940226 (5)


Text

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station RED ENGINEERING WORK REQUEST L ORIGINAL l

DB-0044-0 ENGINEERING WORK REQUEST (EWR) NO.

I (x2-o,/-n STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Reactor Vessel Head had degraded because of boric acid corrosion.

0 CONTINUED SUS NO.

INITIATING DOCUMENT (IF APPLICABLE) 064-02 N/A PROPOSED CHANGE Replace existing Reactor Vessel Head. Also replace the existing Service Structure if required.

E CONTINUED INITIATOR (PRINT NAME) I,IGNATURE EXT.

l DATE SUPERVISOR (PRINT NAME) I SIGNATURE DATE P.K.GOYAL 7351 5/15/02 T.S.SWIM l

5/15/02 DESIGN BASS ENGINEER

-i-

--V-;

0 ACCEPTED 0 REJECTED-AltachJustfiication OCOMMERCIAL CHANGE l ODOCUMENT ONLY CHANGE 0 EQUIVALENT CHANGE TOSIMPLE CHANGE MAJOR CHANGE BYES INTERIM DESIGN PACKAGE E NO (SCs, ECs, or MCs ONLY)

DESIGN BASIS ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR (PRINT NAME) I SIGNATURE J

DATE TrctIt4

/

___SA_/o_

o NOT APPUCABLE I DESIB AIS ENGINE IG NER (PRINTNAME)/SIGNATURE DATE W REQUEST FOR PROVED R (

NAME)

D)ESIGN EFFORT TO I

/

BEGIN IMMEDIATELY OREJECTED l e-la

,h i

-;,;K.

SYSTEMTEAM EV;EW;f S

i PRIORITY:.

T E:

13j le ESTIMATED COST:

(

APPROVED SYSTEM TEAM LEADER

/

_ 7DATE

/

Z

_ REJECTED t

C 5

2

/

-F

.BLDGED RY APPROVA, DAPPROVED MANAGER - DESIGN BASIS ENGINEERING (for SCs & MCs S 50K)

DATE OREJECTED - Attch Justification CIAPPROVED MANAGER - MAINTENANCE (for SCs & MCs 550K)

DATE OREJECTED - Attach Justification ACCOUNTING WORK ORDER NUMBER

3 Q O&M PRC CHAIRPERSON (Conceptual Design - MC Only)

DATE PRC CHAIRPERSON (Detail Dsll DATE O APPROVED t9kPPROVED I

/

OREJECTED I

IO(REJECTED 79 (C7

ENCINEERING CHANGE / PROJECT DISPOSITION WORKSHEET Page 1 of 4 DB-0097-0 ENGINEERING CHANGE I PROJECT DISPOSITION WORKSHEET Section A Initiation Document Number:

EWVR 02-0217 PE Andrew Siemnaszko OTHER System Team Member:

DE Prasoon Goyal, Peter Sadowyj OPS Bob Lakis Section B Problem Description Reactor Head Wastage Problem Summary:

Reactor Head requires replacement.

O Continued Section C Do Nothing Option Risk Associated with Doing Nothing:

Modification is required due to wastage identified on existing head. Doing Nothing is not an option.

o Continued Team Recommends Taking No Action System Team Leader Date

' ENGIIJEERING CHANGE / PROJECT DISPOSITION WORKSHEET D1B-0097-0 Page 2 of 4 ENGINEERING CHANGE I PROJECT DISPOSITION WORKSHEET Section D Alternative Solutions Considered Description of Alternative Number 1 of 2 Repair damage to existing head. This option was already persued under EWRs 02-0111 "RV Head Repair* and EWR 02-0112 hReactor Vessel Head CRDM Relocation". Davis-Besse management elected to abandon repair option in favor of Head replacement.

Associated Risks:

Repair option required prior NRC approval with no assurance that final repair configuration would be accepted by regulators.

Preliminary Cost Estimate:

a

<S25K 1 Continued El cS25 - S50K 0 <$50-$100K 0 >S100K Description of Alternative Number 2 No Other Options Available.

Associated Risks:

N/A Preliminary Cost Estimate:

l 425K C Continued 1-1 <S25 - S50K 1-1 450-SlOOK 1- !,Slnooz El <S25-SSOK fl S5o-SiooK fl 1flflK

ENGINEERING CHANGE / PROJECT DISPOSMON WORKSHEET OB-0097 -O Page 3 of 4 ENGINEERING CHANGE / PROJECT DISPOSITION WORKSHEET Section E Justification for Recommendation of Alternative 1 0 Addresses Plant Safety Issue 0 Addresses Regulatory Issue El Annual Radiation Exposure Reduction of [ ] Man Rem 0

Improved Reliability 0 Annual Cost Savings of [S ] with a [ ] year payback period o

Improved Capacity-Increase[ ] Mwe Supporting Explanation:

The reactor head must be replaced before plant can restart from 13RFO. Not implementing this change will prevent restart.

0 Continued Section F Plant Chancie Implementation Recommendation and Constraints Recommended Priority and Implementation Cycle (provide Justification):

13 RFO - must be completed prior to startup from 13 RFO.

OperationaVConstructability Implementation Constraints:

None Material Constraints:

Material available, usable replacement head Is available from Consumers Energy Midland site.

i.'), -

D Continued Date

/

6t System Team Leader U

Pann A ^f A ENGiNEERING CHANGE / PROJECT DISPOSITION WORKSHEET r OB-0097-O ENGINEERING CHANGE / PROJECT DISPOSITION WORKSHEET Continuation Sheet