ML032970156
| ML032970156 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 11/19/2003 |
| From: | Marsh L NRC/NRR/DLPM |
| To: | Richard Anderson Public Service Enterprise Group |
| Fretz R, NRR/DLPM, 415-1324 | |
| References | |
| TAC MB9299, TAC MB9338, TAC MB9339, TAC MB9403, TAC MB9442, TAC MB9443 | |
| Download: ML032970156 (4) | |
Text
November 19, 2003 Mr. Roy A. Anderson President and Chief Nuclear Officer PSEG Nuclear, LLC End of Buttonwood Road Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038-0236
SUBJECT:
ORDERS MODIFYING LICENSES FOR REVISED DESIGN BASIS THREAT AND FOR TRAINING AND PHYSICAL FITNESS ENHANCEMENTS APPLICABLE TO SECURITY FORCE PERSONNEL (TAC NOS. MB9299, MB9338, MB9339, MB9403, MB9442 AND MB9443)
Dear Mr. Anderson:
On April 29, 2003, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) issued Orders modifying the operating licenses for Hope Creek Generating Station, Unit 1, Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 to: (1) require compliance with a revised design basis threat (DBT); (2) implement new security force personnel training and physical fitness requirements; and (3) prescribe compensatory measures related to fitness-for-duty enhancements applicable to security force personnel.
When it issued the Orders, the Commission recognized that you voluntarily and responsibly implemented additional security measures following the events of September 11, 2001.
However, as part of the Commissions review of the security and safeguards program, the Commission determined that enhancements to the DBT, as currently specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 73.1(a), were required. The NRC further determined that security force personnel tactical and firearms proficiency, physical fitness, and fitness-for-duty requirements needed to be enhanced. The Commission also concluded that, based on the current threat environment, these Orders were to be effective immediately.
The Orders require responses and actions within specified time frames. This letter addresses your response to the Orders pertaining to the revised DBT and the new security force personnel training and physical fitness requirements. The Commission replied to your response to the fitness-for-duty Order in separate correspondence, dated July 10, 2003.
Section III.A.1 of the Order implementing new security force personnel training and physical fitness requirements states that licensees must comply with the new requirements described in the Order, except to the extent that more stringent requirements are set forth in the licensees security plan and security training and qualifications plan.Section III.A.1 of the DBT Order requires licensees to submit revised physical security plans, safeguards contingency plans, and guard training and qualification plans, including an implementation schedule, based on the revised DBT, to the Commission for review and approval no later than April 29, 2004. The Order requires licensees to implement the revised physical security plans, revised safeguards contingency plans, and revised security force personnel training and qualification plans no later than October 29, 2004.Section IV of both Orders noted that, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.202, licensees must submit an answer to the Orders and may request a hearing on the Orders, within thirty-five (35) days of the date of the Orders and, where good cause is shown, consideration would be given to extend the time to request a hearing.
The Orders also required licensees to notify the Commission within thirty-five (35) days if:
(1) the licensee was unable to comply with the requirements specified in the attachments to the Orders; (2) compliance with the requirements is unnecessary; (3) implementation of any of the requirements would result in a violation of the provisions of any Commission regulation of the facility license; or (4) implementation of any of the requirements described in the attachments to the Orders would adversely impact safe operation of the facility.Section III.C.1 of the security force personnel training and physical fitness Order required licensees to submit to the Commission, within thirty-five (35) days of the date of the Order, a schedule for achieving compliance with each requirement described in Attachment 2 to the Order.
By letters dated June 2, 2003, you submitted responses to the Orders for PSEG Nuclear, LLC.
In your responses, you indicated that you consented to the DBT and security force personnel training Orders and did not request a hearing. The NRC staff has reviewed your responses, and finds that you have satisfied the thirty-five (35) day reporting requirements for both Orders.
In your response to the DBT Order, you also requested that the NRC provide clarification of five DBT-related issues described in the safeguards attachment to a letter from Mr. Colvin, President and CEO of the Nuclear Energy Institute, to Chairman Diaz dated May 16, 2003. By letter dated September 25, 2003, the NRC provided you a copy of Chairman Diazs response to Mr. Colvin, dated July 18, 2003, which clarified the five DBT-related issues.
Please contact Robert Fretz at 301-415-1324, if you have any other questions on these issues.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Ledyard B. Marsh, Director Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-354, 50-272 and 50-311 cc: See next page
10 CFR 2.202, licensees must submit an answer to the Orders and may request a hearing on the Orders, within thirty-five (35) days of the date of the Orders and, where good cause is shown, consideration would be given to extend the time to request a hearing.
The Orders also required licensees to notify the Commission within thirty-five (35) days if:
(1) the licensee was unable to comply with the requirements specified in the attachments to the Orders; (2) compliance with the requirements is unnecessary; (3) implementation of any of the requirements would result in a violation of the provisions of any Commission regulation of the facility license; or (4) implementation of any of the requirements described in the attachments to the Orders would adversely impact safe operation of the facility.Section III.C.1 of the security force personnel training and physical fitness Order required licensees to submit to the Commission, within thirty-five (35) days of the date of the Order, a schedule for achieving compliance with each requirement described in Attachment 2 to the Order.
By letters dated June 2, 2003, you submitted responses to the Orders for PSEG Nuclear, LLC.
In your responses, you indicated that you consented to the DBT and security force personnel training Orders and did not request a hearing. The NRC staff has reviewed your responses, and finds that you have satisfied the thirty-five (35) day reporting requirements for both Orders.
In your response to the DBT Order, you also requested that the NRC provide clarification of five DBT-related issues described in the safeguards attachment to a letter from Mr. Colvin, President and CEO of the Nuclear Energy Institute, to Chairman Diaz dated May 16, 2003. By letter dated September 25, 2003, the NRC provided you a copy of Chairman Diazs response to Mr. Colvin, dated July 18, 2003, which clarified the five DBT-related issues.
Please contact Robert Fretz at 301-415-1324, if you have any other questions on these issues.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Ledyard B. Marsh, Director Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-354, 50-272 and 50-311 cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC TMarsh DLPM Project Directors CBixler Region I OGC CHolden DLPM Section Chiefs PD Reading Files ACRS JClifford DLPM Project Managers GTracy, NSIR RFretz VNerses DLPM Licensing Assistants JPeralta, NSIR ADAMS Accession Number: ML032970156
- See previous concurrence OFFICE PDI-2/LPM PDI-2/LA PDI-2/SC*
NSIR/DNS*
PDI/D*
DLPM/D NAME RFretz CRaynor JClifford GTracy CHolden LMarsh DATE 11/13/03 11/13/03 10/30/03 11/03/03 11/07/03 11/14/03 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 cc:
Mr. Timothy J. OConnor Vice President - Operations PSEG Nuclear - X15 P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Mr. John T. Carlin Vice President - Engineering PSEG Nuclear - N10 P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Mr. David F. Garchow Vice President - Projects and Licensing PSEG Nuclear - N28 P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Mr. Gabor Salamon Manager - Nuclear Safety and Licensing PSEG Nuclear - N21 P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Jeffrie J. Keenan, Esquire PSEG Nuclear - N21 P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Ms. R. A. Kankus Joint Owner Affairs PECO Energy Company Nuclear Group Headquarters KSA1-E 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348 Lower Alloways Creek Township c/o Mary O. Henderson, Clerk Municipal Building, P.O. Box 157 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Dr. Jill Lipoti, Asst. Director Radiation Protection Programs NJ Department of Environmental Protection and Energy CN 415 Trenton, NJ 08625-0415 Brian Beam Board of Public Utilities 2 Gateway Center, Tenth Floor Newark, NJ 07102 Richard Hartung Electric Service Evaluation Board of Regulatory Commissioners 2 Gateway Center, Tenth Floor Newark, NJ 07102 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Senior Resident Inspector Salem Nuclear Generating Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Drawer 0509 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Hope Creek Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Drawer 0509 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Mr. Roy A. Anderson Chief Nuclear Officer PSEG Nuclear LLC - X04 Post Office Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08036