ML042250413

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Assessment Follow-Up Letter
ML042250413
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/12/2004
From: Caldwell J
NRC/RGN-III
To: Myers L
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
References
IMC 0305
Download: ML042250413 (5)


Text

August 12, 2004 Mr. Lew W. Myers Interim Site Vice President-Nuclear and Chief Operating Officer FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Perry Nuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 97, A210 Perry, OH 44081

SUBJECT:

ASSESSMENT FOLLOW-UP LETTER PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Dear Mr. Myers:

This refers to the telephone conversation on August 12, 2004, between you and Steven Reynolds of my staff regarding Perry Nuclear Power Plants transition into the Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone column of the NRCs Action Matrix in accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0305 (IMC 0305), Operating Reactor Assessment Program.

The NRC performed a supplemental inspection in accordance with Inspection Procedure (IP) 95002 based on our assessment of plant performance at Perry. As stated in our Annual Assessment Letter dated March 4, 2004, plant performance was within the Degraded Cornerstone column based on two White findings in the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone. An additional White finding was subsequently identified and documented in our letter dated March 12, 2004.

The first finding involved the failure of the high pressure core spray pump to start during routine surveillance testing on October 23, 2002. An apparent violation of Technical Specification 5.4 for an inadequate breaker maintenance procedure was identified in Inspection Report 05000440/2003008. This performance issue was characterized as White in our final significance determination letter dated March 4, 2003. A supplemental inspection was performed in accordance with IP 95001 for the White finding and significant deficiencies were identified with regard to your extent of condition evaluation. Inspection Procedure 95001 was re-performed and the results of that inspection were documented in Inspection Report 05000440/2003012 which determined the extent of condition reviews were adequate.

The second finding involved air binding of the residual heat removal 'A' and low pressure core spray waterleg pump on August 14, 2003. A special inspection was performed for this issue and the results were documented in Inspection Report 05000440/2003009. An apparent violation of Technical Specification 5.4 for an inadequate venting procedure was identified in Inspection Report 05000440/2003010. This performance issue was characterized as White in our final significance determination letter dated March 12, 2004.

L. Myers The third finding involved the failure of emergency service water (ESW) pump A, caused by an inadequate maintenance procedure for assembling the pump coupling which contributed to the failure of the pump on September 1, 2003. An apparent violation of Technical Specification 5.4 was documented in Inspection Report 050000440/2003006. This performance issue was characterized as White in our final significance determination letter dated January 28, 2004.

As documented in the IP 95002 supplemental inspection report, the NRC concluded that the corrective actions to prevent recurrence of a significant condition adverse to quality were inadequate. Specifically, the same ESW pump coupling that failed on September 1, 2003, failed again on May 21, 2004. This resulted in the ESW pump White finding remaining open.

As a result, Perry entered the Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone for Mitigating Systems because of having two White inputs for five consecutive quarters. Specifically, for the third quarter of 2004, the waterleg pump finding remains open a fourth quarter while the ESW pump finding has been carried open into a fifth quarter as a result of the IP 95002 supplemental inspection.

As a result of this transition, we will perform IP 95003, Supplemental Inspection for Repetitive Degraded Cornerstones, Multiple Degraded Cornerstones, Multiple Yellow Inputs, or One Red Input. The IP 95003 inspection will be conducted in addition to the baseline inspections currently scheduled. The intent of the IP 95003 inspection is to allow the NRC to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the depth and breadth of safety, organizational, and performance issues at facilities where data indicates the potential for serious performance degradation. The objectives of this inspection are to: (1) provide additional information to be used in deciding whether the continued operation of the facility is acceptable and whether additional regulatory actions are necessary to arrest declining performance; (2) provide an independent assessment of the extent of risk significant issues to aid in the determination of whether an acceptable margin of safety exists; (3) independently evaluate the adequacy of your programs and processes used to identify, evaluate, and correct performance issues; (4) independently evaluate the adequacy of programs and processes in the affected strategic performance areas; and (5) provide insight into the overall root and contributing causes of identified performance deficiencies.

As prescribed by IP 95003 the scope of NRC inspection activities will include the assessment of performance in the Reactor Safety Strategic Performance Area, including the inspection of key attributes such as design, human performance, procedure quality, configuration control, and emergency response organization readiness. Also, the IP 95003 inspection will review the control systems for identifying, assessing, and correcting performance deficiencies to evaluate whether programs are sufficient to prevent further declines in safety that could result in unsafe operation. We understand that you plan to conduct your own assessments of these areas using a program similar to our IP 95003 inspection and that some of these assessments are underway. In developing the scope of our IP 95003 inspection, we will consider the results of your self-assessments. We also understand that you have developed the Perry Performance Improvement Plan using insights from your assessments and lessons learned from your other FirstEnergy plants. We will closely monitor your implementation of this plan.

L. Myers As explained in IMC 0305, plants in the Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone column of the Action Matrix are given consideration at each quarterly performance assessment review for (1) declaring plant performance to be unacceptable in accordance with the guidance in IMC 0305; (2) transferring to the IMC 0350, Oversight of Operating Reactor Facilities in a Shutdown Condition with Performance Problems process; and (3) taking additional regulatory actions, as appropriate. We will notify you via separate correspondence if any of these actions are taken by the agency.

The IP 95003 inspection schedule will be communicated by separate correspondence.

Additionally, you will receive a revised inspection plan with our mid-cycle performance assessment, scheduled to be issued on August 26, 2004.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mark Ring at 630-829-9703.

Sincerely,

/RA/

James L. Caldwell Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-440 License No. NPF-58 See Attached Distribution DOCUMENT NAME: G:\Perr\ML042250413.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:"C" = Copy without enclosure "E"= Copy with enclosure"N"= No copy OFFICE RIII N RIII E RIII RIII RIII NAME PPelke/trn MRing SReynolds JCaldwell for JCaldwell GGrant DATE 08/11/04 08/11/04 08/12/04 08/12/04 08/12/04 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

L. Myers cc: G. Leidich, President - FENOC J. Hagan, Senior Vice President Engineering and Services, FENOC W. OMalley, Director, Maintenance Department V. Higaki, Manager, Regulatory Affairs J. Messina, Director, Nuclear Services Department T. Lentz, Director, Nuclear Engineering Department F. von Ahn, Plant Manager Nuclear Power Plant Department M. OReilly, Attorney, First Energy Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Ohio State Liaison Officer R. Owen, Ohio Department of Health W. Repke, President, Geauga County Board of Commissioners D. Wedge, Executive Director, Geauga County Department of Emergency Services D. McClelland, Geauga County Sheriff D. Newcomb, President, Ashtabula County Board of Commissioners W. Johnson, Ashtabula County Sheriff G. Bolender, Ashtabula County, Emergency Management Director The Honorable Joseph Verkin G. Adams, Genoa Village Administrator D. Troy, President, Lake County Board of Commissioners D. Dunlap, Lake County Sheriff R. McMahon, City Manager, Painesville K. Gauntner, Jr., County Administrator The Honorable Frank J. Sarosy The Honorable Dan DiLiberto The Honorable Thomas Ruffner R. Rosebrugh, President, Geneva City Council J. Pearson, Geneva City Manager The Honorable Edward J. Podojil The Honorable Robert M. Shiner J. Suso, Mentor City Manager The Honorable John M. Rogers K. Molenaar, Administrative Director The Honorable Mort ORyan The Honorable David E. Anderson The Honorable Lorraine M. Fende The Honorable Mike Evangelista J. Sample, Administrator, Village of Madison F. Ashton, Chairman, Madison Board of Trustees The Honorable John Turben The Honorable Georgette Allison The Honorable Joseph Dudas The Honorable John Roskos The Honorable Alan DiLiberto INPO

L. Myers ADAMS Distribution:

AJM DFT SPS1 RidsNrrDipmIipb GEG HBC RJP CAA1 C. Pederson, DRS (hard copy - IRs only)

DRPIII DRSIII PLB1 JRK1 ROPreports@nrc.gov (inspection reports, final SDP letters, any letter with an IR number)