ML033290346

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

BWROG Summary of Meeting Concerning Steam Dryer Integrity (Tac. MC0931)
ML033290346
Person / Time
Site: Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group
Issue date: 11/24/2003
From: Wang A
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD4
To: Stephen Dembek
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD4
Wang A, NRR/DLPM, 415-1445
Shared Package
ML033290370 List:
References
TAC MC0931
Download: ML033290346 (6)


Text

November 24, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: Stephen Dembek, Chief, Section 2 Project Directorate IV Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:

Alan B. Wang, Project Manager, Section 2

/RA/

Project Directorate IV Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF NOVEMBER 5, 2003, MEETING WITH THE BOILING WATER REACTOR OWNERS GROUP (BWROG) CONCERNING STEAM DRYER INTEGRITY (TAC NO. MC0931)

During an August 21, 2003, meeting, the staff requested that the BWROG provide to the staff the supplement to Service Information Letter (SIL) 644, "Boiling Water Reactor Steam Dryer Integrity." On September 5, 2003, GE Nuclear Energy (GENE) provided the staff with SIL No.

644, Supplement 1. A teleconference was held on September 17, 2003, with the BWROG to discuss the SIL. As a result of that call, the staff issued a letter dated September 26, 2003, that contained several questions regarding the SIL. In addition, the staff requested that the BWROG meet with the staff in the near future to discuss the letter. The BWROG proposed this meeting be held during the BWR Vessel and Internals Program (BWRVIP) meeting on November 4 and 5, 2003. On November 5, 2003, an open meeting was held between the BWROG and the NRC staff to discuss the BWROG efforts related to the steam dryer integrity issue. Ledyard Marsh, Director, Division of Licensing Project Management, opened the meeting stating that the staff was concerned that the industry was being reactive rather than proactive. He noted that the SIL actions appear to require actions after the discovery of the failure. He stated that the NRC would prefer that industry resolve this issue, but if the NRC does not see a concrete plan being developed, it will consider the issuance of generic guidance, such as generic letters or bulletins to prevent future failures. He also noted the failures only occurred after the extended power uprates. The staff is concerned that the analyses to support the uprates may be deficient.

The BWROG noted that they have decided that the best group to manage this issue will be the BWRVIP. As such the BWRVIP is now the lead for the BWR owners to develop a plan to ensure the structural integrity of the steam dryer for the life of the plant. In addition, the BWRVIP will manage all aspects of steam dryer integrity as the SIL only addresses the Quad Cities failure mechanisms. The BWRVIP is preparing Steam Dryer Inspection and Evaluation (I&E) Guidelines. The I&E will address many aspects of the steam dryer issue including: (1) steam dryer configurations, (2) consequence analysis, (3) inspection guidelines, (4) flaw evaluation methods, (5) operational guidance, and (6) repair guidance. Again, the BWRVIP noted that the proposed program will be expanding its studies beyond the Quad Cites failures.

S. Dembek The BWRVIP proposed to divide the meeting in two parts: part one - discuss ongoing activities including recent inspections and extended power uprate analyses, and part two - discuss the September 26, 2003, letter. The BWROG stated an ad hoc committee on steam dryer integrity had been formed after the Quad Cities event. The committee reviewed recent steam dryer failures including root cause analyses, fleet wide operating experience, GE screening matrix for ranking susceptibility and potential impact of dryer failure on safety and operation. As noted earlier, the committee decided that the long-term plan should be developed by the BWRVIP.

The BWRVIP presented recent inspection results from 4 plants with power uprates varying from 5 to 17 percent increase over the original licensed thermal power (OLTP). No indications were found in three of the plants and one plant had short fatigue cracks on the inner surface of the outer vertical hood panels at the diagonal brace brackets. The location of this crack is similar to the location where the Quad Cities 2 failure initiated and the location was predicted by structural load analyses. The staff requested the BWRVIP to develop a table with the breakdown of the plants by steam dryer type, power uprate, and actions taken in accordance with the SIL. The BWRVIP agreed to provide this information as part of the response to the September 26, 2003, letter. GENE noted that the most susceptible plants are the BWR3s with square dryers with internal braces. The staff was concerned that the emphasis was on these designs only and wanted to know what was being done to ensure the integrity of the other designs especially since the failures occurred only after uprates causing higher steam flows. The staff must assume that the higher flow rates caused the failures by increasing the loads to cause new cracks or exacerbate the failure of existing cracks. When flow is increased in the other steam dryer designs, how can the staff ensure that this same phenomena will not happen? GENE noted that plants with proposed uprates are performing more detailed structural analyses. The first oppurtunity for the staff to review these revised analyses will be Vermont Yankee. In addition, the BWRVIP has evaluated and will perform additional analyses to evaluate the effects of a power uprate on other reactor internals in the steam and feed flow path.

GENE then addressed the questions in the September 26, 2003, letter. The responses were provided in the handout. Some areas in the responses where the staff wanted additional information included:



Where are the high stress locations on the slanted and curved hood designs?



Is it possible to instrument the steam dryers to measure loadings?



Provide the basis for why waiting as long as two outages before inspecting is acceptable.

BWROG stated it would try to have a response to the September 26, 2003, letter in 2 to 3 weeks. Again they noted they felt the BWRVIP is the correct organization to address this issue.

The BWRVIP process will develop an I&E which would be adopted by its members. The BWRVIP will keep constant interactions with the NRC in the development of this I&E. Once it is adopted, any member that wishes to deviate from this I&E must inform the NRC. The BWRVIP noted this meeting was useful in understanding the staffs concerns.

S. Dembek The staff thanked the BWROG, BWRVIP and GENE for the presentation. This meeting was informational. No regulatory decisions were made. The meeting handouts can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. ML033110600.

Project No. 691

Attachment:

Meeting Attendees cc w/att: See next page

ML033290346 NRC-001 OFFICE PDIV-2/PM PDIV-2/LA EMEB/SC PDIV-2/SC NAME AWang EPeyton DTerao SDembek DATE 11/19/03 11/18/03 11/21/03 11/24/03 DOCUMENT NAME: C:\\ORPCheckout\\FileNET\\ML033290346.wpd

MEETING WITH THE BOILING WATER REACTORS OWNERS GROUP STEAM DRYER INTEGRITY ISSUE NOVEMBER 5, 2003 BWROG K. Putnam, Chairman BWRVIP G. Inch GE NUCLEAR ENERGY R. Horn D. Pappone OTHER B. Wilton (Progress Energy)

D. Potter (Nuclear Management Company)

L. Hay (SERCH Bechtel)

J. Weil (McGraw Hill)

R. Carter (EPRI)

NRC L. Marsh J. Wermiel S. Dembek A. Wang D. Terao T. Scarborough J. Wu K. Manoly J. Vora

BWR Owners Group Project No. 691 cc:

Mr. Joseph E. Conen Vice Chairman, BWR Owners Group DTE Energy - Fermi 2 200 TAC 6400 N. Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 Mr. J. A. Gray, Jr.

Regulatory Response Group Chairman BWR Owners Group Entergy Nuclear Northeast 440 Hamilton Avenue Mail Stop 12C White Plains, NY 10601-5029 Mr. H. Lewis Sumner Southern Nuclear Company 40 Inverness Center Parkway P.O. Box 1295 Birmingham, AL 35242 Mr. Carl D. Terry Vice President, Nuclear Engineering Nine Mile Point - Station OPS Building/2nd Floor P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, NY 13093 Mr. Thomas G. Hurst GE Nuclear Energy M/C 782 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, CA 95125 Mr. Thomas A. Green GE Nuclear Energy M/C 782 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, CA 95125 Mr. James Meister Exelon Cornerstone II at Cantera 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 Mr. William A. Eaton ENTERGY Grand Gulf Nuclear Station P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, MS 39150 Mr. Mark Reddeman Vice President Engineering Point Beach Nuclear Plant 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241 Mr. Richard Libra DTE Energy Fermi 2 M/C 280 OBA 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 Mr. James F. Klapproth GE Nuclear Energy M/C 706 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, CA 95125 Mr. Kenneth Putnam, Chairman BWR Owners Group Nuclear Management Company Duane Arnold Energy Center 3277 DAEC Road Palo, IA 52324