ML032731602

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Early Site Permit Application, Revision 0, Site Safety Analysis Report, Figures 2.5-46 Through 2.5-72
ML032731602
Person / Time
Site: North Anna, 05200008, PROJ0719  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/30/2003
From:
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
+reviewedDominionESP, +reviewedmls
Download: ML032731602 (27)


Text

2-2-430 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-46 Low-Frequency, 10-5 Median, Magnitude-Distance Deaggregation Using Updated Source and Ground Motion Models 0-15 15-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-300 300+

5.25 5.75 6.25 6.75 7+

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Fraction Distance (km)

M Updated Models

2-2-431 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-47 High-Frequency, 10-5 Median, Magnitude-Distance Deaggregation Using Updated Source and Ground Motion Models 0-15 15-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-300 300+

5.25 5.75 6.25 6.75 7+

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Fraction Distance (km)

M Updated Models

2-2-432 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-48 Selected Performance-Based Horizontal SSE Response Spectrum, As Scaled from Mean 10-4 Ground Motion Spectrum, Compared to RG 1.60 Spectrum Anchored to 0.3g 0.01 0.1 1

10 0.1 1

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Spectral Acceleration (g)

Performance-based SSE Spectrum Mean 10-4 Ground Motion Spectrum Reg. Guide 1.60 @ PGA = 0.3g 5% Critical Damping

2-2-433 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-49 Magnitude-Distance Deaggregation for Low-Frequencies (1 and 2.5 Hz) at a Mean Annual Frequency of 5 x 10-5 Using Updated Source and Ground Motion Models 0-15 15-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-300 300+

5.25 5.75 6.25 6.75 7+

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Fraction Distance (km)

M Updated Models

2-2-434 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-50 Magnitude-Distance Deaggregation for High-Frequencies (5 and 10 Hz) at a Mean Annual Frequency of 5 x 10-5 Using Updated Source and Ground Motion Models 0-15 15-25 25-50 50-100 100-200 200-300 300+

5.25 5.75 6.25 6.75 7+

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Fraction Distance (km)

M Updated Models

2-2-435 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-51 Horizontal Ground Motion Spectrum Calculated for Reference Probability of Mean 5 x 10-5, Compared to RG 1.60 Spectrum Anchored to 0.3g and to Selected SSE Spectrum 0.01 0.1 1

10 0.1 1

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Spectral Acceleration (g)

Performance-based SSE Spectrum Reg. Guide 1.60 @ PGA = 0.3g Mean 5x10-5 hazard with RG 1.165 5% Critical Damping

2-2-436 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-52 Sensitivity Plot of Scaled Spectrum Calculated Using Alternative Lower-Bound M of 5.0 and Scaling Factors in Table 2.5-27, Compared to RG 1.60 Spectrum Anchored to 0.3g and to Selected SSE Spectrum 0.01 0.1 1

10 0.1 1

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Spectral Acceleration (g)

Performance-based SSE Spectrum Reg. Guide 1.60 @ PGA = 0.3g Performance-based Spectrum using Mmin=5 5% Critical Damping

2-2-437 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-53 Comparison of Aleatory Sigmas Reported for California with Weighted Average Aleatory Sigma from EPRI Ground Motion 2003 Models for M = 5.5, RCD = 20 km 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.1 1

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Sigma of ln(Spectral Acceleration)

EPRI AS97 SEA97 C97 BJF97

2-2-438 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-54 Sensitivity Plot of Scaled Spectrum Calculated Using Alternative Ground Motion Aleatory Uncertainties and Scaling Factors in Table 2.5-28, Compared to RG 1.60 Spectrum Anchored to 0.3g and to Selected SSE Spectrum 0.01 0.1 1

10 0.1 1

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Spectral Acceleration (g)

Performance-based SSE Spectrum Reg. Guide 1.60 @ PGA = 0.3g Performance-based Spectrum using alternative sigmas 5% Critical Damping

2-2-439 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-55 Horizontal SSE and OBE Response Spectra Based on Updated Models (5% of Critical Damping) 0.01 0.1 1

10 0.1 1

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Spectral Acceleration (g)

Performance-based SSE Spectrum Performance-based OBE Spectrum 5% Critical Damping

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-440 September 2003 Figure 2.5-56 Site Vicinity Geologic Map and Seismicity (25-Mile Radius)

Virginia Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Map of Virginia, 1993, Scale 1:500,000 Virginia State Plane (North) coordinate system, Fipszone 4501, NAD 1927 Horizontal datum.

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-441 September 2003 Figure 2.5-57 Subsurface Profile A-A' 0

200 400 HORIZONTAL SCALE - FEET BECHTEL NORTH ANNA ESP APPLICATION SUBSURFACE PROFILE A-A' 24830 FREDERICK, MARYLAND REV.

DRAWING NO.

JOB NO.

340 340 320 320 300 300 280 280 260 260 240 240 220 220 200 200 180 180 160 160 140 140 120 120 100 100 80 80 ELEVATION - feet B-804 B-803 B-26 B-802 B-626 B-801 B-624 B-31 B-29 or (271)

(238.25)

Zone IIA Zone III-IV Zone IV 3 and 4 Excavations Units 3 and 4 Excavations Approximate Original Grade Existing Grade IRIS ACR-700 ABWR GT-MHR Planned Grade PBMR AP-1000 (199)

(194.7)

(131)

(231.5)

(221.8)

Zone III Limit of Units Fill for Zone III Zone IIA PBMR AP-1000 IRIS ACR-700 ABWR GT-MHR Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Westinghouse AP - 1000 Advanced CANDU Reactor - 700 Westinghouse IRIS Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Gas Turbine - Modular Helium Reactor Key:

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-442 September 2003 Figure 2.5-58 Subsurface Profile B-B' 0

100 200 HORIZONTAL SCALE - FEET BECHTEL NORTH ANNA ESP APPLICATION SUBSURFACE PROFILE B-B' 24830 FREDERICK, MARYLAND REV.

DRAWING NO.

JOB NO.

340 340 320 320 300 300 280 280 260 260 240 240 220 220 200 200 180 180 160 160 140 140 120 120 ELEVATION - feet B-21 B-805 B-23 B-802 B-22 B-41 Approximate Original Grade Existing Grade Zone IIA Zone IIB Zone III-IV Zone III Zone IV or Planned Grade PBMR AP-1000 IRIS ACR-700 ABWR GTMHR (271)

(238.25)

(231.5)

(221.8)

(199)

(131)

(194.7)

Zone III PBMR AP-1000 IRIS ACR-700 ABWR GT-MHR Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Westinghouse AP - 1000 Advanced CANDU Reactor - 700 Westinghouse IRIS Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Gas Turbine - Modular Helium Reactor Key:

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-443 September 2003 Figure 2.5-59 Locations of Previous Boreholes

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-444 September 2003 Figure 2.5-60 ESP Borehole Locations

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-445 September 2003 Figure 2.5-61 Locations of All Exploration Points

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-446 September 2003 Figure 2.5-62 Zone IIA Shear Wave Velocity Profile (a) Full-Depth Shear Wave Velocity Profile (b) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 Zone IIA Depth Below Ground Surface, Feet Depth Below Ground Surface, Feet Zone IIB Zone III Zone III-IV or Zone IV Zone IIA 60 50 40 30 20 Design Value CPT-825 Down-Hole CPT-822 Down-Hole Units 1 & 2 and ESP Average Value B-805 Cross-Hole 0

10 Design Value (Unimproved)

Design Value 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 CPT-825 Down-Hole Shear Wave Velocity, Ft/Sec.

Shear Wave Velocity, Ft/Sec.

Design Value (Improved)

(a)

(b)

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-447 September 2003 Figure 2.5-63 Variation of Normalized Shear Modulus with Cycle Shear Strain Cyclic Shear Strain, Percent 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1

Figure 2.5.4-7(a) Variation of Shear Modulus with Cyclic Shear Strain 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0

G/G max Zone IIA Saprolite (sand)

Zone IIB Saprolite (gravel)

Zone III Weathered Rock 2

3 1

3 1

2

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-448 September 2003 Figure 2.5-64 Variation of Damping Ratio with Cyclic Shear Strain 25 20 15 10 5

0 Damping Ratio Cyclic Shear Strain, Percent 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1

Figure 2.5.4-7(b) Variation of Damping with Cyclic Shear Strain Zone IIA Saprolite (sand)

Zone IIB Saprolite (gravel)

Zone III Weathered Rock 1

2 3

2 3

1

2-2-449 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-65 Plan View of Slope North of the SWR

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-450 September 2003 Figure 2.5-66 Photograph of Plan View of Slope North of the SWR

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-451 September 2003 Figure 2.5-67 Photograph of Slope North of the SWR

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-452 September 2003 Figure 2.5-68 Cross-Section of Existing Slope North of the SWR 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 Elevation, Ft Slope of Abandoned Units 3 & 4 Excavation 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 Elevation, Ft Zone IIA Saprolite Phreatic Surface 3

SWR Bedrock Zone III-IV B-18 B-15 Zone IV Section A-A' 0

50 100 Ft Bedrock Zone III Weathered Rock Zone IIA Saprolite

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-453 September 2003 Figure 2.5-69 SLOPE/W Analysis of Long-Term Static Case 1.748

==

Description:==

North Anna Existing Slope Comments: 2H:1V Slope - Saprolite File Name: Existing NC 1.slp Last Saved Date: 9/2/2003 Analysis Method: Bishop P.W.P. Option: Piezometric Lines / Ru Seismic Coefficient: (none)

==

Description:==

Saprolite Unit Weight: 125 Cohesion: 250 Phi: 30

North Anna Revision 0 Early Site Permit Application 2-2-454 September 2003 Figure 2.5-70 SLOPE/W Analysis of Seismic Case 1.405

==

Description:==

North Anna Existing Slope Comments: 2H:1V Slope - Saprolite

- Seis Case 2 File Name: Existing NC 1 (sei Last Saved Date: 9/2/2003 s2).slp Analysis Method: Bishop P.W.P. Option: Piezometric Lines / Ru Seismic Coefficient: Horizontal

==

Description:==

Saprolite Unit Weight: 125 Cohesion: 250 Phi: 30 (0.1g)

2-2-455 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-71 Log of Boring B-15

2-2-456 Revision 0 September 2003 North Anna Early Site Permit Application Part 2 - Site Safety Analysis Report Figure 2.5-72 Log of Boring B-18