ML031320693
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| ML031320693 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch, Saint Lucie, Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 05/06/2003 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2003-0189 | |
| Download: ML031320693 (2) | |
Text
Endangered Species Meeting withth,VWS
- 1. License Renewal Overview Tappert/ why and what are we doing for T&E species
- 2. Hatch Dredging issue Details on effort Relationship to license renewal COE - our position relative to lead agency Precedent in this area Shortnose Sturgeon Issue Flow rates-river v plant seasonal variation - relationship to SNS What we know from other nearby populations Historical record at plant Life history data from river Collection of additional data Licensee commitment to SNS See no nexus between plant and population that leads to more study Our BA
- 2. Terms and Conditions Issue Cooperative effort - recognize they are expert in biology and species conservation - we are experts in writing requirements and getting licensees to comply with requirements Why can not we work together on development of Terms and Conditions of IT statement?
Suggest - we propose in our BA/ have meeting to discuss/ they run draft T&C past us to review/ we provide comments/NMFS issues BO Standardized Terms and Conditions for Power Reactors General comments on T&Cs Why absolute numerical limits? Why not just on causually related mortality?
No more "greater than or equal to" Basis for the "approach limit" notification? Why does it require a prompt report?
Why not a standard set of requirements - on our way with Crystal River
- 3. General Comments Agency POC for SERO Periodic (every 2 years?) Review of plants and issues
- 4. Crystal River Licensee comments on BO Approach limits Limits on total number of incidental take
Use of NRC suggested T and C
- 5. St. Lucie Input for letter review for facility Information on turtle mortalities for CY2001 Net improvements Security issue