Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML0424406402004-08-31031 August 2004
Memo, E-mail from PSEG Nuclear, LLC Regarding Hope Creek Generating Station Proposed Removal of Selected Reactor Protection System Surveillance Requirements
Project stage: Other
ML0428903492004-10-13013 October 2004
Tech Spec Pages for Amendment 153, Re.: Removal of Surveillance Requirements Related to Reactor Protection System and Control Rod Block Instrumentation, Source Range Monitors, and Power Distribution Limits
Project stage: Other
ML0420304122004-10-13013 October 2004
License Amendment, Issuance of Amendment Re.: Removal of Surveillance Requirements Related to Reactor Protection System and Control Rod Block Instrumentation, Source Range Monitors, and Power Distribution Limits
Project stage: Approval
2004-10-13
[Table View] |
|
|---|
Category:Memoranda
MONTHYEARML18269A2522018-10-12012 October 2018
F&O Closure Observation Hope Creek Fire PRA
ML17023A1452017-01-23023 January 2017
Summary of Teleconference with PSEG Regarding Hope Creek HPCI
ML16259A2042016-09-20020 September 2016
Hope Creek Generating Station - Safety Evaluation - Request to revise technical specifications - safety limit minimum critical power ratio.(TAC NO. MF7793)
ML15015A6772015-01-16016 January 2015
Forthcoming Closed Meeting with PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Regarding a Planned Digital Instrumentation and Controls License Amendment Request Associated with Hope Creek Generating Station, Unit 1
IR 05000272/20132022013-12-20020 December 2013
IR 05000272-13-202, 05000311-13-202 & 05000354-13-201, September 9-13, 2013, Salem Nuclear Generating Station and Hope Creek Generating Station - Cover Letter
ML13309A0802013-12-11011 December 2013
Memorandum to File: Transcript for 10 CFR 2.206 Petition from Beyond Nuclear (Et Al) Regarding General Electric Mark I and Mark II Boiling-Water Reactors
ML13233A1132013-08-22022 August 2013
Notice of Forthcoming Meeting with PSEG Nuclear, LLC Regarding a Planned Digital Instrumentation and Controls License Amendment Request Associated with Hope Creek Generating Station, Unit 1
ML13154A4952013-06-0404 June 2013
Rai'S Following Ifib Analysis of Pseg'S 2013 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Hope Creek Generating Station
ML13196A2202012-06-0606 June 2012
Memo from B. Balsam, NRR and D. Logan, NRR to J. Susco, NRR on Summary of Section 7 Consultation Activities Related to the National Marine Fisheries Service'S Final Rule to List the Atlantic Sturgeon
ML1209002372012-03-29029 March 2012
and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Draft Request for Additional Information
ML1129901422011-10-25025 October 2011
Draft Request for Additional Information
ML1129700652011-10-21021 October 2011
Summary of PSEG Drop-in Visit, 9-28-2011 and Slides
ML11250A1712011-09-14014 September 2011
Notice of Forthcoming Meeting with Petitioner Requesting Action Under 10 CFR 2.206 Regarding Immediate Suspension of the Operating Licenses of General Electric (GE) Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactors (Bwrs)
ML1118605722011-07-0505 July 2011
Draft Request for Additional Information
ML11181A1772011-06-30030 June 2011
June 29, 2011 Summary of Public Meeting to Discuss Observations and Lessons Learned During the Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station Application of the Nuclear Energy Institute'S Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment Process
ML11137A0762011-06-0202 June 2011
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on May 11, 2011, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Concerning the Hope Creek License Condition for the Drywell
ML11126A0962011-05-12012 May 2011
Notice of Meeting with Petitioner Requesting Action Under 10CFR2.206 Regarding Immediate Suspension of Operating Licenses of General Electric Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactors
ML11105A0372011-05-0404 May 2011
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on March 25, 2011, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Concerning Findings on the Hope Creek Generating Station Gas Turbine
ML1111108862011-04-20020 April 2011
and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Draft Request for Additional Information
LR-N11-0087, 2011 Annual Report - Guarantees of Payment of Deferred Premiums2011-03-31031 March 2011
2011 Annual Report - Guarantees of Payment of Deferred Premiums
ML1106801152011-03-0808 March 2011
Draft Request for Additional Information
ML1106005572011-03-0101 March 2011
Minutes of the Meeting of the Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal Regarding Hope Creek Generating Plant on November 3, 2010, in Rockville, Maryland
ML1034909292011-02-0909 February 2011
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on November 18, 2010, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Concerning Findings on the Hope Creek Generating Station Recent Outage
ML1101901352011-01-18018 January 2011
Draft Request for Additional Information
ML1029500062010-10-28028 October 2010
11/17/10 Forthcoming Meeting to Discuss the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2
ML1027100672010-09-30030 September 2010
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Review of the Hope Creek Generating Station License Renewal Application - Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items
ML1027207232010-09-29029 September 2010
Federal Register Notice Regarding the ACRS Subcommittee Meeting on Plant License Renewal (Hope Creek), November 3, 2010
ML1024407062010-09-20020 September 2010
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on August 18,2010 Between Us NRC and PSEG Nuclear, LLC Concerning Questions Pertaining to the Hope Creek Generating Station License Renewal Application
ML11263A0282010-09-16016 September 2010
E-mail with Attachment from T. Ghosh, NRR, to C. Eccleston, NRR Et Al, on Reaction Hope Creek SAMA Transmittal Memo
ML11263A0272010-09-14014 September 2010
E-mail with Attachment from T. Ghosh, RES, to L. Perkins, NRR Et Al, on Fyi Salem SAMA Transmittal
ML1023201782010-09-0303 September 2010
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on 8/16/10, Between Us NRC and PSEG Nuclear,Llc,Concerning Draft Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Hope Creek Generating Station, License Renewal Application
ML1023201792010-09-0202 September 2010
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on 6/21/10 Between the USNRC and PSEG Nuclear LLC Concerning Responses to Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to the Hope Creek Generating Station License Renewal Application
ML1022204762010-08-18018 August 2010
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on 8/4/10,Between Us NRC and PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Concerning Draft RAI Pertaining to the Hope Creek Generating Station, License Renewal Application
ML1022200122010-08-13013 August 2010
Summary of Telephone Conf Call Held on 7/29/10, Between the USNRC and PSEG Nuclear LLC, Concerning Follow-Up Questions Pertaining to the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 & 2, and Hope Creek Generating Station License Renewal Enviro
ML1020105012010-07-20020 July 2010
Draft Request for Additional Information
ML1018303472010-07-0202 July 2010
Draft Request for Additional Information
ML1017600102010-06-24024 June 2010
Draft Request for Additional Information
ML1011004322010-04-19019 April 2010
PSEG Slides for Salem and Hope Creek Annual Assessment Meeting, April 6, 2010
ML1009904032010-04-0808 April 2010
Draft Request for Additional Information
LR-N10-0115, Salem, Units 1 & 2 and Hope Creek, 2010 Annual Report - Guarantees of Payment of Deferred Premiums2010-04-0101 April 2010
Salem, Units 1 & 2 and Hope Creek, 2010 Annual Report - Guarantees of Payment of Deferred Premiums
ML11259A2702010-03-0101 March 2010
E-mail with Attachment from D. Logan, NRR, to S. Duda, Aecom Et Al, on Mitigation Memo
ML1002907322010-01-28028 January 2010
Draft Request for Additional Information
ML0934405582009-12-10010 December 2009
Notice of Closed Meeting with PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG) to Discuss Exemption from Schedular Requirements of 10 CFR 73.55 for Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
ML0928706352009-10-23023 October 2009
11/05/2009 Notice of Meeting to Discuss License Renewal Process and Environmental Scoping for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, and Hope Creek Generating Station, License Renewal Application Review
ML0923606212009-08-27027 August 2009
Logistics Trip Report to Delaware Emergency Management Agency Regarding Salem-Hope Creek License Renewal
ML0920103212009-07-30030 July 2009
Logistics Trip Report to Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Stations and Salem, New Jersey
ML0919504062009-07-14014 July 2009
Draft Request for Additional Information
ML0917302782009-06-22022 June 2009
PSEG Drop-in Visit (Salem and Hope Creek) on 6-18-2009
ML0913502412009-05-14014 May 2009
Draft Request for Additional Information
ML0911701652009-04-27027 April 2009
Draft Request for Additional Information
2018-10-12
[Table view] |
Text
August 31, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: James W. Clifford, Chief, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management FROM: Daniel S. Collins, Senior Project Manager, Section 2 /RA/
Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
EMAIL FROM PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC REGARDING HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION PROPOSED REMOVAL OF SELECTED REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (TAC NO. MC1155)
By letter dated October 24, 2003 PSEG Nuclear, LLC (PSEG) requested a revision to the Hope Creek Generating Station Technical Specifications. During its review, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff (NRC or staff) identified that additional information was required and the questions were communicated to PSEG in a letter dated May 7, 2004. By letter dated June 29, 2004 PSEG provided a response to the staffs questions. On July 20, 2004 the staff had a teleconference with Mr. Paul Duke, PSEG to clarify certain aspects of the questions. Additional information, clarifying parts of their response, was provided to the NRC via an e-mail from Mr. Duke. The additional information is provided in attachment 1 to this memorandum.
Docket No. 50-354
Attachment:
As stated
August 31, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: James W. Clifford, Chief, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management FROM: Daniel S. Collins, Senior Project Manager, Section 2 /RA/
Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
EMAIL FROM PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC REGARDING HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION PROPOSED REMOVAL OF SELECTED REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (TAC NO. MC1155)
By letter dated October 24, 2003 PSEG Nuclear, LLC (PSEG) requested a revision to the Hope Creek Generating Station Technical Specifications. During its review, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff (NRC or staff) identified that additional information was required and the questions were communicated to PSEG in a letter dated May 7, 2004. By letter dated June 29, 2004 PSEG provided a response to the staffs questions. On July 20, 2004 the staff had a teleconference with Mr. Paul Duke, PSEG to clarify certain aspects of the questions. Additional information, clarifying parts of their response, was provided to the NRC via an e-mail from Mr. Duke. The additional information is provided in attachment 1 to this memorandum.
Docket No. 50-354
Attachment:
As stated Distribution PUBLIC PDI-2 R/F DCollins GMiller MLangschwager ADAMS Accession Numbers: ML042440640 OFFICE LPDI-2/PE LPDI-2/PM NAME GMiller DCollins DATE 08/31/04 08/31/04 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
- 1. The current APRM and RBM functional tests do not check trip setpoints.
The procedures were changed in June 2002 (for APRMs) and March 2003 (for RBM) to eliminate the requirement to record trip and reset setpoints.
Confirmation of trip setpoints is required by TS for channel calibrations, but not for channel functional tests.
- 2. The current recirc flow unit functional test procedure records trip setpoint data, but the associated procedure steps are not acceptance criteria for the functional test. If the as-found data exceeds the desired range, the applicable sections of the channel calibration are performed.
The desired ranges are more restrictive than the TS allowable values.
- 3. Since we are not proposing to change any channel calibration intervals, we did not discuss instrument drift in our responses to RAIs 1.a and 1.b.
Our responses provide the details on which to base the conclusion that the normal channel functional test frequencies will continue to provide sufficient assurance that the channels are functioning properly: a review of surveillance test results identified no case in the last three years in which a condition discovered during a periodic channel functional test would have prevented the APRMs or RBM from performing their required functions.
For the recirc flow units, we identified one instance (a defective test card pushbutton switch in the last three years in which a condition discovered during a periodic channel functional test could have prevented a flow unit from performing its required functions.
ATTACHMENT 1
