|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML11189A0492011-07-0606 July 2011
Comment (8) of Lewis Patrie, Opposing Proposed Rules Pr 50, Draft Regulatory Basis for a Potential Rulemaking on Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facilities
ML0807205022008-03-0505 March 2008
Letter from Thomas P. Harrall on Behalf of Duke Energy on Pr 20, 30, 40, 50, 70 and 72 Regarding Decommissioning Planning. Supports Nei'S Request for a 90-Day Extension of the Comment Period
ML0735215422007-12-17017 December 2007
Comment (1) of Thomas P. Harrall, on Behalf of Duke Energy, on Proposed Rule Pr 50, Regarding Alternate Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events
ML0727709122007-09-21021 September 2007
Comment (1) of Henry B. Barron, on Behalf of Duke Energy on Energy Solutions PRM-50-88 Re to Amend 10 CFR 50.82., Termination of License
ML0632102172006-11-15015 November 2006
Comment (2) Submitted by Duke Energy, Bryan J. Dolan, on Supplemental Proposed Rules PR-2, 50, 51, and 52, Regarding Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants
ML0607302102006-03-0606 March 2006
Comment (11) Submitted by Duke Power Company, James R. Morris on Proposed Rule PR-50 Regarding Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) Technical Requirements
ML0407609042004-03-0303 March 2004
Comment (13) Submitted by Duke Energy Corporation, H. B. Barron on Proposed Rules Pr 170 & 171, Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2004
ML0326903062003-09-23023 September 2003
Comment (1) Submitted by Duke Energy Corporation, W. R. Mccollum on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities
ML0328012992003-09-22022 September 2003
Comment (1) Submitted by Duke Energy Corp., W. R. Mccollum on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities
ML0323905172003-08-11011 August 2003
Comment (15) Submitted by Duke Power Co., W. R. Mccollum on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML0312701402003-04-28028 April 2003
Comment (13) Submitted by Duke Power, Michael S. Tuckman, on Proposed Rules PR-170 and PR-171 Re Revision for Fee Schedule; Fee Recovery for Fy 2003
ML0228904032002-09-17017 September 2002
Comment from Mary T. Kelly on Proposed EIS for a MOX Fabricating Facility at SRS
ML0225600652002-09-0303 September 2002
Comment of M.S. Tuckman on Model Safety Evaluation on TS Improvement to Modify Requirements Regarding Mode Change Limitations Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process
ML0223305642002-07-10010 July 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Draft Regulatory Guides, DG-1114, Control Room Habitability at Nuclear Power Reactors, and DG-1115, Demonstrating Control Room Envelope Integrity at Nuclear Power Reactors Dated March 28, 2002
ML0219906432002-07-10010 July 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Draft Regulatory Guides, DG-1114, Control Room Habitability at Nuclear Power Reactors, and DG-1115, Demonstrating Control Room Envelope Integrity at Nuclear Power Reactors Dated March 28, 2002
ML0214902762002-05-23023 May 2002
Comment (3) Submitted by Duke Power Co., M.S. Tuckman on Proposed Rule PR-50 Regarding Incorporation by Reference of ASME BPV and OM Code Cases
2011-07-06
[Table view] |
Text
SECY - Duke Ener Comments for RIN3150-AHOO) Proposed Rule, Emergency Planningand P rss for Productiged PROPMRUg 1 3 )
From: 'Luellen B Jones Ibjones @duke-energy.com>
To: <SECY@nrc.gov>
Date: Tue, Sep 23, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject:
Duke Energy Comments for (RIN 3150-AHOO) Proposed Rule, Emergency Planningand Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities September 22, 2003 DOCKETED Secretary USNRC U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 September 23, 2003 (2:27PM)
Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Branch OFFICE OF SECRETARY
Subject:
Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and RULEMAKINGS AND Utilization Facilities, Proposed Rule (68 Fed. Reg. 43673, July ADJUDICATIONS STAFF 24,2003) RIN 3150-AHOO Duke Energy Corporation has reviewed and supports the adoption of the Proposed Rule, Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities (68 Fed. Reg. 43673, July 24, 2003) to amend 10CFR Part 50 Appendix E.IV regarding NRC approval of licensee changes to Emergency Action Levels (EAL) and exercise requirements for co-located licensees. These changes will reduce unnecessary regulatory burden on licensees while maintaining an acceptable level of safety.
NRC review and approval of every EAL change prior to implementation is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance that EALs will continue to provide an acceptable level of safety. Requiring prior NRC review and approval in the two situations described Inthe proposed rule (EAL changes that potentially decrease the effectiveness of the plan and changing from one EAL scheme to another) will ensure adequate regulatory oversight of the licensee's emergency classification system. The NRC will continue to review through the Inspection process the licensees determinations as to which EAL changes represent potential decreases in the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan. These changes will provide a means for licensees to improve their EALs without undo regulatory burden.
Clarifying exercise requirements to allow alternating participation in exercises for co-located licensees will remove ambiguity that currently exists. The proposed exercise frequency, coupled with the detailed activities and interactions will continue to provide a sufficient level of assurance of offsite emergency preparedness. Also, it will provide clear guidance for future licensing actions, and avoid undo burden on offsite response organizations.
Duke Energy Corporation appreciates the efforts the NRC staff has made to clarify the regulations. If you have any questions please contact Tina Kuhr at (704) 382-3151 or email (tmkuhreduke-energy.com).
Sincerely, W. R. McCollum, Jr.
Senior Vice President, Nuclear Support
-emPla+P,=Seci-oobq
