ML033020131

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2 and 3, License Renewal Application, Tva/Nrc Meeting, Nuclear Reactor Regulation - Rockville, MD, September 29, 2003 (Encl. 2)
ML033020131
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 09/29/2003
From:
Tennessee Valley Authority
To: Hoffman S
NRC/NRR/DRIP/RLEP
Hoffman ST, NRR/DRIP/RLEP, 415-3245
Shared Package
ML033080360 List:
References
Download: ML033020131 (8)


Text

.Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Units 1, 2, and 3 I

I..

.1 K

License Renewal Application

....'

...s?

.'

44 I,I rc p

Agenda im

-~-W

-1~--

---,-----.C-I

~-

... i M M.WW"W--

Introduction and Background

  • . Application Overview
  • . Items From Previous Meetings Closing Remarks Tim Abney Ray Alexander Mike Morrison Gary Adkins Gary Adkins Tim Abney 1

-~~V Introduction k

~~~-

-,1-tZ47V i.-..fl, N

CM3 M---'.-

_-f

~z

--mx_-

Meeting Objectives

> Demonstrate TVA's approach to the preparation of a three-unit license renewal application for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) using the latest standard application format

> Present an overview of the BFN draft application Tim Abney 2

MM Previous TVA/NRC Meeting Highlights A three-unit application is acceptable for BFN

  • The Unit 1 current licensing basis (CLB) provides an adequate basis for an LRA
  • Operating experience for Units 2 and 3 is applicable to Unit 1 The BFN application will resemble multi-site applications previously reviewed by the staff
  • Differences between the Unit 1 CLB and the Units 2/3 CLB will be annotated in the application
  • TVA was requested to address the following items in the application:

Description and schedule for the resolution of Unit 1 CLB differences Effect of Unit 1 layup on the application

  • A final inspection of Unit 1 prior to restart may be needed to verify that actions required as a result of the renewal review have been completed T iVA will provide notification when the documentation is available on-site All three renewed licenses will be issued at the completion of the renewal review

> Additional license condition for Ul is acceptable S-Review may take longer than standard (proposed 1-3 months)

Tim Abney 3

License Renewal Project Status

  • TVA will submit the BFN application in December 2003
    • Draft application prepared (including environmental report)
  • Industry peer review completed Site reviews in progress
    • Remaining / Ongoing activities P

Update the application for recent RAls, SER open item closures, etc.

S Implement program to ensure the basis for the renewed licenses is maintained during the renewal term Train site personnel S

Prepare documentation to support the new process for reviewing license renewal applications Ray Alexander 4

=

Application Format and Content k

"T-#gT

~

~

~ - -

~

i--.Cq

~

z.

-- l=-'

9 IT-=.Sfl--.

-M.T W"T WW

  • Application conforms to the May 2003 standard format As modified by the presentation of Unit 1 CLB differences Temporarv differences enclosed in bold border ("boxes")

Permanent differences will be described in the text - currently none have been identified

    • TVA will submit a list of commitments with the application
    • Final and draft interim staff guidance addressed
    • Submittal will include a text-searchable copy of the UFSAR linked to the application
  • Boundary drawings provided for mechanical systems le Red for 10 CR 54.4(a)(1) and 10 CFR 54.4(a)(3) scoping results Blue for 10 CR 54.4(a)(2) scoping results
  • 39 aging management programs identified 31 existing programs, 8 new programs 36 GALL programs, 3 plant specific programs Mike Morrison 5

Application Overview Methodology Scoping, screening, aging management examples Main steam system Unit 1 intended function difference Residual heat removal system Unit 1 material difference - piping replacement with IGSCC resistant material Auxiliary decay heat removal system New system for unit 1 (only case)

Electrical commodities

  • Appendix B
  • Appendix F

>- Plan and schedule for the resolution of unit 1 CLB differences AMR / AMP consistency with the GALL Gary Adkins 6

Items From Previous Meetings BWR RPV integrity Unit 1 will conform to the BWRVIP at restart S

Implementation plan provided in Appendix F

>o Unit 1 restart inspection plans will be available for on-site inspection

    • Permanent Unit I licensing basis differences will be identified in the application text None have been identified to date
    • NRC asked to be informed of any changes to the plans for the resolution of Unit 1 differences as described in Appendix F after submittal The Staff will be notified as soon as any deviation from this plan becomes known
  • TVA requested to ensure the LRA does not reference out-of-date FSAR information The BFN FSAR contains some historical information which is clearly identified No historical information used to support the application Gary Adkins 7