ML033100152
| ML033100152 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 10/27/2003 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2003-0395, NMSS-02-A-0002, RIII-02-A-0005 | |
| Download: ML033100152 (1) | |
Text
STATUS
SUMMARY
SHEET Page 1 ALLEGATION NUMBER:
NMSS-2002-A-0002 FACILITY:
U. S. Tool & Die Holtec Commonwealth Edison/Dresden
~
==
Description:==
The Concerned Individual (Cl) stated that a Location:
1/2.stsy-- vendor [U.S. Tool & Die] modified spent fuel storage casks Algr docs -
during the fabrication process by making repairs and/or RiII-2002-A-0005 accepted discrepancies "as Is" without obtaining the required review and approval of the cask designer [Holtec]. Cl is concerned that this was contrary to Excelon's (ComEd) procedures.
ACTION: SFPO review/inspect.
CLOSURE:
Closed. Substantiated, but there is not a resulting safety or regulatory concern requiring further NRC action.
See also:
06/13/02 -Letter (email) from alleger after closure, disagreeing with previous response.
07/10/02 -OAC letter to alleger. Conclusions unchanged. File remains closed.
08/19/02 -Letter (email) from alleger after closure, disagreeing with previous response.
09/23/02 -OAC letter to alleger. Conclusions unchanged. File remains closed.
Concern No
==
Description:==
Cl Is concerned about the inadequate QA/QC Location:
S.212 E oversight by the spent fuel storage cask design organization Algr docs -
[Holtec] over the spent fuel storage cask fabricator [U.S. Tool &
R1I-2002-A-0005 Die] and that this nadequate.oversight has resulted in indeterminate quality and the structural integrity of the casks is suspect. Cl stated that the fabricator's disposition of nonconformance condition as "use-as-is," "rework," and "repair" was a violation of the QA program for design. control as specified in 10 CFR 71 and 10 CFR 72. Cl stated that "use-as-is" and "repair" dispositions are design changes and should be evaluated and documented by engineering analysis.
F~iriadditioni; h dbiaormpoitone-bynncbnformnce conditions under its QA program without the design organization's consent.
ACTION: SFPO review/inspect.
CLOSURE:
Closed. Substantiated, but there is not a resulting safety or regulatory concern requiring further NRC action.
See also:
06/13/02 -Letter (email) from alleger after closure, disagreeing with previous response.
07/10/02 -OAC letter to alleger. Conclusions unchanged. File remains closed:
08/19/02 -Letter (email) from alleger after closure, disagreeing with previous response.
09/23/02 -OAC letter to alleger. Conclusions unchanged. File remains closed.
I