ML031640529

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
13RFO, CRDM Nozzle, Examination Report
ML031640529
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 03/09/2002
From: Hacker M
Framatome ANP
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2003-0018
Download: ML031640529 (65)


Text

a. A FRAMATOME ANP I1 I ID%

(j IMPq JJA~) 2 rV_V_% rv--,% a 2d)U Lfu 6w 6T March 9, 2002 M. G. Hacker UT-Level II Framatome ANP

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 PROPRIET-ARY FRAMATOME ANP Automated ultrasonic examinations of 69 CRDM nozzles were performed from beneath the head using the ARAMIS inspection tool and a uCirc." blade probe.

Framatome ANP examination procedure 54-lSI-100-08, "Remote Ultrasonic Examination of Reactor Head Penetrations" was used to perform the examination. This procedure was revised by change authorizations #FRA 002 and #DB-02-012 and governs the remote automated contact ultrasonic examination of CRDM nozzles using the ACCUSONEXT automated data acquisition and analysis system.

The techniques utilized for this examination are intended for the detection and through-wall (depth) sizing of circumferential ID and OD initiating flaws in the nozzle base metal only. Forward scatter (TOFD), longitudinal-wave techniques are used. The examinations were conducted from the bore of the CRDM nozzles in the J-groove weld region of the nozzle.

The examinations performed with the blade probe consisted of scanning for circumferential and significant axial flaws within the nozzle wall. The tooling consisted of a blade containing a nominal 5 MHz, 50 degree TOFD transducer set. The circ. blade probe provides flaw detection (axial and circ. flaws) and sizing (non-axial flaws) information. For the forward scatter transducers, flaw detection is identified by loss of signal response either from the lateral wave or backwall responses as well as the presence of crack tip diffracted responses.

Prior to the examinations, demonstrations were performed using the EPRI/MRP samples removed from Oconee. This demonstration showed that circumferential as well as axial flaws could be detected with the circ. blade probe.

The ARAMIS tool was positioned beneath each nozzle examined with the Yt axis (axial) zeroed at the bottom of the nozzle with the positive direction extending up the nozzle. The Theta" axis was zeroed at the downhill side of the nozzle with the positive direction proceeding in the clockwise direction while looking down from the top of the nozzle. Following the initial examination, some nozzles had areas where the gap was too narrow to insert the probe. All of these exclusion areas were rescanned after the initial inspection by moving the lead screw support tube to open the gap for examination.

The examination with the blade probe identified flaw indications in six nozzles (1, 2, 3, 5, 47, and 58). Because almost all of the flaws detected on these nozzles were characterized as axial, only limted information was available with the circ.

blade probe. These axial flaws could have been characterized using axial blade probes, however, because there was a high probability that these nozzles would require repair, the drives for these nozzles were removed in order to perform additional UT examination using the Top-Down tool. The Top-Down tool contains 10 transducers and provides the ability to detect and characterize axial and circumferential flaws and also provides additional information in the nozzle 2

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 -PRGPRtETARY FRAMATOME AP.

tube required for the repair activity. Images of the nozzles identified for repair are included in this report and identify the various landmarks required to implement the repair. These generally include the location of the head OD, the elevation of the proposed cut line, and the location of the top of the j-groove weld.

Automated ultrasonic examinations of six CRDM nozzles (1, 2, 3, 5, 47, and 58) were performed using the Top-Down inspection tool and Framatome ANP examination procedure 54-lSI-100-08. The techniques utilized for the examination are intended for the detection and through-wall (depth) sizing of axial and circumferential ID and OD initiating flaws in the nozzle base metal only.

Forward scatter, longitudinal-wave and backward scatter shear wave techniques are used. The examinations were conducted from the bore of the CRDM nozzles in the J-groove weld region of the nozzle.

The inspections consisted of scanning for axial and circumferential flaws within the nozzle. The tooling consisted of a transducer head that holds 10 individual search units. These search units were divided into two sets, one for the axial beam direction and one for the circumferential beam direction. The axial beam direction set of search units consisted of 5.0 MHz, longitudinal wave forward scatter time of flight search units with angles of 300 and 45°; backward scatter pulse echo, 2.25 MHz 600 shear wave search units; and a 5.0 MHz 00 search unit (see Appendix A for calibrations files and scan parameters). The circumferential beam direction set of search units consisted of 5.0 MHz, longitudinal wave forward scatter time of flight search units with angles of 450, 550, and 65°; backward scatter pulse echo, 2.25 MHz 600 shear wave search units; and a 5.0 MHz 0 search unit (see Appendix B for calibrations files and scan parameters).

The detection of flaw indications is based upon the expected responses for each search unit and technique. The 00 transducer provides weld position information and also provide positional information due to lack of backwall response in the region of the flaw. The forward scatter time of flight techniques provides flaw detection and sizing information. For the forward scatter transducers, flaw detection is identified by loss of signal response either from the lateral wave or backwall responses as well as detection of crack tip diffracted responses. The 600 shear wave transducer provides detection by means of corner trap responses between the flaw and nozzle surface and sizing with tip diffracted signals.

The top-down tool was positioned with the Z"axis (axial) zeroed at the top of the nozzle flange with the positive direction extending down the nozzle. The Theta" (rotational) axis was zeroed at the dowel pinhole in the flange with the positive direction inthe clockwise direction while looking down from the top of the nozzle.

The ultrasonic data is adjusted for individual transducer offsets in the transducer head to provide actual reflector location in the nozzle.

3

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 PIROPR1ETARY FRAMATOME ANP This report contains the data sheets from ultrasonic examination of the 6 CRDM nozzles that were identified as having flaws with the blade probe. Included in this report are the data sheets for the blade UT and the rotating UT from the Top-Down tool. Images of the UT data are also included to show the features identifying detected flaws.

The data was also reviewed for evidence of a leak path in the penetration bore with the blade and rotating UT techniques. Leak paths were detected in nozzles 1, 2, and 3 with blade and rotating UT. Images of the leak paths are included in this report.

Review of the attached data sheets for the circ. blade and Top-Down UT examinations will show that not all of the axial flaws identified with the circ. blade probe were confirmed with the rotating probe. In each case, axial flaws were identified with the circ. blade probe but could not be substantiated with the rotating UT. This is primarily due to the means required to identify an axial flaw when the beam is directed along the axis of the nozzle with the circ. blade probe.

Detection of an axial flaw with the circ. blade is made based on lack of signal amplitude and pattem of the signal loss observed in the C-scan. This loss of signal can either be due to interruption of the sound energy by an axial flaw in the beam path or by extemal factors affecting probe contact such as nozzle ovality or weld shrinkage.

The rotating UT also has conventional backward scatter transducers in both the axial and circumferential beam directions. These transducers rely on direct reflection from the flaw to provide detection. This is the opposite of the method used for the circ. blade probe and provides confirmation that a real flaw is detected. This is the reason that some of the flaw signals detected using the circ. blade probe were subsequently listed as non-relevant using the Top-Down tool. These axial flaw signals detected with the circ. blade probe could have also been dispositioned with the axial blade probes but, because they were likely candidates for repair, it was more efficient to use the rotating UT with the Top-Down tool for final disposition. Therefore the data from the Top-Down tool is considered the final result for each nozzle. Both data sheets are provided in this report for comparison.

A summary of the examination results is presented in the following table. The ultrasonic instrumentation calibration parameters are also included at the end of this report.

4

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 PREPRIE.TAR-Y A

FRAMATOME ANP Nozzle # Summary of Results 1 9 Axial Flaws 2 8 Axial Flaws, I Circ. Flaw 3 4 Axial Flaws 5 1 Axial Flaw 47 1 Axial Flaw 58 No Recordable Indications See CRDM Nozzle Flaw Reports for each nozzle for specifics.

5

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 PRPRIETF.R FRAMATOME ANP AFAMATOME ANP CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet Customer: FENOC plant Davis Besse I7 nit: . na Nozzle:

Procedure: 54-ISI-1000B CA: FRA-02-002, DB2-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (in.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 0 End of Noz. (in. 0 robe Seral No.'s: Ch I S0382CN Ch 6 Axial Scan Start -1.5, .22 Stop: 366, 9.8 Setup: 3 Ch 2 Ch 7 Files: B20581 7.43.33 Ch 3 Ch 8 Clrc. Scan Start Stop: Setup: Ch 4 Ch 9 Files: Ch 5 Ch 10 Filaw Surtace Depth End Point I Enci Polnt Z Axial Adjused Clrc. Extent Flaw Flaw Flaw Flaw Flaw Weld Location No. (IDIOD) to Min ri1ln Max Max Total Mln Max Total Length Angle TWD Aspect Orientation @ Flaw Flaw Tip (In.) (deg.) (in.) (dog.) (In.) (dog.) (deg.) (in.) (In.) (dog.) (In.) Ratio AMn Max U 1.19 241 54* U4.1 524 . .- AXIAL Z CJD 1.18 75 Z.1 77. U5 75.7 77.4 U.0b -- -

UD 1.65 0.3 -- T8 -- 5. U.U U.46 3 AXIAL WD U. 7C_Z U.ZC 21. Y7 ZZ4~ .8Z 1 21 Z1O.Z Z.8b -. 3 - 4 XA 4 uu 0.Z4 160. 1Z62.75 3.46 Z60.Z 162.7 0.0 3.46 AXIAL I ODJ U.Y4 316.Z 3.Z 31.6 ZZ7 36.Z 313.6 *0U ZZ745 AXIAL UD 1.UZ 345.5 Z.24 348. 11 1.2Z 345.6 348.1 0Y 1.Z 4 -- AXTAr w ~~~~~~~~~~~~~2M- - m - - 1 - --

173

-U_

uata Loc. o 330 2 U Z40 U U 3 uvegrees WELD Noz. Loc. U 30 6U 9U 1 10 10 ;Z10 24U Z7U 3UU 3 360 Uegrees Noz. End O U.0 OU. -u.W--u U.OU U.1 U. 0 .U 000

.W UU - Inches PROFILE IW 3. -3.Tu rn2 3U5- 31 T 3T 3 .19 3.U1 9.u 2Z.9 3.17 uD Incnes MIN. T2 T.6 16 164- T.76- 1 T.B9W 1.4 1.64 T5 1.60 1.5 1.tZ Inches ACJusted rc. xent is relative to downhill side ot nozzle Clockwislooking IU ish MUgWa Uimension Comments: Mese naws are axial in the weld region. Faw #7 is are elie% to e rougw an creates te lea path through the weld region. Several other axiai 1

IllM*

610..Q

-lrn ale ueLzeut tl i.

Oil LUl-wnr

-III WIU lthl rin IVW.VII UUt h lIl nni Cdle IiW, au,r aulI tn W

Uh hc UBD Iu1u rh l O1L.vi uHWaslLe J Ucinl

ilSue thl I.T eir.

%OL,.

ia opliJ1,h WfUld;: ,UIUUt7 Full

-11 rul Vullruert r

-t l11

_lll.ISoliln WI Cal laW in I

-II lie LilsO nuzzL W1ill U W oet r

peUrrnIuU nis repot Will e remised wnen tne top-aown data ecomes available.

using the top-down tool.

Analyzed Dy: . E. MARIIN Date: dZ/ U Analyzed by: Date:

6

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 -PRePRIETRY A

FRAMATOMEAP f ^ ' :lE ' ,; . . i s*RAMA;OME ANP 1O.01,7-,S ----------------- , 4 . ....

75 j . ... .. .. .. ..

w7.0.. ........... ... ... ........

.. . . ........... ............ .... ... ........ . .... ........................... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

7 B. - ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------. ...............

oB .5 . ................................................... ........................ ............................. ..................... ...........................

- 6. - -- ---- --- --- ....... .......................... ........... ............ ..... .............. ............................ ................

X5... .-....................------------------........--------................................... ..........................................

...... 4S. - -------------------

Nu~ ' ~ ----------------------- ---------------

31 E 4.5 ................................................ ............................................ .................... ..................................

e 0 . ... .......... ....................... .......... ..... 4.......... ................ ......... ....... -8 -

.. Ut

.0 - ~~~~~~- - - `- 1 is 1En 15 .... E . -----77

.7 . & l. ---- -------------

'f)tX 7 C4 = e S S ~f0

.1 31 __ 2 4 . 5 6 7 _ 8 9 10 12 _ 13 _ 1 4 15 _ 16~7 . . .. '...... ,..!',!., . aia 7

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February I March 2002 R AFRAMATOM F AN P

,;%11. C41:-14 This scan provided the Initial detection of flaws In the nozzle wall using the circ. blade probe. Leak Path patterns are observed In this image. The vent holes (at 90 deg. Intervals) are also detected as well as several axial flaws starting below the weld and extending Into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. At least one flaw extends above the J-groove weld region.

Nozzle I Circ. Blade UT Data 8

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 PRePRt A '

FRAMATOME ANP AFRAMATOME ANP CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet Customer: FENOC Plant: Davis Besse jUnit r/a Nozzle: 1 Procedure: 54-1S-100-08 CA FRA02-002. DB-02-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (in.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 183 End of Noz. (In. 29.6 robe Serdal No.'s: Ch 1 2078-01002-OL Ch 6 2IGB-01002-45L Axial Scan Start -6, 15.06 Stop: 360. 29.63 Setup: I Ch 2 21GF-01004-30L Ch 7 21GC-01001-55L Files: T2061_12.36.51 Ch 3 21GA-01004-45L Ch 8 22CD-01001-65L Circ. Scan Start -5, 19.23 Stop: 360, 29.63 Setup: 2 Ch 4 2623-01002-60S Ch 9 2624-01005-60S Files: T2061_11.11.08 Ch 5 2623-01002-60S Ch 10 2624-01005-60S Flaw Surface Depth End Point 1 End Point Z Axial AdJusted Circ. Extent Flaw Flaw F Flaw Flaw Weld Location No. (IDIOD) to MWln Mln Max Max Total min MEi TrYIF Length Angle TWD Aspect Orientation @ Flaw Flaw Tip (in.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (deg.) (In.) (In.) (dog.) (In.) Ratio Mln-TMax 1 OD 0.Z9 2 3 8.31 2 1 1.35 af 0.36 0.2 AXIAL In Wefd egion QuL Z6f 28z4 13.6 T5b UAz a 70.0 0.U7 0.66 Z 0.4 0Z4 AXIAL in Weld Region

~3 ~UD 0 277'i 51 Z8.1 *55 0.4 13Z0 13U.0 0U7 U.4 1U 0 0.05 AXIAL In Wela Kegion

__ou___ 26.' 31 25.W Z 1.77 15Z.0 154. 07 177 Z 0.65 0.37 AXIAL In Weld xegion OD-M 0.U4 Zl.1T-- -- T-733uu ---4 rw- --- zu M3 77 1.70 -- fZ09.0 MU --- ZU90 M .0170 IJ:7- 0- .36 AXIAL ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

InWela Weld Region Region T7 -o= D -W -5.9M5-=--- 7Z85 Z91" 3.48 5. .1 --- SW 34 M

.6 0-.WY -AXIAL In WveId Region-V uO 0.3z Zt7.3 zJJ ZO.40 3 Z* 0.57 31U.0 310.0 U.00 0.87 0 0.33 0.3E AXIAL In Weld Region

- - ~CD ~ 2 6

-U.Z8 UZ 28.35 zU2 0.75 34 341.0 0.UU U.75 0U-D037 -. 49 XIUA In Weld Region '

~

UU,.U 0.24 z4 181 Zt 181~ 1.ZZ~ ~*ZUJ ~ZU.0U 1.ZZ 0 0.41 0.34 AXIAL in Weld Region 11 _ __ ___

13- - __

Uata Loc. 183 213 Z4 273 303 333 3 3 3 6 93 1Z3 1b3 1egrees WELD Noz. Loc. Uu 14U uZ 7W Z *= -- 3U uegrees NOz. und ZY.21; Z9 60 zs U . U Z9.609.

9 6 Z9.2U Incnes M

PROFILE MAX -_7.85- 77 27.89 z77Ns 7 7 27W- 77.r 7.7 =Z7.9 2 27.93 2T8W 27.85 inches MIN. Z 55.

.67 5 59I71 Zff. Z 6 U 2.W Z6.40 Z6.Z59- Z.59 Z659- - Z55 incnes Notes: Adjusted Crc. xten is relatlve to doWnhill side ot nozzie; lockwlme looking 8own. i E is hough-Wa IDimensn comments: Data was encoded with positive I heta going counterciockwse. Adjusted circ. positions have corrected te position to read clockwise looking down.

i-law 5 was identifed as an axial naw -using the circ. blade probe but is not connrmed withthe rotating UT. I ere7creonaw P5 is not reievant.

Analyzed by: K.C.Gebetsberger Date: 31biUZ Anaiyzed by: M.U. Hacker Date: 31b102 9

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February I March 2002 [flDEC4VTARU FRAMATOM ANP tFFFFF F.F.F,F.rFtnwwr* F4 F.FFFF.FFt..>AFtF.1/4...FF. FFFFFF ... .F . . wrrrrr FFFt:7,.;*.F..F>F FFFFFF

... - F.FFF: FFF <. FF** .,.,.. F. ,. i FF ,, I NoflieiFroti!e F F F. .. F F F FF" CF IF .FC -

F 1 F

Fl. F .

. F F.

F - rnt..In,amnn

  • JLr'JV**Otfl F F

F F F F F

F F FF F F

- F FJFF F 'F - , - F F -

F F - F Fl F F F FF F 41 F F Fr FF F F F 1 A AF FF F F.- F FFF F F F FF F F F F F F I F F F F F F I F, FF F F F FF F F FF F FFF F F Fr F .F F F FF F F A FF F FF F FIF F -

Iflina FF F IF F F FFF F F F > F F F FFF FF F FFFFF F FF F FF F F F F F F F F,> FF F F F F F FFF OF 4 FF F

F F F F FF F FF IF <F i7FF;{FF F FF F F F Fr F

36O FFF F F F F F F IF F F nfl F F F F I F F F F F F F F F F IFFF F FFF F F F 1

FF F FF. IF FFFF FF F F F .1 F F FF IF F F F F F FF F F F F F N F 21.5 . F.£IF -

F F F F F F F

F F F F F FF F AF F F F F F F F F F F F F FFF4.F F F.

F FFF F FF F F F .F no F F FF.FFFFFFFFFF.F.FFFFFFFFF.FF*F.FFFFF#F..FFFF.FIFFFFFFFF. F .FF.FFFF IF F F F FFF.FjF,F F F FFF...FFF..FF.F F F F F F I F F F F F F F F F F F4 F F F F F F III F F F F F F F F F F FF......F...IF.

F F 23.0

.-.-. .F..-.F..--..-..F.-

215 240 . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .

24.5 . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . ..

c a, 20 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .

tL 25.5 . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .

2 26.0 . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . ..

"a 26.5 . .. . . .. . . . . . . ..... .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .

0

.c 270 . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C 27.5 . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .

20

r. . ;X~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

0... . . . ... .. 1 1 . .. . .. . . ... . .

.,,n ;.. O i j . . ... ..

30:0 .. L -FF-..-.-F I ' . .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~......

3F 0:45 4.

....A."4t . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . .....

4 i:l 5 _ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 P iO$EIAlW FRAMATOME ANP t

!r This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial Indications detected using the circ. blade probe and provides elevation dimensions for repair activities. This scan also provides characterization of the region of the nozzle surrounding the location of the new ID temperbead weld to assure sound material for welding. Leak Path patterns are observed in this Image. The vent holes (at 90 deg. intervals) are also detected as well as several axial flaws starting below the weld and extending into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. At least one flaw extends above the J-groove weld region.

Nozzle I Rotating UT, 0-deg. Data 11

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination AFRAMATOMIE ANP February / March 2002 RR)PRE Head OD @20.12" Nozzle I Elevations 12

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February I March 2002 MePRY FRAMATOME ANP This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial Indications detected using the circ. blade probe. This image Is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed circumferentially. The B-scan and D-scan show the relative depths of the OD initlated cracks. Several axial flaws are detected starting below the weld and extending into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. At least one flaw extends above the J'groove weld region.

Nozzle 1 Circ. Blade UT Data 13

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February t March 2002 R RE FRAMATOME ANP This image s from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed circumferentially. This is a cross-sectional view of the nozzle wall using the 60-deg. shear wave transducer showing the relative angular position and the depths of the flaws.

Nozzle I Rotating UT 60-deg. Data 14

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 a. rRAMATOME AN!P FPR4&AR*

rRAMATOMEANP CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet Customer: FENOC IPlant: Davis Besse Unit N/A Nozzle: 2 Procedure: 54-ISI-100-08 CA FRA02-002, DB02-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (in.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 0 End of Noz. (in. 0.12 robe Serial No.s: Ch I S0385CN Ch 6 Axial Scan Start: 2, .55 Stop: 366, 10 Setup: 3 Ch 2 Ch 7 Files: B2059. 15.33.08, B2059 16.59.12 Ch 3 Ch 8 Circ. Scan Start: Stop: Setup: Ch 4 Ch 9 Files: Ch 5 Ch 10 FTaw SurFace Depth End Poilnt 1 End Point 2 Axial Adjusted CIrc. xtent Flaw Flaw Flaw Flaw Flaw Weld Location No. (IDIOD) to Miin Min Max Max Total Min Max Totai Length Angle TWD Aspect Orientation @ Flaw Flaw Tip (in.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (deg.) (in.) (in.) (deg.) (in.) Ratlo ln Max 1l OU 0.5 1.51 5.C TU I 177 5. 0.45 0.60 . G CIRC.

UU~ 3.E :Ua 06 5ZC 3.14 J6.0 5Z. 0.57 31 10 -XA 3 ZU 1 4 . 61.3 1 .050 3.44 51.0 U1B U.0 1. . - 5 1 -I OD 2.5E 170.C 4.18 I71.u 1.63 17.0 171. U 1.64 1 A OU5- 1.4 4 Z1 230 Z 2 1.0 230.0 0.5 Z85 10 -X I uu - . --- P 3.3 30 Z.52 ZZ9. Z30. 0.4 .5i 1 _AXIAL aU _ U.7 2.64 3.76 Z3. Z654.0 0.99 3.8S 15 -AXAr 11 OU U.94 UU94 Z5E 23.11 Z~~~~~~~.44 3 Z5 2

34C .C 0.1 Z5.

23.U 56U 24.u 0.4 1.ZU 1 1.5 8 .3 AXIAL

-g- -n -2.1us 2U54 2-50 --m i~

10 .47iU Uata Loc. *U 3 bO 9 - U TbU T80 T Z4U Z7 3U 33U uegrees WELD Noz. Loc. U 1T2 i6U ZU 15 W U ZU *Z4U 27U 3 33U vegrees Noz nd . U1Z U.1 U1 01 0.1Z 0.1Z U1Z U1 Inches - U1 U1Z PROFILE MAX . 1 35 37 3.88 3.7 -3.4- 3.8T 71 3.6 3Z U 301 Z Inches MN 1 1 Z. Z .9 78 - .Z Z65-Z.47 Z13Z.31 .Y4 1.8Z.7 Inches 1.78 Notes; Adjusted rc. xtent is relalie to downhill side ot nozzle;clockwise looking c D1I7iTroughWai Uiar Comments: These flaws are axial in the weld region. laws #Z, #f, #8, #1U is are believed to be troughwall and creates the leaK path through the weld region.

,J:VIaI lII I-3==ICX oif UtAr IIOWO dIA Url4VUt_ inI LIED VVWU *V iUr UIt dIA IIUL dUIU LU IJU fillGIIdI uulerU CAIal IIOV:i Cdie ueLecLeu II ll 1e;Iwelu reLunUt VI dhersrLLrU UrII CM IWL CIUIV U De UllY CnBACMMlMIALO

<!U ir Ulig L

ll

~

GLii.

hslrutuor uilaut rAAc U~

plEuuti.

1 www-_ti uii Cna{CliiO iA uTi 0

"aws 10S11_1 flO_

as inaW

_Z EIs rio nzie will be perrormed using the top-down tool. his report will be reMsed when tne top-down data becomes available.

Analyzed by: K. C. Gebetsberger Date: Z8510Z Analyzed by: M.G.Hacicer Date: 212810Z 15

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February I March 2002 rPR{lr FRAMATOME ANP F . *><rrrr< <F> FFFF FFFF.FF - - FFF.N.rFUF.7Wu1rIU¶FFnFW F7 r F r - 7

<tt; F F FF 7 F F 'FF 7  !"F4... I F p - <

F F F F F - - F - tt..aflt..4'e. fl.,a F - - F F F - 1FFF FFF V 7 taIl taOICtiC IJCLO I F F F -

F F F F FFF F F <I F F - F F F F F - F F F FF F F 7 7 7 - F

- 7< - __________________ __________________ 4 F - 'F - F F F?

F F . F7 .7F F F FFFFŽ F

- F F 7 < F' - - 777 FF.FF - - F F. -

F F - FFF F FF7', F7 F F -

9 on Ii F

Fr F F F- F -

.FFF*FF F--4-FFF- F I

Fr

.1

.1 F.

F F

F "F

F F

F F F F FFFF F

F F

FF F F F

"..L IF F F F -

Fod.JIF F F F F F-IF} F FFF F F F F F F F en- F I F F F F F - F F F -. - --

~~LU~~~ ....... .... ..... . ... . ~ F -. . .. .... . -. .. ..... ..... ... ...-- - - --

0 Is 1L5 ... . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .r.. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . - -- - -- -- --- - . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0.5 -- - -- - -- - -- - . .... t~ F F z~.... . . .. . . ... .... .  :.

- t ,F .... .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . ..... . . . . . . . .  ::

t:  :::

. . ;. 4 .

,$ ,: ,. iL;,;,j.,,riji ii i jji,Sjj,jyij,j ii :. iii: F:ii!

, .Ri's it I'ii .; 1l .! i; li.;as: i, \ 4: .;

15..... . ...... 7. ------ .............. N O Ef iin2\fuLitiw jS ' i 9

- "" F F F ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~- F

* ' > . ' n.:',.

,,.,:i...,7. ,,,:,

,1 !t vr; v r .

. ^^ w  ;,

j: t t m o;  : .A.+? # .>.u'. 1 Wv wX^: j:,.,;!w,iii :!iiwlii.>i-iL i:ii i *'.!i;t zui4, io:,0; z;,i!,iirsi :t.iiiiiipiii iiiir 'iii i +; ji ; !EjiC; Z-,  ;; jjjjj!, i: ii,il Si;

.... ,.. ...:'....',,'. ,ji.,'.:z:,." .' .......

i,; '..i.... ;. i..Nj;,jj ji.t!S9; ,ivEji';, ji,

_^,_  ;, *,.<, r...!i 16

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination AFRAMATOME ANP February / March 2002 P9QRREA;l Y This scan provided the initial detection of flaws In the nozzle wall using the circ. blade probe. Leak Path patterns are observed In this Image. Several axial flaws are detected starting below the weld and extending Into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. Several flaws extend above the J-groove weld region.

Nozzle 2 Circ. Blade UT Data 17

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 ,12R =

A A A CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet FRAMATOMM ANP Customer: FENOC Plant Davis Besse - nit N/A Nozzle: 2 Procedure: 54-lSi-100-08 CA: FRAo2-0o2, D"2-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (in.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 315 End of Noz. (in. 30.78 robe Senal No.'s: Ch 2078-01002-OL Ch 6 2tGB-01002-45L Axial Scan Start -5,16.1 Stop: 360, 30.77 Setup: I Ch 2 21GF-01004-30L Ch 7 21GC-01001-55L Files: T2061 09.12.19 Ch 3 21GA-01004-45L Ch 8 22CD-01001-65L CIrc. Scan Start 0, 18.95 Stop: 360, 29.52 Setup: 2 Ch 4 2623-01002-60S Ch 9 2624-01005-60S Files: T2061_07.25.10 Ch 5 2623-01002-60S Ch 10 2624-01005-60S Fl surace Deptn End Point 1 End Point 2 Axial AdJusted CIrc. Extent Flaw Fiaw Flaw FIlaw Flaw Weld Location No. (IDIOD) to Min Min Max Max Total Min Max- Tota Length Angle TWD Aspect Orientation @Flaw Flaw Tip (in.) (deg.) (In.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (deg.) (in.) (in.) (deg.) (in.) Ratio Mln Max

~-- - = -~--v- -_71M 1 QU 0 ~1r.4t -g- Z1.U 2Y.1~~ 275.C2.05 7- 4.0 -- 75-101) -U.t

.---- 0.57

-3M Z.3- 165 -0.41- M. --- 0.1Y

~M. -AIART= IAL TvvelaegTon in ved egionf UD TW z.5 Z6Z.U, 3u37 Z40.C 3.78 *53. 75.0 078 3.BB U.6 D68 :0.7 AXl7AL InWeld iKegion 4 -=UU 1W u 140.0 ZY.391 141.1.C L70 167.07 17421.0-U.25 Z.71 175 0.65 U.Z4 -AXrAL in weld i(eglon 6 ~OU~ 017 lW~

V ~*28:TZ683 u 2 II Z

-8:3E 17.0 3Y8 Z.59.

U4 - U6.3 AXIAL in weld Region a UU TW M.30 32 MU -Wi 35I 283Z 254D TUi 1 I 5 U6 5 8:11 AXIAL In eld Kegion 10 D -A- 2T35 7  :<U.3 26 -2:9 Z.96 8. U uZ9. 0.67 3.04 13 0.65 O.21 AAXIL In vve egion OD - "44 27.9 314 zm. 7 1. 347D 3Z8 1.17 1.18 83 -Z 0.3 - U.1 1 .1

  • 2- -- T0F  : ZU.2 27.

1 32 55 fl:. 1Z9 :25 i 2 -U DU -- AXMIA n e Kegion 14 - -

Data Loc. 31 34 45 75 l 15 15 lS5 Z25 Z5 Z85 35 _z_Uegrees WELD NTo-z.Co L-c. 32U- 150 180 210 Z4 27 300 330 rdU Uegrees Noz. tnd 3U.78 3U.78 30.78 3U.78- 3078 30. 378 3. 378* 30.78 37 30.7 -U.78 ncnes PROFILE MAX 2 1 29.U9 29.02 28:8w 3 4T28.68.45 Z.49 28.9 Z Z9 8.92 04 2 914 inches AMdN.J7 ~28:O5 Z7.33 '7 17:r t77W 27 275-27 1 272 273W -28W 27.84 -28:0 Inches Notes: Adjusted Urc. Extet is relati e MPc own si e FiiSdoc wis iooi ng own. lVUi ughWa IuhW mension comments: Data was encoded with positive Tneta going counterclockwise. Adjusted circ. positions nave correctea the position to read clockwise looking down.

Flaws 3, ,and 9 were identined as axial naws using the circ. blade proDe but are not connrmed witn the rotating U . umeretore, naws #3, , and 9 are not relevant.

Analyzed by: K.C.Gebetsberger Uate: 3M0UZ Analyzed by: M.G. Hacker Date: 3/5(02 18

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February IMarch 2002 flVR?!i-VRT' F!RAMATOME ANP

~~~~~~~~2Z. 0::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.4 -.- 'r4-'

210~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~

..... . ..... ' 4 23.5 ........... i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.' ' 44-4

- 44' ...... ------ ------ 4......4'

.-h-- . .f .l..3. . . . ., . .4 . .4 444 4- -- - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - 4'. 44~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

24.0 . .................................................. .................................................. ................................................... ..................................................

24.5 . .................................................. ..................................... ......... ................................................... ..................................................

S 0 . ................... .............................. .................................................. ...................... ............................ ..................................................

Xt 25L5 . ........................... ...................... .................................................. ................... .............................. ..................................................

E 2&0O .................................... ............. ......... ........................................ ....................................... ----- --------------------------------------------------

a 265 .................. ................ .............. ........................................... ..... ....................................... ----------- ----- ...........................................

2 27.0 --------------------- ......

C 275 . . . . ... ... .......... ....................... ........................................ .............. ..................

2&O0 .............. ............................................ -------v............ ............... -------------- ... ..

28.5 ---------- .... -----------

9.0 -------------

~ ~

, ... .\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~

4-'r-~~~~~~~~~~4"4'4

4'..4:.,.4'44' 1

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;",4 4' -

4 ".'4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. .....

4ti.vt~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4.</.:..;:~~~~~~~~~~~~+.: .-..  :.....

21.0" s ..4 4' 4' 4' 4'4' 4' I 4ls

.4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

iiis:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4'4 ' 4' -4 4 ti '-Vi ?ia~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-44' -.

4"'44'4--- 44'4' 4'- 4.4'-4'4'4'44'4'4 -4' .4'4'44'4'44'44'- -4' 44'.44'.4'4-4'-4 4'. -4 4 4 44 .. ...... '. 44 '4'.. ' 4' 44 19

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February I March 2002 PfReIRlET Y FRAMATOME ANP This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial indications detected using the circ. blade probe and provides elevation dimensions for repair activities. This scan also provides characterization of the region of the nozzle surrounding the location of the new ID temperbead weld to assure sound material for welding. Leak Path patterns are observed In this Image. Several axial flaws are detected starting below the weld and extending into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle.

Several of these flaws extend above the weld region.

Nozzle 2 Rotating UT 0-deg. Data 20

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 A

FRAMATOME ANP Nozzle 2 Elevations 21

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination AFRAMAT'OME ANP February / March 2002 PRPR iY This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial Indications detected using the circ. blade probe. This Image Is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed circumferentially. The B-scan and D-scan show the relative depths of the OD initiated cracks. Several axial flaws are detected starting below the weld and extending Into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. At least one flaw extends above the J-groove weld region.

Nozzle 2 Rotating UT 60-deg. Data 22

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February 1March 2002 PRePR4EAR?*

A FRAMATOME AN P This Image is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed circumferentially. This Is a cross-sectional view of the nozzle wall using the 60-deg. shear wave transducer showing the relative angular position and the depths of the flaws.

Nozzle 2 Rotating UT, 60-deg. Data 23

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 1PRtF*IYl AFR~AMATOMS ANP A CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet F RAMATOIME At4P Customer: FENOC Plant: Davis Besse n t: na Nozzle: 3 Procedure: 54-ISI-100-08 CA: FRA.02-002, DB-02-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (in.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 0 End of Noz. (In. 0.11 robe Seral No.'s: Ch I S0382CN Ch 6 Axial Scan Start -1.9, 36 Stop: 372, 11.47 Setup: 3 Ch 2 Ch 7 Files: B2058 07.30.36 Ch 3 Ch 8 Clrc. Scan Start Stop: Setup: Ch 4 Ch 9 Files: Ch 5 Ch 10 Flw burace Dept" End Point 1 End Point Z Axial AdJustea Circ. Extent Flaw Flaw Flaw Flaw -Flaw eld Location No. (IDIOD) to Mln Mln Max Max Total Min Max Total Length Angle TWD Aspect Orlentation @ Flaw Flaw Tip (In.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (In.) (deg.) (deg.) (In.) (in.) (deg.) (In.) Rato Mrn ax 1 au4 4.b_ U.3 AZ 40 0.3 .13 4.1Z 178 AXIAL

-- :r~ ~~~R5

~ ~ Zs 1 940 4 b YZ 1Z5 9492M 9- 05 1.251 177 -- AXIAL

__r_ OD 1.8Z lZff. -- TT4 138e9 1.3Z 1Z6.6 136.9 0.37 1.37 15 -A7TA=

4 D _ 1.21 1Y.0 4.J3 19 3.17 189.U 19Z 0.11 3.1 -A M

--- U 1.4b -34. 1 3.32 344AI 1.87 -- =7 rI 1 --. U 1 77 AXIrA 7__

D-ata Loc. OC bu 6U 90 1u 1 210 24U 27U 3UU 330 uegrees WELD Noz. Loc. 0 30 6U U 1ZU 15 1u Z1i Z4U 7 3W 3 Degrees NOZ. Enca 0.T 0.11 0.11 0.11 .1 1 1 U11 U11 0.1 01 01 1 0.11 inches PROFILE MAX -3:- 325 3.47 3765 9r 1u 4W u5 -3773 355 3T 3. 1 3Inches Notes:

MIN.

Adjusted

~~rnt -z'm-C rc. Extent is Z1 Z6 2-i87

~tBT -~~ziw- 35 2~~r~ - r Z.51 Z.71 F Z.671 reiative to ownlniii side ot nozzle;clockwise looking own.

r2~ ---- 2nrou-gn--ii*-

Z?.59 Z45 uis Z- Z r ugh-Wa Z.07 imension 1.Ub 1.8[ Inches comments: Iis is an axial naw below the weld region.

nis lnaw is not able to be tuiy cnaractenzed using the circ. blade probe. FUll characterization ot aiin aws in this nozzle will De perFormed using the top-down tool or axial blade probes. This report will be revised when adcitional data becomes avaiable.

AnaIyzed by: M. U. HacKer Date: Z/21/0Z Analyzed by: Date:

24

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 RQPRErRY FRAMATOME AP ii - i 'iiii2 ii - i lj;j ,; , '  ! 'C Nt-o I B3 a r i f I 1i I; la ~ -I- Cr ldDaa- --

I II~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10.0 0

= 1 l -R', 41 '-

.. ~~~~411 ---------

-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M 1 - - - ~ - I;;

7.5 . . . I . .

7 0 .......................................................................................

5.................... .......................................

0 a s . ...... .. ............ .... .... ........ ......... ................................... ................ .................... .............. ......................... .......... ..... ........

EU . .......... .. ......... ....... ... ................ ............... .............. .... ............................... ..... ................. ....... ...................................... ....

o4 5 .. ........................................... ..................... ....................... ............................... . .. . ....... ..............................................

40 --............................. . . ...........--........................

I S ~~~~~~~~~~lklV2iIU~~~~~~~~

4

,&... 42,..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.&.~~~~~. dM4, -- ..

,....y..4.. L...,..t..&L..Z I...-.., .. .U...4,.. . .. . - --

10 ......

I 7~~~~~~~~~~~~&5~~~~~~~~~~2

-:r~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ... .. ._5. ...... - - -- ---;--j-; _9 10 11

~~~~~4 2

12 .; . .... 13 14 15 16 j,,

t..3/4:14.,...... I j"' 7' 111 II-

-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1 3-4-5-6-7-8-9 - -- 1 - 122I 13 iZ I=  :

'1~~~ 1I' I - - , - 1 I 1 2 II~~~~~~~N-

-I I I -~~~~~~~~~~2

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 1 Y AFRAMATOMS ANP This scan provided the initial detection of flaws in the nozzle wall using the circ. blade probe. Leak Path patterns are observed in this image. Several axial flaws are detected starting below the weld and extending into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. Several flaws extend above the J-groove weld region.

Nozzle 3 Circ. Blade UT Data 26

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination AFIRAMATOME AMP February / March 2002 tFPRt&RY A CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet FRAMATOMM AMP Customer: FENOC Plant: Davis Besse anit: n/a Nozzle: 3 Procedure: 54-ISI-100-08 CA FRA-02-002, DB-02-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (In.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 150 End of Noz. (In. 30.75 . robe Sedal No.'s: Ch 1 2078-01002-OL Ch 6 2IGB-01002-45L Axial Scan Start -5 16 Stop: 360, 30.81 Setup: I Ch 2 21GF-01004-30L Ch 7 21GC-01001-55L Files: T2061_15.39.37 Ch 3 21GA-01004-45L Ch 8 22CD-01001-65L Circ. Scan Start 6, 20.3 Stop: 360, 30.88 Setup: 2 Ch 4 2623-01002-60S Ch 9 2624-01005-60S Files: T2061_14.09.39 Ch 5 2623-01002-60S Ch 10 2624-01005-60S Flaw Surface Depth End Point End Foint 2 Axial Adjusted Clrc. Extent Flaw Flaw Faw Flaw Flaw Weld Location No. (IDIOD) to Min MinM ax Max Total rilTn Max Toai Length Angle TWD Aspect Orientatlon @ Flaw Flaw Tip (in.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (deg.) (In.) (In.) (deg.) (in.) Ratio Mn ax ODVV0-Zw 1b1 .U -TU.D 1W.0 .08 U.1Z2 4.8 .65 0.16 AXIAL in Weld Region ODu 0.234 2ao71 z7s.0 29.19 260.0 1.12 12S.U 13Q.U Q.E .13 9 .4Z 0.37 AXIAL In vveld eglon 4 U 72.T 31.0 29.89 3.0 3.82 165.0 1E U.Q 0.3' 3.8 T -- T 06 0. -XIA in Weld Region

-TI-I

-I-Vata Loc. 1b0 5U 1 Z0¶ 240 4 Z7O 3* 330 ;36U u YO 1ZO

  • u egrees WELD Noz. OC. Z= Z 0 I2.

Z T51 U 0 *bu 2U0N uegrees Noz. End 0.75- M75 u.b U.5 3u7s 30.75 3075 3.75- 3u.75s 7 3 75- -U.75- 3/5 t Inches PROFILE MAX Z9W 08 ZY.0 Z9.UZ 8 70- Z8 zs.3 zs-3 28.: zs.3 2W80- 28. zs.o s.os Incnes tIeW C27:7r M 7 dN 223s. 7 2.b7 5 2700 2z1 7.4 z717 z7l.0 Z7.8t Inches Nos: Adjusted Urc. Extent is relat r e ownnhll side ot nozzle;1ockwise oKIng Jwn I s Inro ughWa Uimension Comments: inese are axial flaws that extend trom below the weld region into the weia region. iney were also detected With the circ. blade proDe.

Flaw # Z was identiled as an axial law using te circ. blade probe but is not confirmed with tne rotating Ui. iherefore, naw Mz is not relevant.

Analyzed by: k.c. Uebetsberger Date: :Vb/UZ Analyzed by: MAi. HacKer Date: 3/o10 27

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination AFRAMATOME ANP February / March 2002 Pl8PRIEFARY

4.r4 44 ^ -- . ^ .. R i SX .

4 4. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4 4, 4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ........

.- ,ii -  ! -

  • mi 4444 ' 4 - - "'
  1. - i

--- jj 4. 4 -.  ; s.z_m

-. i4 E, i_ -

i_>_s*;xoig4 EL.

4i .'

-: . :'  ;-  : - .4 0 4  ; 4 4

...7 4 0 4~~~~~~~~~~~~.. .. .. .. .. .

mi a- .a  : 4t,;.-- . i;-, i ..

. I. L".I I1 I I- ..I.I.. I... ... .. 4i4;.-m;-4'd--.

I 1 - 1. .... ,.1 4 ... .;w.1. -

. I -. I L. I II  ; I I .

I4 . .

I -------- -. 1~~~~~~~~~~~

... . 4'I.I .

25. -

,, 2565- t----------------------------- ..-....---------- --------------------- ------------------------------ I - ------------------.....----- --

c 28.5 26.0-Et 2.5- ----------------------------------------- ----

E 4------------ -------------------------- I---------

o 275

-5 280O

- 28.5 l......................

1--..---------------------------......................................................................................... .......------------------------------------...--. ...............................

29.0 ~~~~~~~ ----------- - .. ....

29X5~~~~ ~ .........~~~~ .- ~~ p- , !* - ~~ \

t~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~.7 7,O 777-. 7 7- 77  ;= 7 r- . . . ..-....... . .I .... .

300 305 .s - .r r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ... 84....a.44o444:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .........

4-=4 4 ' ij 0 2 ~~~~~*  ! . .

t,,r 3 -4

-6 -5 -7 N=. Erd~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~44~-

1 2 3..4.5..6........j... ....... 8 9 10 11.......12..~.13............14 15...........16...1..14 s. En

'7~ ~ ~ ~~~' t 28

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 1PR ff*4 APRAMATOME AN!'

0-, _.

This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial Indications detected using the circ. blade probe and provides elevation dimensions for repair activities. This scan also provides characterization of the region of the nozzle surrounding the location of the new ID temperbead weld to assure sound material for welding. Leak Path patterns are observed in this Image. Several axial flaws are detected starting below the weld and extending into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. Two of these flaws extend above the weld region.

Nozzle 3 Rotating UT, 0-deg. Data 29

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 F3REPRTTARV AFRAMATOME ANP Nozzle 3 Elevations 30

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 PRGPRtEF-ARW-A FRAMATOMC ANP Head OD @20.92" I1 Top of Weld 26.86j

p. ',  :.i. iV>B:9k'^ ;_ ' Ri.':

7-,

.' I 7^,

These areas are quite localized and are believed to be related to flow paths to the Head OD. The areas shown are on the tube OD and penetrate to a estimated maximum depth of 0.050".

Nozzle 3 Elevations 31

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 PROPRTEFT-ARY AFRAMATOME ANP This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial Indications detected using the circ. blade probe. This image is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed circumferentially. The B-scan and D-scan show the relative depths of the OD Initiated cracks. Several axial flaws are detected starting below the weld and extending Into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. At least two of the flaws extend above the J-groove weld region.

Nozzle 3 Rotating UT 60-deg. Data 32

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February March 2002 PRGR Y- FRAMATOME ANP This Image is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed crcumferentially. This Is a cross-sectional view of the nozzle wall using the 60-deg. shear wave transducer showing the relative angular position and the depths of the flaws.

Nozzle 3 Rotating UT, 60-deg. Data 33

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 FfI E A D FRAMATOME ANP APRJAMATOMME ANP CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet Customer: FENOC Pant: Davis Besse n t: A Nozzle: 5 Procedure: 54-lSi-100-08 CA FRA-02-002, DB-02-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (in.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 0 End of Noz. (in. 0.23 robe Seral No.'s: Ch I S0385CN Ch 6 Axial Scan Start -57, .6 Stop: 372, 10.13 Setup: 3 Ch 2 Ch 7 Flies: B2059_17.34.32 Ch 3 Ch 8 Circ. Scan Start Stop: Setup: Ch 4 Ch 9 Files: Ch Ch 10 Flaw Surface Depth End Point 1 End Point 2 Axial Adjusted Circ. Extent Flaw Fiaw Flaw Flaw Flaw Weld Locatlon No. (IDIOD) to Min Mln Max Max Total Mln Max Total Length Angle TWD Aspect Orientation @ Flaw Flaw Tip (in.) (dog.) (in.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (deg.) (in.) (in.) (dog.) (in.) Ratio Mln 1 liF

-D 1.37 308.u 2.1 310.0 0.81 3 310.0 0.07 0.811 5 - X -

-5T-

~8~ _ _ _ _

14 _

17 -- _--- ---- -

Data Loc.

  • ~~ ~~~~~~

"5~~~ ~~ 7 T5W it$ 47U z7O i~uW 3**W TDegrees WELD r oz. Loc. 5 Tu5- t5o 0 7Tu 240 2 5 . 0 6egrees NOZ. nd *W2W. .23

-U:23- 0.

U U.Z3 203 5Z3 U.Z3 U.Z Tu. UZ O3 U.2W Inches PROFILE Mt 33 3.U 3.Z6 3.41 3.6au 3.91 3.YY 3.87 3.76 .60- 344 3.U 3.U Inches MIN TCT 1.97 Z.01 2' Z.1Z 2.57

-2:.4 Z.644.7 Z.5 Z4 2.2 Z 1.97 inches Notes: Adjusted c. Ent is relative to downnill side otnozzle.clockwise looking gown.I is rough-Wa 1Dimension comments: This is an axial flaw below the weld region.

ThiS faw is not aoble to be tully characterized using the circ. blade prooe. Full charactenzation will be pertorned using the top-down tool or axial blade probes.

mis report will be revised when additional data becomes available.

Analyzed by: Date: Ana7yzed by: M.U.H-acker Date: 3/1/U 34

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 IkP tETtY FRAMATOAE ANP I w ~ ...

4F" .2 ...

4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...

7. 4.-

. . . . . . . .A.. . . . . . . . . .4 - ' '

7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.5 .......................................... ............................. ...................... ....... F............................

E4 5 ~~

~

.~ . . . . . . . . . . . .F . .F.. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .... . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .4.. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .

Z 5 ----------- .~4 -FF

. ...... F F ~ F' F-

4: F F -F F - F F, F F.F ~ F F F FF IF -FF F F- F

- -- - F

--- -- F- F F 0 5~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 F

. .. F F ......

F~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

....... ~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. .......

0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. F.: Y... ..

7 2 - 4 - 6 -

.5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Nz 8 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 35

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 RPRIWETAI A

FRAMATOME ANP This scan provided the Initial detection of a flaw In the nozzle wall using the circ. blade probe. Leak Path patterns are not observed In this Image. One axial flaw Is detected starting below the weld and extending Into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. This flaw does not extend above the J-groove weld.

Nozzle 5 Circ. Blade UT Data 36

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 I R AFRAMATOME ANP A

F:RAMATOMF ANP CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet Customer: FENOC - P ant: Davis Besse lUnit: N/A Nozzle: 5 Procedure: 54-ISI-100-08 CA:FRA-02-002, DB-02-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (in.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 320 End of Noz. (In. 30.75 robe Senal No.'s: Ch I 2078-01002-OL Ch 6 2IGB-01002-45L Axial Scan Start -4_16.11 Stop: 360. 30.78 Setup: I Ch 2 21GF-01004-30L Ch 7 21GC-01001-55L Files: T2061 18.30.12 Ch 3 21GA-0100445L Ch 8 22CD-01001-65L Circ. Scan Start -6, 19 Stop: 360, 29.41 Setup: 2 Ch 4 2623-01002-60S Ch 9 2624-01005-60S Files: T2061_16.53.38 Ch 5 2623-01002-60S Ch 10 2624-01005-60S Fi Surace Depth End Point 1 Lnd Point 2 Axial Adjusted Clrc. Extent Flaw Flaw FIlaw Flaw Faw Weld Location No. (IDIOD) to Mlin Mn Max M ax - Total Mln Max Total Length Angle TWD Aspect Orientation @ Flaw Flaw Tip (In.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (In.) (deg.) (deg.) (In.) (In.) (dog.) (In.) Ratio n ax

.D ~28 77~t.44 274.U- . . .-- .T7 771.0 -u. 1.25 6 0.46 0.36 AXIAL- n Weld egion -5s- Nata LOc. 3Z0 3 a - -T4- T70 *23 02 32 -egrees WELD Noz. Loc. 0O T5U 79 -DZ1 4- 270 3() 330 360 Uegrees Noz. E nd 3075750.75 75 30;75 3075 3.75 3075 30.75 3u.75 30.75 30.75 3U.75 3u.75 inches PROFILE MA ZY.10 29.07 Z9.07 28.91 28.73 28.6 208.5 28.40 28.46 28.67 289 2.96 29. inches MIN 27:- 789 -27.87- -.68 Z7.39 27.Z1 Z7.0 i737T.1 Z7.Z . Z7.91 Z7.90 Inches otes: Adjusted rc. xte is reTaT e to downhill side T nozzle; cockwise looking o l.1 is rough-Wal Dimenson Comments: This is an axial aw that extends into the weld region. This flaw was also detected sing the circ. blade probe.

Analyzed by: K. C. Gebetsberger Date: 31/Z Analyzed by: M.G.Hacker Date: 3isIoz 37

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A FebruaryI March 2002 PRlOPRIE&TAY FRAMATroMe AMP

'2Z .fl . A ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A'Af A ' A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A LAA L . . ... . A.. .. AL . . A A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

24 5

.- ... . ~~~~~~~~~A ..... .. ....

A

. . .A . . . . .A.. '... . . .. . .'A.. . . . . .L... . . -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -A- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -A-- - - - - -

21.1 ta 2&1 . ............................................................................................................... ........................................ ................ ................................

010All ..................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................

E-L 0 271 . ........................................................................................................................................... ........... ..................................................

a 2.11 ....................................................

0 .................................... ..................................................

2BLI . .................................................................................................... .....................................................................................................

0J--

.E All ................................................................................. . .. ................................................

29.0 - ----------------------- ............... - -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ...

29.11 ........... ............... . ....... ..................... ...................

301

.. 30.11.... -7; pp`e;"`e,;- TV:- - V.R!' gv 4V I , : ea.u 124; A '.A L...AL..,A..LL..

- j L .A . AWA A 2'AAAAA .'A. *

-'A.2.42 A)

A

[ A/ . "A A

AA A..AAA 1 .. LA,.

LA IAL

.A

.'A A

A - A A

'AA

-I

. ..A A

-- AA A'A .2* A .A .'.. "-.: A:QAA'AAA A, -242 .2 LA .A 1:2 -

A .'.. A .' 'A. :.AA.,,A...,. *. . A A ' ...

'AL A -

.-. 'A- - A-i; 'AA'AA A- A

- A . - ' A - -A; *A A - - - ..-

- .' 'A IA - - - - A. 'A - .. A - - - A A' - AA A A 2 -- A '2 ' -

- A A

-- A A - A - AA - A - ' -. - - A L AA A A 'A A, AAL I -)

A A A A AA A A L 'AA A A A A' A A' A 'A. 'ALAAAAAA L - 'AL A - - - ALA ,.A 'A AL LA-2 - AA *

- .AAA'AA'AAAA - A A A- AA AAA2A A A A, A A A A - AAA A A - A Al AA .AA A A A - A A A A A - L A A L A I - A A ' - -

A A A - A A - A A. A .AAA .AA 38

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 FR !lE,TW A

FRAMATOME ANP

.- ..,.I tF:

This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial Indication detected using the circ. blade probe and provides elevation dimensions for repair activities. This scan also provides characterization of the region of the nozzle surrounding the location of the new ID temperbead weld to assure sound material for welding. Leak Path pattems are not observed in this Image. One axial flaw is detected starting below the weld and extending Into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. This flaw has not yet breached the pressure boundary.

Nozzle 5 Rotating UT 0-deg. Data 39

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 99Q RA A

FRAMATOME ANP' Head OD @20.88"l I

Top of Weld @27.0" Nozzle 5 Elevations 40

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 -Q A

FRAMATOME ANP This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial Indications detected using the circ. blade probe. This image is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed circumferentially. The B-scan and D-scan show the relative depths of the OD initiated crack. One axial flaw is detected starting below the weld and extending into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle.

Nozzle 5 Rotating UT, 60-deg. Data 41

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 FRAMATOME AN P This Image is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed circumferentially. This is a cross-sectional view of the nozzle wall using the 60-deg. shear wave transducer showing the relative angular position and the depths of the flaws.

Nozzle 5 Rotating UT, 60-deg. Data 42

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 l ' F FRAMATOME ANP FmRAMATOME ANP CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet Customer. FENOC IPlant Davis Besse Unit NJA Nozzle: 47 Procedure: 54-ISI-100-08 CA FRA.02-002, DB02-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (in.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 0 End of Noz. (In. 0.1 robe Seil No.'s: Ch I S0382CN Ch 6 Axial Scan Start -3.08 .35 Stop: 373.10, 11.44 Setup: 3 Ch 2 Ch 7 Files: B2058 21.22.49 ;B2058_22.13.59; B2058 22.46.12 Ch 3 Ch 8 Circ. Scan Start_ Stop: Setup: Ch 4 Ch 9 Files: Ch 5 Ch 10 Fliw Surtace Depth End Point 1 End Point 2 Axial Adjusted Circ. Extent Faw Flaw Flaw Flaw Flaw Weld Location No. (DIOD) to min min Max Max Total M inMax ToIt Length Angle TWD Aspect Orientation @ Flaw Flaw Tip (in.) (deg.) (n.) (deg.) (n.) (deg) (dog.) (In.) pn.) (deg.) (In.) Ratio 2ln ax 1 WU 1.06 9.5 4 22 13 . 12.Z 10 1.35 4 AXIAL uu 1.61 Z34 Z9 24.2 2.4 -

OD Z5 337-.45.9 1.54 33.7 45.9 0.43 .6 16 - ArA 4 __ 1.76 5U.U Z 1 5.9 0.25 56.0 50.9 0 . 1 -X 4 IAL

TT -

== __-___ ___

- - --- _ -- -_ -_==

17 -)t -oc - - -71 -6 _~H WELD N az L o O c 30 60 90 15 18) 2U 1 Z70" 30 33 360-- -_Ugree Na. n 0.fW U.1U .10 0.10 Ur -rw1U 0.10 ~Iu- 0.10 0.10 0.10 -u 01 Inhe PROFILE MA Z.3 26 412 5.0

&W 6.4 679 681-6.63 5.67 4.59 3.73 3.24 Z93 Ihe MIN 1.3 1.4 2.3 301 373 4Z 4.3 3.8 3.Z Z5 1.7 158 1.3 Inhe Notsc Adjusted Cr. xtr is relatieto daMfhl side xf noze lcws okn N.ID Is uir sThWai L)mns X Comments: These flaws are axial in the weld region.- -

I e awsarenot able o bey aractenze usingth circ. a . ul characerizatlon otal aws in isnoszzlewil bepelre using tdown o to or axial blade probes. lhis report will be revised when additional data becomes aeiabie.

Analyzed by: r;E Martin Date: VZ8/0Z Analyzed by: Date:

43

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 PRO?NtIRMZ AFRAMATOME ANP ft ft ft ft ft F ft ft ft ftftft ft ftft F ft F ftftft'ftft ft F ft F ft ft ft F ft F' ft ft ft ft ft ftft Fft ftft ft F F ft '<ft. ft F ft ft ft ftF F F F F ft ft F ftF ftFft ft ft ft ft '- F ft ft 'ft ft F ft ft ft ft ft ft F ft F ft ft~~~~~~~~~~~L ft ft F F ft - ft ft ft ft F ft ftft Fftftft ft F ft F ft ft ft ft ft. ft ft I

ft ft'-ftF ft ft F ft ft

'ft ftft ft ft ft ft tf~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~T ft f4 ft ft

-F F '- f t ft'- ft ft ft ft -'-

4 ft ft F' ftft ft

-ft ft 4ftft.ftftwftft ft F.ftftftftftftftftftftAftftftftft.ftftftftft ft 'ft

.ft.ft.t.

1 I ft ft ftftftftftftF.ftftSF.44ftftftftft4ftft4ftft'-F#PftFFftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftFftft FF ftftF ft ft ftftft'ft'Fftftftftftftft'ftft.ftftft.ft.ftftftft-'-ft'ftft- I I

ft F Z:

7 7f 7 -t-

-77 ... ........ ... --*- --- --ft. ' I:, ...+1.

7.0 Z 6.0 o I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ----- -

c ao 20

........ ..... .. . .... .. .. . .. .Ff. ...... ...... ...... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ...... ...... ...... ' ..... ' ...... . ft-...... ......-

... .. .. ... .. F

. F F----- - --------- F --- --------- ---------

S 25l10 C) 5ao 1.5 I l*IJ .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ft ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ F.......

ao~~~~~~~ 1:m' l 1 F ft 0 2904 5 - 7 8 9 - 1813 0 1 1 210 360f16tfNt 44

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination AFRAMArOME ANP February I March 2002 FMUPRTW This scan provided the initial detection of axial flaws In the nozzle wall using the circ. blade probe. Leak Path patterns are not observed in this Image. The flaws are detected starting below the weld and extending into the Jgroove weld region of the nozzle. The rotating UT determined that this area only contained one axial flaw.

Nozzle 47 Circ. Blade UT Data 45

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination

,February / March 2002 13or FRAMATOME ANP 1RRAM^T0MP A4P CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet Customer: FENOC IPlant: Davis Besse lUnit: N/A Nozzle: 47 Procedure: 54-ISI-100-08 CA FRA.02-002, DBM02-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (in.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 143 End of Noz. (In. 45.9 robe Seral No.'s: Ch 1 2078-01002-OL Ch 6 2IGB-01002-45L Axial Scan Start -6, 29.9 Stop: 360,45.9 Setup: 1 Ch 2 21GF-01004-30L Ch 7 21GC-01001-55L Files: T2062_01.40.41 Ch 3 21GA-01004-45L Ch 8 22CD-01001-65L Clrc. Scan Start: -6, 34 Stop: 360,46 Setup: 2 Ch 4 2623-01002-60S Ch 9 2624-01005-60S Files: T2062 23.53.48 Ch 5 2623-01002-60S Ch 10 2624-01005-60S Fiaw uce Depth End Point 1 End Point 2 Axial Adjusted Circ. Extent IFlaw Flaw Flaw Flaw Flaw Weld Location No. (DIOD) to Min Min Max Max Total Miln MIax Total Length Angle TWD Aspect Orientation @ Flaw Flaw Tip (in.) (deg.) fin.) (deg.) (in.) (deg.) (deg.) (in.) (in.) (deg.) (In.) Ratio ln ax T OD 0.09 3 , Z 21.0 1.77 5.30 Q74 1.9 Z- 23 0.59 0.31 AXIA In Weld egion

-7Z-11 Data Loc. 143 173 2 Z3 Z6 Z3 3Z3353 Z3 53 83 1 143 Degnees WELD Noz. Loc. 30 6 0- 90 120 178 Z 0 0Z0 3 W uegrees Noz.End 45.90 45.90-745.9 45.90 5.90 -45.9 45.90 45.UU 45.90 45.90 45.U 45.U0 45.90 Inches PROFILE MAX - 444 44.58 44P10 43.40 4Z.tf7 4Z.1 41.75 4-4 4Z.58 43.31 4.01 44.42 44.48 Inches IMIN. 43.10 MC)9 4Z.4Z 41.49 40Z.54 MM 39.39 39.49 40.19 J-4T.41 4Z.383 4.9 43.10- nches Notes Adjusled Crc.Eenr is relatie to ownnll side ot nozzle;clockwse looking oown. iu is ThroughWa, imens n Comments: Flaw #3 is an axial flaw that extends into the weld region. his Daw was also detected with the circ. blade probe.

Flaws #1 and #2 were identified with the circ. blade probe but were determined not to be walid detections with the rotating Lt. Nozzle ovality in the location of these indications is the source of these alse indications. Flaw 04 was detected with the rotating U I but it s located in the J-groov weld fillet and outside the nozzle wall and is theretore outside the scope of this procedure.

Analyzed by: K. C. Uebetsberger Date: 3141UZ Analyzed by: M. U. Hacker Date: 31410Z 46

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 =

AFRAMATOME ANP

- .- - -.-- - I i. -.1-1-11.1--.11 - 11.1 w 94 .9 99 9999  :.9:1.9.9.9' - 99 O.9.9 .9 .9 .9 -

99 U -

9 -

.<..I Nozzle47 PrpfHe 9

- 999 99 1/4 -

-" - - 9 ,9 Iflnj1fltanW51tS .9 99 9 - 9999 -

- - 9. 9 - - - 9 - , . 9 . - ..

... -- . . . . . . . 4

- 9 - - .9 9 9 9 -. 9 9 9

- 9 99,9 99 99999 9, 99 99< 99. .9 999 9 .9 9 9999 9 99999 9 9 99 99 999.99 99 9 9.9 .9 999 , 99 9 99 9 9.99.9 9

9 .99 9 9 ,99 99.9, 9999 9 .9 .9.99.9 99 97 T .9 9 t 9 .9 ..

.999 9 9 99 - 9 9.9 . 9* 9

.9..9. 9 9999\99.9.9 9 99 9 SQ- 9 9999 ti8O<9 99Th. 99 9 99

-99

-270 99 9 99 99-9.9, 9

999360 99 9 9

36,0, 9 9 9 . 9 1 9 99 9 999 9 1

999 9 ,-

99 999 f9 99 99J 9 [99.9 99 . 9

-r .9 999 .9.999999 -- 94 .99- 9 t9 9 -

. L.= -= -; g >S.~~~~~- ..,:,  :;XE

,-tr-~~57 t;-- 77

!'.0:

37:5 r .: s ~~~~~ ^ ^ - e t ~~~. ,; ........................................... ...-....

3&0 385 ___ ___ _ ~~~~~~....... .....__g..... . ___........

39.0

______ _ .., vj/_ .... _ .........~~.......

39.5 S

C 40.0

'U

~~~~~~~~~~~~~. . ... .. .... .. . . ... ... .. ... .__

LL 40.5 ..-..

E 41.0 a 41.5 S

-5 420 425 -------- -- - - - -- - ------- --- -- - - ... -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- v 43.0 435 t 44.0 44 5 99999999 l9 . ~ 9 9 9. 9.. . ..... ..........

460

.... ~ ...... ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9~~9.

.. .......9 XY ~

. 7 h. >

19- - 4 5 6 8 10 192 1 - 499 16 Nz.Ed

~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

......... .. 9 .

47

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 F R AFRAMATOME ANP This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial Indication detected using the circ. blade probe and provides elevation dimensions for repair activities. This scan also provides characterization of the region of the nozzle surrounding the location of the new ID temperbead weld to assure sound material for welding. Leak Path patterns are not observed In this Image. One axial flaw is detected starting below the weld and extending into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. This flaw has not yet breached the pressure boundary.

Nozzle 47 Rotating UT, 0-deg. Data 48

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 P A

FRAMATOME ANP Head OD @32.57 l 71 ImmouLl Top of Weld@ 39.3w

. 1- . - Iw r -

Nozzle 47 Elevations 49

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February I March 2002 PP,R3RR APRAMATOME ANP 1[

This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial indications detected using the circ. blade probe. This image Is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed circumferentially. The B-scan and D-scan show the relative depths of the OD Initiated crack. One axial flaw is detected starting below the weld and extending into the J-groove weld region of the nozzle.

Nozzle 47 Rotating UT, 60-deg. Data 50

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 P R4EUAY A

FRAMATOME ANP This Image Is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed crcumferentially. This is a cross-sectional view of the nozzle wall using the 60-deg. shear wave transducer showing the relative angular position and the depths of the flaws.

Nozzle 47 Rotating UT, 60-deg. Data 51

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 tFtJR AFRAMATOME ANP A CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet FRAMATOMLr AMP Customer: FENOC IPlant Davis Besse . Unit ri/a Nozzle: 58 Procedure: 54ISI-100-08 CA FRA.02-002, DB-02-012 Nozzle Dimensions: (In.) ID: 2.765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 0 End of Noz. (In. 0.14 - robe Sedle No.'s: Ch I S0319CN Ch 6 Axial Scan Start -1, 6 Stop: 370, 11.4 Setup: 3 Ch 2 Ch 7 Files: B2059_05.56.14 Ch 3 Ch 8 Circ. Scan Start Stop: Setup: Ch 4 Ch 9 Files: Ch 5 Ch 10o Haw Surrace Depth En Point1 End Polnt 2 AXial Adjusted Circ. Extent Fiaw Filaw iaw 7iaw Flaw velc Location No. (IDIOD) to Min Min Max Max Total *Min Max Length Angle TWD Aspect Orientation @ Flaw Flaw Tip (in.) (deg.) (In.) (deg.) (In.) (deg.) (deg.) (in.) (In.) (deg.) (in.) Ratio Min Max

~~1.02 8 ZC 2'E -- 6 -7.M 1. § --- 67. 0.1; 1.54 41. AXIAL

-7 ____ -wTr Uata Loc. u 3U i YU 1 5IUU 21U 40 27 3 0 Degrees WELD NOZ. Loc U W . U9 l0 150 u8 ZU4 -U7U -3W 30W 3Uegrees Nof.-nf -tnar U. 14 U.14n1 U. 14 nT;r 142F QTw 14 U.1 1n14U.1Q14 U.1hce PROFILE MAX Z Z 5 3.6u4 4.60 7U5 5.8U 55 4 Z8 .73 3. 6 Y incnes MN 4T Z1 Z9 375 45 5 t 31W 157 1.4 .ncnes i7U NOteS: Adjusted Crcir tr Is reIaMIe to downiii sle oFnozzle;ulockwis0CV R cwn=. VU Is hi-Wa loking rI mension Comments This is an axial Haw below the weld region.

ITis flaw is not able to be Illy characterized using the circ. blade probe. Full characterization or all flaws in this nozzle will be pertormeid using the top-down tool or axial blade probes. I his repot will be revised when additional data becomes a'failable.

Analyzed by: K. C. (.ebetsDerger Date: ZIZ81UZ Analyzecd Dy: Date:

52

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination Ar-RAMATOME AMP February / March 2002 aR E 44444 44 4 - F - 4.,

- 4 - - 4 *44 4 -

4. - -4. - - .4 it. i "44

- 44 K.. -

100 I -, -

nFl 4 4 4 %44 ,. - 4 - '444

-- A 9.0 III, - I 8.5 -----.-.--. -" -"

8.0 --.

494

.. ::.; .: r.- j -!

, ....: V, . . .11
i .
:. 4,

. . .:.1 I.; ..... . . . . . . . .. .

-I.

7.0 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

a5 ....................... ------


1-11,..........

6a5 . ......... I................................................... ................ -- .................................... ......... ..................................................

c w 5.0 . .........- ...................................... ............................. ................. ............... . ............................................. ....

E 5 . ........................................ ........... ....................... a- .......... ...................................

s4O ------- .............. ---------- ................. ............... ....... ............. ... ................................

'c Z o. . Z-' ........

-1 5

- 2 3- - 64 - - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 1 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 Noz~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

4 53

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination AFRAMATOME ANP February / March 2002 ROIRKIEIART This scan provided the Initial detection of an axial flaw in the nozzle wall using the circ. blade probe. Leak Path patterns are not observed in this image. The flaw is detected starting below the weld and extending up to the J-groove weld region of the nozzle. The rotating UT determined that this area did not contain any flaws. The indication was determined to be non-relevant caused by nozzle ovality interfering with probe contact.

Nozzle 58 Circ. Blade UT Data 54

4.

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 PRUPl AFRAMATOME ANP A

FRAMATOME ANP CRDM Nozzle Ultrasonic Examination Data Sheet Customer. FENOC Plant Davis Besse jUnit n/a Nozzle: 58 Procedure: 54-1SI-100408 CA; FRA.02-002, DB-02-012 Nozzle Dinmnsions: (in.) ID: 2765 OD: 4.06 Thickness: 0.649 Downhill Side of Nozzle (deg.): 109 End of Noz. (n. 48.11 obe Sedial No.'s: Ch I 2078-01002OL Ch 6 21GB-0100245L Axial Scan Start -5,31.85 Stop: 365, 48.65 Setup: I Ch 2 21GF-0100430L Ch 7 2IGC.01001-55L Fifes: T2061_20.48.11 Ch 3 21GA-01004-45L Ch 8 22CD-01001465L Circ. Scan Start -,36 Stop: 366,48 Setup: 2 Ch 4 26231002-OOS Ch 9 2824-010056S Files: T2061_21.47.33 Ch 5 2623-01002-60S Ch 10 2624-01005-60S Flaw SurFace Depti id Point End Point 2 Axial Adjusted Cirm Extent Flaw Flaw iaw Flaw Flaw Weld Location No. (DIOD) to 1Nin Wi n Iax MaxM Total ix r Length Angle WD Aspect Orientatlon @ Flaw Flaw Tip (n.) (dog.) in.) (dog.) fim) (dog.) (deg.) In.) On.) (deg.) in.) Ratio _i_ n Max m eocai Ind

-w - --

I I _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~hf

-w~~~19-E - -- 1.1- -T -Tr - 7r-. --4W - - -4.f iih PROFILE -eC- - - - - - Inches Notes:A louted titx is reai%t 11 side otnzi;COKs lookin Ma. Uis IFWVtQIi-W Dmnion Comments: [Nls examiniation was perfied to charaternze an axial incication detected below the weld with the Ciro. Bladce probe.

Tis lew is niot conlnmed ith any of the transduers used with the top-dawn tool and teeore the dication detected with the blade probe is conisidered non-re%ent.

Analyzed by: K. U.Uiebetsberge Date: af4VP2 Analyzed by: M. U.Hacker Dat: l4L, 55

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 FROPRIETA AFRAMATOME ANt' I 1. *: -I This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial indication detected using the circ. blade probe and provides elevation dimensions for repair activities. Leak Path patterns are not observed in this Image. The Indication detected with the Circ. blade probe Is not detected with any of the 10 transducers used with the rotating UT.

Nozzle 58 Rotating UT, 0-deg. Data 56

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 P i E9AR AFRAMATOCME ANP This scan provides more comprehensive characterization of the axial Indications detected using the circ. blade probe. This Image Is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed circumferentially. All views with all transducers show the absence of signals that can be correlated with the blade UT results. Therefore the indication detected with blade probe is considered non-relevant.

Nozzle 58 Rotating UT, 60-deg. Data 57

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 A

FRAMATOME ANP This Image Is from one of the 60-deg. shear wave transducers with the beam directed circumferentially. This Is a cross-sectional view of the nozzle wall using the 60-deg. shear wave transducer. Note that there are no flaw signals observed.

Nozzle 58 Rotating UT 60-deg. Data 58

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February I March 2002 FRAtA4ATOME ANP Calibration Data for Circ. Blade Pu C UliLb S 5 hE ~lt

- A' A'

.... .. P d.hoiiain-,=xz

'TB 3ATIl GUIlD~~F2 ig~~~~~~~ZS.

59

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination 4FRTUFTR2WIP(

A February / March 2002 FRAMATOME ANP Calibration Data for Top-Down Axial Beams FilN1e H:die;toiion 1XtAP8Th tO

.IsaAYsUntta' Ct

$A&fiXISutm,~) Z1486 290 INDX.,AXS(mmx . ItAC -5 00 365 00)

Caii~b&m(dB) 2 ,

4-LS- ; 42 SYNDiCHODE) 'S2O0(cvtWits) I 60

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February l March 2002 O - FRAMATOME ANP

, sXSL ~N~ t X " S:'t Y ' t;l'Y Ptj: t ) .SX s -

214./.o.0 r, 1 OW460 Er I -~~~~LJ ~~~t. p W;;0 .;ii :;..00

.1twS ls n,s;,(i jtz* S0s Ai lide  ? I §U1if;N '

Gae Du)  : i1dwu)I iL ' 1-]y *t.=;tai12n t;t ':4tY.satEi 61

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February I March 2002 FRAMATOME ANP se 1 ~~4 10 S 03X

,, . '  : g 4 t ' ' ' ' >.x< 2E 1>' X .'t'

7

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 0i0.,

j 4}..Y ' mYtŽIr.7 . - L.L . caz, A.Q

'~~~~~~~~~A.

>'x i'J O~~~~~SUtto Paa'eer(00 H -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "11I1:`I,- " , ,,

62

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February/ March 2002 e 2 FRAMATOME ANP Calibration Data for Top-Down Circ. Beams

. Oe-zsACEd Be jId(

t. Loa..or;eco m) - ii ehad(..) -.2 . epth( ,,;)

229t t 80 0.300-->;> F

~~~7:

2.8Q-.27ilt2XEt1.i3ne &46OlSa-- - l 1..L ______ I I ltZ.J. LP 5 >42 - d! - 50!

X.' cq ito Paate( oco

- rqanSIi" 00'~Cb~~oe:Da

'K, " " ' '~, o6,0)<-'.~ ~: - ,

Fr -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

63

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination A February / March 2002 - FRAMATOME ANP feU o .' bar.i" i.:S: C a X  : fi:

GMh Oftetdb)

'~ > ,, 0rz

~ CaF;l;t >l 1t aih+/-:23e a&'29 ".%

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IVp

-S~~~~~~~~~~~~-~

4 0 0 0000 (4 1~~~~~~~~t1

""<t><' .,cq4u;itj'rmeter*060j.' ilM

>tqunc(W') 0 ai Node Dual 300 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~00' g-' Catis i i jela is) t4fS M4d isiS S -,' -E ,,.,i., xi

>N--g E ~~~~~~Dt Editorj 3' " 4't 3 . I-.ff,,,stzj! _ i fl i' X,i.'.;S~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ .'-' -'.

'4 4" .

&thtflt<0Z 5Z'$0Zj' "

LealncuS)' 'fuhi(F) DpMn 64

Davis Besse CRDM Nozzle Examination February / March 2002 -

AFRAMATOME ANP 65