ML030300506

Consolidated License Application for Framatome Anp, Inc, Model 51032-1 Shipping Container, Table of Contents - Appendix IV, Page IV-63

ML030300506
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River, 07106581
Issue date:	01/17/2003
From:	Jennifer Davis Framatome ANP
To:	John Monninger Framatome ANP, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
-RFPFR, JKD:03:002 EMF-52, Rev 7
Download: ML030300506 (193)

Text

4r:ý,

APPENDIX V PACKAGE COMPONENT EVALUATIONS li )

V-1 XN-52, 'Rev, 1 APPENDIX V PACKAGE COMPONENT EVALUATIONS The Model 51032-la package includes design changes to assure that the main shock mount bolts yield and dissipate energy in any drop configuration, except for a drop in the normal upright configuration which is the least subject to failure potential. Clearances between the assembled strongback and the containment vessel are about two and one-half inches and may limit the combined distortion of bolts, full-clamps and shock mounts. The static tensile tests result in shock mount bolt failure at about 1.7 inches of bolt distortion, which is sufficient for the desired energy dissipation. When the bolts are loaded transverse to the shock mount, the net distortion at failure, including bolt and mount, is about 3.2 inches in static tests.

To assure that the distortion occurs in the shock mount bolts, other bolts which could fail and relieve the stress on the shock mounts have been strengthened. These have also been tested stat ically to verify that their strength exceeds that of the shock mount bolts.

Full-clamp assemblies consist of 2-1/2 x 2-1/2 x 1/2 inch angle bars which span the strongback, clamping to its lip, and sliding clamps which bolt to the angle bars and hold the fuel elements in the corners of the strongback (see Figure 2.17). These full-clamps were strengthened, by about a factor of three, relative to the drop-tested package to assure that they retain the fuel elements within the strongback during the time required to distort and fail

( the shock mount bolts. In the drop-tested package, abrupt failure

V-2 XN-52, Rev. 1 of the shock mount'bolts protected the full clamps until they impacted the cover. To assure this same failure mode in the Model 51032-la container, even though dynamic loads could result in shock mount bolt failures before the clamp distortion is excessive even if the clamp were the weak link statically, static tests were made to show that the full clamps are, in fact, stronger than the shock mount bolts.

The separator blocks and their attaching bolts have been strengthened to provide at least 23% more strength than those in the Model 51032-1 packages. This increased strength, whep eight separator blocks are employed with Type AA fuel elements, assures that the strength of the separator blocks per unit weight of the contents is equivalent to t6e Model 51032-1 package. To obtain the increased strength, a gusset plate has been added to the block and the carbon steel bolts have been replaced by grade 8 bolts, which have a shear strength of 90,000 psi as compared to 38,400 psi for the previously used bolts. New washers have also been provided to prevent the bolts from tearing out of the strongback.

Aluminum honeycomb energy absorbing material has been added at the strongback ends to absorb energy in the end-drop configuration.

The purchase order specified that the strength shall be between 1200 and 1500 psi. The manufacturer has provided test data on the actual material which gave an average strength of 1310 psi up to 80% compression.

The influence of dynamic loading conditions on component performance is discussed in Section V.6.

V.1 Shock Mount and Bolt Response in End-Drop Configurations Two different static tests of the shock mount and stain less steel bolt behavior have been conducted for designs

V-3 XN-52, Rev. I wp similar to the one selected. The first was with a stock 304 SS 5/8 inch diameter bolt with no undercut. The second was with a 304 SS 3/4 inch diameter bolt undercut toO.6 inch diameter over a 4 inch length to improve the tensile properties for the cover-drop accident. The loading for both tests was prototypical for an end-drop.

The head-end of the bolt was forced to move in a straight line perpendicular to the bolt axis. This shear loading leadsto distortion of the shock mount and bending of the bolt. The mid-section tends to be supported by the shock mount and the most severe stresses are at the two ends.

I The first test was carried to bolt failure when the head end had been moved 3.255 inches and the loading was 24,000 pounds. Failure occurred at the nut end in a thread root. The-second-test was taken to the 30,000 pound limit of the testing machine when the deflection was 2.6 inches. There was no indication of approach to failure and it was predicted that the ultimate joint strength would again be determined by the thread-root strength which scales up to 35,000 lb based upon the experience with the 5/8 inch bolt. The expected bolt head movement at, failure would have been'equal to the 3.25 inches in the first test, or greater if the reduced section were to develop significant elongation.

To provide greater assurance that the shock mount bolt is the weakest link in a cover-drop, the undercut diameter was reduced to 0.43 inches. This reduces the tensile strength to 1/2 the 0.6 inch diameter strength. Since the strength in the transverse loading in end drops was not limited by the undercut to 0.6 inch, the reduction to 0.43 inch will not reduce the strength by as much as a factor of 2. Furthermore, the bolt head movement will be

V-4 XN-52, Rev..1 enhanced since the undercut section must certainly elong ate at the reduced strength. It is conservative, there fore, to assume that the load at failure will be at least 16,500 lb, the head movement at failure at least 3.2 inches and the energy absorption at least 1/2 that of the extrapolated energy absorption obtained in the second test.

The force-deflection curve for the second test with the undercut 3/4 inch diameter bolt is shown in Figure V.M, with the extrapolation beyond the- test machine limit shown as a dotted line. In this test, the mount was fastened with the four 3/8 inch bolts used to fasten the mount to the shipping container. The test determined, as desired, that these bolts provide a stronger link than the stainless steel shock mount bolts.

V.2 Shock Mount Bolt Response in a Cover Drop In a cover drop the shock mount bolts are in tension and the shock mount itself is put in compression. In static tests the mount is not expected to provide significant energy dissipation and was not included in the tests.

The bolts, however, yield plastically and have been tested in the Tinius-Olsen machine.

A standard Type 304L SS bolt, machined down to 0.6 inch diameter over a four inch length, was tested to failure.

The test gave a 42 percent elongation at a failure tensile strength of 27,000 pounds. The average energy dissipation was 25,000 in.-lbs. per inch of deformation of the 0.6 inch diameter portion of the bolt length. This provides 48,000 ft.-lbs. of energy absorption in the set of 14

V-5 XN-52, Rev. 1 shock mount bolts. The stress-strain curve for this bolt is given in Figure V.2.

The bolts actually used in the shock mount are undercut to 0.43 inch diameter over a four inch length. The expected elongation at failure is the same as in the test and the energy absorption is 24,000 ft.-lbs.

In a similar test of 5/8 inch low carbon steel bolts used in the Model 51032-1 package, the shock mount bolt energy absorption capability was found to be less than 4,000 ft.-lbs. for all 14 bolts. Thus, the Model 51032-la package with 14 shock mounts dissipates at least an additional 20,000 ft.-lbs. in bolt distortion.

V.3 Combined Energy Dissipation of the Shock Mount Bolts, Aluminum H6neycomb, Strongback Extension, and Fuel Element Nozzles in End Drops Tests described in Section V.1 on the shock mounts define the energy dissipation in those assembles. At the strongback ends, aluminum honeycomb has been added which has a compressive strength (1310 psi) and area designed to absorb at minimum of 129,000 ft.-lbs. of energy. As the strongback and its contents move toward the container end, this material compresses and dissipates energy while the shock mount bolts are deformed.

As designed, there is a one-half inch clearance between the honeycomb and the containment vessel. When the container impacts the ground, the end may,be pushed in sufficiently to close this gap. In drop tests of the 9 Model 51032-1 package, the end did not appear to be pushed in any more than that. The performance of the

V-6 XN-52, Rev. 1 honeycomb is not sensitive to this uncertainty and is described here assuming that the gap is closed only by relative motion between strongback and container.

The'two ends of the shipping package differ in honeycomb absorber design because at the fuel element nozzle end the nozzle projects two inches into the honeycomb. The honeycomb is cut back in that area and additionally cut back to facilitate assembly. The design is shown in i

N Figure 2.20. As the strongback and fuel elements move forward, the nozzle impails into thehoneycomb and it is assumed that the honeycomb area interior to the nozzle is unavailable for energy dissipation. Crushing of the raised section of honeycomb material begins when the 1/2 inch clearance gap is closed. The area of the raised section is 135 in 2 and begins crushing first. With the exception of the nozzle area, the depressed section begins to compress when the strongback has moved an additional 2.25 inches toward the container end. The depressed area crushed is 77 in 2. The honeycomb thick ness is 7.75 inches in the raised area and 5.625 inches in the'depressed area.

The manufacturer has provided test data on the production run for the honeycomb which shows that the honeycomb will crush 80% with an average force of 1310 psi. The energy absorption capability is therefore:

E = 1310 x 0.8 x [7.75 x 135 + 5.625 x 77} = 1,550,000 in-lb E = 120,000 ft-lb

I V-7 XN-52, Rev. 1 There is a 2.5 inch extension of the sides at the strong back beyond the thrust plate. This-will strikethe container end 1 inch before the honeycomb is fully com pressed. The crushing strength is calculated to be.

225,000 lb and it can, therefore, add 19,000 ft-lb of energy dissipation. o:The fuel element nozzle would strike the end 1/2 inch before the honeycomb is fully compressed, although the energy balance indicates that the strongback would be stopped before that point. If not, the combined crushing 'strength of-the two nozzles is 500,000 pounds of force and could add 20,000 foot pounds oflenergy dissipation in 1/2 inch of crushing. ,

The combined stopping force versus relative strongback container displacement due to shock mount bolts, honey comb, strongback extension and fuel element nozzles is presented in Figure V.3. In this figure the sloping lines show the increase in stopping force as the bolts and shock mounts yield. The step down at 3.25 inches is due to the failure of the bolts. The first step up at 0.5 inch occurs at gap closure as the raised section of honeycomb begins to crush., The second step up at 2.75 inches occurs as the depressed section of honeycomb begins to crush. The third step up at 5.75 inches is where the strongback extension begins crushing and the final step at 6.25 Ainches results when the fuel element nozzles begin to crush. -The arrow at 6.2 inches, however, indicates that the kinetic energy is dissipated at that point and the last step due to crushing of the nozzles should not occur.

The situation at the other end of the container is much more simple. The full 300 in 2 of the honeycomb area

V-8 XN-52, Rev. 1 crushes uniformly and has a restraining force of 400,000 lb. Complete compression from 8.25 inch thickness to 1.65 inch thickness could absorb 220,000 ft-lb of energy.

Since the shock mounts provide 30,000 ft-lbs and the total needed is only 159,000 ft-lbs, the honeycomb will only crush 4 inches. The strongback will not reach the container end and will not crush.

V.4 Integrity of the Full Clamps A lower limit for the strength of the full clamps was determined by loading one in a near prototypical manner on the Tinius-Olsen testing machine. Preliminary tests demonstrated that small design changes would greatly improve the performance and, therefore, part no. '5 of Figure 2.17 was replaced by a similar part 3/4 inch thick and 2 1/2 x 4 inches. This provides 4 inches of bearing',

length on the lip of the strongback. The bolts for the sliding clamp have been replaced by similar but high strength grade 8 bolts with 150,000 psi ultimate strength.

In the final test the 2 1/2 x 2 1/2 x 1/2 inch angle bar began yielding at 17,000 pounds force and was bent 1 inch at 23,000 pounds force. At that point there was some slippage in the test jig linkage and the bolts, part 10 of Figure 2.17 appeared near to failure. The test was run with a weaker SAE grade 2 bolt rather than the specified grade 8. Because the test had demonstrated sufficient strength the test was terminated prior to failure. The total deflection of the beam resulting from combined beam bending, bolt distortion, clamp distortion, and strong back lip distortion was 2.3 inches.' The distortion at 23,000 lb would have been less and the strength higher with the high-strength bolt.

V-9 XN-52, Rev. 1 The test also determined that the sliding clamp is self locking under the applied loads and will not slip.

There are nine full clamps in the Model 51032-la shipping package with the Type AA fuel elements. These provide a total restraining force in excess of 207,000 pounds of force (9 x 23,000). This is sufficiently larger than the 180,000 pound strength of the 14 shock-mount bolts and assures that the shock-mount bolts would elongate to failure and prevent failure of the full clamps in a 30 ft drop on the cover.  !

Tests conducted on the aluminum clamp assemblies shown in Figure 2.18, result in a deflection of 0.267 inch at 10,000 pounds force. For BWR fuel elements this indicates smaller C-* deflections, at equivalent "g" loadings, than were obtained "in the drop tested Model 51032-1 package. The force deflection curve is shown in Figure V.4.

V.5 Integrity of the Separator Blocks The Model 51032-la package separator blocks have been tested on the Tinius-Olsen compression machine. The test established that buckling strength of the gusset plate was greater than the 30,000 pound limit of the machine. The plate did not buckle and there was no significant block deformation.

Without the gusset plate, significant deformation occurs at 16,000 pounds force. The attachment of the separator blocks to the strongback was also strengthened. Notably, Grade 8 bolts with a shear strength of 90,000 psi are used instead of carbon steel bolts with a shear strength of 38,400 psi and 3/8 inch thick washers are added in place of 1/8 inch thick washers to distribute the load over a larger area of the strongback channel.

V-10 XN-52, Rev. 1 V.6 The Influence of Dynamic Loading on Component Performance Steel shows some increase in tensile strength under impact loading*. The ductility under some loading conditions increases and for other conditions decreases. The increases in strength are mainly in the range of ten percent to twenty percent. Davies and Magee studied a wide range of mater ials, including Types 302 and 310 stainless steel, at room temperature and found "no significant change in tensile ductility over the investigated strain rate range", which included the range of interest for the impact loadings in container drop tests. Type 310 stainless steel showed a small increase in strength with higher strain rate, while for Type 302 the strength was independent of strain rate. At elevated temperatures, Steichen found an increasing trend in ductility in Types 304 and 316 stainless steel towards the upper end of the strain rate range, which did not quite reach the range of interest for this application.

Relative to the performance evaluation of the Model 51032-la packaging, it is only important that the dynamic effects do not alter the designed bolt deformation mode, (i.e., that the stainless steel shock mount bolts deform while the high-strength carbon steel bolts do not fail).

Available data supports this result. With respect to energy dissipation in the stainless steel bolt distor tion, the data suggests a small increase in energy dissipation capability under impact loads.

• See, for example, R. G. Davies and C. L. Magee, Journal of Eng. Mat. and Tech., April 1975, pages 151-155, and J. M.

Steichen, High Strain Rate Mechanical Properties of Types 304 and 316 Stainless Steel, HEDL-TME-71-164, November 1971.

V-1 1 XN-52, Rev. 1 LIw-I FIGURE V.1 SHOCK MOUNT LOADING CHARACTERISTICS

-'p-Extrapolation based on Bolt Failure 30,000 5/8 inch-bolt test 25,000 0

0 20,000 0

44 15,000 10,000 5,000 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Deflection (inches) 9'-_j

V-12 XN-52, Rev. I FIGURE V.2 SHOCK MOUNT BOLT TENSILE STRESS-STRAIN CURVE 30,000 0

20,000 0

C 03 U

I-.

0

z4 10,000 0.5 1.0 1.5 Strain (inches)

,_l

X)a-52, Rev. 1 V-1 3 LD FIGURE V.3 LOADED STRONGBACK STOPPING FORCE IN AN END DROP Fuel Assembly Nozzle Crushes 1000

• -oo 0

Shock-mount o 600 Bolts Fail Strongback Extension Crui w Depressed Honeycomb Begins to Crush 0

a 400 0

Raised Honeycomb Begins to Crus 200 Kinetic Energy Completely Dissipated S23 5 6 4Vý Displacement (inches

.300 f

U

= .200 o

a_)

'44

.100

'NU, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Load (1000 ibs)

Figure V.4 Force Deflection Curve For fiodel 51032-la Alun .i Clamp Assembly

II XN-52, Rev., 1.

ii) APPENDIX VI FUEL ROD DROP TEST REPORT C

VI-I XN-52, Rev. 1 4V) .I FUEL ROD DROP TEST "GENERAL I

Of interest to' persons involved with the shipmentof fuel assemblies is the degree of containment and protection provided by the fuel rods'them selves. To get a feel for containment and protection provided it was decided to subject individual fuel rods to the hypothetical accident conditions detailed in Appendix B of IOCFR71.

This test consisted of subjectingrthree fuel rods to-the specified 30 ft. drop test. Test conditions, methods, procedures and results are discussed below;,

FUEL ROD DESCRIPTION The three fuel rods used in this test were earlier fabricated and employed for certain quality control examinations. As such, one rod had:been autoclaved, and 'two of the rods had small holes drilled through the cladding near the plugs; one rod had a single 0.016 inch hole, and the other rod had a 0,125 inch hole. Upon completion of the quality control examinations; these fuel rods were to be scrapped; instead, they were turned over to Nuclear Safety-for the subject test. The physical K) characteristics of the fuel rods are defined below:

Overall Length: 158.148 inches (nominal);

Fuel Length: 144 inch (nominal);

Fuel: Sintered depleted UO2 pellets; Cladding: 36.5 (nominal) mil zircaloy-2; Tube O.D.: 0.570 inches (nominal).

All three fuel rods had been fabricated in accordance with standard process specifications, and contained the standard internal hardware components, and, as-such, were prototypical of rods which will make up typical fuel assemblies.

TEST CONDITIONS Since the fuel rods contained depleted uranium, each rod was individ ually encased in a thin polyethylene tube, which as taped to the two end plugs with masking tape. This was done to provide secondary containment in the event of rod rupture as a result of the impact.

r The rods were dropped (by hand) from a heiaht of two feet above the parapet of the UO2 building to the concrete pad (8 inches thick) at the south side of the building, thus constituting a 30 foot drop to an unyielding surface.

VT -9 All-0/, Kev.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES The three fuel rods (individually encased in thin polyethylene tubing) were held, one at a time, out over the edge of the buildinq such that the lowest part of the rods were 30 feet above the concrete pad -- and released (see photo No. 1).

ROD NO. 1 (450 L Drop)

This fuel rod was not autoclaved and had a 0.016 inch hole drilled in the plenum region (upper end). The rod was held at a 450 angle with the lower end 30 ft. above the concrete pad, and dropped such that the lower end plug (no plenum spring) was the first part of the fuel rod to make contact with the pad.

ROD NO. 2 (Flat Drop)

This fuel rod was not autoclaved and had a 0.125 inch hole drilled in the plenum region (upper end). The rod was held horizontal 30 ft.

above the concrete pad and dropped; the fuel rod was in this same position when it made contact with the pad.

ROD NO. 3 (straight drop)

This fuel rod had been autoclaved in accordance with standard process specifications; no holes had been drilled in this rod. This rod was held vertical with the lower end 30 ft. above-the concrete pad, and dropped such that the lower end plug (no plenum spring) was the first part of the fuel rod to make contact with the pad.

RESULTS Each fuel rod, after being subjected to the afore described tests, was inspected for damage and release of radioactive material. In no case was there any release of radioactive material (as determined by surveys with alpha sensitive instruments), nor were there any cracks in either the tubing or the welds detected.

Photographs were taken of the fuel rods subjected to these drop tests; these appear, along with brief discussions, on the following pages.

Witnesses: H. Paul Estey W. S. Nechodom R. L. Miles E. L. Foster / "

K-,Vi

X1-52, Rev. 1

( I I

.- I Preparation for dropping fuel rods from the roof of the U0 building 2

-9KJ to the concrete pad at the south end of the building.

,2.

Rod No. 1: This photo shows the lower end plug and weld region of the fuel rod dropped at a 450 angle. The tip of the lower end plug was tJ deformed.

VI-4 - X-J-52, Rev. 1 41ýý Rod No. 1: This photo shows the warp developed in the fuel rod dropped at a 450 angle.

4 Rod -No. 2: This photo shows abrasion of the rod surface of the fuel rod dropped in the horizontal (flat) position.

C\Lj

VI-5 XN-E2, Rev. 1 (7

I -

- 9..

- -r

---

. 9... - -. I

• - -.. I

- I Rod No. 2: This photo shows the warp developed in the fuel rod droDped in the horizontal (flat) position.

.... -A I

Rod No. 3: This photo shows the warp developed in the fuel rod drooped f in the vertical (straiqht) position.

VI-6 VXN-52, Rev. 1 (5

51

. -,. . o, o . . . . ; . ' ,

Rod No. 3: This photo shows the damage done to the concrete pad, and the lower end plug, caused by the fuel rod dropped in the vertical (straight) position.

A Rod No. 3: This photo shows the lower end plug and weld region of the C9" fuel rod dropped in the vertical (straight) position.

60 VI-7 XM-52, 1

Rev. 1

( -

- -1 I..1 2

1-Z-A Rod Nios. 1, 2 & 3:. This photo shows all three fuel rods together -

depicting the-relative -arps developed as the results of the individual drop tests.

41 ý

VI-8 XN-52,'Rev. I SECOND FUEL ROD DROP TEST GENERAL of radio Additional information was desired on the degree of containment the fuel rods active materials and environmental protection afforded by fuel assemblies. The object themselves during the transport of nuclear damage that of this test was to determine the upper range of probable an internal component of could be expected as a result of impact with the packaging.

loaded fuel rods 30 This test consisted of dropping (individually) three concrete pad. Test feet onto a 4" x 4" x 3/8" steel-angle positioned on a below.

conditions, methods, procedures and results are discussed FUEL ROD DESCRIPTION in JN-55.

The test rods are those described in the Fuel Rod Description drop tests foot These same rods were previously subjected to various 30 as described in JN-55.

TEST CONDITIONS and, as As stated above, the test rods had been used in previous tests, to the following such, exhibited bends and warps-prior to being subjectedor other enclosure tests. However, none of the rods exhibited any cracks failure (as described in the Results section of JN-55).

Since the fuel rods contain depleted uranium, each rod was individually encased in a thin polyethylene tube, which was taped to containmentthe two end plugs to provide secondary in the with masking tape. This was done event of rod rupture as a result of the impact.

a height of The rods were hand-dropped (see Photo No. 1 of JN-55) from 4" x 3/8" steel two feet above the parapet of the UOg building onto a 4" x angle set on a concrete pad 30 feet Below at ground level.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES thin polyethylene The three loaded fuel rods (individually encased in of the building and tubing) were held, one at a time, out over the edge a 4" x 4" x 3/8" allowed to drop (in the horizontal position) across steel angle set on a concrete pad 30 feet below.

RESULTS Following the completion of the drops, the three rods were positioned the angle and upon the steel angle (Photo No. 1) to show how they struck inflicted the pad, and to show the deformations inflicted. The deformations

- C-)

I VI-9 X.M-52, Rev. 1 by these drops are not truly depicted in Photo No. 1 as all of the rods exhibited deformations as the results of previous drop tests (reference JN-55).

Photo No. 2 shows the points (arrows) of impact of each of the fuel rods upon the steel angle.

Photo No. 3 shows the overall warping and bending of the fuel rods resulting from the combined t ests. The arrows locate the points of impact with the steel, angle i n the most recent tests.

Each fuel rod, after being subjected to the above described tests, was inspected for damage and surveyed for release of radioactive material.

In no case was there any release of radioactive material (as determined by surveys with alpha sensitive instruments), nor were there any cracks detected in either the tubing or the welds. I I Witnesses: H. Paul Estey -5<

J. D. Cudmore R. L. Miles i "

R. E. Dal ing_ *o-*ý a.z I

ý'I-

I, VI-IOR XN-52, Rev.1 4V)

PHOTO NO. 1 II O

PHOTO NO. 2 PHOTO NO. 3

1. 61

LI>

APPENDIX VII CRITICALITY SAFETY ANALYSIS OF T15X15 FUEL

.7

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page,

1. INTR O D UCT IO N............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 S um m ary ............................................................................................................... 1

2. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 3 2.1 Nuclear Analysis Methodology ........................................................................... 3 2.2 Computer Codes and Databases Used .............................................................. 3 2.3 Cross Section Preparation ........................................ 3 2.4 Benchm arking ................................................................................................... 3 1 1

3. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS .............................. I................................ 6 3.1 Standard T15X15 Fuel Assembly ....................................................................... 7 3.1.1 Computer Model Description ................................................................ 9 3.1.2 Analygis of Single Container with Standard T1 5X1 5 Fuel Assembly ..................................................................... 10 3.1.3 Analysis of Array of Undamaged Containers (Normal Conditions) with Standard Trino Fuel Assembly ................... 16 3.1.4 Analysis of Array of Damaged Containers (Accident Conditions) with Standard Trino Fuel Assembly ..................... 22 3.2 T15X15 Cruciform Assembly ........................................................................... 30

4. QA REVIEW DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 33

5. R EFER EN C ES .............................................................................. I.................................. 34

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII

- Paae ii f,

LIST OF TABLES Table VII-1 Summary Table of Criticality Evaluation for the Model 51032-1 Shipping Container .................................... ..................... 2 Table VII-2 Benchmark Data Used for Determination of Calculation Bias for the Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Analysis ............................... 5 Table VII-3 Model 51032-1 Major Components and Comparison of Actual vs. Modeled Conditions..; .. ................................. 6 Table VII-4 Comparison of Actual vs. Modeled Conditions for Standard TI5XI 5 Fuel Assembly ...................................... 7 Table VII-5 Drop Test Results vs. Damaged Conditions Modeled ................................ .. 10 Table VII-6 Single Model 51032-1 Shipping Container, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets ............. ............................ ................... 12 Table VII-7 Single Model 51032-1 Shipping Container, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets;........ i............................ 13 Table VII-8 Single Model 51032-1 Shipping Container, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, Standard Trino Assembly, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets................................................................. 14 aJble VII-9 Single Model 51032-1 Shipping Container, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, Standard Trino Assembly, Sm all Diameter (0.332") Pellets ..................................................................... 15 Table VII-10 Infinite Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Undamaged Conditions, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets ......... 17 Table VII-1 1 Infinite Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Undamaged Conditions, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets ................ 18 Table VII-12 13x13x3 (507 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Undamaged Conditions, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets ................................................................... 19 Table VII-13 13x13x3 (507 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Undamaged Conditions, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets ................ 20 Table VII-14 15x15x3 (675 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Undamaged Conditions, 7 vol% Interspersed Moderator Between Containers, Polyethylene Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles,

@0 Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets ................................................................... 21

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII K,

I I Parne iii Pn iii Table VII-15 1Ox1Ox2 (200 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Damaged Conditions, Bundles and Strongbacks Centered in Containers, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets ................................................................... 25 Table V11-16 lOxlOx2 (200 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Damaged Conditions, Bundles and Strongbacks Shifted in Containers, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets ................................................................... 26 Table VII-17 1Ox1Ox2 (200 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Damaged Conditions, Bundles and Strongbacks Centered in Containers, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x1 5 Array of Rods in Bundles, Sm all Diam eter (0.332") Pellets .......................................... : .............................. 27 Table VII-18 1Ox1Ox2 (200 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Damaged Conditions, Bundles and Strongbacks Shifted in Containers, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of R'ods in Bundles, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets .................................................................. 28 Table VI1-19 12x12x2 (288 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Damaged Conditions, Bundles and Strongbacks Shifted in Containers, Fully Flooded Interspersed Moderator, Polyethylene Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets ................. 29 Table VII-20 Component Dimensions for Trino Cruciform Assembly ................................. 32 49.j I

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 A

Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIk VII Page iv v 2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure VII-1 Standard T15X15 Assembly Layout ................................................................ 8 Figure VII-2 Bundles and Strongbacks Shifted within Containers under Damaged Conditions ........................................ ........... 24 Figure VII-3 T15X15 Cruciform Assembly Layout ............................................................ 31 j-)

i)

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation 'Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Pagel

1. INTRODUCTION This supplemental Criticality Safety Evaluation (CSE) provides the criticality safety basis for adding a fifth category of fuel (T15X15) to the allowed payloads in the m6del 51032-1 shipping contairer.

It also provides justificati6n for changing the clad and gap requirements for the existing four fuel categories based on the need to include cruciform assemblies to be shipped with the T15X15 payload. The four fuel categories allowed by the current Certificate of Compliance (COC; Reference 5) were analyzed for criticality safety in Reference 6.

Section 2 of this CSE details the methodologies used for the criticality analysis. Component description and analysis are provided in Section 3. Section 4 contains the Quality Assurance (QA) review and comment resolution. Section 5 documents the references. Sample computer inputs are provided in Appendix VII-A.

1.1 Summary f his CSE shows that sufficient margin to safety exists to add the following fuel category to the

"--allowed payloads for the model 51032-1 shipping container:

Unirradiated fuel assemblies consisting of uranium dioxide fuel pellets clad in zircalloy or stainless steel tubes. Uranium is enriched to a maximum of 5.0 w/o in the U-235 isotope.

The pellets must have a nominal OD not less than 0.332 inch and not greater than 0.350 inch. The sum of the cladding wall thickness and the pellet-clad radial gap must not be less than 0.016 inch. The maximum length of the active fuel region is 196 inches. Fuel assemblies consist of 208 fuel rods in a 15x1 5 array with a nominal fuel rod pitch of 0.527 inch and a maximum assembly cross section of 7.91 inches square. The rod arrangement is shown in Figure VII-1. The transport index for this category is 0.4.

This CSE also justifies the following change to the clad and pellet-clad gap requirement for the existing four fuel categories in the current COC:

The sum of the cladding wall thickness and the pellet-clad radial gap must not be less than 0.023 inch.

A summary of the results in this CSE is provided in.

IL

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Table VII-1 Summary Table of Criticality Evaluation for the Model 51032-1 Shipping Container, Descriptior of Most Reactive-Case 2 Ibia --

• ICO +2a:bi6.s-,

Standard Trino Fuel Assembly Single Package with standard T15X15 0.9044 0.0037 NA 0.9117 fuel assembly 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged Packages 0.8601 0.0030 NA 0.8661 (675 Containers) with standard T15X15 fuel assembly 12x12x2 Array of Damaged Packages 0 9073 0.0033 NA 0.9139 (288 Containers) with standard T15X15 fuel assembly K)ý

Consolidated License Application EMF-52

-for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6

• Model 51032-1 Shipping Container , APPENDIX VII r ,2. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Page 3 2.1 NuclearAnalysis Methodology Monte Carlo techniques were used in this'analysis. The sensitivities of pellet diameter, interspersed moderation, number of rods in abundle, and placement of low density polyethylene inside the containers were evaluated.

2.2 Computer Codes and DatabasesUsed The following codes and cross section libraries are part of the SCALE 4.2 system of codes (Reference 1) placed on the SPC HP workstation SSLO1. ,

791176 Jun 22 1994 11:36:41 oOoOOl.a (XSDRN) 545416 Feb 21 1994 10:25:06 o0o002.a (NITAWL) 516744 Feb 21 1994 10:14:38 oOoOO8.a (BONAMI) 1094280 Jun 22 1994 11:46:27 oOoOO9.a (KENO.Va) 112000 Feb 23 1994 15:16:47 albdata.bin 4256216 Feb 23 1994 14:40:21 pxsl23Jbin (123 group master cross section library) 362140 Feb 25 1994 16:54:21 pxsl6.bin (16 group master cross section library)

<2 9020996 Feb 23 1994 14:53:45 pxs2lB.bin (218 group master cross section library) 824404 Feb 23 1994 14:38:03 pxs27.bin (27 group master cross section library) 94400 Feb 23 1994 15:12:03 stdcomp.bin (standard comp. library) 44812 Feb 23 1994 15:14:40 wtdata.bin 287 Jul 7 1994 09:35:35 csas25 2295 Jul 7 1994 17:07:41 drva 2.3 Cross Section Preparation BONAMI and NITAWL adjust the cross section data for the specific problem (e.g., perform resonance self-shielding corrections). The Hansen-Roach 16-energy group cross sections available in SCALE were used for all calculations.

2.4 Benchmarking The bias and its standard deviation are calculated using the methods described in Reference 4.

These methods use standard analysis of variance principles.

kc is the value of ke, that results from the calculation of benchmark experiments using a particular calculation method. This value represents a combination of theoretical techniques and numerical data. The value for kc is the weighted average (grand average) of the average keff values for a series of benchmark cases that are applicable to the system being modeled. Each individual (L) benchmark case is weighted by the inverse of the ke, variance (square of standard deviation).

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page 4 The average value of the variance is taken as the "within class" variance. The variance of the average keff data, weighted as for the grand average, is taken as the "between class" variance.

Since the true value for all benchmark cases is assumed to be 1.0 (critical), the class effect (the change in average kef from case to case) is also the bias and the variance of the class effect is the variance of the bias.

The calculation bias, Akb, is therefore calculated as 1-Akc. A negative bias indicates conservative calculation results.

The SCALE 4.2 system of codes was developed for use by the USNRC and its licensees. SPC benchmarking of SCALE 4.2 on HP Workstations includes critical experiments of 4.31% enriched assemblies from NUREG/CR-0073 (Reference 2) which were Modeled using the same methodology used in these calculations.

A bias estimate based on 23 pooled cases was calculated from the 16-group data in Table 12 of Reference 3 and is -0.00321 +/- 0.00261. Again, negative bias indicates conservative results. The benchmark data used to calculate this bias is provided in Table VII-2

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping 'Container APPENDIX VII I' Page 5 fIý Table VII-2 Benchmark Data Used for Determination of Calculation Bias for the Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Analysis Cs D Averae,&ff G, a-cOOlx 1.00355 0.00249 a-c002x 1.00905 0.00257 a-cOO3x 1.00845 0.00252 a-c004 1.00435 0.00265 a-cOO5a 1.00244 0.00265 a-cOO5b 1.00198, 0.00252 a-c006a 1.00188 0.00236 a-c006b 0.99954 0.00237 a-'c007a 1.00425 0.00247 a-c007x 1.00788 0.00253 C a-c008a a-cOO8x 1.00148 1.00109 0.00231 0.00242 a-c009a 1.00062 0.00233 a-cOlOa 1.00481 0.00239 a-cO11a 1.00356 0.00275 a-cO12a 1.00063 0.00244 a-cO13a 1.00142 0.00240 a-cO13x 1.01149 0.00227 a-cO14a 0.99991 0.00241 a-cO14x 1.00732 0.00259 a-c029a 0.99956 0.00242 a-c03Oa 1.00278 0.00257 a-c031a 0.99736 0.00239

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII lkz)1 Page 6 Page 6 v

3. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS ,

The model 51032-1 shipping container major components and their actual and modeled dimensions are provided in Table VIi-3. Except for some rubber gaskets, the entire container is constructed of carbon steel. Therefore, only the results of the drop tests need to be considered for decreased dimensions during damaged conditions, i.e., ,there is no wood or plastic to burn away, which could decrease spacing between fuel bundles and/or containers.

This section provides an analysis for shipping T15X15 fuel bundles in model 51032-1 shipping' containers. Descriptions of the payloads and modeled conditions are provided in subsections below.

Table VII-3 Model 51032-1 Major Components and Comparison of Actual vs. Modeled Conditions TparameterH J "'Actua, Modeled 6 I . Reference fordActual

1,

• 4 'Conditions

,SEPARATOR*BLOCKS .

fl Outer Width Outer Height 6" min 8 +/- 1/2" 6"

7.5" _

DWG EMF-309,813 R-0 Length 9 +/- 1/2" 8.5" U Steel Thickness 3/8 +/- 1/16" 0.3125" Number in 5 min 5 EMF-52, Rev. 6, p. 2-6 Container

,STRONGBACKiASSEM~BLY ij, Width 24-7/8 +/- 5/16" 24.5625"- DWG EMF-303,898 R-4 Height 12-1/2 +/- 3/4" 11.5625" Length 196 1" -- 197" Steel Thickness 114 +/- 1/16" 0.1875"

'CONTAINER'-STEEU'SHELL.:. ......... __o_......

Inner Radius 19-7/8 +/- 3/8" 19.5" DWG EMF-303,360 R-5 Outer Length 216-1/4 + 1-5/16 197" Steel Thickness 11 ga 0.09568" (80% of nominal 11 ga)

Container C-C > 42-1/8 +/- 3/8" 41.75" (undam) DWG EMF-309,813 R-0 Spacing 1 40.75" (dam) II 4tL'ý,

Apphcatlon Container Corporation License Power Consolidated Shipping Siemens License Application Consolidated for EMF-52 51032-1 for Siemens Model Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container I APPENDIX VII

.Page 7 3.1 StandardT15X15 FuelAssembly The layout of a standard T15X15 fuel assembly is shown in Figure VII-1. The reference for this assembly layout is provided in Appendix VII-B. A comparison of actual and modeled dimensions for the standard T15X15 fuel assembly are provided in Table VII-4.

Table VII-4 Comparison of Actual vs. Modeled Conditions for Standard T15X15 Fuel Assembly P'arameter_-,ý:Y, rarameter Acu 1.-7 -,,. Modeled :o Refe-rence ,for.Actual: ý:.--  ;

-- ~- Condi*tion~sr- -A

.STANDARD--ROD,->~

Pellet Diameter 0.350" 0.350" See Appendix VII-B Theoretical Density 95% 95%

98% in some cases Diametral Gap 0.005" 0.016" (clad + gap Clad Thickness 0.0151" _ 5% thickness; modeled as void)

Rod OD 0.385" 0.382"

,THICK-CLAD _'ROD ý,ý. . ~

~...... - ,. .. * -

Pellet Diameter 0.332" 0.332" See Appendix VII-B Theoretical Density 95% 95%

98% in some cases Diametral Gap 0.005" 0.016" (clad + gap Clad Thickness 0.024" +/- 5% thickness; modeled as void)

Rod OD 0.385" 0.364" Enrichment 4.47 wt% 2 11U 5 wt% 131U See Appendix VII-B Assembly Cross 7.909" x 7.909" 7.909" PECO DWG 302951D, Rev.

Section max 0101 Rod Array Size 15x1 5 15x15 See Appendix VII-B Nominal Rod Pitch 0.52727" 0.52727" Calculated from Assembly Cross Section and Rod Array Size Active Fuel Length < 108.039" 197" See Appendix VII-B

ý"i

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII

1. 7) Page 8 D* Standard Rod -'- Thick Clad Rod Empty Location Figure VII-1 Standard T15X15 Assembly Layout fL

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII

,Page 9 3.1.1 Computer Model Description The model 51032-1 shipping container was modeled with the dimensions shown in Table VII-3.

Except for the length of the strongback assembly, all components were modeled at minimum dimensions. This was done to minimize the amount of steel in the model and to provide a minimum credible spacing between containers. Maximizing the length of the strongback assembly increases the amount of fissile material on the strongback, but concurrently increases the amount of steel (a poison) in the container. Using the maximum strongback length vs. the minimum length adds 2.31 kg carbon steel to the model. However, modeling the strongback thickness at the minimum value over the entire length (highly conservative), removes over 74 kg of carbon steel from the model.

This alone more than makes up for the added steel due to the increased length. In addition, all other steel components (separator blocks, clamps, exterior bracing) are either modeled at minimum dimensions or are completely ignored. The KENO model uses approximately 597 kg of carbon steel in a single model 51032-1 container. A single model 51032-1 shipping container prepped for bundle loading actually weighs at least 4100 lbs (1860 kg). Note that a very small amount of this actual weight is due to rubber gasket material. This shows that the amount of steel used in' the model is less than that actually contained in the model 51032-1 shipping containers (conservative).

Appendix IV of Reference 6 provides the results of the 30-foot drop tests. A summary of the worst case results, along with the modeled damaged conditions, is provided in Table VII-5.

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page 10 fL; Table VII-5 Drop Test Results vs. Damaged Conditions Modeled

-Parameter , ** Horiiontalý(x) Drop5 * -Vertical (z)0Dr0p , Modeled -,in, I

.LTtRest ultkds t&4t4§suit - Damaged, Horizontal (x) Offset of 0.875" 1.25" 1.5" Strongback Vertical (y) Offset of 2.75" 0.5" 3.0" Strongback C-C Container Spacing No significant No significant 1"reduction in C-C Affected by Damage to change change spacing Outer Container I-________1__I

I The standard T15X15 assemblies were modeled with the dimensions shown in Talble VII-4. Each of the pellet diameters was used (in separate sets of calculations). Instead of explicitly modeling the pellet-clad gap and the clad, a bounding minimum (conservative) clad+gap thickness of 0.016" was used in the model. This 0.016" thick region was modeled as void. Modeling the clad and gap 11 ý in this manner results in a' smaller outer rod diameter than actually exists. However, the amount of moderator within the assembly is thereby maximized.

Full water reflection is used around the container in the single container calculations and around the array in the array calculations. No pathway for preferential flooding has been identified. Fuel bundles are held in place with clamps. If polyethylene sheathing is used, the current COC requires that it be open on each end.

3.1.2 Analysis of Single Container with Standard T15X15 Fuel Assembly Calculations were performed for a single model 51032-1 shipping container. The following sets of cases were analyzed, each varying interspersed moderation from dry to fully flooded:

Bundles in container consist of 15x15 array of rods. The rods contain the large diameter pellets.

Bundles in container consist of 15x15 array of rods. The rods contain the small diameter pellets.

o Bundles in container consist of the standard T15X15 assembly (15x15 array of rods with several empty locations; see Figure VII-1). The rods contain the large diameter pellets.

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIXVII

' ~Page 11 I Bundles in container consist of the standard T15X15 assembly (15x15 array of rodswith several empty locations; see Figure VII-1). The rods contain the small diameter pellets.

I The results of these calculations are provided in Table VII-6 through Table VII-9. As shown in these tables, the maximum keff+2a is 0.91041, well below 0.95. The peak reactivity occurs with the small pellet diameter and at fully flooded conditions.

The results also show that the bundles with a 15x15 array of rods are more reactive than the standard T15X15 assemblies. Therefore, the 15x15 bundles are used in the subsequent damaged and undamaged calculations.

Calculations were also performed to show that modeling the combination of clad+gap as void yields either identical or conservative results relative to explicitly modeling the clad and gap. The most reactive case from Table VII-6 through Table VII-9 (case 15x15s.100.1) was used. This case was modified to explicitly model the clad as zircalloy and stainless steel, in separate cases. The results are summarized below and show that modeling the combination of clad+gap as void does indeed yield either identical or conservative results, i.e., the zircalloy clad model yields statistically identical results an..

the stainless steel clad model yields a slightly lower reactivity, as expected.

246075 Jul 29 06:43:21 1999 droa-15x15s.l00.1Z .90251 .00349 .90834 .90949 255555 Jul 29 09:25:20 1999 droa-l5xlSs.100.lS .89976 .00350 .90561 .90676

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII r'_ Page 12 Table VII-6 Single Model 51032-1 Shipping Container, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets

,Fil~ffamet& (droa.'?) V61% JIM eff~

15x151.000.1 0 0.32410 0.00243 0.32896 15x151.001.1 1- 0.31857 0.00282 0.32421, 15xl 51.003.1 3 0.31822 0.00219 0.32260 15x151.005.1 5 0.32985 0.00294 0.33573 15x151.007.1 7 0.34569 0.00230 0.35029 15x151.010.1 10 0.37629 0.00256 0.38141 15x151.020.1 20 0.49832 0.00310 0.50452 15x151.030.1 30 0.57982 0.00254 0.58490 15xl 51.040.1 40 0.63519 0.00303 0.64125

-15x151.050.1 50 0.68659 0.00297 0.69253 15x151.060.1 60 0.72974 0.00330 0.73634 15xl 51.070.1 70 0.77600 0.00278 0.78156 15x151.080.1 80 0.81175 0.00364 0.81903 15x151.090.1 90 0.84854 0.00332 0.85518 I 15x151.100.1 100 0.89236 0.00372 0.89980 (r9

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII I Page 13 Table VII-7 Single Model 51032-1 Shipping Container, Interspersed Page 13  !

ý'l Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Small

.I Diameter (0.332") Pellets Filena1x i5s(droa-?'1 - 1W, 0.3 0.025 0.3245 15x15s.000.1 0 0.31945 0.00255 0.3245 15x15s.001.1 1 0.31211 00270.317455 15x15s.003.1 3 0.30852 0.00234 0.31320 15x15s.005.1 ,5 0.31767 0.00232 0.32231 15x15s.007.1 7 0.33161 0.00221 0.33603 15x15s.010.1 10 0.36639 0.00279 0.37197 15x15s.020.1 20 0.48974 0.00314 0.49602 15x15s.030.1 30 0.57853 0.00318 0.58489 15x15s.040.1 40 0.63714' 0.00293 0.64300 15x15s.050.1 50 0.68970 0.00304 0.69578 15x15s.060.1 60 0.73319 0.00369 0.74057 15x15s.070.1 70 0.78160 0.00350 0.78860 15x15s.080.1 80 0.82792 0.00330 0.83452 15x15s.090.1 90 0.86715 0.00292 0.87299 IUA I zi IUW. I "IUU n .9U341 DnnnRBA A Q4f)4 I I I .l 1l11M KYW,

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII I, Paae 14 Table VII-8 Single Model 61032-1 Shipping Container, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, Standard T15X15 Assembly, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets Filenhbme (droa-?) - Vol%IMW §-K6':-9<kf+:a trinol.000.1 0 0.31937 0.00276 0.32489 trinol.001.1 1  ; 0.31224 0.00262 0.31748 trinol.003.1 3 0.31010 0.00235 0.31480 trinol.005.1 5 0.32153 0.00264 0.32681 trinol.007.1 7 0.33321 0.00248 0.33817 trinol.010.1 10 0.36554 0.00244 0.37042 trinol.020.1 20 0.48252 0.00287 0.48826 trinol.030.1 30 0.56310 0.00335 0.56980 tnnol.040.1 40 0.61863 0.00302 0.62467 trinol.050.1 50 0.67204 0.00378 0.67960 trinol.060.1 60 0.71480 0.00322 0.72124 trinol.070.1 70 0.75696 0.00313 0.76322 trinol.080.1 80 1 0.79774 0.00299 0.80372 trinol.090.1 90 , 0.83706 0.00309 0.84324 trinol.100.1 100 0.88372 0.00394 0.89160 I,

91"'ý

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page 15 j4l Table VII-9 Single Model,51032-1 Shipping Container, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, Standard T15X15 Assembly, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets trinos.000.1 0 0.30480 0.00238 0.30956 trinos.001.1 1 0.30186 0.00245 0.30676 trinos.003.1 3 0.30061 0.00231 0.30523 trinos.005.1 5 0.30351 0.00222 0.30795' trinos.007.1 7 0.32660 0.00224 0.33108 trinos.010.1 10 0.36083 0.00245 0.36573 trinos.020.1 20 0.47831 0.00283 0.48397 trnos.030.1 30 0.55705 0.00282 0.56269 trinos.040.1 40 0.62657 0.00332 0.63321 trinos.050.1 50 0.67334 0.00303 0.67940 trinos.060.1 60 0.72378 0.00331 0.73040 trinos.070.1 70 0.76653 0.00319 0.77291 trinos.080.1 80 0.81178 0.00330 0.81838 trinos.090.1 90 0.85472 0.00337 trinos.100.1

_ _ _ _57 100 I0.88574

_ _ _0322

0. 00322 S....

0.86146 R

0.8921

...V~21R I.

j4

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for-Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII

1. 6 3.1.3 Page 16 Analysis of Array of Undamaged Containers (Normal Conditions) with Standard T15x15 Fuel Assembly Calculations were performed for an array of model 51032-1 shipping containers under normal or undamaged conditions. Bundles of 15x15 rods were placed in the containers, since Section 3.1.2 shows that bundles with a 15x15 array of rods are more reactive than the standard T15X15 assemblies. Page 45 of Reference 6 states that the water spray test demonstrated that water would not leak into the package. Therefore, in the undamaged calculations of this subsection,,the

'insides of the containers remain dry. The following sets of cases were analyzed, each varying interspersed moderation (between containers) from dry to fully flooded:

Infinite array of containers. The rods 'contain the large diameter pellets.

Infinite array of containers. The rods contain the small diameter pellets.

13x1 3x3 (507 total) array of containers. The rods contain the large diameter pellets.

13x13x3 (507 total) array of containers. The rods contain the small diameter pellets.

The results of these calculations are provided in Table VII-10 through Table VII-13. As shown in these tables, keff for an infinite number of model 51032-1 shipping containers exceeds 0.95.

However, for an array of 507 containers, the maximum keff+2a is 0.84254, well below 0.95. The peak reactivity occurs with the large pellet diameter and at 7 vol% interspersed moderator. This peak case (151u.007.507) was modified to include 675 containers in a 15x15x3 array. The results are summarized below. The resulting keff +2a is 0.86233.

269428 Aug 2 11:49:08 1999 droa-151u.007.675 .85681 .00276 .86142 .86233 Except for some rubber gaskets and a polyethylene bundle sheath in some cases, no hydrogenous shipping components are use in the model 51032-1 shipping container. In order to show that this small amount of hydrogenous material does not have an adverse impact on reactivity, the most reactive case above (151u.007.675) was modified to include low density polyethylene inside the container, but outside of the bundles. The amount of polyethylene inside the container was varied from 1 to 10 vol%. The results are summarized in Table VII-14. As expected, since the peak interspersed moderator was already identified and used, addition of polyethylene to the inside of the container results in lower reactivities.

summary, since five times the allowed number of containers must be analyzed at undamaged conditions, the analysis in this subsection supports shipments of 67515 = 135 containers.

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII page 17 P

-U, Table VII-10, Infinite Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Undamaged Conditions, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets IFilehamfe;(droa-.?) ,", ke, k- rVll'~ a. iz' - '4f' ý2d 151u.000.inf 0 0.80197 0.00135 0.80467 151u.001.inf 1 0.93633 0.00186 0.94005 151u.003.inf 3 1.00207 0.00209 1.00625 151u.005.inf 5 1.00326 0.00265 1.00856 151u.007.inf 7 0.97210 0.00289 0.97788 151u.010.inf 10 0.92199 0.00279 0.92757 151u.020.inf 20 0.74999 0.00264 0.75527 151u.030.inf 30 0.63820 0.00271 0.64362 151u.040.inf 40 0.57510 0.00255 0.58020 151u.050.inf 50 0.53667 0.00276 0.54219 151u.060.inf 60 0.50816, 0.00258 0.51332 151u.070.inf 70 0.47937 0.00230 0.48397 151u.080.inf ,. 80 0.46285 0.00248 0.46781

.4 ,,,, ;,4fP 151u.090.inf ..

90 0.44185

. . . i 0.00260 "02 0 0.44705 0.4 0 151Du. I u0.n[ "IUU 13_

n .7

'43 n 13 fn7A2 1uu I4f3 I A Af9A I A1M 17-

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page 18 Table VII-11 Infinite Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Undamaged Conditions, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets

Filehamn'&(dro6;-?)

V1I>f

-0 fktt2~

15su.000.inf 0 0.79631 0.00141 0.79913 15su.001.inf 1 0.93265 0.00192 0.93649 15su.003.inf 3 0.99946 0.00230 1.00406 15su.005.inf 5 0.99464 0.00233 0.99930 C7 15su.007.inf 15su.010.inf 7

10 0.97278 0.91791 0.00273 0.00260 0.97824 0.92311 15su.020.inf 20 0.74003 0.00295 0.74593 15su.030.inf 30 0.63108 0.00256 0.63620 15su.040.inf 40 0.56530 0.00255 0.57040 15su.050.inf 50 0.52139 0.00270 0.52679 15su.060.inf 60 0.49433 0.00254 0.49941 15su.070.inf 70 0.46973 0.00235 0.47443 15su.080.inf 80 1 0.44838 0.00258 0.45354 15su.090.inf 90 0.43712 0.00253 0.44218 15su.100.inf 100 0.41831 0.00229 0.42289 i-A

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Pane 19 Table VII-12 13x13x3 (507 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Undamaged Conditions, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets Flnm(da-)VoI%,IM -2Qkeff' ~ m k;ýff+2'4 151u.000.507 0 0.54721 0.00270 0.55261 151u.001.507 1 0.63285 0.00299 0.63883 151u.003.507 3 0.76561 0.00291 0.77143 151u.005.507 15 0.82168 0.00277 0.82722 151u.007.507 7 0.83634 0.00310 0.84254 151u.010.507 10 0.81878 0.00263 0.82404 151u.020.507 20 0.70422 0.00235 0.70892 151u.030.507 30 0.61148 0.00316 0.61780 151u.040.507 40 0.55491 0.00261 0.56013 151u.050.507 50 0.51802 0.00273 0.52348 151u.060.507 60 0.49483 0.00234 0.49951 151u.070.507 70 0.46929 0.00261 0.47451 151u.080.507 80 0.45013 0.00219 0.45451 151u.090.507 90 0.43556 0.00273 0.44102 I 0lU.I UU.oU/' 1UU 0.42392 n nn9A7 R *RRR II -- ., 0U I_______________ I .- A ~- 7.AfZR n04 11 "U,

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII I, Paqe 20 Table VII-13' 13x13x3 (507 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Undamaged Conditions, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets

~Fleare~dra-) ~VoiolMW. 1- 1 tr 'kff.*I-26 15su.000.507 0 0.52762 0.00261 0.53284 15su.001.507 1 0.61376 0.00259 0.61894 15su.003.507 3 0.75358 0.00276 0.75910 15su.005.507 5 0.80694 0.00273 0.81240 15su.007.507 7 0.82675 0.00323 0.83321 15su.010.507 10 I 0.80830 0.00281 0.81392 15su.020.507 20 0.69301 0.00325 0.69951 15su.030.507 30 0.60301 0.00306 0.60913 15su.040.507 40 0.53919 0.00267 0.54453 15su.050.507 50 0.50740 0.00245 0.51230 15su.060.507 60 0.48313, 0.00264 0.48841 15su.070.507 70 0.45833 0.00274 0.46381 15su.080.507' 80 0.44044 0.00268 0.44580 15su.090.507 90 0.42963 0.00234 0.43431 15su.100.507 100 0.41446 0.00258 0.41962 C

rý

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page 21 Table VII-14 15x15x3 (675 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Undamaged Conditions, 7 vol% Interspersed Moderator Between Containers, Polyethylene Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets Filnienme,(droa;-?),',, VlPE>W:

-Y60 k'-"K1/2 &f k+26K 151u.007.675 0 0.85681 0.00276 0.86233 151upeOO1.007.675 1 0.83370 0.00249 0.83868 151upeOO3.007.675 3 0.77004 0.00288 0.77580 151upe005.007.675 5 0.70645 0.00282 0.71209 151upeOO7.007.675 7 0.65059 0.00274 0.65607 151upeOlO.007.675 10 0.57932 0.00272 0.58476 KJ

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII f jPage 22 3.1.4 Analysis of Array of Damaged Containers (Accident Conditions) with Standard T15x15 Fuel Assembly Calculations were performed for an array of model 51032-1 shipping containers under accident or damaged conditions. Bundles of 15x15 rods were placed in the containers, since Section 3.1.2 shows that bundles with a 15x15 array of rods are more reactive than the standard Trino assemblies. As previously stated, no pathway has been identified for preferential flooding of the container. The following sets of cases were analyzed, each varying interspersed moderation'(both inside and between containers) from-dry to fully flooded:

• 1Ox1Ox2 (200 total) array of containers. The rods contain the large diameter pellets.

Bundles and strongbacks are centered in container.

1Ox1 0x2 (200 total) array of containers. The rods contain the large diameter pellets.

Bundles and strongbacks are shifted in container.

10x10x2 (200 total) array of containers. The rods contain the small diameter pellets.

Bundles and strongbacks are centered in container.

1Ox1Ox2 (200 total) array of containers. The rods contain the small diameter pellets.

Bundles and strongbacks are shifted in container.

Cases with the bundles and strongbacks shifted in the containers have the strongbacks shifted by the amount listed in Table VII-5. The bundles are then shifted in the same horizontal direction, so that they are against the inside of the strongback. These shifts are performed so that the spacing between bundles in four adjacent containers is minimized. Figure VII-2 shows this configuration.

Grid lines were placed through the centers of the containers in Figure VII-2 to better show the direction in which bundles and strongbacks were shifted.

The results of these calculations are provided in Table VII-1 5 through Table VII-1 8. As shown in these tables, the maximum kettf+2a is 0.91036, well below 0.95. The peak reactivity occurs with the small pellet diameter, bundles and strongbacks shifted, and fully flooded conditions. The peak cases (15sds.100.200 and 15sdc.100.200) were modified to include 288 containers in a 12x12x2 array. The results are summarized below. The maximum resulting keff +2a is 0.91194.

282464 Jul 29 11:59:29 1999 droa-15sds.100.288 .90504 .00345 .91080 .91194 264805 Jul 30 04:57:12 1999 droa-15sdc.l00.288 .90254 .00391 .90907 .91036 SAs discussed in Section 3.1.3, except for some rubber gaskets and a polyethylene bundle sheath in

,ome cases, no hydrogenous shipping components are use in the model 51032-1 shipping

"*"-container. In order to show that this small amount of hydrogenous material does not have an

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page 23 <j adverse impact on rekctivity, the most reactive case above (15sds.007.288) was modified to include low density polyethylene inside the container, but outside of the bundles. The amount of polyethylene inside the container was varied from 1 to 10 vol%. Since the container is fully flooded, as the polyethylene volume fraction increases, the water volume, fraction must decrease, so that the sum of the two volume fractions equals unity. The results are summarized in Table VI!-19. The maximum keff +2a for these cases is 0.91194 and occurs with 0 vol% polyethylene.

In summary, since two times the allowed number of containers must be analyzed at damaged conditions, the analysis in this subsection supports shipments of 288/2 = 144 containers.

' I

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container r-APPENDIX VII I Page 24 I

. I xv se:':n -through 2xZ>:l orr:- of oontairers UL ?TZ: C..CCCCEiOO 2.1200E'132 2.5343E I02 LqJ ).'r-: _.l .,2r.9L-- 2 fl.f.flfiO-.J' .2 .:,-'4,A+O,-

7 II l 11

1. 1 m

4r--,j Figure VII-2 Bundles and Strongbacks Shifted within Containers under Damaged Conditions

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page 25 Table VII-15 1Ox1Ox2 (200 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Damaged Conditions, Bundles and Strongbacks Centered in Containers, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets Filename (droa4?)- V01%IM tKa** ke, *. k.... 2 15ldc.000.200 0 0.51327 0.00268 0.51863 15ldc.001.200 1 0.67802 0.00268 0.68338 15ldc.003.200 3 0.77884 0.00273 0.78430 15ldc.005.200 5 0.74186 0.00307 0.74800 151dc.007.200 7 0.67622 0.00269 0.68160 15ldc.010.200 10 0.59904 0.00299 0.60502 151dc.020.200 20 0.55333 0.00280 0.55893 15ldc.030.200 30 0.59212 0.00299 0.59810 15ldc.040.200 40 0.63881 0.00273 0.64427 15ldc.050.200 50 0.69035 0.00328 0.69691 15ldc.060.200 60 0.72985 0.00321 0.73627 15ldc.070.200 70 0.76828 0.00368 0.77564 15ldc.080.200 80 0.81889 0.00392 0.82673 151dc.090.200 90 0.85159 0.00327 0.85813 190c09.0 I 00.00327 0.85159 - -- 085813 -- 4 dg----

151dc.100.200 100 0.89490 0.00387 0.90264 l5Idc. I 1000.003870.04 00.2000.8949 __________________ A _________________ - - -

'\

ý'-

.7

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page 26 Table VII-16 1Ox1Ox2 (200 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Damaged Conditions, Bundles and Strongbacks Shifted in Containers, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Large Diameter (0.350") Pellets Filenme~(roa-) I Vol% IM~ -',ý+a J 15lds.000.200 0 0.51248 0.00241 0.51730, 15lds.001.200 1 0.68291 0.00313 0.68917 151ds.003.200 3 , 0.77440 0.00264 0.77968 15lds.005.200 5 0.73512 0.00295 0.74102 15lds.007.200 7 0.67678 0.00301 0.68280 15lds.010.200 10 0.61109 0.00259 0.61627 15lds.020.200 20 1 0.56055 0.00329 0.56713 15lds.030.200 30 - 0.59591 0.00322 0.60235 15lds.040.200 40 i 0.64050 0.00311 0.64672 15lds.050.200 50 1 0.68806 0.00345 0.69496 151ds.060.200 60 0.72777 0.00335 0.73447 151ds.070.200 70 0.77527 0.00352 0.78231 15lds.080.200 80 0.81395 0.00332 0.82059 15lds.090.200 90 0.85567 0.00279 0.86125 C 151ds.100.200 100 10.88527 0.00329 0.89185 97_ý

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII I Page 27 Table VII-17 1Ox1Ox2 (200 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Damaged Conditions, Bundles and Strongbacks Centered in Containers, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets Filename (dfoa-?)2,, IVoIIM

- . ___ " ° _- aoij 15sdc.000.200 0 0.49548 0.00243 0.50034 15sdc.001.200 1 0.66916 0.00277 0.67470 15sdc.003.200 3 0.77035 0.00279 0.77593 15sdc.005.200 5 0.72518 0.00298 0.73114 15sdc.007.200 7 0.67075 0.00322 0.67719 15sdc.010.200 10 0.59396 0.00274 0.59944 15sdc.020.200 20 0.54132 0.00254 0.54640 15sdc.030.200 30 0.58711 0.00298 0.59307 15sdc.040.200 40 0.63927 0.00323 0.64573 15sdc.050.200 50 0.69411 0.00343 0.70097 15sdc.060.200 60 0.72893 0.00338 0.73569 15sdc.070.200 70 0.78935 0.00347 0.79629 15sdc.080.200 80, 0.81957 0.00340 0.82637 I OSUC.UU9U.LUU I U Unitib2ti n nnf;nl R R79*d b.. n A,79AA

-1OSUC.1U . CUU IlUU 7UI n.92n7 IO.nOR3 SRRRR*

nl 55RP?

ý"I--

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation -Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container , APPENDIX VII Table Vi1-18 lOx1Ox2 (200 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Damaged Conditions, Bundles and Strongbacks Shifted in Containers, Interspersed Moderator Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets filbnarrfe;(dro6?) Noflm - K. a 15sds.000.200 0 0.49710 0.00276 0.50262 15sds.001.200 1 0.66112 0.00286 0.66684 15sds.003.200 3 0.76510 0.00307 0.77124, 15sds.005.200 5 0.72197 0.00292 0.72781 15sds.007.200 7 0.66943 0.00320 0.67583 15sds.010.200 10 0.60277 0.00296 0.60869 15sds.020.200 20 0.55516 0.00315 0.56146 15sds.030.200 30 0.59657 0.00318 0.60293 15sds.040.200 40 0.64554 0.00257 0.65068 15sds.050.200 50 0.69272 0.00314 0.69900 15sds.060.200 60 0.74084 0.00342 0.74768 15sds.070.200 70 0.77851 0.00267 0.78385 15sds.080.200 80 0.82522 0.00322 0.83166 15sds.090.200 90 0.86162 0.00357 0.86876 15sds.100.200 100 0.90392 0.00322 0.91036

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII I page 29 A)

NJ Table VII-19 12x12x2 (288 Total) Array of Model 51032-1 Shipping Containers, Damaged Conditions, Bundles and Strongbacks Shifted in Containers, Fully Flooded Interspersed Moderator, Polyethylene Sensitivity Study, 15x15 Array of Rods in Bundles, Small Diameter (0.332") Pellets Fileniam~e (ra?) Nol% PE-'Y- V e >r C!~2~

15sds.100.288 0 0.90504 0.00345 0.91194 15sdspeOO1.100.288 1 0.89459 0.00359 0.90177 15sdspe003.100.288 3 0.90270 0.00390 0.91050 15sdspe005o.100.288 5 0.90120 0.00330 0.90780 15sdspeOO7.100.288 17 0.89997 0.00329 0.90655 15sdspeOlO.100.288 10 0.89937 0.00321 0.90579

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII

,, Page 30 3.2 T15X15 Cruciform 'Assembly The layout of a T15X15 cruciform assembly is shown in Figure VII-3. The reference for this assembly layout is provided in Appendix VII-B. The component dimensions for the T15X15 cruciform assembly are provided in Table VII-20.

With only one exception, the T15X15 cruciform assemblies meet the requirements for category 3 fuel in the current COC for the model 51032-1 shipping containers (Reference 5). The exception is that the current COC requires:

i Ii "Cladding must have a minimum wall thickness of 0.02 inch and a minimum nominal pellet clad radial gap of 0.003 inch."

The T15X15 cruciform assemblies meet the 0.02 inch minimum clad wall thickness, but the pellet clad radial gap is only approximately 0.0025 inch. Calculations in Section 3.1.2 show that modeling the clad and gap as void, instead of explicitly modeling the gap as void and the clad as zircalloy or stainless steel, results in either identical or conservative results. These calculations support a change in the COC wording for categories I through 4 to:

"The sum of the cladding wall thickness and the pellet-clad radial gap must not be less than 0.023 inch."1 Since the minimum cladding wall thickness of the T15X15 cruciform, assemblies is 0.0266 inch, the cladding alone (without the gap) meets this requirement. This change in wording to the current COC will bring the T15X15 cruciform assemblies into compliance with the requirements of category 3 fuel.

1.

SAs identified in section 11.2 of EMF-52.

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page 31 I

1, Figure VII-3 T15X15 Cruciform Assembly Layout

tI Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Paoe :32 Table VII-20 Component Dimensions for T15XI5 Cruciform Assembly Parameter Actual1'.. , Referencefor.Actual Conditions Clad Thickness 0.0288" + 5% See Appendix VII-B Rod OD 0.430" Enrichment 2.73 wt% 235U Assembly Cross Section 7.574" x 7.574" Rod Array Size 14x14 Rod Pitch 0.556" (center 4 rods) 0.547" (remaining rods)

Active Fuel Length < 115.838" K-,

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII I Page 33 4V

4. QA REVIEW DESCRIPTION

1) Methodology used in this CSE is clearly defined and was verified to be applicable. ,

Agreement is i~ndicated by a check mark in the CSE text. The calculation methods including details on cross section preparation, atom densities assumed, and geometry models were reviewed and determined to be adequate. Each of these items was verified to be conservative.

2) Assumptions were reviewed for reasonableness and applicability to this analysis.

Agreement is indicated by a check mark in the CSE text.

3) Modeling was reviewed and determined to conservatively model the actual system. A Iisting of one or more of the most reactive cases is included in the CSE.

1 1

4) Referenced sources were reviewed for applicability to this CSE.

5) Input information was checked against referenced sources.

6) Input for computer calculations were checked for agreement with values in the CSE text.

7) Hand calculations were independently checked.

<--- 8) Keff for worst caseaccident conditions is specifically stated in the text.

9) Comments are provided below and are referenced in the CSE text as QA-N, where N is the corresponding comment number.

41ýý

Consolidated License Application EM F-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII Page 34

5. REFERENCES

1) SCALE Standardized Computer Analysesfor Licensing Evaluation, NUREG/CR-2000 ORNL/NUREG/CSD-2, Volumes 1,2, and 3.

2) Critical Separation Between Subcritical Clusters of 4.31 wt% Enriched U0 2 Rods in Water with Fixed Neutron Poisons, NUREG/CR-0073.

3) EMF-94-175, 'Validation and Verification of KENO.Va" by R. E. Coen, Siemens Power Corporation - Nuclear Division, 2101 Horn Rapids Road, Richland, WA 99352.

4) UCRL-53369, Nuclear Criticality Safety Experiments, Calculations, and Analyses - 1958 to 1982: Compilation of Papers from the Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Volume 2: Summaries, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, W. Marshall, et al, "Criticality Safety Criteria," pp.687-688.

5) Certificate USA/6581/AF, Revision 27, Model 51032-1 Certificate.

t 6) ANF-52, Revision 5, Consolidated License Application for Siemens Nuclear Power Corporation Model 51032-1 Shipping Container.

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A rj I, Page 1 APPENDIX VII-A_ SAMPLE COMPUTER INPUTS

1) Case "drda-single.98": Single model 51032-1 shipping container, fully flooded, 15x15 array of rods in bundles, small diameter (0.332") pellets, U02 at 98% TD.

=csas25 51032 category 5 (trino fuel) hans infhom

' mixture 1

• uo2 pellets, interior to assy uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.000' 92238 95.000 end mixture 2

• uo2 pellets, edge, not facing ad3 assy uo2 2 0.98 293.0 92235 5.000 92238 95.000 end

' mixture 3 uo2 pellets, edge, facing adj assy uo2 3 0.98 293.0 92235 5.000 92238 95.000 end mixture 4 carbon steel in container carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end mixture 5

• interspersed moderator h2o 5 den-l.0 1.00 293.0 'end mixture 6

' reflector water h2o 6 den=1.0 1.00 293 end end comp more data res- 1 cyli 4.1893E-01 dan( 1)- 2.7649E-01 res= 2 cyli 4.3752E-01 dan( 2)- 1.7928E-01 res= 3 cyli 4.3530E-01 dan( 3)- 1.9903E-01 end more 51032 category 5 (trino fuel) read parameters tme-90 gen=103 npg-500 nsk-3 flx-yes fdn-yes xsl=yes nub=yes pwt=yes run-yes plt-yes end parameters read geom unit 1 com='standard rod - larger pellet - interior' I for std rod, pellet diam = 0.350 in.

cyli 1 1 0.44450 2p250.19 I use min clad + gap thickness - 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.48514 2 p 2 50.19 I use max nom rod pitch - 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 2 com='standard rod - larger pellet - edge, not facing adj assy'

' for std rod, pellet diam = 0.350 in.

cyli 2 1 0.44450 2p 2 50.1 9 I use min clad + gap thickness = 0.016 in.

91__ý cyli 0 1 0.48514 2p250.19 I use max nom rod pitch - 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4p0.669 6 3 2p250.19

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container .APPENDIX VII-A 3

unit com='standard rod - larger pellet - edge, facing adj assy'

' for std rod, pellet diam = 0.350 in.

cyli 3 1 0.44450 2p250.19

' use min clad + gap thickness - 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.48514 2p250.19 I use max nom rod pitch - 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 4 com='thick rod - smaller pellet - interior'

' for thick rod, pellet diam - 0.332 in.

cyli 1 1 0.42164 2p250.19 I use min clad + gap thickness - 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.46228 2p250.19 I use max nom rod pitch - 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 5 com-'thick rod - smaller pellet - edge, not facing ad3 assy' I for thick rod, pellet diam - 0.332 in.

cyli 2 1 0.42164 2p250.19

• use min clad + gap thickness - 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.46228 2 p250.19

' use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4p0.66963 2 p250.19 unit 6 com='thick rod - smaller pellet - edge, facing adj assy'

' for thick rod, pellet diam - 0.332 in.

cyli 3 1 0.42164 2 p 2 50.19

' use min clad + gap thickness - 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.46228 2 p250.19

' use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4p0.66963 2 p250.19 unit 7 com='location in assy with no rod' I use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4pO.66963 2 p250.19 unit 101 com-'15x15 array on +x side of container' array 1 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 unit 102 com-'15xl5 array on -x side of container' array 2 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 unit 103 com-'trino assy on +x side of container' array 3 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 cubo 5 1 4p10.04445 2 p250.19 unit 104 com='trino assy on -x side of container' array 4 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 cubo 5 1 4 pi0.04445 2p250.19 unit 501 com-'separator block' min dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0 6 in. w x 7.5 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 x 0.3125 in. thk cubo 5 1 2 p6.82625 2 p8.73125 2 pi0. 7 95 cubo 4 1 2 p 7 .62 2p9.525 2 p10. 7 95 I place on 39.4 in. centers 2

cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 p5O.038 unit 502 com='lxlx5 array of separator blocks'

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A Page 3 min of 5 blocks required in 51032

' y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.04445 -250.19

"* match the bundle height cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2 p10.04445 2p250.19 global unit 601 com='single container' I center fuel in container array 6 -27.70890 -10.04445 -250.19 match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 2p31.1943 7 19.32430 -10.04445 2 p 2 50.1 9

' add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1

' im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19

' steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2 p250.43303 undamaged spacing between containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0 2 2 5 2 p 2 50.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 end geom read array ara=l nux-15 nuy-15 nuz-l fill 6 5 5 5 5555555 5 6444 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6444

¶7' 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6444 4444444 5 6555 5555555 5 end fill ara=2 nux=15 nuy=15 nuz=l fi15 55 5 5555555 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4444444 6 5444 4 4 4 4 4.4 4 6 5555 5555555 6 end fill ara-3 nux-15 nuy-15 fill 6 5 55 nuz-l 5557777 7 6444 4445555 7 6444 41 6444 6444 6444 6444 4444444 4444444 4444444 4444444 4444444 7

7 7

7 7

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A Page 4 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 4 4 4 4.4 5 7 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 end fill ara=4 nux-15 nuy=15 nuz-l fill 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 7 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 7 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 7 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 7 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 7 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 7 5 4 4 4 4 4 7 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 end fill ara=5 nux-l nuy=l nuz-5 fill f501 end fill ara-6 nux=3 nuy-i nuz-1 fill 102 502 101 end fill end array read start nst=l end start read bounds all-vacuum end bounds read bias id-500 2 11 end bias read plot use this block for plotting single container calcs

• I .

ttl-' xy section through strongback I xul--32 yul=16 zul-O xlr-32 ylr--16 zlr=O uax-l.0 vdn=-l.0 nax=150 lpi=l0 end ttl-' xy section through one container xul=-82 yul=82 zul=O xlr=82 ylr--82 zlr-O uax-l.0 vdn=-l.O nax-150 lpi=l0 end ttl=' xz section through one container xul--82 yul=O zul--283 xlr=82 ylr=O zlr=283 wax=l.0 udn=l.0 nax=150 lpi=l0 end A

end plot

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A Page 5 end data end

2) Case "drda-undam.98": 15x15x3 (675 total) array ofmodel 51032-1 shipping containers, undamaged conditions, 7 vol% interspersed moderator between containers, 15x15 array of rods in bundles, large diameter (0.350") pellets, U0 2 at 98% TD.

-csas25 51032 category 5 (trino fuel) hans infhom mixture 1 uo2 pellets, interior to assy uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.000 92238 95.000 end

• mixture 2 uo2 pellets, edge, not facing adj assy uo2 2 0.98 293.0 92235 5.000 92238 95.000 end

' mixture 3 uo2 pellets, edge, facing adj assy uo2 3 0.98 293.0 92235 5.000 92238 95.000 end

• mixture 4 carbon steel in container carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end mixture 5 S-.'

interspersed moderator

• /'h2o 5 den-1.0 0.07 293.0 end

• mixture 6

• reflector water h2o 6 den=i.0 1.00 293 end end comp more data res= 1 cyli 1.0428E-01 dan( 1)= 9.7805E-01 res- 2 cyli 7.0576E-01 dan( 2)- 5.9434E-01 res- 3 cyli 6.'7335E-01 dan( 3)- 6.8717E-01 end more 51032 category 5 (trino fuel) read parameters tme=90 gen=103 npg-500 nsk=3 flx-yes fdn-yes xsl-yes nub=yes pwt-yes run-yes plt-yes end parameters read geom unit 1 com='standard rod - larger pellet - interior' I for std rod, pellet diam - 0.350 in.

cyli 1 1 0.44450 2 p 2 50.19

• use mmn clad + gap thickness = 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.48514 2p250.19

' use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 0 1 4p0.66963 2 p250.19 r unit 2 com='standard rod - larger pellet - edge, not facing adj assy'

' for std rod, pellet diam - 0.350 in.

ý-/cyli 2 1 0.44450 2p250.19 I use min clad + gap thickness = 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.48514 2p250.19

Consolidated License Application EM F-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container ,APPENDIX VII-A

, Page 6 use max nom rod pit ch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 0 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 3 com='standard rod - larger pellet - edge, facing ad) assy'

' for std rod, pellet diam = 0.350 in.

cyli 3 1 0.44450 2p250.19

' use min clad + gap thickness = 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.48514 2p250.19

' use max nom rod pitch - 0.52727 in.

cubo 0 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 4 com-'thick rod - smaller pellet - interior'

' for thick rod, pellet diam = 0.332 in.

cyli 1 1 0.42164 2p250.19

' use min clad + gap thickness = 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.46228 2p250.19

' use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 0 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 5 com-'thick rod - smaller pellet - edge, not facing adj assy'

' for thick rod, pellet diam - 0.332 in.

cyli 2 1 0.42164 2p250.19 I use min clad + gap thickness - 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.46228 2p250.19 I use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 0 1 4pO. 6 69 6 3 2p250.19 unit 6 com='thick rod - smaller pellet - edge, facing ad3 assy' I for thick rod, pellet diam = 0.332 in.

cyli 3 1 0.42164 2p 2 5 0.19 I use min clad + gap thickness = 0.016 in.

cyll 0 1 0.46228 2p250.19

' use max nom rod pitch - 0.52727 in.

cubo 0 1 4p0.6 6 9 6 3 2 p250.19 unit 7 com-'location in assy with no rod'

' use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 0 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 101 com='15xl5 array on +x side of container' array 1 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 unit 102 com='15xl5 array on -x side of container' array 2 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 unit 103 com-'trino assy on +x side of container' array 3 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 cubo 0 1 4p10.04445 2p250.1 9 unit 104 com-'trino assy on -x side of container' array 4 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 cubo 0 1 4 p10.04 4 45 2p250.19 unit 501 com='separator block' rmin dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0 6 in. w x 7.5 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 x 0.3125 in. thk cubo 0 1 2p6.82 6 2 5 2p8. 7 31 2 5 2p10. 7 95 cubo 4 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 2plO.795

' place on 39.4 in. centers cubo 0 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 2p5O.038

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation , Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENOIX VII-A Lb unit 502 Page 7 com='lxlx5 array of separator blocks'

" min of 5 blocks required in 51032

' y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.04445 -250.19

' match the bundle height cubo 0 1 2p 7 .62 2p10.04445 2p 2 50.19 unit 601 cormI='single undamaged container'

' center fuel in container array 6 -27.70890 -10.04445 -250.19 I match strongback width and height cubo 0 1 2p31.19437 19.32430 -10.04445 2p250.19

' add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2r0.0 1

' im to inside of steel shell cyli 0 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2 p 2 50.43303

' undamaged spacing between containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2 p 2 50.43303

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 unit 701 com='single damaged container - strongback centered'

' center fuel in container array 6 -27.70890 -10.04445 -250.19

' match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 2p 3 1.1943 7 19.32430 -10.04445 2p250.19

-' add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O I im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2 p 2 50.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51. 7 525 2p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 unit 702 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y'

' shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -20.41345 -2.42445 -250.19 match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.94430 -2.42445 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - I - 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 unit 703 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, +y'

' shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container S'arraymatch6 -35.00435 strongback -2.42445 width and-250.19 height cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.94430 -2.42445 2 2 p 50.19 add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1

' im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIXPage VII-A8 .1

'steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303

' damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51. 7 525 2p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector

• repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 unit 704 com-'single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y'

' shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -20.41345 -17.66445 -250.19

' match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 11.70430 -17.66445 2p250.19

' add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1

' im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p 2 5O.4 3 3 03 I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 unit 705 com-'single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y'

' shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -17.66445 -250.19 match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 11.70430 -17.66445 2p250.19

' add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2r0.0 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19

. steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303

' damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4 p51. 7 5 2 5 2p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 global unit 901 com-'15xl5x3 array of undamaged containers' array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 902 com-'lOxlOx2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 903 com='lOxlOx2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom read array ara-l nux=15 nuy=15 nuz=l fill 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 311111111111112 3 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 2 31 1 111 11 1 111 11 2 3 111 11 11 11 1 1 112

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A I, Page 9 4V. 311 311 311 1 11 1'. 1 1 1 1 1 2 I

I I 311 111111111112 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 311 311 111111111112 21 111111~111112 1'1 1 1 1 2 311 311 I.

311 111'11* 11 11 2 322 2 2 222:2'2 2 2 2 2 2 end fill ara=2 nux=15 nuy=15 nuz=1 fill 2 2 2 2 222222. 2 2 223 2111 111111 1 1 113 2111 111111 1 1' '1 1 3 2111 iiiiii: 1 1 113 2 111 iiiiii: 1. 1 113 2111 111111: Li 113 2111 111111: 113 2111 iiiii1: 11 113 2111 1 1 11,1 1 Li 113 2111 11111*: 113 2111 11111: L1'1 113 2111 111iii: 113 2111 111111: i1 113 2111111 Li 113 2222222 222f 223 end fill ara=3 nux-15 nuy-15 nuz-1 fill 3 2 2 2 22277777 7 7 3111 1 1 1 2 2 2T22 2 7 3111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 7 3 111 11111111 2 7 3111 11111111 2 7 3111 11111111 2 7 3111 11111111 2 7 3111 11171111 2 7 3111 11111111 1 2 3111 11111111 1 2 3111 11111111 1 2 3111 11111111 1 2 3111 11111111 1 2 3111 11111111 1 2 7222 22'222222 2 2 end fill ara-4 nux=15 nuy-15 nuz-i fill 7 7 7 7 777722: 2 2 2 3 7222 222211: 1 1 3 7211 1 1 3 7211 111111: 1 1 3 7211 111111: 1 1 3 7211 1 1 3 7211 1 1 3 7211 111711 1 1 3 2111 111111J 1 1 3 2111 111111J 1 1 3 2111 111111] 1 1 3 2111 1111112 1 1 3 2111 111111) 1 1 3 2111 111111) 1 1 3 2222 222222 2 2 7 end fill ara=5 nux-i nuy=l nuz-5 fill f501 end fill J ara-6 nux-3 nuy-1 nuz=l fill 102 502 101 end fill ara-7 nux-15 nuy-15 nuz-3 fill f601 end fill

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container . APPENDIX VII-A Page 10 ara=8 nux-lO nuy-10 nuz=2 fill f701 end fill ara-9 nux-10 nuyO1 nuz-2 fill 702 703 4q2 704 705 4q2 702 703 4q2 704 705 4q2 702 703 4q2 704 705 4q2 702 703 4q2 704 705 4q2 702 703 4q2 704 705 4q2 702 703 4q2 704 705 4q2 702 703 4q2 704 705 4q2 702 703 4q2 704 705 4q2 702 703 4q2 704 705 4q2 702 703 4q2 704 705 4q2 end fill end array read start nst-1l end start read bounds all-vacuum end bounds read bias id=500 2 11 end bias read plot 9t *** *** * **** **** **** *** ****** *** ***** ******* *** * ****** *******

I use this block for plotting container array calcs ttl-, xy section through one strongback I xul-16 yul=81 zul=250.43303 xlr=88 ylr-32 zlr=250.43303 uax-l.0 vdn--l.0 nax-150 lpi-10 end ttl-' xy section through one container I xul=O yul-06.045 zul=250.43303 xlr-106.045 ylr=O zlr-250.43303 uax=l.0 vdn=-1.0 nax=150 lpi=l0 end ttl-' xy section through 2x2x .I array of containers xul=O yul=212.090 zul-250.43303 xlr-212.090 ylr=O zlr=250.43303 uax-l.0 vdn=-l.0 nax-150 lpi110 end ttl-' xy section through array .

xul--32 yul=1622.675 zul=250.43303 xlr=1622.675 ylr--32 zlr=250.43303 uax=1.0 vdn=-l.O nax=150 lpi=l0 end ttl=' xz section through one container xul=O yul=51.7525 zul=O 4

xlr-106.045 ylr=51.7525 zlr=500.86606 wax-1.0 udn=l.0 nax-1SO lpi=b0 end

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A r,- ttl-'

xul=-32 xz section through array 1, xlr=1622.675 wax=1.0 yul=51.7525 ylr-51.7525 udn=l.0 zul=-32 zlr=1534.59818 nax=150 ipi-10 end Page 11 I I e ************************************************************

end plot end data end I I

3) Case "drda-dam.98": 12x12x2 (288 total) array of model 51032-1 shipping containers, damaged conditions, bundles and strongbacks shifted in containers, fully flooded, 15x15 array of rods in bundles, small diameter (0.332") pellets, U0 2 at 98% TD.

-csas25 51032 category 5 (trino fuel) hans infhom mixture 1 uo2 pellets, interior to assy uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.000 92238 95.000 end mixture 2 uo2 pellets, edge, not facing adj assy uo2 2 0.98 293.0 92235 5.000 92238 95.000 end mixture 3 uo2 pellets, edge, facing'adj assy uo2 3 0.98 293.0 92235 5.000 92238 95.000 end mixture 4 carbon steel in container carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end mixture 5 interspersed moderator h2o 5 den=l.0 1.00 293.0 end mixture 6 reflector water h2o 6 den=1.0 1.00 293 end end comp more data res- 1 cyli 4.1044E-01 dan( U)- 2.7818E-01 res- 2 cyli 4.4739E-01 dan( 2)- 1.7862E-01 res- 3 cyli 4.3145E-01 dan( 3)- 1.6896E-01 end more 51032 category 5 (trino fuel) read parameters tme-90 gen=103 npg=500 nsk-3 flx-yes fdn-yes xsl=yes nub=yes pwt-yes run-yes plt-yes end parameters rcom-'standard read geom unit 1 rod - larger pellet - interior' I for std rod, pellet diam - 0.350 in.

cyli 1 1 0.44450 2p250.19 I use min clad + gap thickness = 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.48514 2p250.19 I use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

Consolidated License Application for Siemens Power Corporation EMF-52 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Revision 6

-APPENDIX VlI-A

' Page 12 cubo 5 1 4p0.66963 2 p250.19 unit 2 com-'standard rod - larger pellet - edge, not facing adj assy'

' for std rod, pellet diam = 0.350 in.

cyli 2 1 0.44450 2p250.19

' use min clad + gap thickness = 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.48514 2p250.19 I use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4 p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 3 com='standard rod - larger pellet - edge, facing ad) assy'

' for std rod, pellet diam - 0.350 in.

cyli 3 1 0.44450 2p250.19

' use min clad + gap thickness = 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.48514 2p250.19

' use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 4 com='thick rod - smaller pellet - interior'

' for thick rod, pellet diam = 0.332 in.

cyli 1 1 0.42164 2p250.19

' use mnm clad + gap thickness - 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.46228 2p250.19

' use max nom rod pitch - 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 5 com-'thick rod - smaller pellet - edge, not facing ad] assy'

' for thick rod, pellet diam = 0.332 in.

cyli 2 1 0.42164 2 p250.19

' use min clad + gap thickness = 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.46228 2 p250.19

. use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 6 com='thick rod - smaller pellet - edge, facing ad] assy'

' for thick rod, pellet diam - 0.332 in.

cyli 3 1 0.42164 2 p250.19

' use min clad + gap thickness - 0.016 in.

cyli 0 1 0.46228 2 p250.19

' use max nom rod pitch - 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4 pO.66963 2 p250.19 unit 7 com-'locatmon in assy with no rod'

' use max nom rod pitch = 0.52727 in.

cubo 5 1 4p0.66963 2p250.19 unit 101 com='15xl5 array on +x side of container' array 1 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 unit 102 com-'15x15 array on -x side of container' array 2 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 unit 103 com='trino assy on +x side of container' array 3 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 cubo 5 1 4p10.04445 2p250.19 unit 104 com-'trino assy on -x side of container' array 4 -10.04445 -10.04445 -250.19 cubo 5 1 4p10.04445 2p250.19

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation "Revision6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A Page 13 J

unit 501 com='separator block' Smin dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0

' 6 in. w x 7.5 in. h x 8.5 in. I x 0.3125 in. thk cubo 5 1 2p6.82625 2p8.73125 2 pi0. 7 95 cubo 4 1 2p 7 .62 2 p9.525 2p10. 7 95

' place on 39.4 in. centers cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 2p50.038 unit 502 com='Ixlx5 array of separator blocks' min of 5 blocks required in 51032 ,

' y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.04445 -250.19

' match the bundle height cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2p10.04445 2p250.19 unit 601 com-'single undamaged container' center fuel in container array 6 -27.70890 -10.04445 -250.19

' match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 2p31.19437 19.32430 -10.04445 2 p 2 50.19 add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303

' undamaged spacing between containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2 p 2 50.4 3 303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10

/

unit 701 com='single damaged container - strongback centered' I center fuel in container array 6 -27.70890 -10.04445 -250.19 match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 2 p 3 1.1943 7 19.32430 -10.04445 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2 p 2 50.43 3 0 3 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 40. 75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 unit 702 com-' single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -20.41345 -2.42445 -250.19 match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.94430 -2.42445 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2 p250.19 rcubo I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303

' damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 unit 703 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, +y'

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A Page 14 shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -35.00435 -2.42445 -250.19

' match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.94430 -2.42445 2p250.19

' add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2r0.0 1

' im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2 p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303

• damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2 p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 unit 704 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y' shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -20.41345 -17.66445 -250.19

' match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 11.70430 -17.66445 2 p250.19 add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2r0.0 1

' im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2 p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 damaged spacing between'containers 41.75 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 unit 705 com-'single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -17.66445 -250.19 match strongback width and height cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 11.70430 -17.66445 2p250.19

• add strongback steel repl 4 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2r0.0 1 I im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyll 4 1 49.77303 2 p 2 50.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2 p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 unit 901 com-'lOxlOx2 array of undamaged containers' array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 902 com-'lOxlOx2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 global unit 903 com-'12x12x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A I Page 15

1. 1) read array ara=l nux-15 nuy=15 nuz=l fill 6 5 5 5 555555 55 5 5 5 6444 444444 44 4 4 5 6444 444444, A 4 4 4 5 6444 444444 4 ,4 4 4 5 6444 4 4 4 4 4 4,4 4 4 5 6444 4 4 4 4,4,4 4 4 4 4 5 6444 4 4 4 4,4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6444 444444 4 4 4 4 5 6444 444444 4 4 4 4 5 6444 444444 4 4 4 4 5 6444 444444. 4 4 4 4 5 6444 444444. 4 4 4 4 5 6444 444444, 4 4 4 4 5 6444 444444, 4 4 4 4 5 6555 555555 5 5 5 5 5 end fill 4 .4 4 4 4 4 ara-2 nux-15 nuy-15 nuz=l fill 5 5 5 5 5 5 55,5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5444 444444~ 4 4 4 4 6 5444 444444~ 4 14 4 4 6 5444 444444~ 4 4 4 4 6 5444 444444~ 4 4 4 4 6 54 4 4 444444~ 4 4 4 4 6 5444 4 4 4 4 6 5444 444444d 4 4 4 4 6 5444 444444~ 4 4 4 4 6 5444 444444~ 4 4 4 4 6 4 4 4 4,4 4 5444 4 4 4 4 6 444444~

1- 5444 5444 5444 5555 444444~

4444444*

555555.'

4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4

4 4

5 6

6 6

6 end fill ara=3 nux=15 nuy=15 nuz=l fill 6 5 5 5 55577777 7 6444 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 7 6444 44444444 7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4'4 6444 4444444'4 7 6444 44444444 7 6444 44444444 7 6444 44474444* 7 6444 44444444 7 6444 44444444 5 6444 44444444 5 6444 44444444 5 6444 44444444 5 6444 44444444 5 6444 5 7555 55555555 5 end fill ara=4 nux=15 nuy-15 nuz=l fill 7 7 7 7 7777555 5 6 7555 5555444 4 6

.7544 4444444 4 6

.7544 4444444 4 6 7544 4444444 4 6 7544 4444444 4 6 7544 4444444 4 6 7544 4447444 4 6 5444 4444444 4 6 5444 4444444 4 6 5444 4444444 4 6 5444 4444444 4 6 S5444 4444444 4 6 5444 4444444 4 6 5555 5555555 5 7 end fill

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A Page 16 ara=5 nux=l nuy=l nuz=5 fill f501 end fill ara=6 nux=3 nuy=l nuz=l fill 102 502 101 end fill ara-7 nux-10 nuy=l0 nuz=2 fill f601 end fill ara=8 nux=l0 nuy=10 nuz=2 fill f701 end fill ara=9 nux=12 nuy=12 nuz=2 fill 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 702 703 5q2 704 705 5q2 end fill end array read start nst-l end start read bounds all=vacuum end bounds read bias id=500 2 11 end bias read plot use this block for plotting container array calcs

• ttl-,' xy section through one strongback '

xul-16 yul=81 zul=250.43303 xlr=88 ylr-32 zlr=250.43303 uax=l.0 vdn--l.0 nax-150 lpil10 end ttl-' xy section through one container I xul-O yul-106.045 zul=250.43303 xlr-106.045 ylr-O zlr-250.43303 uax-l.0 vdn=-l.0 nax-150 lpi-l0 end ttl-' xy section through 2x2xl array of containers xul=O yul=212.090 zul=250.43303 xlr=212.090 ylr=O zlr=250.43303

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 A

Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-A Page 17 uax~l.O0 vdn=-l.0 nax=150 ipi=lO end I

ttl-' xy section through array kul=-32 yul-1304.54 zul-250.43303 xlr-1304.54 ylr=-32 zlr-250.43303 uax=l.0 vdn=-l.0 nax=150 ipi-lO end ttl=' xz section through one con' tainer xul=O yul=51.7525 zul-O xlr=106.045 ylr=51.7525 zlr=500.86606 wax=l.O udn=l.0 nax-150 ipi=lO end ttl-' xz section through array xul=32 yul=51.7525 zul=-32 xlr=1304.54 ylr=51.7525 zlr-1033.73212 wax-l.0 udn=l.0 iax-150 lpi=10 end end plot end data end 9>

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-B

1. 9- I Page 1 APPENIDIX VII-B MISCELLANEOUS REFERENCES The following pages provide miscellaneous reference data for the T15X15 fuel assemblies.

9-

Consolidated License Application for Siemens Power Corporation EMF-52 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container 6 APERevision APEDIX I-S1GLA 01 IQENflF1CtZLr~ II V_ .-? II FoglLo 01.9 d! !-'7

-. A~a C

-- 1.05312 R 014 CM 1ASSE Il TABLE .L..3 FUEZL P7-L---7 AND FUEL ROD sZC:FCA7:cHI3 Raeion taLciaL rJ-Z33 w/ Thea re-elcal F PeLle: Cold (noio~nal) Density (Z noinl (cm) (cm) 10 4.47 95.0 .3390"t 26.5.

4.47 9 5. 0 .8390* 26 5 .6 4.47 95.0 .8890* 2653.6 1.3 4.47 95.0 .8890* Z635.

• 4 Tue2. Rod outer Dia~ecer - 0.385 in (0.97S c=)

Clad macerial. - SS-304 Clad Thickness * = O.015L in (0.0384 c=)

Gas F-41 - Air Fuel Rod Diametral Gat) - 0.005 i= (0.0127 cz)

' hick clad rzd ;Le:dl:e - .2za:

(,)Thtck clad chtzeass a 0.0:.L !a ('X6.

Consolidated License Application for Siemens Power Corporation EMF-52, Model 51032-1 Shipping Container A R~e~v~isionI B6 rage 3 7.

• RE LCWIamLO

- 54 I . -

r I.-.

.A~rAci4weT 3

- I

- P -- - .. i-Nq wI W I_

.e-vul 00 0101C OKD 0 000116 0Q1I1 00 I..

flgflfl 001m 0~ _ 0 011 C. W UMW rznc~xdcI&a stbdad (2.S7 brt=Tv) SbA-R ROb

=acwsicz~m a spesse m-auiaf b~ar-uft) TH.ti c. b 6

Consolidated License Application for Siemens Power Corporation EMF-52 Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-13 Page4 NUCMEAR PLANT MAKAGEMENT (S'GN)

IVL Tciawo'N' 9 - =O84 ROMA A40M (+39 6) 85091 TELEFAX (-386a) 85096U1 TO: SEO POWN C0RORPlOM W- ?4UCIL!M ON== I FAx W':

Al?. Nit LAmm YSO'uLLy bfl.d25A84 4" From: PAPR.ANG.o Suswrc: ENF. aaax c 296 Cw~ AM TN1Me FOMn SmU Waiardmief to yaw requed at iifintio about fte Wierane en wi-ie "

of 15 ffW Uidc Tfuio clddng you will Wi Inadcifiert the drawing 1-tad bfthe5 aid 28.8 mwl I** Tdri -+d-ng5 'mwe do not have fte same arawbV fcrihe ufi rod dnl.

Fw duab msirfndo me~ d iiduse ithle)rw=c is 5.

W Msnd toyu orq" a nrflt app cad n va ftmi~buio 'n sio2 of

?twn B (mesung Inwnule) a tho rI= bwo v meeting kt C=ots and Trivme 608aim ft 7" ot juy.

Kee (7 J

,k-C~Y,-C "

TRANSMLssxm nAn4 NUMER CF SHEETS S~ruRE:*

Sj IFIM PAZ WAN moin ffCC2M =100M ftMU~n C&LL *316 ubfid -4V

Consolidated License Application for Siemens Power Corporation EMF-52 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container 6 Revision APPENDIX VII-B Page 5

'L/

u be Cr

!I 6 tr cre CFm "rn (Iiij 01*a( W)W 0 1I' L~

i'II d " I L,4.

I It' tit

- ,. = I 1 L '1

.1 3IUwHi; WZ t

-= Ut.

Cp wT ala a

oIa 4 -t i

I-Ii I -

II l

I low

.aR~.

zl N 4 A

(DI M-V0 4d 9t'tw Isp SZP d.,o= -AO'0d sunm.*!.S VOt:40-o4- 9 "nC.

Consolidated License Application EMF-52, for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping, Container APPENDIX VII-B Pagea 0-Z: 7 M.,.h Wgir The ininumm of 0.-1 yield strength obtained from actual tensile tests on tube specimens at ,'=ZF iS aboove 60,000 psl. The maximum stress in the fuel.clddlang at maximum steady state pressure (2,030 paig), worst tolerance o~mbinat*onl And 1 power average care temporatur.e conditions (623F average clad temperature)"is a compres sive Str*ss of 54,200 psi.

From thiý bursting test results It was extrtpolated that at 7:6r bursting of the clad would occur at, & pressure of ?,100 psi. The inter nal, pressure buildup due to gaseous fission products does not repre sent A limiting factor an the design of f0el tube.I I To detect any defect in the mat*r-*l and insure iniegrity, el1 fuel tubes are ultrasonically and hydrostatically tested aid many are eddy current tested. rn addition, on A statistical basis, the inside' surface is', visually Inspected with a horoscope and the outside surface is fluid penetrant Inspected. Rejection standards an the eddy current test are based on defects in excess of 10% of the wall thickness. Kif linear indications are Accepted by the fluid penetrant The fuel rod ends are hermetically sealed with end plus arr.

welded to the fuel tube under an inert xas atmospaetre. The technique for end plug welds *as extensively evaluated by radiograephic inspeg tiLn, helium leak testing, and destructive tests including mechanical (bursting) and netalloraphic examination.

D- 1.3.3 Cruciform Fuel Asasemly In the reactor care the cruciform fuel assembly may be either inserted in the core or attached to a control rod absorber assembli.

Though the cruciform fuel assemblies flied and movable are absolutely Identical in aIl. respects, it is sometimes convenient to use a dilferent term when referring to the latter t*yp." Therefore the movable cruciform fuel Assembly (attached to A control rod absorber assembly) bears Also the name of Fuel Follower.

The cruciform fIuel assembly reduces the neutron flux peLesng due to the formation of a moderator slot after the coon'tol red absorber withdrawal, contributes to the power generation beaing made out of fuel, actws as A guide to the absorber, and serves to prevent exes sive bypass coolant flow through the control rod cha..el.,

4) Descrizption The crucirorm fuel assembly, shown on rig. 4:D-1, can be Lttacahi7i to in adapter or to the bottom of the control rod absorber assembly and it is shaped to fit the control rod slot.

I Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VJI-B Page 7 All strucurl parts ofr & -cruc-tOrm assembly are maeal or AImI

=04 stainless steel. Thseoverall lenlgthi 13 115.538 in. And the total 9-Iwaigbt is spproxivAely, 160 lbs.

A cruciform Assembly Is essentially composed of three -main soq tions welded tocether: (1) the interlock with the control rod asboor bar Lassembly;,() tht ceotial section containing the fuel bearing rods; (3) the endasaemhl'y.

TIhe interlock is a stainless steel cutaway inverted T which, pro videiq & close fit far the bottom absorber end and also the esngapsmst surfaces -for the Universal Handling Tool used on the square fuel a~ssemblies. The opposite surface to the enpgagment ban. =3 lsiais to accept the fuel rod end plugs of the central section of the arnwmhly,.

The central section consists essentia~lly of two separatn panels formed by &.'total of 25 rods which, as shown in Figure 4:11-2, are allowed *to sove relativ4 to 'one another for most or their lencth.

Rehlative motion is not possible at the extreme ends where the rafta ame welded to the rizid end adapt~ers.

This design yields a lower spring rate in lateral deflection, thereby al1lowing the cruciform fuel assembly to conform mare easily to the control rod channel envelope. This reduces rod clad wear to a negligible-level end provides added insrance against j auing or bind Ing due to thermal bowing.

.All rods,with the exception of tworicontusin W, pellets. Each rod is made up of eight ccwpart:ents with seven stainleoss steel ssparazor plugs welded to the cladding at alternate Intervals of 13.347 In. or

=.7=2 in. In the same Million. that end plugs art normally velded to the clsolding of square fuel aSssembl rods. Each compartzent separator plug has a small hole drilled through its. length to equalize the fig.

sian gas pressure throughout the length of the fuel red. The separs tar plugs are laterally machined to form a plane on which a tie strip is velded. Tie straps 0.030 In. thick keep together the plugs, -and therefore, the fuel tubes of each pawel.

The arrangement of the central four rods is evlident from Fig~ure 4:13-1. The fuel Is removed fr= two diagonally opposite rods out of the above four rods to prevent formation of possible hot rot~s when the clearance between rods in opposite panels is reduced by movement or either panel.

The rod wells have & thickness 'of =4 mils and are made of h.Zsr stainless steel I0% cold workced. The roft have an outer diameter of 040in. and a pitch of 0.547 -In. except for the tour central rods which have a pitch of .0.305 In.

The cruciform assemblies contain zhe 5.15% of the total fuel weight contained in the core. The enrlchinment of this fuel is 2.72%,

that is, equal to that of the first core region having the lower enr4^

ciuwen:. Power in the cruciform fuel assembly rods is maintained below the level of the surrounding core by Vis low enrichment and by the

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-B Page 8 Moral# 11144 itihvr claddin

,o ~e n1.thicimegs.

ez~ec1ed Tile care 80% ortil*,e power worstpe.L~t peak in "te followers is so tJuat: rultem, roetuerot- inL the pellet center will be well below tle normal. Ace*,tnd value.

"The end assemblY is simply an oOffset cruciform stainless steel section with holes bared to accept the terminal plugs of the 2R rods of the rollower central section.

The cruciform Mlf assemblies which arei mlntained ftied In the reactor core bear an adapeor, shown on rig. 5-D-1, which reproduces the offset cruciform shpe. 1 0.519 In. thick stop Is riveted on each of the four blades. T-en the crucifora fuel annembiy is inserted in the care, the stops rest on the edges of the adjacent square fuel assembly end plates and prevent the c4ruciorm &asemblyfrom falling into the shroud tube below. The stops, a1 shown om Fig. 5:D-1, are arranged in such a way to rest an the edges of two diagona17 oapmeed fuel assembly end plates in order to allow removal of the other two adjacent square fuel azszeblies while the crucifarm assembly is in place. The upper portion of the adapter has the characteristic shape of an inverted T to permit engagement with the Universal Handling Tool.

b) Design Cansiderations A =It*e conservative approach was used to establish the c.rucI form Muel assembly design to accomnt for the maction to which fuel fal lowers unlike the square assemblies may be subjected.

Clad thiclkness in Increased from the nominal requzrement, or 15 ails for sta3tlo=ry fuel rods to g ails. This Increase minimizes the stress due to contral rod motion and provides a wear allowance.

Fuel rods are divided Into short compartments to minimize the accumulated weight of fuel bearing upon the bottom pellet of each stack. Is in the square Nei assemblies, Pellets have dished centers to ensure that this load is carried on the outer circumference of each pellet where temperature is low.

Dashpaots are designed to dissipate the scraml energy without applyinK more than 3.0 X's to the control rod assembly. The accelera tion during & control rod drive mechanism normal step is 3.6 :Xs.

ruel follower pellets tilhus experience less force on sc.-amsing than they do during normal rod notion. It. may be noted that Ite fuel fol lower exposed to 3.9 X's &cc-lera*lun im.oses about ute same load on the bottom fuel pelleot In a 12 In. ccpmartment as a square fuel assent bly element of 4D in. compart.*ent length.

Consolidated License Application EMF-52 for Siemens Power Corporation Revision 6 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX VII-B Page 9 ij 9-,

1 I

I I

NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY ANALYSIS MODEL 51032-1 SHIPPING CONTAINER SUPPLEMENTAL EVALUATION (L1, L2, AND L4 ASSEMBLY DESIGNS) 6 EMF-52 APPENDIX VIII REVISION 7 JANUARY 2003 C

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

....................... ............................. 1 1.1 Allow ed Contents ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Criticality Safety Index (CSI) ........................................ 1 1.3 Reactivity Sum m ary ...................................................................................................... 1

2.0 INTRODUCTION

........................................................................................ 5 3.0 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ................................................. 6, 3.1 Nuclear Analysis Methodology ........................................... 6 32 Computer Codes and Databases Used .......................................................................... 6 33 Benchm arking ................................................................................. 6 3.3.1 Benchmarking Methodology ........................................................................... 6 3.3 2 Benchmarking Results ................................................................................ 7 4.0 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS ................................................. 14 4 1 LI Fuel Assembly Design ................................................. 15 4.1.1 Computer Model Description ........................................................................ 15, 4.1.2 Analysis of Single Container with Li Fuel Assemblies ..................... 16 4.1.3 Analysis of Array of Undamaged Containers (Normal Conditions) with LI Fuel Assemblies ................................. 18 4.1.4 Analysis of Array of Damaged Containers (Accident Conditions) with LI Fuel Assemblies ......................................................... 20 4.1.5 Calculation of CSI with LI Fuel Assemblies ............................................... 23 4.2 L2 Fuel Assembly Design ......................................... 24 4.2.1 Computer Model Description ................................ 24 4.22 Analysis of Single Container with L2 Fuel Assemblies .............................. 24 4.2.3 Analysis of Array of Undamaged Containers (Normal Conditions) with L2 Fuel Assemblies ......................................................... 25 4.2.4 Analysis of Array of Damaged Containers (Accident Conditions) with L2 Fuel Assemblies ......................................................... 27 4.2.5 Calculation of CSI with L2 Fuel Assemblies ................................................ 29 4.3 L4 Fuel Assembly Design .......................................................... 30 4 3.1 Computer Model Description ....................................................................... 30 4.3.2 Analysis of Single Container with L4 Fuel Assemblies ................................ 30 4.3.3 Analysis of Array of Undamaged Containers (Normal Conditions) with L4 Fuel Assemblies .......................................................... 31 4.34 Analysis of Array of Damaged Containers (Accident Conditions) with L4 Fuel Assemblies ................................. 33 4.3 5 Calculation of CSI with L4 Fuel Assemblies .................................................. 35 5.0 REVISION HISTO RY ............................................................................................................. 36 5.1 R evision 0 ..................................................................................................................... 36 6.0 R EFER EN C ES .............................................................................................................................. 37 K)

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page ii APPENDIX A - TECHNICAL REVIEW ................................................. Al APPENDIX B - CALCULATION DATA ...... .................................................................................. .B1 APPENDIX C - CALCULATION INPUTS .......................................................................................... CI APPENDIX D - COPIES OF REFERENCES .......................... .................................................... D1

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application 'Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page iii INDEX OF TABLES Table 1 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................... vi Table 2 Fuel Specification Sum m ary ................................................................................................. 1 Table 3 Summary of Reactivity Results for the Model 51032-1 Shipping Container with Assembly Types L1, L2, and L4 ............................. .............................................................. 4 Table 4 Benchmark Data from Reference 4 for 238-Group Cross Section Library and Heterogeneous UOx without Gd203 .................................................. .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. . . .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . . . . 9 Table 5 Model 51032-1 Major Components and Comparison of Actual vs Modeled Conditions .................................................... ...................................... 14 Table 6 Comparison of Actual vs Modeled Conditions for LI Fuel Assembly ..................................... 15 Table 7 Drop Test Results vs. Damaged Conditions Modeled ............................................................ 16 Table 8 Comparison of Actual vs. Modeled Conditions for L2 Fuel Assembly .................................... 24 Table 9 Comparison of Actual vs Modeled Conditions for L4 Fuel Assembly ..................................... 30 Table 10 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, IM(Inside and Outside Container) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ........................................................... Bi Table 11 Infinite Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM(Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ............................................. B1 Table 12 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM(Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ................................................................................................... . B2 Table 13 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with Li Fuel Assemblies, 7 vol% IM (Between Containers), PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 vol% ...................................................................... 82 Table 14 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ..... ............. B3 Table 15 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ........................ ;........................ B3 Table 16 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, Fully Flooded Conditions, PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 v ol% ............................................................................................................................... B4 Table 17 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, IM (Inside and Outside Container) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded .......................................................... B4 Table 18 Infinite Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM (Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ................................................................................................... B5 Table 19 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with 12 Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM (Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ..................................................................................................... B5 0

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page iv Table 20 15x1 5x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, 7 vol% IM(Between Containers), PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 vol% ....................................................................... B6 Table 21 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ....................... :.................. B6 Table 22 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ................................................. B7 Table 23 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, Fully Flooded Conditions, PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 Vol% ................................................................................................................................ B7 Table 24 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, IM (Inside and Outside Container) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ........................................................... B8 Table 25 Infinite Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM (Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ....................................................................................................... B8 Table 26 15x1 5x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM (Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ....................................................................................................... B9 Table 27 15x1 5x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, 7 vol% IM(Between Containers), PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 vol% ............................... B9 Table 28 12x1 2x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded ................................... B10 Table 29 12x1 2x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded .............................................. B10 Table 30 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered Inside Containers, Fully Flooded Conditions, PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 v ol% .............................................................................................................................. B 11

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Pagev Model 51032-1 Shipping Container INDEX OF FIGURES 2

Figure 1 Li and L2 Fuel Assembly Layout ...............................................

.. 3 Figure 2 L4 Fuel Assembly Layout ................................................

12 Figure 3 Analyse-it Plots for Normality Test .........................................................

13 Figure 4 Standardized Residual Plots from Analyse-it.........................................................................

Assemblies ............................................... 17 Figure 5 Cutaway View of a 51032-1 Containing L1 Fuel Assemblies ............................. 18 Figure 6 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with LI Fuel with L1 Fuel Assemblies ..................... 19 Figure 7 Arrays of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded Loaded with Li Fuel Figure 8 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers 20 Assemblies, Low Density PE Inside Container ...............................

Centered Inside 51032-1 Figure 9 Cutaway View of Strongbacks and Assemblies ...... . ....... 21 Containers ................................................... . ...........................

Shifted Inside 51032-1 Figure 10 Cutaway View of Strongbacks and Assemblies 21 Containers ..............................................................................................

Loaded with LI Fuel Figure 11 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers 22 Assem blies ...............................................................................................................................

Loaded with LI Fuel Figure 12 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers PE in Container but Assemblies, Fully Flooded Conditions, Low Density 23 Outside of Assem blies ........................................................................................................

Assemblies .............................................. 25 Figure 13 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with 12 Fuel with 12 Fuel Assemblies .................... 26 Figure 14 Arrays of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded Loaded with L2 Fuel Figure 15 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers 27 Assemblies, Low Density PE Inside Container ..................................................................

Loaded with 12 Fuel Figure 16 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers .................................................. 28 Assem blies ..........................................................................

Loaded with 12 Fuel Figure 17 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers PE in Container but Assemblies, Fully Flooded Conditions, Low Density 29 O utside of Assem blies ........................................................................................................

Assemblies ............................. 31 Figure 18 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with L4 Fuel with L4 Fuel Assemblies .......................... 32 Figure 19 Arrays of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded Loaded with L4 Fuel Figure 20 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers 33 Assemblies, Low Density PE Inside Container ....................................

Loaded with L4 Fuel Figure 21 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers 34 Assemblies ................................................ . ........................................

Loaded with L4 Fuel Figure 22 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Assemblies, Fully Flooded Conditions, Low Density PE in Container but 35 O utside of Assem blies ....................................................................................................

n, Exceeds 50 ........................................... D1 Figure 23 W Test Percentage Points when Number of Cases,

<2

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application -Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Page vi Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Table I List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym Definition COC Certificate of Compliance CSi Criticality Safety Index FANP Framatome ANP, Inc IM Interspersed Moderator MAX Maximum MIN Minimum NCS Nuclear Criticality Safety NCSA Nuclear Criticality Safety Analysis OD Outside Diameter PE Polyethylene SCALE Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation K>

K>

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page'1 1.0 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

This Nuclear Criticality Safety Analysis (NCSA) shows that sufficient margin to safety exists to add fuel categories L1, L2, and L4 (described in Section 1.1) to the allowed payloads for the model 51032-1 shipping container.

1.1 Allowed Contents The allowed contents are unirradiated, sintered U0 2 pellets in fuel rods assembled into fuel assemblies The fuel assembly specifications are in accordance with Table 2. The locations of the guide tubes and instrument tubes are in accordance with Figure 1 and Figure 2 Table 2 Fuel Specification Summary Assembly Type L1 L2 L4 Rod Array Size 15X15 15X15 17X17

1. Fuel Rods 208 208 264

1. Non-Fuel Locations 17 17 25 Fuel Rod Pitch 0.568" 0.568" 0.496" MAX Pellet OD 0 3707" 0.3742" 0 3232" MIN Clad OD 0.428" 0 428" 0.372" MAX Active Fuel Length 196" 196" 196" MAX Enrichment 235U 5.05 5.05 5.05 MAX U0 2 Theoretical Density 97.5% 97.5% 97.5%

1.2 CriticalitySafety Index (CSO)

The CSI for fuel categories L1, L2, and L4 is 0.4. With this CSI, 50/0.4 or 125 packages may be shipped together.

1.3 Reactivity Summary A summary of the reactivity results is provided in Table 3.

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container ' Page 2 o00000000000000 0Q00OQ 000Q 0o000o 0 0 00O0.00 000OOO 000000000000000 00~00000 00- 00 0Q00000 0000000 00 ooo00o000 00oQO0O oo--ooo ooo oo--,oo o0-0,0 ooooo 000 o-000 o

0000000 o oo o0 o-1::600 00000 000 00000:.

oooooooo0oo0ooo0 Figure 1 Li and L2 Fuel Assembly Layout

0 0

0 L CL o ýL 0 w 0 3

cn > 0 z

-0 CD

=):3 O,qGo*., cc) F) ->0 0

0,0 0`0 0.'0'0 0"01 0 0.0,0`0010,00 0

0 Ololi 0 00 o (D (a b10000,00010,00,00,00,010:

0,0.",0,0 o 0, 0 0 0 b" 00 "oo'o 0,0 o o o 000"O"oo'o Q"O,ýo 0,0 o o o o o o o 0ý00,01'0, ocý-,`,-,,ýo 0 ý,Oo CD 0,00, o o opo o o o'o 0,0"'O"ao, 3 oo 0,C) 0,0 O'o o o o o 0,0,0 o 00 0 Q0,00,000001($000' Q.,o, 0'0' 010,011",.,-,o'0-00'Q'ooobý'000, 0'

00:0,aO,oooo'Oob,00,0ýýCa o,0,-OO""oao,'o,o 0"0,0""00 ob 0, (D (D T CL=) < m M R, ca 71 CD ch G) = -4 N)

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 4 Table 3 Summary of Reactivity Results for the Model 51032-1 Shipping Container with Assembly Types L1, L2, and L4 Description of Most Reactive Case k,, a Bias Biased k,,f LI Fuel Assembly (5.05 wt% 235U)

Single Package 0.9283 0.0007 0.0168 0.9451 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged Packages (675 Containers) - 0.9093 0.0006 0.0168 0.9261 112x2x2 Array of Damaged Packages (288 Containers) 0.9306 0.0008 0.0168 0.9474 L2 Fuel Assembly (5.05 wt% 23U)

Single Package 0.9290 0.0008 0.0168 0.9458 15x1 5x3 Array of Undamaged Packages (675 Containers) 0.9109 0.0007 0.01 68 0.9277 112x2x2 Array of Damaged Packages (288 Containers) 0,9313 0.0007 0.0168 0.9481 L4 Fuel Assembly (5.05 wt% 235U)

Single Package 0.9271 0.0007 0.0168 0.9439 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged Packages (675 Containers) 0.9041 0.0006 0.0168 0.9209 12x12x2 Array of Damaged Packages (288 Containers) 0.9298 0.0007 0.0168 0.9466 CQ q

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix ViII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Page 5 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container

2.0 INTRODUCTION

three additional categories (LI, This NCSA provides the nuclear criticality safety (NCS) basis for adding container. The fuel categories L2, and L4) to the allowed payloads in the model 51032-1 shipping (COC; Reference 1) were analyzed for NCS in allowed by the current Certificate of Compliance Reference 2.

the criticality analysis. Component Section 3.0 of this NCSA details the methodologies used for in Section 4.0. Section 5.0 provides the revision history. Section description and analysis are provided in Appendix A Appendix B provides 6.0 documents the references. The technical review is documented are provided in Appendix C.

inputs a summary of all SCALE calculation results. Sample computer D.

Copies of selected references may be provided in Appendix K>

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. ,Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 6 3.0 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 3.1 Nuclear Analysis Methodology Monte Carlo techniques were used in this analysis. Sensitivities to pellet diameter, clad diameter, rod pitch, bundle size, interspersed moderator (IM), and placement of low density polyethylene (PE) inside the containers were evaluated 3.2 ComputerCodes and DatabasesUsed This NCSA employed the SCALE-4 4a (PC version) code system (Reference 3) using the CSAS25 module, KENO-V.a, and the ENDFIB-V 238-group cross section library to calculate the neutron multiplication factor, kff. Within the SCALE package, BONAMI and NITAWL adjust the cross section data for the specific problem (e.g., perform resonance self-shielding corrections) 3.3 Benchmarking 3.3.1 Benchmarkincq Methodoloy SCALE 4.4a-PC and associated modules using ENDFIB-V 238-group cross sections were validated for use at FANP in Reference 4. The bias and its standard deviation are calculated using the methods described in Reference 4. These methods use standard analysis of variance principles, consistent with NUREG/CR-6698 (Reference 6). For the reviewer's use, the calculational bias evaluation methodology described in Reference 4 is repeated in this subsection.

The approach employed for determining the 95/95 upper limit (K9,m) for calculated ks, of the SCALE 4.4a version of KENO-V.a is based on the following equation:

K95195=Kmvo + AKB + M95, 95 (o07 + EN where KKENO is the KENO multiplication factor of interest, AK4 is the mean calculational method bias, M 9& is the 95/95 multiplier appropriate to the degrees of freedom for the number of validation analyses, 0m 2

is the mean calculational method variance deduced from the validation analyses, and a2KENO is the standard deviation appropriate to the KENO multiplication factor of interest For a given KENO-V.a eigenvalue and uncertainty, the magnitude of K5m5 is computed by the above equation. These results provide a 95 percent confidence that in 95 percent of similar analyses the validated calculational model will not yield a multiplication factor greater than K K>

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 7 The equation for the mean calculational method bias (AKB) is the difference between the weighted mean k-value for the validation experiments and unity.

AKB=K'av-I K"' is given by the following equation (equation 6 from Reference 6):

n The pooled method analysis variance, a,2 is the sum of the variance about the mean and the average total uncertainty. This value is determined as follows (equations 4 and 5 from Reference 6):

2 k,) n Yi i 1 2 1 n ( ", (" ,

Mw is obtained from the one side tolerance statistical tables and is valid for data that has a distribution consistent with the assumptions associated with the tables in Reference 7.

The plots of statistical data that are included in this section were created using Analyse-itO, a commercially available statistical software add-in for Microsoft Excel.

The bias, square root of pooled method analysis variance, weighted mean, and 95/95 multipliers were obtained by using the FANP computer code USLS prepared by L.A. Hassler. The code description and verification is documented in Reference 8.

The determination for normality was made by using the Shapiro-Wilk coefficient produced by Analyse-it and comparing this value with W test percentage points associated with the number of benchmarks being evaluated. When n, the number of cases being evaluated, exceeds 50, the W test percentage points were obtained from Appendix D. When n

• 50, the W test percentage points can be obtained from any standard statistics table containing Shapiro-Wilk data.

3.3.2 Benchmarkinci Results As previously stated, SCALE 4.4a-PC and associated modules using ENDF/B-V 238-group cross sections were validated for use at FANP in Reference 4. The calculations in this NCSA are bounded by the Reference 4 validation report As stated in Reference 4, K9 5 (called biased k,; later in this NCSA) can be obtained by adding the calculated total uncertainty to the average kf produced by KENO-V.a.

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 8 All calculations in this NCSA utilize the 238-group cross section library and heterogeneous UO1 without Gd 20 3. Reference 4 uses a pool of 82 critical experiments to calculate the total uncertainty for heterogeneous UOx without Gd 20 3 The benchmark data used to calculate the total uncertainty for the 238-group cross section library and heterogeneous UOx without Gd 2O3 is provided in Table 4.

Figure 3 provides the Analyse-it plots for normality and shows that the 82 points are normally distributed about the mean with a Shapiro-Wilk coefficient of 0 9869. According to the W test percentage points obtained from Appendix D, 82 points are normally distributed about the mean if the Shapiro-Wilk coefficient is greater than 0.971.

Figure 4 shows the standardized residuals from the value obtained by dividing the predicted kf by experimental (measured) values of kf plotted against EALF. Figure 4 illustrates that any potential trends in the data are statistically insignificant. The 82 benchmark cases used for this validation included cases with various amounts of IM. As evidenced by the standardized residual versus EALF plot in Figure 4, there is no significant trend for IM.

Using the 82 data points in Table 4 and the FANP computer code USLS (Reference 8), the resulting bias, pooled uncertainty, and 95/95 multiplier are Bias = -1.019699E-02 Square Root of Pooled Variance = 3.194255E-03 95/95 One-Sided Tolerance Limit Multiplier = 1.961 Provided the KENO-V.a calculated k.f has a standard deviation less than or equal to 0.001, Kv (biased S j kf) is calculated as follows (see section 3.3.1 for equations):

Kv,._5 = KKENO + 1.019699E-02 + 1.961*[(3.194255E-03) + (0.001)2Jlr2 K9=5 = KKENO + 0.0168 Therefore, in this NCSA, the biased 1kf is obtained by adding 0.0168 to the kff produced by KENO-V.a, while ensuring that the KENO-V.a calculated kff has a standard deviation (a) less than or equal to 0.001.

The biased kf is then compared to the 0 95 limit

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 9 Table 4 Benchmark Data from Reference 4 for 238-Group Cross Section Library and Heterogeneous UO, without Gd 2O3 File Name,' k-mean a c004.out 0.9930 0.0010 cOO5b.out 0.9931 0 0008 c006b.out 0.9941 0.0009 c007a out 0.9944 0.0008 c008b.out 0.9931 0.0007 cOO9b.out 0.9928 0.0008 cOlOb.out 0.9952 0.0009 cOllb.out 0.9964 I 0.0008 cO12b.out 0.9938 I 0.0009 cO13b out 0.9953 0.0008, cOl4b.out 0.9942 0.0009 c029b.out 0.9942 0.0008 c03Ob.out 0.9946 0.0008 c031b.out 0.9951 0.0008 core0l.out 0.9952 0.0007 i corel2a.out 0 9950 0.0006 core18.out 0.9950 0.0007 aclpl.out 0.9889 0.0009 aclp2.out 0.9939 0 0008 aclp3.out 0.9934 0.0007 aclp4.out 0.9875 0.0008 aclp5.out 0.9873 0.0008 aclp7.out 0.9867 0.0008 aclp9.out 0.9879 0.0007 aclplO.out 0.9883 0 0008 acplla.out 0.9919 00006 acpl lb out 0.9916 0.0009 acpl lc.out 0.9915 0.0008 acpl ld out 0.9920 0.0009 acpl le.out 0.9918 0.0006 acpllf.out 0.9916 0.0006 IJ

EMF-527 Revision Consolidated License Application ,tppendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc Page 10 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Heterogeneous Table 4 Benchmark Data from Reference 4 for 238-Group Cross Section Library and UOx without Gd 2 03 File Name k-mean cr acpl 3g.out 0.9908 0.0007 aclpl2.out 0.9889 0.0008 aclpl3.out 0.9906 0.0009 acpl3a.out 0.9884 0.0007 aclp14.out 0.9891 0.0009 acIpl5.out 0.9823 0.0007 aclp16.out 0.9841 0.0007 aclp17.out 0.9874 0.0007 acIp18.out 0.9859 0.0008 aclp19.out 0.9888 0.0006 aclp20.out 0.9869 0.0008 0.9854 0.0007 aclp2n.out rcon04.out 0 9910 0.0007 0.9909 0.0008 rcon02.out rcon03.out 0.9882 0.0007 rcon04.out 09899 0.0007 "I_; rcon05.out 0.9899 0.0008 rcon06.out 0.9906 0.0008 rcon07.out 0.9904 0.0008 rconO9.out 0.9884 0.0006 rconlO.out 0.9909 0.0008 rconl 1.out 0.9876 0.0007 rcon12.out 09897 0.0007 rcon13.out 0.9894 0.0007 rcon14.out 09915 0.0007 0.9892 0.0007 rcon15.out 0.0006 rcon16.out 0.9894 rcon17.out 09909 0.0007 rcon1 8 out 0 9897 0.0007 rcon19.out 0.9915 0.0007 rcon20.out 0.9903 0.0007 rcon21.out 0.9915 0.0008 l UUI If-Q.UUt 0 9894 U.UUU1 rcoIIL.2JU I 09894 K1->

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. I Page 11 Ur,*4,Ii t4ni*.1 *hinninn Container Table 4 Benchmark Data from Reference 4 for 238-Group Cross Section Library and Heterogeneous UO. without Gd 203 File Name k-mean mdis0l.out 0.9885 0.0010 mdis02.out 0.9862 0.0008 mdis03.out 0.9805 0.0008 mdis04 out 0.9884 0.0008 mdis05.out 09891- 0.0009 mdis06.out 0.9963 0.0008 mdis07.out 0.9886 0.0008 mdis08.out 0.9840 0.0009 mdis09.out 0.9861 0.0009 mdisl0.out 0.9912 I 0.0008 mdisll.out 0.9997 0.0008 mdis13 out 0.9878 0 0008 mdis14.out 0 9854 0.0009 mdis15.out 0.9842 0.0008 mdisl6.out 0.9970 0.0009 mdisl7.out 0.9951 0.0009 mdis18.out 0.9923 0.0009 mdis19.out 0 9888 0.0008

EMF-527 Revision Consolidated License Application ,Appendix Vill for Framatome ANP, Inc Page 12 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container 82 30, Mean 0.990167 95% c I~ 0 989373 to 0.990960 25 Variance 0 0000130 20 SDi 00036119 SE 0 0003989 S15 0%

CV1 10.

5 01 3.

2 I Coefficient P05779 Shapiro-Wilk 09869 Skewness 00498 08459 Kurtosis -00324 08961 Go z-1 098 098309850988 099 099309950998 1 k-norm Figure 3 Analyse-it Plots for Normality Test K-)

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 13 I

• =-0 0007x + 0 9906 ooo--__

0 099.

09 . -

05 1 15 2 2-5 3 EALF 3.

a 0%

! 10.

08 0

00 0

0 0 05 1 15 2 2.5 3 0 5 10 15 20 EALF Figure 4 Standardized Residual Plots from Analyse-Mt

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 14 4.0 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS This section provides analyses for three additional categories (L1. L2, and L4) to the allowed payloads in the model 51032-1 shipping container. Descriptions of the payloads and modeled conditions are provided in subsections that follow.

For container modeling and sensitivity studies, the reader is referred to References 2 and 5 The container and assembly modeling and sensitivity studies performed in this analysis are identical to those performed for existing payload types in these references.

The model 51032-1 shipping container major components and their actual and modeled dimensions are provided in Table 5 Except for some rubber gaskets, the entire container is constructed of carbon steel.

Therefore, only the results of the drop tests need to be considered for decreased dimensions during damaged conditions, i e., there is no wood or plastic to burn away, which could decrease spacing between fuel assemblies and/or containers.

Table 5 Model 51032-1 Major Components and Comparison of Actual vs. Modeled Conditions Parameter Actual I Modeled Reference for Actual Conditions SEPARATOR BLOCKS OuterWidth 6" MIN 6" Drawing EMF-309,813 R-2 Outer Height 8 +/- 1/2" 7.5" Length 9 +/- 1/2" 8.5" Steel Thickness 3/8 +/-11116" 0.3125" Number in Container 5 MIN 5 Reference 2, p 2-6 STRONGBACK ASSEMBLY Width 24-7/8 +/- 5116" 24 5625" Drawing EMF-303,898 R-5 Height 12-1/2 +/- 3/4" 11.5625" Length 196 +/- 1 197" Steel Thickness 114 +/- 1/16" 0.1875" CONTAINER STEEL SHELL Inner Radius 19-7/8 +/- 3/8" 19.5" Drawing EMF-303,360 R-6 Outer Length 216-1/4 +/-1-5/16" 197" Steel Thickness 11 ga 0.09568" (80% of nominal 11I ga) _________ ______

Container C-C Spacing > 42-118 +/- 318" 41.75" (undam) DWG EMF-309,813 R-2 40.75" (dam)

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 15 4.1 L1 Fuel Assembly Design The Li fuel assembly is a 15x15 design. The layout of the Li fuel assembly is shown in Figure 1. Only the fuel rod locations are explicitly shown in Figure 1. The "empty" locations in Figure 1 are guide and instrument tube (non-fueled) locations. A comparison of actual and modeled dimensions for the Li fuel, assembly is provided in Table 6 Table 6 Comparison of Actual vs. Modeled Conditions for L1 Fuel Assembly Parameter Actual Modeled Reference for Actual Conditions FUEL ROD MAX Pellet Diameter 0.3707" 0.3707" Pending Certificate of Compliance Theoretical Density 97.5% 98%

MIN Clad OD 0.428" 0.428" ASSEMBLY MAX Ennchment 5.05 wt% 235U 5.05 wt% 235U Pending Certificate of Compliance Assembly Cross Section 8 520" x 8.520" MAX 8.520" x 8 520" Rod Array Size 15x15 15x15 Number of Non-Fueled 17 (see Figure 1) 17 Grid Locations Nominal Rod Pitch 0.568" 0.568" Active Fuel Length 144" 197" 4.1.1 Comouter Model Description The model 51032-1 shipping container was modeled with the dimensions shown in Table 5, exactly as it was modeled in Reference 5, which supported the most recently added fuel categories (Tnno fuel).

Except for the length of the strongback assembly, all components were modeled at minimum dimensions This was done to minimize the amount of steel in the model and to provide a minimum credible spacing between containers. Maximizing the length of the strongback assembly increases the, amount of fissile material on the strongback, but concurrently increases the amount of steel (a poison) in the container.

Using the maximum strongback length, compared to the minimum length, adds 2.31 kg carbon steel to the model. However, modeling the strongback thickness at the minimum value over the entire length (highly conservative), removes over 74 kg of carbon steel from the model. This alone, more than compensates for the steel added due to the increased length. In addition, all other steel components (separator blocks, clamps, exterior bracing) are either modeled at minimum dimensions or are completely ignored. The KENO model uses approximately 597 kg of carbon steel in a single model 51032-1 container. Via a telecon on 8/9/99, Bob Summerville (FANP) reported that a single model 51032-1 shipping container prepped for assembly loading weighs at least 4100 lbs (1860 kg). Note that a very small amount of this actual weight is due to rubber gasket material. This shows that the amount of steel used in the model is significantly less than that actually contained in the model 51032-1 shipping containers (conservative).

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc Page 16 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Appendix IVof Reference 2 provides the results of the 30-foot drop tests. 7A summary of the worst case results, along with the modeled damaged conditions, is provided in Table ,

Table 7 Drop Test Results vs. Damaged Conditions Modeled Parameter "Horizontal (x) Drop Test Vertical (z) Drop Test Modeled in Damaged Result Result Conditions Horizontal (x) Offset of Strongback 0.875" 1.25" 1.5" Vertical (y) Offset of Strongback 2 75" 0.5" 3 0" C-C Container Spacing Affected No significant change No significant change 1" reduction in C-C by Damage to Outer Container spacing The LI assemblies were modeled with the dimensions shown in Table 6. By modeling the maximum pellet diameter and the minimum clad OD, both fuel and moderator within the assembly are maximized.

In order to minimize any neutron absorption in the clad material, the clad was modeled as void Full water reflection was used around the container in the single container calculations and around the array in the array calculations. No pathway for preferential flooding has been identified. Fuel assemblies are held in place with clamps. If PE sheathing is used, the current COC requires that it be open on each end 4.1.2 Analysis of Single Container with LI Fuel Assemblies Calculations were performed for a single model 51032-1 shipping container loaded with the LI fuel design. The shipping container and LI assemblies were modeled as described in Table 5 and Table 6.

IM (inside the shipping container and assemblies) was varied from dry to fully flooded. Figure 5 presents a cutaway view of a 51032-1 containing LI fuel assemblies

EMF-527 Revision Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. , Page 17 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Figure 5 Cutaway View of a 51032-1 Containing Li Fuel Assemblies The results of the calculations for a single container loaded with Li fuel assemblies are presented kf occurs at graphically and in tabular form in Figure 6 and Table 10, respectively. The maximum biased fully flooded conditions and is 0.9451, below 0.95.

I

• EMF-52

'Revision 7 Consolidated License Application for Framatome ANP, Inc ,Appendix VIII Page 18 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container LI DESIGN - SINGLE CONTAINER 100 095 090 0 85 080 075 1!:070 0065 I05 050 045 040 035' 0 30 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 so 90 100 VOL%INTERSPERSED MODERATOR Figure 6 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies 4.1.3 Analysis of Array of Undamaged Containers (Normal Conditions) with LI Fuel Assemblies Calculations were performed for an array of model 51032-1 shipping containers under normal or undamaged conditions. L1 fuel assemblies were placed in the containers. Page 9-1 of Reference 2 states that the water spray test demonstrated that water would not leak into the package. Therefore, in the undamaged calculations of this subsection, the insides of the containers remain dry. The following sets of cases were analyzed, each varying IM (between containers) from dry to fully flooded.

"* Infinite array of containers

"* 15x15x3 (675 total) array of containers A 15x15x3 array was chosen so that the array would contain enough containers to justify a CSI of 0 4, while also maintaining a nearly cubic shaped array in order to maximize the reactivity. The dimensions of a 15x15x3 array of undamaged 51032-1 containers are approximately 1591 cm x 1591 cm x 1503 cm.

The results of the calculations for an infinite and 15x15x3 array of undamaged 51032-1 containers loaded with LI fuel assemblies are presented graphically in Figure 7. This data is presented in tabular form in Table 11 and Table 12, respectively. For an infinite array, the maximum biased kf occurs at 5 vol% IM and is 1.0685. For a 15x1 5x3 array, the maximum biased I%,occurs at 7 vol% IM and is 0.9261, below 0.95.

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc.ý Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 19 LI DESIGN - UNDAMAGED CONTAINERS U

U.

to 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10D VOL% INTERSPERSED MODERATOR Figure 7 Arrays of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies As discussed previously, except for some rubber gaskets and a PE assembly sheath in some cases, no hydrogenous shipping components are used in the model 51032-1 shipping container. In order to show that this small amount of hydrogenous material does not have an adverse impact on reactivity, the most reactive case for a 15x15x3 array of undamaged containers (case U675C007 with 7 vol% IM) was modified to include low density PE inside the container, but outside of the bundles. The amount of PE inside the container was varied from 1 to 10 vol%. The amount of IM between containers was maintained at 7 vol%. The results are summarized graphically and in tabular form in Figure 8 and Table 13, respectively. As expected, since the peak IM was already identified and used, addition of PE to the inside of the container results in lower reactivities.

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Page 20 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container LI DESIGN -UNDAMAGED CONTAINERS WITH PE INSIDE CONTAINER 1 0 0 95 090 085- -

I.

0 080 075-070 065 060 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 VOL% PE INSIDE CONTAINER Figure 8 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L1 Fuel Assemblies, Low Density PE Inside Container 4.1.4 Analysis of Array of Damaged Containers (Accident Conditions) with LI Fuel Assemblies Calculations were performed for an array of model 51032-1 shipping containers under accident or damaged conditions. I_ fuel assemblies were placed in the containers. As previously stated, no pathway has been identified for preferential flooding of the container. The following sets of cases were analyzed, each varying IM (both inside and between containers) from dry to fully flooded:

"* 12x12x2 (288 total) array of containers. Bundles and strongbacks are centered in container.

"* 12x12x2 (288 total) array of containers. Bundles and strongbacks are shifted in container.

A 12x12x2 array was chosen so that the array would contain enough containers to justify a CSI of 0.4, while also maintaining a nearly cubic shaped array in order to maximize the reactivity. The dimensions of a 12x12x2 array of damaged 51032-1 containers are approximately 1242 cm x 1242 cm x 1002 cm Cases with the bundles and strongbacks shifted in the containers have the strongbacks shifted by the amount listed in Table 7. The bundles are then shifted in the same horizontal direction, so that they are against the inside of the strongback These shifts are performed so that the spacing between bundles in four adjacent containers is minimized. Figure 9 and Figure 10 show cutaway views of four adjacent 51032-1 containers with the strongbacks and assemblies centered and shifted, respectively.

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc., Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 21, Figure 9 Cutaway View of Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered Inside 51032-1 Containers Figure 10 Cutaway View of Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside 51032-1 Containers

EMF-52

,Revision 7 Consolidated License Application ,Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc Page 22 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container The results of the calculations for a 12x12x2 array of damaged 51032-1 containers loaded with LI fuel '

assemblies are presented graphically in Figure 11. This data is presented in tabular form in Table 14 and Table 15 Whether the strongbacks and assemblies are centered or shifted in the containers, the maximum biased kI occurs at fully flooded conditions. The maximum biased kef for the centered and shifted cases is 0.9446 and 0.9458, respectively, both below 0.95.

LI DESIGN - 288 DAMAGED CONTAINERS (12X12X2 ARRAY)

S08 U]

U] 075 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 ' 70 80 90 100 VOL% INTERSPERSED MODERATOR Figure 11 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies As discussed previously, except for some rubber gaskets and a PE assembly sheath in some cases, no hydrogenous shipping components are used in the model 51032-1 shipping container. In order to show that this small amount of hydrogenous material does not have an adverse impact on reactivity, the most reactive case for a 12x12x2 array of damaged containers (case D288S100 with fully flooded conditions) was modified to include low density PE inside the container, but outside of the bundles. The amount of PE inside the container was varied from I to 10 vol% Since the container is fully flooded, as the PE volume fraction increases, the water volume fraction in the same region must decrease, so that the sum of the two volume fractions equals unity. PE volume percents greater than 10% were not used in these calculations. At 10 vol% PE, each 51032-1 would contain over 300 kg PE. As stated earlier, the only hydrogenous components used are some rubber gaskets and a PE assembly sheath for some cases, well below 300 kg The results are summarized graphically and in tabular form in Figure 12 and Table 16, respectively. As expected, since the peak IM condition was fully flooded and the added PE displaces water, the addition of low density PE does not significantly impact reactivity. The maximum biased kf occurs at 3 vol% PE is 0.9474, below 0.95.

EMF-527 Revision Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Page 23 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Li DESIGN - DAMAGED CONTAINERS WITH PE INSIDE CONTAINER La.

U.

0 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 0

VOL% PE INSIDE CONTAINER Figure 12 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Fully Flooded Conditions, Low Density PE in Container but Outside of Assemblies 4.1.5 Calculation of CSI with LI Fuel Assemblies and two The CS! is set such that five times the allowed number of packages at undamaged conditions less than 0.95. The CSI is times the allowed number of packages at damaged conditions must have a k,ff The CSI is rounded to the highest tenth.

calculated as 501N, where N is the number of allowed packages.

Section 4.1.3 shows that an array of 675 undamaged 51032-1 containers loaded with LI fuel assemblies with LI fuel has a maximum kff of 0.9261. This supports shipments of 67515 or 135 containers loaded 4.1.4 shows that an array of 288 damaged 51032-1 assemblies. This results in a CSI of 0.4. Section LI fuel assemblies has a maximum kf, of 0.9474. This supports shipments of containers loaded with 288/2 or 144 containers loaded with LI fuel assemblies. This results in a CSI of 0.4.

with LI fuel Therefore, the calculations of this section support a CSI of 0.4 for 51032-1 containers loaded assemblies.

, EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application "Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc Page 24 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container 4.2 L2 Fuel Assembly Design The L2 fuel assembly is a 15x15 design. The layout of the L2 fuel assembly is shown in Figure 1. Only the fuel rod locations are explicitly shown in Figure 1. The 'empty" locations in Figure 1 are guide and instrument tube (non-fueled) locations. A comparison of actual and modeled dimensions for the L2 fuel assembly is provided in Table 8.

Table 8 Comparison of Actual vs. Modeled Conditions for L2 Fuel Assembly Parameter Actual Modeled Reference for Actual Conditions FUEL ROD MAX Pellet Diameter 0 3742" 0.3742" Pending Certificate of Compliance Theoretical Density 97.5% 98%

MIN Clad OD 0.428" 0.428" ASSEMBLY MAX Enrichment 5 05 wt% 2U 5.05 wt% 235U Pending Certificate of Compliance Assembly Cross Section 8 520" x 8.520" MAX 8.520" x 8 520" Rod Array Size 15x15 15x15 Numberof Non-Fueled 17 (see Figure 1) 17 Grid Locations Nominal Rod Pitch 0.568" 0 568" Active Fuel Length 144" 197" 4.2.1 Computer Model Description The model 51032-1 shipping container was modeled with the dimensions shown in Table 5, exactly as it was modeled in Section 4.1 for the LI fuel assembly analysis and in Reference 5, which supported the most recently added fuel categories (Trino fuel).

The L2 assemblies were modeled with the dimensions shown in Table 8. By modeling the maximum pellet diameter and the minimum clad OD, both fuel and moderator within the assembly are maximized In order to minimize any neutron absorption in the clad material, the clad was modeled as void.

Full water reflection was used around the container in the single container calculations and around the array in the array calculations. No pathway for preferential flooding has been identified Fuel assemblies are held in place with clamps. If PE sheathing is used, the current COC requires that it be open on each end 4.2.2 Analysis of Single Container with L2 Fuel Assemblies Calculations were performed for a single model 51032-1 shipping container loaded with the 12 fuel design. The shipping container and L2 assemblies were modeled as described in Table 5 and Table 8.

IM (inside the shipping container and assemblies) was varied from dry to fully flooded. Figure 5 shows a

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix Vill, Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 25 cutaway view of a 51032-1 containing Li fuel assemblies Loading of L2 assemblies in the 51032-1 is identical to that of Li assemblies.

The results of the calculations for a single container loaded with L2 fuel assemblies are presented graphically and in tabular form in Figure 13 and Table 17, respectively. The maximum biased kf occurs at fully flooded conditions and is 0 9458, below 0.95.

L2 DESIGN - SINGLE CONTAINER 095 090 __

0 85 ____

080 ___ ___ __ _

075 ____ ____

.070 _ _'_

S0 65 _ _,

W

9060 __

0t55 0

050 ___

045 ___

040 035 030 ____

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 VOL% INTERSPERSED MODERATOR Figure 13r Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies 4.2.3 Analysis of Array of Undamaged Containers (Normal Conditions) with L2 Fuel Assemblies Calculations were performed for an array of model 51032-1 shipping containers under'normal or undamaged conditions. L2 fuel assemblies were placed in the containers. Page 9-1 of Reference 2 states that the water spray test demonstrated that water would not leak into the package. Therefore, in the undamaged calculations of this subsection, the insides of the containers remain dry. The following sets of cases were analyzed, each varying IM (between containers) from dry to fully flooded:

0 Infinite array of containers 0 15x15x3 (675 total) array of containers

. EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. 'Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 26 A 15x15x3 array was chosen so that the array would contain enough containers to justify a CSI of 04, while also maintaining a nearly cubic shaped array in order to maximize the reactivity. The 'dimensions of a 15x15x3 array of undamaged 51032-1 containers are approximately 1591 cm x 1591 cm x 1503 cm The results of the calculations for an infinite and 15x15x3 array of undamaged 51032-1 containers loaded with L2 fuel assemblies are presented graphically in Figure 14. This data is presented in tabular form in Table 18 and Table 19, respectively. For an infinite array, the maximum biased kf occurs at 5 vol% IM and is 1 0693. For a 15x15x3 array, the maximum biased kc occurs at 7 vol% IMand is 0.9277, below 0 95.

L2 DESIGN - UNDAMAGED CONTAINERS 105 ..f02 INFINITE ARRAY 100 -- X- -15X15X3 ARRAY 095_

090 ____

0851 06 0655 050 ____

045-____

040 ____

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 s0 90 100 VOL% INTERSPERSED MODERATOR Figure 14 Arrays of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies As discussed previously, except for some rubber gaskets and a PE assembly sheath in some cases, no hydrogenous shipping components are used in the model 51032-1 shipping container. In order to show that this small amount of hydrogenous material does not have an adverse impact on reactivity,-the most reactive case for a 15x15x3 array of undamaged containers (case U675C007 with 7 vol% IM)was modified to include low density PE inside the container, but outside of the bundles. The amount of PE inside the container was varied froni 1 to 10 vol% The amount of IM between containers was maintained at 7 vol%. The results are summarized graphically and in tabular form in Figure 15 and Table 20, respectively. As expected, since the peak IM was already identified and used, addition of PE to the inside of the container results in lower reactivities.

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 27 Figure 15 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, Low &

Density PE Inside Container 4.2.4 Analysis of Array of Damaged Containers (Accident Conditions) with L2 Fuel Assemblies Calculations were performed for an array of model 51032-1 shipping containers under accident or damaged conditions. L2 fuel assemblies were placed in the containers. As previously stated, no pathway has been identified for preferential flooding of the container. The following sets of cases were analyzed, each varying IM(both inside and between containers) from dry to fully flooded:

"* 12x12x2 (288 total) array of containers. Bundles and strongbacks are centered in container.

"* 12x12x2 (288 total) array of containers. Bundles and strongbacks are shifted in container.

A 12x12x2 array was chosen so that the array would contain enough containers to justify a CS! of 0.4, while also maintaining a nearly cubic shaped array in order to maximize the reactivity. The dimensions of a 12x12x2 array of damaged 51032-1 containers are approximately 1242 cm x 1242 cm x 1002 cm.

Cases with the bundles and strongbacks shifted in the containers have the strongbacks shifted by the amount listed in Table 7. The bundles are then shifted in the same horizontal direction, so that they are against the inside of the strongback. These shifts are performed so that the spacing between bundles in four adjacent containers is minimized. Figure 9 and Figure 10 show cutaway views of four adjacent 51032-1 containers with the strongbacks and assemblies centered and shifted, respectively.

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc Page 28 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container with L2 fuel ,

The results of the calculations for a 12x12x2 array of damaged 51032-1 containers loaded This data is presented in tabular form in Table 21 and assemblies are presented graphically in Figure 16.

the strongbacks and assemblies are centered or shifted in the containers, the Table 22. Whether biased kf for the centered and maximum biased kf occurs at fully flooded conditions. The maximum shifted cases is 0.9461 and 0.9478, respectively, both below 0.95.

L2 DESIGN -288 DAMAGED CONTAINERS (12X12X2 ARRAY) w a

ILl I0 50 60 100 0 10 20 30 40 VOL% INTERSPERSED MODERATOR Figure 16 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies no As discussed previously, except for some rubber gaskets and a PE assembly sheath in some cases, show 51032-1 shipping container. In order to hydrogenous shipping components are used in the model the most that this small amount of hydrogenous material does not have an adverse impact on reactivity, a 12x12x2 array of damaged containers (case D288S100 with fully flooded conditions) reactive case for amount of was modified to include low density PE inside the container, but outside of the bundles. The 1 to 10 vol%. Since the container is fully flooded, as the PE PE inside the container was varied from the water volume fraction in the same region must decrease, so that the sum volume fraction increases, than 10% were not used in these of the two volume fractions equals unity. PE volume percents greater contain over 300 kg PE. As stated earlier, the only calculations. At 10 vol% PE, each 51032-1 would hydrogenous components used are some rubber gaskets and a PE assembly sheath for some cases, 23, well below 300 kg. The results are summarized graphically and in tabular form in Figure 17 and Table was fully flooded and the added PE displaces respectively. As expected, since the peak IM condition biased kf water, the addition of low density PE does not significantly impact reactivity. The maximum occurs at I vol% PE is 0.9481, below 0.95.

KU

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. 'Page 29 S

Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Figure 17 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded wth L2 Fuel Assemblies, Fully Flooded Conditions, Low Density PE in Container but Outside of Assemblies 4.2.5 Calculation of CSI with L2 Fuel Assemblies The CSI is set such that five times thee allowed number of packages at undamaged conditions and two times the allowed number of packages at damaged conditions must have a keff less than 0.95. The CSI is calculated as 50/N, where N is the number of allowed packages. The CSI is rounded to the highest tenth.

Section 4.2.3 shows that an array of 675 undamaged 51032-1 containers loaded with L2 fuel assemblies has a maximum kf of 0.9277. This supports shipments of 675/5 or 135 containers loaded with L2 fuel assemblies. This results in a CSI of 0.4. Section 4.2.4 shows that an array of 288 damaged 51032-1 containers loaded with L2 fuel assemblies has a maximum kI of 0.9481. This supports shipments of 288/2 or 144 containers loaded with L2 fuel assemblies. This results in a CSI of 0 4.

Therefore, the calculations of this section support a CSI of 0 4 for 51032-1 containers loaded with L2 fuel assemblies.

I

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application for Framatome ANP, Inc ,,Appendix VIII Page 30 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container 4.3 L4 Fuel Assembly Design The L4 fuel assembly is a 17x17 design. The layout of the L4 fuel assembly is shown in Figure 2. Only the fuel rod locations are explicitly shown in Figure 2. The 'empty" locations in Figure 2 are guide and instrument tube (non-fueled) locations A comparison of actual and modeled dimensions for the L4 fuel assembly is provided in Table 9.

Table 9 Comparison of Actual vs. Modeled Conditions for L4 Fuel Assembly Parameter Actual Modeled Reference for Actual Conditions FUEL ROD MAX Pellet Diameter 0.3232" 0 3232" Pending Certificate of Compliance Theoretical Density 97.5% 98%

MIN Clad OD 0 372" 0.372" ASSEMBLY MAX Enrichment 5.05 wt% 235U 5.05 wt% 23U Pending Certificate of Compliance Assembly Cross Section 8.432*x 8.432" MAX 8 432" x 8 432" Rod Array Size 17x17 17x17 Number of Non-Fueled 25 (see Figure 2) 25 Grid Locations Nominal Rod Pitch 0.496" 0.496' K> Active Fuel Length 145.83" 197" 4.3.1 Computer Model Description The model 51032-1 shipping container was modeled with the dimensions shown in Table 5, exactly as it was modeled in Section 4.1 for the LI 'fuel assembly analysis and in Reference 5, which supported the most recently added fuel categories (Trino fuel).

The L4 assemblies were modeled with the dimensions shown in Table 9. By modeling the maximum pellet diameter and the minimum clad OD, both fuel and moderator within the assembly are maximized.

In order to minimize any neutron absorption in the clad material, the clad was modeled as void.

Full water reflection was used around the container in the single container calculations and around the array in the array calculations. No pathway for preferential flooding has been identified Fuel assemblies are held in place with clamps. If PE sheathing is used, the current COC requires that it be open on each end 4.3.2 Analysis of Single Container with L4 Fuel Assemblies Calculations were performed for a single model 51032-1 shipping container loaded with the L4 fuel design. The shipping container and L4 assemblies were modeled as described in Table 5 and Table 9.

IM (inside the shipping container and assemblies) was vaned from dry to fully flooded. Figure 5 shows a

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 31 I cutaway view of a 51032-1 containing LI fuel assemblies. Loading of L4 assemblies in the 51032-1 is identical to that of Li assemblies.

The results of the calculations for a single container loaded with L4 fuel assemblies are presented graphically and in tabular form in Figure 18 and Table 24, respectively. The maximum biased kf occurs at fully flooded conditions and is 0.9439, below 0.95.

L4 DESIGN - SINGLE CONTAINER 100 095 ____

090 ___

085 ___ ___

080o 0.75 ____

Uj o°L

u. 070 0 065 060 055.____

050- -____

045 __-__

040 0 35'____

030 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 VOL% INTERSPERSED MODERATOR Figure 18 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies 4.3.3 Analysis of Array of Undamaged Containers (Normal Conditions) with L4 Fuel Assemblies Calculations were performed for an array of model 51032-1 shipping containers under normal or undamaged conditions. L4 fuel assemblies were placed in the containers. Page 9-1 of Reference 2 states that the water spray test demonstrated that water would not leak into the package. Therefore, in the undamaged calculations of this subsection, the insides of the containers remain dry. The following sets of cases were analyzed, each varying IM (between containers) from dry to fully flooded:

"* Infinite array of containers

"* 15x15x3 (675 total) array of containers G

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. '-Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 32 A 15x15x3 array was chosen so that the array would contain enough containers to justify a CS! of 0.4, while also maintaining a nearly cubic shaped array in order to maximize the reactivity The dimensions of a 15x15x3 array of undamaged 51032-1 containers are approximately 1591 cm x 1591 cm x 1503 cm.

The results of the calculations for an infinite and 15x15x3 array of undamaged 51032-1 containers loaded with L4 fuel assemblies are presented graphically in Figure 19 This data is presented in tabular form in Table 25 and Table 26, respectively. For an infinite array, the maximum biased kf occurs at 5 vol% IM and is 1 0647. For a 15x15x3 array, the maximum biased k.ff occurs at 7 vol% IMand is 0.9209, below 0.95.

L4 DESIGN - UNDAMAGED CONTAINERS 0U 075 070 0 65 a 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 VOL% INTERSPERSED MODERATOR Figure 19 Arrays of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies As discussed previously, except for some rubber gaskets and a PE assembly sheath in some cases, no hydrogenous shipping components are used in the model 51032-1 shipping container. In order to show that this small amount of hydrogenous material does not have an adverse impact on reactivity, the most reactive case for a 15x15x3 array of undamaged containers (case U675C007 with 7 vol% IM)was modified to include low density PE inside the container, but outside of the bundles. The amount of PE inside the container was varied from I to 10 vol%. The amount of IM between containers was maintained at 7 vol%. The results are summarized graphically and in tabular form in Figure 20 and Table 27, respectively. As expected, since the peak IM was already identified and used, addition of PEto the inside of the container results in lower reactivities.

K->

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 33 L4 DESIGN - UNDAMAGED CONTAINERS WITH PE INSIDE CONTAINER 1 00 o 95 090 085 O080- -___

075- -*

070 065-060-0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 VOL% PE INSIDE CONTAJNER Figure 20 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies. Low Density PE Inside Container &

4.3.4 Analysis of Array of Damaqed Containers (Accident Conditions) with L4 Fuel Assemblies Calculations were performed for an array of model 51032-1 shipping containers under accident or damaged conditions. L4 fuel assemblies were placed in the containers. As previously stated, no pathway has been identified for preferential flooding of the container. The following sets of cases were analyzed, each varying IM (both inside and between containers) from dry to fully flooded:

"* 12x12x2 (288 total) array of containers. Bundles and strongbacks are centered in container.

"* 12x12x2 (288 total) array of containers. Bundles and strongbacks are shifted in container.

A 12x12x2 array was chosen so that the array would contain enough containers to justify a CSI of 0.4, while also maintaining a nearly cubic shaped array in order to maximize the reactivity. The dimensions of a 12x12x2 array of damaged 51032-1 containers are approximately 1242 cm x 1242 cm x 1002 cm.

Cases with the bundles and strongbacks shifted in the containers have the strongbacks shifted by the amount listed in Table 7. The bundles are then shifted in the same horizontal direction, so that they are against the inside of the strongback. These shifts are performed so that the spacing between bundles in four adjacent containers is minimized Figure 9 and Figure 10 show cutaway views of four adjacent 51032-1 containers with the strongbacks and assemblies centered and shifted, respectively.

I

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application 'Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc Page 34 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container The results of the calculations for a 12x12x2 array of damaged 51032-1 containers loaded with L4 fuel assemblies are presented graphically in Figure 21. This data is presentedin tabular form in Table 28 and Table 29. Whether the strongbacks and assemblies are centered or shifted in the containers, the maximum biased kf occurs at fully flooded conditions. The maximum biased kff for the centered and shifted cases is 0.9448 and 0 9443, respectively, both below 0.95 U. DESIGN -288 DAMAGED CONTAINERS (12X12X2 ARRAY) 1 00 095 0 90 085 A

080 It

'U O0.75 070 065-/___ ___

--- SHIFTED U - K--CENTERED 10 20 30 40 50 so 7D 80 90 100 0

VOL% INTERSPERSED MODERATOR Figure 21 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies As discussed previously, except for some rubber gaskets and a PE assembly sheath in some cases, no hydrogenous shipping components are used in the model 51032-1 shipping container. In order to show that this small amount of hydrogenous material does not have an adverse impact on reactivity, the most reactive case for a 12x12x2 array of damaged containers (case D288C100 with fully flooded conditions) was modified to include low density PE inside the container, but outside of the bundles. The amount of PE inside the container was varied from 1 to 10 vol%. Since the container is fully flooded, as the PE volume fraction increases, the water volume fraction in the same region must decrease, so that the sum of the two volume fractions equals unity. PE volume percents greater than 10% were not used in these calculations. At 10 vol% PE, each 51032-1 would contain over 300 kg PE. As stated earlier, the only hydrogenous components used are some rubber gaskets and a PE assembly sheath for some cases, well below 300 kg. The results are summarized graphically and in tabular form in Figure 22 and Table 30, respectively. As expected, since the peak IM condition was fully flooded and the added PE displaces water, the addition of low density PE does not significantly impact reactivity. The maximum biased kf occurs at 1 vol% PE is 0.9466, below 0.95.

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Page 35 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Figure 22 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Fully Flooded Conditions, Low Density PE in Container but Outside of Assemblies 4.3.5 Calculation of CSI with L4 Fuel Assemblies The CSI is set such that five times the allowed number of packages at undamaged conditions and two is times the allowed number of packages at damaged conditions must have a ke, less than 0.95. The CSI calculated as 50/N, where N is the number of allowed packages. The CSI is rounded to the highest tenth.

Section 4.3.3 shows that an array of 675 undamaged 51032-1 containers loaded with L4 fuel assemblies has a maximum k* of 0.9209. This supports shipments of 675/5 or 135 containers loaded with L4 fuel assemblies. This results in a CSI of 0.4. Section 4.3.4 shows that an array of 288 damaged 51032-1 containers loaded with L4 fuel assemblies has a maximum ke of 0.9466. This supports shipments of 288/2 or 144 containers loaded with L4 fuel assemblies. This results in a CSI of 0.4.

fuel Therefore, the calculations of this section support a CSI of 0 4 for 51032-1 containers loaded with L4 assemblies.

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. , Page 36 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container 5.0 REVISION HISTORY 5.1 Revision 0 Revision 0 of this NCSA provided the NCS basis for adding three additional categories (L1, L2, and L4) to the allowed payloads in the model 51032-1 shipping container. The fuel categories allowed by the current (at the time of revision 0) COC (Reference 1) were analyzed for NCS in Reference 2.

-I

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc "AppendixVIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 37

6.0 REFERENCES

1) Certificate USN6581/AF, Revision 31, Model 51032-1 Certificate.

2) EMF-52, Revision 6B, Consolidated License Application for Siemens Power Corporation Model 51032-1 Shipping Container July 2000.

3) SCALE (CCC-545): A Modular Code System for Performing Standardized ComputerAnalyses for Licensing Evaluation, NUREG/CR-0200, Rev. 6 (ORNL/NUREG/CSD-21R6), Volumes I, II, and III, March 2000.

4) EMF-2670, Revision 1, Software Validation Document - PC-SCALE4 4a V&V, 11/26/2002.

5) Criticality Safety Evaluation BFQ-M51032-1.1, Revision 0, M51032-1 Shippingq Container Supplemental Criticality Safety Evaluation, 7/27/1999.

6) NUREGICR-6698, 'Guide for Validation of Nuclear Criticaliy Safety Calculational Methodology, prepared by J.C. Dean and R.W. Tayloe, Jr., January 2001

7) ORDP 20-114, Table 15, pg 45-51.

8) USLS Code Description and Verification, 32-5017356-01 prepared by L A. Hassler, dated 05/19/02.

tKJ

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page Al of Al APPENDIX A - TECHNICAL REVIEW

1) Methodology used in this NCSA is clearly defined and was verified to be applicable. The calculation methods including details on cross section preparation, atom densities assumed, and geometry models were reviewed and determined to be adequate. Each of these items was verified to be conservative.

2) Assumptions were reviewed for reasonableness and applicability to this analysis.

3) Modeling was reviewed and determined to conservatively model the actual system. A listing of one or more of the most reactive cases is included in the NCSA.

4) Referenced sources were reviewed for applicability to this NCSA.

5) Input information was checked against referenced sources.

6) Input for computer calculations was checked for agreement with values in the NCSA text.

7) Hand calculations were independently checked.

8) kIf for worst case accident conditions is specifically stated in the text.

9) Comments and resolutions are provided below.

Technical Review Comments andResolution Revision 0:

All comments were editorial in nature and were incorporated into the text.

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Page B1 of B11 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPEiNDIX B - CALCULATION DATA I Table 10 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded-with-LI Fuel Assemblies, IM (Inside and Outside Container)

Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED KEFF NOMOO00 12/15/2002 07:43p 03479 0.0006 10.0168 0.3647 NOM00001 12/15/2002 07:49p 0.3407 00005 0.0168 0.3575 NOM00003 12/15/2002 07:56p 0.3360 0.0006 00168 0.3528 NOM00005 12/15/2002 08.03p 0.3453 00005 0.0168 0.3621 NOM00007 12/15/2002 08:10p 0.3649 0.0005 0.0168 03817 NOM00010 12/15/2002 08"17p 0.4004 0.0006 0.0168 0.4172 NOM00020 12/15/2002 08:26p 0.5185 0.0006 0.0168 0 5353 NOM00030 12/15/2002 08:37p 0.6022 0.0007 -0.0168 0.6190 NOM00040 12/15/2002 08 48p 0.6619 0.0006 0.0168 0.6787 NOM00050 12/15/2002 08 59p 0.7126 0.0007 0.0168 0.7294 NOM00060 12/15/2002 09.10p 0.7598 0.0008 0.0168 0.7766 NOM00070 12/15/2002 09.21p 08053 0.0008 0.0168 0.8221 NOM00080 12/15/2002 09.32p 08491 0.0008 00168 0.8659 NOM00090 12/15/2002 09:43p 0.8893 0.0008 00168 0.9061 NOM00100 12115/2002 09:55p 0.9283 0.0007 0 0168 0.9451 Table 11 Infinite Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM (Between Containers Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded FILE NAME : DATE TIME-- BESTKEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED

,- KEFF UINFCOOO 12/27/2002 12 20p 0.7766 0.0003 0.0168 0.7934 UINFC001 12/27/2002 12.38p 0.9457 0.0004 0.0168 0.9625 UINFC003 12/27/2002 12:49p 1.0436 0.0005 0.0168 1 0604 UINFC005 12/27/2002 12:59p 1.0517 0 0005 0.0168 1 0685 UINFC007 12/27/2002 01:08p 1.0318 0.0005 0.0168 1.0486 UINFC010 12/27/2002 01:17p 0.9794 00006 0.0168 0.9962 UINFC020 12/27/2002 01:28p 0.7949 0.0006 0.0168 0.8117 UINFC030 12/27/2002 01:41p 06772 00006 0.0168 06940 UINFC040 12/27/2002 01:55p 06105 0.0006 0.0168 0.6273 UINFC050 12/27/2002 02"09p 0.5667 0.0005 0 0168 0.5835 UINFC060 12/27/2002 02.24p 0.5339 0.0005 0.0168 0.5507 UINFC070 12/27/2002 02.39p 0.5091 0.0005 0.0168 0.5259 UINFC080 12/27/2002 02:54p 0.4893 0.0005 0.0168 0.5061 UINFC090 12/27/2002 03:1Op 0.4710 0.0005 00168 0.4878 UINFC100 12/27/2002 03:26p 04566 0.0005 0 0168 0.4734 K)

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page B2 of Bll I' Table 12 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with Li Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM(Between Containers Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED KEFF U675C000 12/26/2002 05,08p 0.5803 0.0005 0.0168 0.5971 U675C001 12r26/2002 05 20p 06833 0.0006 0.0168 0.7001 U675C003 12/2612002 05:30p 0.8341 0.0006 00168 0.8509 U675C005 12t26/2002 05:39p 0.8942 0.0007 00168 0.9110 U675C007 12/26/2002 05:48p 0 9093 00006 0.0168 0.9261 U675C010 12t26/2002 05.57p 0 8927 0 0006 0.0168' 0.9095 U675C020 1212612002 06:11p 0.7577 0.0006 0.0168 0.7745 U675C030 1212612002 06:25p 0.6550 0.0006 0.0168 '0.6718 U675C040 12/26/2002 06:41 p 0.5936 0.0006 0.0168 0.6104 U675C050 12/26/2002 06:55p 0.5526- 00005 0.0168 0 5694 U675C060 12/26/2002 07:1Op 0.5247 0.0005 0.0168 0.5415 U675C070 12/2612002 07:25p 0.5004 0.0006 0.0168 0.5172 U675C080 12/2612002 07:41p 0.4811 0.0005 00168 0.4979 U675C090 12/26/2002 07:57p 0.4649 0.0005 0 0168 0.4817 U675C100 12/26/2002 08:14p 0.4513 0.0006 0.0168 0.4681 Table 13 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, 7 vol% IM (Between Containers), PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 vol%

FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED KEFF U675C007 12/26/2002 05:48p 0.9093 0.0006 0.0168 0.9261 U675P001 12128/2002 10:18a 0.8844 0.0006 0 0168 09012 U675P003 12/2812002 10:29a 0.8169 0.0007 0.0168 0.8337 U675P005 12/2812002 10:39a 0.7456 0.0007 0.0168 0.7624 U675P007 12/28/2002 10:51a 0.6843 0.0006 0.0168 0.7011 U675P010 12128/2002 11:03a 0.6156 0.0006 0.0168 0.6324

EMF-527 Revision Appendi VIII Consolidated License Application ANP, Inc.

for Framatome , Page B3 of Bll Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks Table 14 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully and and Assemblies Centered Inside Containers, IM (inside Flooded BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED FILE NAME DATE TIME KEFF 0.5515 0.0006 0.0168 .0.5683 D288C000 12/22/2002 05:15p 0.0007 0168 00.0168 0.7671 D288C001 1212212002 05:25 0.7503 0.8507 0 0007 0.8675 D288C003 12122/2002 05:34p 0.7994 0.0006 0.0168 0.8162 D288C005 12/22/2002 05:42p 0.7277 00006 0.0168 0.7445 D288C007 71222/2002 05:51p 0 6415 00006 0.0168 0.6583 D288C010 12/22/2002 06.02p 0.5765 0.0007 00168 0.5933 D288C020 12/22/2002 06:14p 0.6183 0 0006 0.0168 0.6351 D288C030 12/22/2002 06.26p 0.6677 '0.0007 '0.0168 0.6845' D288C040 12122/2002 06,39p 0.7158 0.0007 00168 0.7326 D288C050 12/2212002 06:51p 0.7608 00008 0.0168 0.7776 D288C060 12/22/2002 07:04p 0 8070 0 0007 ý0.0168 0.8238 D288C070 12122/2002 07:16p 0.8493 0.0008 l0 0168 0.8661 D288C080 1212212002 07:28p 0.8904 " 00007 0.0168 0.9072 D288C090 12/2212002 07:40p 09278' 0.0008 00168 0.9446 D288C100 12122(2002 07:51p Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks Table 15 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, IM Flooded Between (Inside and BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED FILE NAME DATE TIME KEFF 0.5492 0.0006 0 0168 0.5660 D288S000 12/2212002 08"02 0.7479 0.0007 0.0168 0.7647 D288S001 12/22/2002 08:12 0.8436 0.0006 0 0168 0.8604 D288S003 12/22/2002 08:21p 0.7942 0.0007 0 0168 0.8110 D288S005 12122/2002 08:33p 0.7275. 0.0006 0.0168 0.7443 D288S007 12122/2002 08.47p 06507 0.0006 0.0168 0.6675 D288S010 12122_/2002 08:58p 0.5875 00006 0.0168 0.6043 D288S020 12/22/2002 09:10p 0.6239 0.0006 0.0168 0.6407 D288S030 1212212002 09.23p 0 6722 00007 0.0168 0.6890 D288S040 12/22/2002 09.37p 0.7197 0.0006 0.0168 0.7365 D288S050 12122/2002 09.51p 0 0168 0.7784 10 05p 0.7616 0.0007 D288S060 12122/2002 0.8235 10:17p 08067 0.0008 0.0168 D288S070 1212212002 0.8675 10.29p 0.8507 0.0007 0.0168 D288S080 12122/2002 0.9066 10.40p 0.8898 00007 0.0168 D288S090 12122/2002 09458 10.50p 09290 0.0007 0.0168

-288S100 12/22/2002

, EMF-52 Consolidated Ucense Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. "AppendixVIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page B4 of B11 Table 16 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, Fully Flooded Condiions, PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 vol%

FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF -SIGMA BIAS BIASED

_______ KEFF D288S100 12/22/2002 10.50p 0.9290 0 0007 0.0168 0.9458 D288P001 12/28/2002 02:53p 0 9298 0.0008 0 0168 0.9466 D288P003 12/28/2002 03:04p 0.9306 0.0008 0.0168 0.9474 D288P005 12/2812002 03:15p 0 9284 0 0007 0.0168 0.9452 D288P007 12r28/2002 03:27p 0.9278 0.0009 0 0168 0.9446 D288P010 12128/2002 03:38p 0 9286 0.0007 0.0168 0.9454 Table 17 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, IM (Inside and Outside Container)

Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded FILE NAME DATE ,.TIME - BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED,

-- ________ ______... __ _ _ _ _ KEFF NOMOOOOO 12/15/2002 05:19p 0.3501 0.0006 00168 0.3669 NOM00001 12/15/2002 05:25p 0.3421 0.0005 0.0168 0.3589 NOM00003 12115/2002 05:32p 03394 0.0005 0.0168 0.3562 NOM00005 12/15/2002 05:39p 0.3490 0.0005 0.0168 03658 NOM00007 12/15/2002 05:47p 0.3662 0.0006 0.0168 0.3830 NOM00010 12/15/2002 05.54p 0.4030 0.0005 0.0168 0.4198 NOM00020 12/15/2002 06,04p 05202 0.0006 0.0168 0.5370 NOM00030 12/15/2002 06:15p 0.6061 0.0007 0.0168 0.6229 NOM00040 12115/2002 06"26p 06637 0.0008 0.0168 0.6805 NOM00050 12/15/2002 06:38p 0.7144 0.0007 0.0168 0.7312 NOM00060 12/15/2002 06:50p 0.7621 0.0008 00168 0.7789 NOM00070 12115/2002 07 03p 0 8073 0.0008 00168 0.8241 NOM00080 12/1512002 07:14p 08507 00008 0.0168 0.8675 NOM00090 12115/2002 07:24p 0.8918 0 0007 0.0168 0.9086 NOM00100 12/1512002 07,36p 09290 0.0008 0.0168 0 9458

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Page B5 of B11 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Table 18 Infinite Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM (Between Containers Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED S... KEFF UINFCOOO 12/27/2002 04:01p 07783 00003 0.0168 0.7951 UINFCOO1 12/27/2002 04:18p .- 09456- 00004 00168 0.9624 UINFC003 -12/27/2002 - 04:29p 1 0448 0.0005 00168 1.0616 UINFC005 12/27/2002- 04:39p, 1.0525 0.0006 0.0168 1.0693 UINFC007 12/27/2002 04:48p 1.0325 0.0005 0.0168 1.0493 UINFC010 12/27/2002 - 04:57p - 0.9804 0.0006 0.0168 0.9972 UINFC020 12/27/2002 05:08p 0.7971 0.0006 00168 0.8139 UINFC030 12/27/2002 05"20p 0.6800 0.0005 00168 0.6968 UINFC040 12/27/2002 05 34p 06118 00006 00168 06286 UINFC050 12/27/2002 05"49p 0.5679 0.0006 0.0168 0.5847 UINFC060 12127/2002 06 04p 0.5373 00005 -0.0168 0 5541 UINFC070 12/27/2002 06:19p 0.5124 0.0005 0.0168 0.5292 UINFC080 12/27/2002 06.34p 04901 0.0005 0.0168 0.5069 UINFC090 12/27/2002 06:50p -0.4738 0.0005 0.0168 0.4906 UINFC100 12/27/2002 07:06p 0.4584 0.0005 0.0168 0.4752 Table 19 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM(Between Containers Varied from Dr' to Fully Flooded

-TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED K. FILE NAME - DATE

_. KEFF U675C000 12/26/2002 08.46p 0 5832 0.0006 0.0168 0.6000 U675C001 12/26/2002- 08"59p 0.6879 00006 0.0168 0.7047 U675C003 12/26/2002 09.09p 0.8365 0.0006 0.0168 08533

-U675C005 12/26/2002 09:19p 08953- 0.0007 0.0168 0.9121 U675C007 12/26/2002 09:28p 0.9109 -0.0007 0.0168 0.9277 U675C010 12/26/2002 09:37p 0.8931 - 0.0006 0.0168 0.9099 U675C020 12/26/2002 09.47p 0.7591-- 0.0006 0.0168 0.7759 U675C030 12/26/2002 10.00p 0.6553 0 0006 0.0168 06721 U675C040 12/26/2002 10.13p 0.5954 00006 0.0168 0 6122 U675C050 12/26/2002 10.27p 05545 00006 00168 0.5713 U675C060 12/2612002 10 41p 0.5251 0.0005 00168 0.5419 U675C070 12/26/2002 10 58p 0.5030 0.0006 0.0168 0.5198 U675C080 12/26/2002 11:27p 0.4846 0.0005 0.0168 0.5014 U675C090 12/26/2002 11:44p 0.4660 00005 0.0168 0.4828 U675C100 12/27/2002 12:00a 0.4534 0 0005 0.0168 0.4702

<2

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page B6 of Bll Table 20 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, 7 vol% IM (Between Containers), PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 vol%

FILE NAME 'DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS- BIASED

_ __I_ KEFF' U675C007 12/26/2002 09.28p 0.9109 0.0007 0.0168 0.9277 U675P001 12/2812002 11:22a 0.8857 0.0007 0.0168 0.9025 U675P003 12/28/2002 11:31a 08165 00007 0.0168 0.8333 U675P005 12/28/2002 11:41a 0.7478 0.0006 0.0168 0.7646 U675P007 12/28/2002 11:51a 0.6871 0.0007 00168 0.7039 U675P010 12/28/2002 12"02p 0.6172 0.0006 0.0168 0.6340 Table 21 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered Inside Containers, IM(Inside and Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded FILE NAME DATE - TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED 288C00 12202 1:03 0.555 _ 0.000 065KEFF D288C000 12/22/2002 11:03p 0.5558 0.0006 0.0168 05726 D288C001 12/22/2002 11:13p 0.7534 0.0006 0.0168 07702 D288C003 12/22/2002 11:22p 0.8535 0.0007 -0.0168 0.8703 D288C005 12/22/2002 11:30p 0.8012 0.0006 0.0168 0.8180 D288C007 12/22/2002 11:39p 0.7284 0.0007 0.0168 0.7452 D288C010 12/22/2002 11:49p 0.6437 00006 0.0168 0.6605 D288C020 12/23/2002 12:02a 0.5776 0 0006 0.0168 0.5944 D288C030 12/23/2002 12:14a 0.6218 0 0006 0.0168 06386 D288C040 12/23/2002 12:27a 06702 0.0006 0.0168 0.6870 D288C050 12/23/2002 12"39a 0.7186 0 0007 0.0168 0.7354 D288C060 12/23/2002 12:51a 0.7638 0.0007 0.0168 0.7806 D288C070 12/23/2002 01:02a 0.8089 0.0007 0.0168 0.8257 D288C080 12/2312002 01:13a 0.8507 0.0008 0.0168 0.8675 D288C090 12/23/2002 01:24a 0.8922 0.0008 0.0168 0.9090 D288C100 12/23/2002 01:35a 0.9293 0.0007 0.0168 0.9461

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision ,7

'Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc.

Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page B7 of Bll Table 22 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED

__ KEFF D288S000 12123/2002 01:46a 0.5528 0 0006' 0.0168 0.5696 D288S001 12/23/2002 01:56a 0.7500 0.0007 0.0168 0.7668 D288S003 - 12/2312002 02.05a 0.8457 00007 0.0168 0.8625 D288S005 12123/2002 02.13a 0.7955 0 0006 0 0168 0.8123 D288S007 12/23/2002 02.22a 0.7277 0 0006 0.0168 0.7445 D288S010 1212312002 02.33a 0.6508 0 0006 0 0168 06676 D288S020 1212312002 02:45a 0.5892 0.0006 0.0168 06060 D288S030 12/2312002 02.57a 0.6258 0.0007 0.0168 0.6426 D288S040 12/2312002 03:10a 0.6738 0.0007 0.0168 0.6906 D288S050 12/2312002 03:22a 0.7172 0.0007 0.0168 0.7340 D288S060 12/23/2002 03:34a 0.7642 0.0007 0.0168 0.7810 D288S070 1212312002 03:45a 0.8076 0.0007 0.0168 0.8244 D288S080 1212312002 03:56a 0.8510 0.0007 0.0168 0.8678 D288S090 12/23/2002 04:07a 0.8935 0 0008 0.0168 0.9103 D288S100 12/23/2002 04:17a 0.9310 00009 0.0168 0.9478 Table 23 12x1 2x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L2 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, Fully Flooded Conditions, PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 vol%

FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF. -SIGMA BIAS BIASED KEFF D288S100 12/23/2002 04:17a 0.9310, 0.0009 0.0168 0.9478 D288P001 12/28/2002 03"49p 0.9313 00007 0.0168 0.9481 D288P003 12/28/2002 04:00p 0.9292 0 0009 '0.0168 0.9460 D288P005 12/28/2002 04:11p 0.9312 00007 0.0168 0.9480 D288P007 12/28/2002 04:22p 0.9300 00007 0.0168 0.9468 D288P010 12128/2002 04:34p -0.9296 00008 0.0168 0.9464

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Apjllication Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Page B8 of P11, Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Table 24 Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, IM (Inside and Outside Container)

Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED I KEFF NOMOQOQO 12/16/2002 11:02p 0 3435 0.0006 0 0168 0.3603 NOM00001 12/16/2002 11:08p 0.3343 0.0005 0.0168 0.3511 NOM00003 12/1612002 11:15p 0.3322 00005 00168 0.3490 NOM00005 12/16/2002 11:22p 0.3417 00005 0.0168 0 3585 NOM00007 12/1612002 11"29p 0.3600 00005 0.0168 0.3768 NOM00010 12116/2002 11:36p 0.3962 0.0005 0.0168 0.4130 NOM00020 12/16/2002 11:46p 05146 0.0006 0.0168 0.5314 NOM00030 12/1612002 11:56p 05983 0.0007 00168 0.6151 NOM00040 12/17/2002 12:07a 0.6601 00007 0.0168 0.6769 NOM00050 12/17/2002 12:19a 07113 00008 00168 0.7281 NOM00060 12/17/2002 12:30a 0.7592 00007 0.0168 0.7760 NOM00070 12/17/2002 12:41a 0.8045 0 0007, .0.0168 0.8213 NOM00080 12/17/2002 12:52a 0.8474 0.0007 :0.0168 0.8642 NOM00090 12/17/2002 01"03a 0.8897 0.0008 0.0168 0.9065 NOM00100 12/17/2002 01:13a 0.9271 00007 0.0168 09439 Table 25 Infinite Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM (Between Containers Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED KEFF UINFCOOO 12/27/2002 07:43p 0.7757 0.0003 0.0168 0.7925 UINFC001 12/27/2002 08.02p 0.9454 00004 0.0168 0.9622' UINFC003 12/27/2002 08:14p 1.0419 0.0004 0.0168 1.0587 UINFC005 12/27/2002 08:24p 1.0479 0.0006 0.0168 1.0647 UINFC007 12/27/2002 08:33p 1.0279 0.0006 0.0168 1.0447 UINFC010 12/27/2002 08:43p 0.9751 0.0006 0.0168 0.9919 UINFC020 12/27/2002 08:54p 0.7915 0.0006 0.0168 0.8083 UINFC030 12/27/2002 09.07p 0.6721 0 0005 0.0168 0.6889 UINFC040 12/27/2002 09"20p 0.6050 0.0006 00168 0.6218 UINFC050 12/27/2002 09 35p 05614 0.0006 00168 0.5782 UINFC060 12/27/2002 09:50p 0.5301 0.0005 0.0168 0.5469 UINFC070 12/27/2002 10:05p 0.5036 0.0006 0.0168 0.5204 UINFC080 12/27/2002 10:21p 0.4827 0.0005 0 0168 0.4995 UINFC090 12/27/2002 10:38p 0.4662 0.0005 00168 04830 UINFC100 12/27/2002 10:54p 04515 0.0005 0.0168 0.4683

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix*Vlf l for Framatome ANP, Inc. Pade B9of 11 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Inside of' Table 26 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded Fully Flooded Containers Remain Dry, IM (Between Containers Varied from D to TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED FILE NAME DATE KEFF 12:14a 0 5728 0.0005 0.0168 0.5896 U675C000 - 12/27/2002 0 6955 12:26a 0.6787 0.0006 '0.0168 U675C001 12/27/2002 0.8456 12.36a '0 8288 0.0006 0 0168 U675C003 12127/2002 0.9061 12 45a 0.8893 00006 0.0168 U675C005 1212712002 0.9209 12.55a 0.9041 0.0006 0.0168 U675C007 12/27/2002 0.0006 0.0168 0.9038 U675C010 U675C020 12127/2002 12/27/2002 01:04a 01:14a .00.8870 7504 0.0007 0 0168 0.7672 06487 0 0006 0.0168 0.6655 U675C030 12127/2002 01:27a 01:40a 0.5874 0.0007 0.0168 0.6042 U675C040 -12/27/2002 01:55a 0.5476 0.0005 0.0168 0.5644 U675C050 12/27/2002 0.5358 02.10a 0.5190 000056 0 0005 0.0168 10.0168 0.5126 U675C060 U675C070 12/27/2002 12/27/2002 02:-25a 0 4958 12/27/2002 02:40a 0.4761 0.0005 0.0168 0.4929 U675C080 0.4598 0.0005 0 160.76 U675C09 1 27 002 02:56a R 04634 U65C

,n..0o 1W2/2/002 03:12a 0.4466 0 0005 n.0168 with L4 Fuel Assemblies, 7 vol% IM Table 27 15x15x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded Varied from 0 to 10 vol%

(Between Containers). PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED FILE NAME DATE KEFF 12:55a 0.9041 00006 0 0168 0.9209 U675C007 12/27/2002 01:50p 08772 00007 0.0168 0.8940 U675P001 12/2812002 0.8097 0.0007 0.0168 0 8265 U675P003 12/2812002 01:59p 02 09p 0.7396 0.0006 00168 0.7564 U675P005 12128/2002 02:19 0.6789 0 0006 0.0168 0.6957 U675P007 1212812002 12128/2002 02:32p 0.6078 0.0006 0.0168 0.6246 U675P010

)j

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container PageB1OofB11 Table 28 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED, 4 KEFF D288C000 12/23/2002 10:08a 0 5448 0 0005 0.0168 0.5616 D288C001 12/23/2002 10:19a 0.7461 0 0006 0.0168 0.7629 D288C003 12/23/2002 10:28a 0.8438 0.0007 0.0168 0.8606 D288C005 12/23/2002 10"37a 0.7932 0.0006 0.0168 0.8100 D288C007 12/23/2002 10:47a 0.7213 0.0006 0.0168 0.7381 D288C010 12/23/2002 10.58a 0.6354 0.0007 0.0168- 0.6522 D288C020 12/23/2002 11:10a 0.5708 0.0006 0.0168 0.5876 D288C030 12/23/2002 11.24a 0.6141 0.0008 0.0168 0.6309 D288C040 12/23/2002 11:37a 0.6636 0.0008 0.0168 06804 D288C050 12/23/2002 11:51a 0.7131 0.0006 0.0168 0.7299 D288C060 12/23/2002. 12:03p 0.7581 0.0007 .00168 0.7749 D288C070 12/23/2002 12:15p 0 8042 0.0008 0 0168 0.8210 D288C080 12/23/2002 12:26p 08476 0.0007 0.0168 0 8644 D288C090 12/23/2002 12:37p 08900 0.0008 0.0168 0 9068 D288C100 12/23/2002 12:47p 0.9280 0 0007 0 0168 0 9448 Table 29 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Varied from Dry to Fully Flooded K FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS , BIASED KEFF D288S000 12/23/2002 01:00p 0.5443 00006 00168 0.5611 D288S001 12/23/2002 01:10p 0.7415 0.0006 00168 0.7583 D288S003 12/23/2002 01:19p 0 8383 00007 0.0168 0.8551 D288S005 12/23/2002 01:28p 0.7857 0.0007 0 0168 0.8025 D288S007 12/23/2002 01:37p 0.7206 00006 0.0168 0.7374 D288S010 12/23/2002 01:48p 0.6438 0.0006 0.0168 0.6606 D288S020 12/23/2002 02.00p 0.5821 0.0006 0.0168 0.5989 D288S030 12/23/2002 02:13p 0.6216 0.0006 0.0168 0.6384 D288S040 12/2312002 02:25p 0.6689 0.0007 0.0168 06857 D288S050 12/23/2002 02:37p 0.7144 00008 0.0168 07312 D288S060 12/23/2002 02:49p 0.7614 0.0007 00168 0.7782 D288S070 12/23/2002 03:01p 0.8049 0.0008 0.0168 0 8217 D288S080 12/23/2002 03:12p 0.8499 00007 00168 0 8667 D288S090 12/23/2002 03:23p 0.8905 0 0007 0 0168 0 9073 D288S100 12/23/2002 03:33p 0.9275 0.0008 0 0168 0 9443 3

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIll Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page B11 of B11 Table 30 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered Inside Containers, Fully Flooded Conditions, PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies Varied from 0 to 10 vol%

FILE NAME DATE TIME BEST KEFF SIGMA BIAS BIASED KEFF D288C100 12/23/2002 12:47p 0.9280 0.0007 0.0168 0.9448 D288P001 12/28/2002 06:36p 0.9298 0.0007 0.0168 0.9466 D288P003 12128/2002 06:47p 0.9287 0.0008 0.0168 0.9455 D288P005 12/28/2002 06:58p 0.9281 0.0007 0.0168 0.9449 D288P007 12/28/2002 07:1 Op 0.9279 0.0008 0.0168 0.9447, D288P010 12/28/2002 0721p 0.9274 0.0007 0.0168 0.9442 K>

KU

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C1 of C45 APPENDIX C - CALCULATION INPUTS The computer input listings for this analysis have been archived on the CSTOR system under the following directory structure,

/crisafety/CSNSHIPPING/51032-1151032-1-DATA 51032-1.2/..

Listings of sample cases are provided below.

Due to the similiarity of fuel types LI and L2, only the LI sample input files are listed as representative of these fuel types As a reminder to the reader, LI and L2 are identical, except for the pellet diameter (L2 slightly larger)

L1 Fuel Assembly Case"NOM00100 IN*: Single 51032-1 Container Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Fully Flooded (see Table 10)

=csas25 parm=size=1000000 51032-1 238groupndf5 latticecell

' mixture 1

• uo2 pellets uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.050 92238 94.950 end

• mixture 2

' carbon steel in strongback carbonsteel 2 1.0 293.0 end mixture carbon 3

steel in separator blocks carbonsteel 3 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 4

• carbon steel in container shell carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end mixture 5

, interspersed moderator h2o S den=l.0 1.00 293.0 end

' mixture 6

' reflector water h2o 6 den=1.0 1.00 293 end end comp squarepitch 1.44272 0.94158 1 5 1.08712 0 END 51032-1 read param tme=120 gen=515 npg=2500 nsk=15 nub=yes pwt=yes run=yes end param read geom unit 1 com= fuel rod' cyli 1 1 0.47079 2p250.19 cyli 0 1 0.54356 2p250.19 2 9 cubo 5 1 4pO.72136 2p 50.1 unit 2 com='location in assy with no rod'

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. 'Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C2 of C45 7 2 36 2 5 cubo 5 1 4pO. 1 p2 0.19 unit 101 com='bundle on +x side of container' array 1 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 unit 102 comr-'bundle on -x side of container' array 2 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 unit 501 comr-separator block' min dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0 6 in. w x 7.5 8 6 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 x 0.3125 in. thk cubo 5 1 2p6. 2 25 2p8.73125 2p10.795 6 2 cubo 3 1 2p7. 2 2p9.525 p10.795 place on 39.4 in. centers 62 5 cubo 5 1 2p7. 2p9. 2S 2p50.038 unit 502 com='lxlxS array of separator blocks' min of S blocks required in 51032-1 y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.82040 -250.19 1 match the bundle height cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2p10.82040 2p250.19 global unit 601 com-'single container' center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height-11.5625 in.

2 9 43 7 cubo 5 1 p31.1 18.54835 -10.82040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyla 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 K' steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 3r3.0 10 end geom read array arae- nux-15 nuy-1S nuz-i fill 1 1 1 1 111111: 1 1 1 1 1 1111 11 1 1 1 1111 121112: 11 1 1 1 1112 1.2 1 1 1 1111 11 1 1 1 1121 121112: 1Li 2 1 1 1111 1 1 1 11 1 1L1 1 1 1 111211: 1L1 1 1 1 1111 111111: 1Li 1 1 1 1

11211 1 1 121112: 1L1 2 1 1 1111 11 111 1 1Li 1 1 1 1112 111111: 12 1 1 1 1111 121112: 1L1 1 1 1 1111 111111: 1Li 1 1 1 1111 111111: Li1 1 1 1 end fill ara=2 nux=15 nuy=1S nuz-i fill 1 1 1 1 11111 1 11 1 l11 1111 1 111 1111 11111 111111 i2 1 1 111 1112 1 2 111 1111 1 1 ill 1121 121112 1 1 211 I'

EMF-52

, Revision 7 Consolidated License Application -Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc.

Page C3 of C45 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container 1 11 111 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 1 112 1 1 2111 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 211 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 121 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 111 211 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 end fill ara=5 nux=l nuy=l nuz=5 fill f501 end fill ara=6 nux=3 nuy=l nuz=1 fill 102 502 101 end fill end array read start nst=l end start read bounds all-vacuum end bounds read bias id=500 2 11 end bias end data end Case "U675C007.IN": 15x1 5x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Inside of Containers Remain Dry, IM (Between Containers) at 7 Vol% (see Table 12)

=csas25 parm=size=1000000 51032-1 238groupndf5 latticecell mixture 1 uo2 pellets uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.050 92238 94.950 end mixture 2

• carbon steel in strongback carbonsteel 2 1.0 293.0 end mixture 3

• carbon steel in separator blocks carbonsteel 3 1.0 293.0 end mixture 4 carbon steel in container shell carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 5 interspersed moderator h2o 5 den=1.0 0.07 293.0 end

• mixture 6

• reflector water h2o 6 den=l.0 1.00 293 end end comp squarepitch 1.44272 0.94158 1 0 1.08712 0 END 51032-1 KJ

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C4 of C45 read param tme=120 gens515 npg=2500 nsk=15 nub=yes pwt=yes run=yes end param read geom unit 1 com='fuel rod' cyli 1 1 0.47079 2p250.19 cyli 0 1 0.54356 3 2p250.19 6

cubo 0 1 4pO.721 2p250.19 unit 2 com='location in assy with no rod' cubo 0 1 4p0.72136 2p250.19 unit 101 comr-bundle on +x side of container' array 1 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 unit 102 coma'bundle on -x side of container' array 2 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 unit 501 com-'separator block' min dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0 6 in. w x 7.56 2 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 7 x9 5 0.3125 in. thk 5

cubo 0 1 2p6.82 2p8.731255 2p10. 7 9 5 7 6 2 cubo 3 1 2p . 2p9.52 2p10.

I place on 39.4 in. centers cubo 0 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 2p50.038 unit 502 com-'lxlxS array of separator blocks' I min of S blocks required in 51032-1 y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.82040 -250.19 I match the bundle height 2p250.19 cubo 0 1 2p7.62 2p10.82040 unit 601 com-'single undamaged container' center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

9 4 37 9 cubo 0 1 2p31.1 18.54835 -10.82040 2p2SO.1 add strongback steel 5

repl 2 1 2r0.4762 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel9 shell cyli 0 1 49.53 2p2SO.1 steel shell 4 33 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2SO. 03 undamaged spacing between 4 3 3 containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2p2SO. 03 unit 701 com='single damaged container - strongback centered' center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

943 7 cubo 5 1 2p3l.1 18.54835 -10.82040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.4762S 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell 43 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p25O. 03 damaged spacing between 4 3containers3 41.75 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p5l.7525 2p25O. 03

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. -Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C5 of C45 unit 702 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -23.51725 -3.20040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=l1.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.16835 -3.20040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 I im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 0 4 33 03 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p25 .

I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 unit 703 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, ÷y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -35.00435 -3.20040 -250.19 I match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height-11.5625 in.

2 cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.16835 -3.20040 2p 50.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 I damaged spacing between 4 containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

7 52 3 3 cubo 5 1 4p51. 5 2p250. 03 unit 704 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -23.51725 -18.44040 -250.19

• match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=1l.5625 2

in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 10.92835 -18.44040 2p 50.19 y> I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p25O.19 I steel shell 4 33 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p25O. 03 damaged spacing between 4 containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

3 3 cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p25O. 03 unit 705 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -18.44040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 10.92835 -18.44040 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 I im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 4 33 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2SO. 03 I damaged spacing between 4 containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

3 3 cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p2SO. 03 unit 801 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 802 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 global unit 901 com='15xl5x3 array of undamaged containers'

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc.. Appendix Vill Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C6 of C45 K'

array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0

, add 30 cm water reflector repi 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 902 com-'12x12x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 10 0.0 0.0 0.0

• add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 903 com=112x12x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repI 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom read array ara-1 nux-15 nuy=15 nuzt fill 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 111 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 111 1111 1211121 1 111 1112 11111111 1 1 1111 2 111 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 111 1121 1211121 1 211 1111 1 11 1 1111 1112111 1 1 11 111 1111 1 111 1111 1121 1211121 1 211 1111 1111111 1 111 1112 1111111 2 111 1111 1211121 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1111 1111111 1 111 1111111 1 1 1 end fill 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ara-2 nux-15 nuy-15 nut-i fill 1 1 1 1 1111111 2 1 1 1 KAY 1111 1 1 1 1 1111 1211121 1 1 1 1 1112 1111111 21 1 1 1111 1 1 1 1 1121 1211121 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1112111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 1 1 1 1121 1211121 1 2 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1112 1111111 2 1 1 1 1111 1211121 1 1 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 end fill ara=5 nux=1 nuy-1 nuz-S fill f5Ol end fill ara=6 nux=3 nuy-1 nuz-i fill 102 502 101 end fill ara-7 nux-15 nuy-15 nuz=3 fill f601 end fill ara=8 nux=2 nuy=2 nuz-2 fill Vfol end fill ara-9 nux=2 nuy=2 nuz-2 fill 702 703 704 705 702 703 704 705 end fill 3/4)

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Page C7 of C45 Model 51 032-1 Shipping Container Model 51032-1 Shipping Container ara=10 nux=6 nuy=6 nuz=1 fill f801 end fill ara=ll nux=6 nuy=6 nuz=l fill f802 end fill end array read start nst=l end start read bounds all=vacuum end bounds read bias id=500 2 11 end bias end data end Case "U675P001 .IN": 15x1 5x3 Array of Undamaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, 7 vol% IM (Between Containers), PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies at I vol% (see Table 13)

=csas25 parm=size=1000000 51032-1 238groupndf5 latticecell mixture 1 uo2 pellets uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.050 92238 94.950 end

• mixture 2 carbon steel in strongback carbonsteel 2 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 3 carbon steel in separator blocks carbonsteel 3 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 4

' carbon steel in container shell carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end mixture 5

• interspersed moderator h2o 5 den=l.0 0.07 293.0 end mixture 6

• reflector water h2o 6 den=l.0 1.00 293 end

• mixture 7 pe as im inside container arbmpe 0.92 2 0 1 1 6012 1 1001 2 7 0.01 end end comp squarepitch 1.44272 0.94158 1 0 1.08712 0 END 51032-1 read param tme=120 gen=515 npg=2500 nsk=15 nub=yes pwt=yes run=yes end param

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C8 ofC45 read geom unit 1 com='fuel rod' cyli 1 1 0.47079 2p250.19 cyli 0 1 0.54356 2p250.19 72 1 36 cubo 0 1 4p0. 2p250.19 unit 2 com='location in assy with no rod' cubo 0 1 4pO.72136 2p250.19 unit 101 com.'bundle on +x side of container' array 1 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 unit 102 com='bundle on -x side of container' array 2 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 unit 501 com-'separator block' Smin dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0

• 6 in. w x 7.5 82 62 in. h x7 8.5 in.

2 1 x 0.3125 in. thk cubo 7 1 2p6. 5 2p8. 3125 pi0.795 cubo 3 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 2pi0.795 I place on 39.4 in. centers cubo 7 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 2p50.038 unit 502 com='lxlxS array of separator blocks' min of 5 blocks required in 51032-1 y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.82040 -250.19 1 match the bundle height cubo 7 1 2p7.62 2pi0.82040 2p250.19 unit 601 com-'single undamaged container' center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 7 1 2p31.19437 18.54835 -10.82040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2S0.43303 undamaged spacing between containers 41.75 in.

2 cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2p S0.43303 unit 701 com='single damaged container - strongback centered' center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 match strongback 7 width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

94 3 cubo 5 1 2p31.1 18.54835 -10.82040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 unit 702 com-'single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -23.51725 -3.20040 -250.19

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc ',Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C9 of C45

• match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=ll.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.16835 -3.20040 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 I im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 4 33 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2SO. 03 I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 40.75 in.

0 4 3 30 3 cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p25 .

unit 703 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, +y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -35.00435 -3.20040 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.16835 -3.20040 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell 50 cyli 5 1 49.53 2p2 .19 I steel shell 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43 03 I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 40.75 in.

43 3 7 2 cubo 5 1 4p51. 525 2p 5O. 03 unit 704 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -23.51725 -18.44040 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height-ll.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 10.92835 -18.44040 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 Im to inside of steel9 shell cyl7 5 1 49.53 2p2SO.1 K> , steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 damaged spacing between 4 containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

7 52 3 3 cubo 5 1 4pSl. 5 2p250. 03 unit 705 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -18.44040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height-11.5625 in.

2 cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 10.92835 -18.44040 2p 50.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1

. im to inside of steel shell cyll 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 2 4 3 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p 5O. 03 I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 40.75 in.

7 2 4 33 cubo 5 1 4p51. S25 2p SO. 03 unit 801 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 802 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 global unit 901 com='15xl5x3 array of undamaged containers' array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10

EMF-527 Revision Consolidated License Aplilication Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. , Page CIO ofC45 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container unit 902 2 2 - centered' com=11 xl2x array of damaged containers array 10 0.0 0.0 0.0

, add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 903 comr' 12x12x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 11 0.0 0.0 0.0

. add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom read array ara=l nux=15 nuy=15 nuz=t fill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I11 1 1 1 1 1111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1111121112 1 2 1 1 1 1112111111 1 1 1 1 1 1111111111 1 1 2 1 1 1121121112 1 1 1 1 1 1111111111 1 1 1 I11 1111111211 1 1 1 I11 1111111111 1 1 2 1 1 1121121112 I11 1 1 1 1111111111 1 2 1 1 1 1112111111 1 1 1 1 1 1111121112 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11I 1 1 1 end fill 1111 111111 ara-2 nux-15 nuy-1S 11111111 nuz-i fill 1 1 1 1 iiiiiiii 111 111 111 1 1 1 12111211 11112 11111112 111 1111 11111111 1121 12111211 211 111 1 1 2 1 11111111 1111 111 11121111 1111 11111111 111 1121 12111211 211 1 1 2 1 11111111 111 1 1 1 11111112 11111 111 12111211 111 1111 11111111 1 1 1 2 121112i11 1 1 1 end fill ara-S nux=1 nuy-1 nuzt5 fill f5Ol end fill ara=6 nux=3 nuy-1 nuz-i fill 102 502 101 end fill ara-7 nux-15 nuy-1S nuz-3 fill f601 end fill ara=8 nux=2 nuy-2 nuz-2 fill fVol end fill ara-9 nux=2 nuy=2 nuz-2 fill 702 703 704 705 702 703 704 705 end fill ara-lO nux-6 nuy-6 nuzt fill f8Ol end fill

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page Cll of C45 ara=.l nux=6 nuy=6 nuz=1 fill f802 end fill end array read start nst= 1 end start read bounds all=vacuum end bounds read bias id=500 2 11 end bias end data end Case "D288C100 IN": 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with LI Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered InSide Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Fully Flooded (see Table 141

=csas25 parm=size=1000000 51032-1 1 238groupndf5 latticecell

' mixture 1

' uo2 pellets uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.050 92238 94.950 end

' mixture 2 _

Th-r-----e

---*arb:i-r-ste strongback--______

carbonsteel 2 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 3

• carbon steel in separator blocks carbonsteel 3 1.0 293.0 end mixture 4 carbon steel in container shell carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 5

• interspersed moderator h2o 5 den-1.0 1.00 293.0 end

• mixture 6

' reflector water b2o 6 den=l.0 1.00 293 end end comp squarepitch 1.44272 0.94158 1 5 1.08712 0 END 51032-1 read param tme=120 gen=515 npg=2500 nsk=15 nub=yes pwt=yes run=yes end param read geom unit 1 com='fuel rod' cyli 1 1 0.47079 2p250.19 cyli 0 1 0.54356 2p250.19 cubo 5 1 4p0.72136 2p250.19 unit 2

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C12 of C45 com='location in assy with no rod' 6 5 cubo 5 1 4p0.7213 2p2 0.19 unit 101 com='bundle on +x side of container' array 1 -10.82040 -10.82040 -2S0.19 unit 102 com='bundle on -x side of container' array 2 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 unit 501 com='separator block' I min dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0 1 6 in. w x 7.5 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 x 0.3125 in. thk 6 82 62 cubo 5 1 2p . 6 5 2p8.73125 2p10.795 2 7 cubo 3 1 2p7. 2 2p9.525 plO. 95 I place on 39.4 in. centers cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 2p50.038 unit 502 com.'lxlx5 array of separator blocks' I min of 5 blocks required in 51032-1 1 y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.82040 -250.19 1 match the bundle height cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2pi0.82040 2p250.19 unit 601 com='single undamaged container' center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height-ll.562S in.

1 43 7 2 cubo 5 1 2p31. 9 18.54835 -10.82040 p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2S0.43303 undamaged spacing between containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2p250.43303 unit 701 com='single damaged container - strongback centered' center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=1l.562S in.

4 7 cubo 5 1 2p31.19 3 18.54835 -10.82040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo S 1 4p51.7525 2p2S0.43303 unit 702 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y' shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -23.51725 -3.20040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.16835 -3.20040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 iim to inside of steel shell cyli S 1 49.53 2p2S0.19 steel shell 2 2 cyli 4 1 49.77303 p 50.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.7S - 1 = 40.75 in.

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C13 of C45 5 7 52 5 4 3 30 3 cubo 5 1 4p 1. 5 2p2 0.

unit 703 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, +y' shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -35.00435 -3.20040 -250.19

• match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.16835 -3.20040 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 4 33 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2SO. 03 I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 40.75 in.

3 cubo 5 1 4pS1.7525 2p250.4330 unit 704 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -23.51725 -18.44040 -250.19

• match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 10.92835 -18.44040 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43 03 I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 40.75 in.

75 2 5 43 3 cubo 5 1 4p51. 5 2p2 0. 03 unit 705 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -18.44040 -250.19 I match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=l1.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 10.92835 -18.44040 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 40.75 in.

4 33 2

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p SO. 03 unit 801 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 802 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 901 com='12xl2x2 array of undamaged containers' array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0

• add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 global unit 902 com='12x12x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 903 com='12x12x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 K>

I

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C14 of C45 K

• add 30 cm water reflector repi 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom read array ara-i nux=15 nuy=15 nuz=1 fill 1 1 1 1 1111111 2 1 1 1 1111 111 1111 1 1 1 11 11 1111 1211121 1 1 1112 1111111 21 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 1 1 1 1121 1211121 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 1 1 1 1111 1112111 1 1 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1121 1211121 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 1 1112 1111111 2 1 1 1 1111 1211121 1 1 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 1i1 1 1 end fill ara-2 nux-1s nuy=15 nuz-i fill 1 1 1 1 11111111 111 1111 11111111 111 1 1 1 1 12111211 111 1112 11111112 111 1 1 1 1 11111111 111 1121 12111211 211 1 1 1 1 11111111 111 1 1 1 1 11121111 ill 1111 11111111 111 1121 12111211 211 1111 11111111 111 1112 11111112 111 1111 12111211 111 1111 11111111 111 K' 1111 11111111 1 1 1 end fill ara-5 nux=i nuy=i nuz-S fill fSOi end fill ara-6 nux-3 nuy-1 nuz-i fill 102 502 101 end fill ara-7 nux-12 nuy=12 nuz-2 fill f601 end fill ara=8 nux=2 nuy=2 nuz=2 fill f701 end fill ara=9 nux=2 nuy-2 nuz-2 fill 702 703 704 705 702 703 704 705 end fill ara=-O nux-6 nuy-6 nuz=s fill f801 end fill ara-il nux-6 nuy=6 nuz=l fill f802 end fill end array read start nst-i end start 0

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision '7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. -Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C15 of C45 read bounds all=vacuum end bounds read bias id=500 2 11 end bias end data end Case "D288S100 IN": 12xl2x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with tl Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Fully Flooded (see Table 15)

=csas25 parm=size=1000000 51032-1 238groupndf5 latticecell

• mixture 1

• uo2 pellets uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.050 92238 94.950 end

' mixture 2 carbon steel in strongback carbonsteel 2 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 3

' carbon steel in separator blocks carbonsteel 3 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 4

' carbon steel in container shell carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 5

• interspersed moderator h2o 5 den=l.0 1.00 293.0 end

' mixture 6

, reflector water h2o 6 den=1.0 1.00 293 end end comp squarepitch 1.44272 0.94158 1 5 1.08712 0 END 51032-1 read param tme=120 gen=515 npg=2500 nsk=l5 nub=yes pwt=yes run=yes end param read geom unit 1 com='fuel rod' cyli 1 1 0.47079 2p250.19 2

cyli 0 1 0.54356 2p 50.19 9 cubo 5 1 4p0.72136 2p250.1 unit 2 com='location in assy with 9 no rod' cubo 5 1 4p0.72136 2p250.1 unit 101 com='bundle on +x side of container' array 1 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 unit 102 com='bundle on -x side of container'

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container ,Page C16 of C45, array 2 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 unit 501 comn'separator block' Smin dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0

• 6 in. w x 7.5 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 x9 5 0.3125 in. thk 6 7 cubo 5 1 2p6.82 25 2p8.73125 2p10.

cubo 3 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 2plO.795 I place on 39.4 in. centers cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 2p5O.038 unit 502 com='lxlxS array of separator blocks' Smin of 5 blocks required in 51032-1

, y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.82040 -250.19

' match the bundle height 82 cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2plO. 040 2p250.19 unit 601 com='single undamaged container' I center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

9 43 7 cubo 5 1 2p31.1 18.54835 -10.82040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 iim to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 undamaged spacing between 4 33 containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2p2SO. 03 unit 701 com='single damaged container - strongback centered' center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=ll.5625 in.

9 43 7 cubo 5 1 2p31.1 18.54835 -10.82040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell 43 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p25O. 03 damaged spacing between 4 3containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

3 cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250. 03 unit 702 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y' shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -23.51725 -3.20040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=1l.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.16835 -3.20040 2p250.19 add strongback steel 5

repl 2 1 2r0.4762 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p25O.43303 damaged spacing between 4 3containers 41.75 40.75 in.

3 cubo 5 1 4p5l.7S25 2p250. 03 unit 703 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, +y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -35.00435 -3.20040 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.16835 -3.20040 2p250.19 I add strongback steel

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. ,Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C17 of C45 repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1

- im to inside of 2 steel shell 50 cyli 5 1 49.53 2p .19 I steel shell 4 3 30 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.

, damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

2 4 33 cubo 5 1 4p5l.7525 2p 5O. 03 unit 704 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -23.51725 -18.44040 -250.19

• match strongback widths24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 10.92835 -18.44040 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 4 33 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2SO. 03 I damaged spacing between 4 containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

3 3 cubo 5 1 4p5l.7525 2p250. 03 unit 705 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -18.44040 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height11.5625 in.

2 cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 10.92835 -18.44040 2p 50.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 4 3 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p25O. 03 I damaged spacing7 between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

4 33 cubo 5 1 4p51. 525 2p250. 03 unit 801 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 802 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 901 com='12xl2x2 array of undamaged containers' array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 902 com='12xl2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 10 0.0 0.0 0.0

. add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 global unit 903 com='12x12x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom read array ara=1 nux=15 nuy=15 nuz=1 fill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 K>ý

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C18 of C45 1111121112 11111 112112 1112 11211 1121121112112111 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 12 1 12 1 1 111111111111111 1111112111211111 1112111111121111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 end fill 112112111211211 ara=2 111111111111111 flux-is nuy=15 nuz=1 fill 1r 1nx15 1 1 1 ny15 1 21 1 11z 1111111211112111 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11111 111111111111111 1121121112112111 I1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 1n 1 1 2 1 1n12 1n 1 i 1 1111121112111111 I 1 1 u1 1n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 fil 10 50 101 en fill1 11 ar 1nx1 2 1y1 2 nu1z-2 1S ar= 1u1-2 n1- 1nu11z-2 21 fil 11111 1f70 1111 111111116 nz= end fill 1111 ara-9 nux=2 nuy-2 nuz-2 fill 702 703fil 04 705 0 end fill 7il ara-lo1d-oo211 nux-62 nuy-62 11 nuz-1 11 1 fill f60l end fill ara-il nux=6 nuy=6 nuz-1 fill f702 end fill end bias 111I1 edfl edarrayu=2ny2 u.

fild da0tea i end start dfil read bou1 nds fl fill f8vaendfil end bounds read biast end biast end11 dt 11a

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C19 of C45 end Case"D288PO03 IN*: 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with Li Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, Fully Flooded Conditions, PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies at 3 vol% (see Table 16)

=csas25 parm=-size=1000000 51032-1 238groupndfS latticecell mixture 1

• uo2 pellets uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.050 92238 94.950 end

• mixture 2

• carbon steel in strongback carbonsteel 2 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 3 carbon steel in separator blocks carbonsteel 3 1.0 293.0 end mixture 4 carbon steel in container shell carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end mixture 5

• interspersed moderator h2o 5 den=1.0 1.00 293.0 end

• mixture 6

_* 'reflector water h2o 6 den-1.0 1.00 293 end

' mixture 7 pe + h2o as im inside container h2o 7 den=l.0 0.97 293.0 end arbmpe 0.92 2 0 1 1 6012 1 1001 2 7 0.03 end end comp squarepitch 1.44272 0.94158 1 5 1.08712 0 END 51032-1 read param tme=120 gen=515 npg=2500 nsk=15 nub=yes pwt=yes run=yes end param read geom unit 1 com=' fuel rod' cyli 1 1 0.47079 2p250.19 cyli 0 1 0.54356 2p250.19 72 3 6 cubo 5 1 4p0. 1 2p250.19 unit 2 com=*location in 3 assy with no rod' 6

cubo 5 1 4p0.721 2p250.19 unit 101 com='bundle on +x side of container' array 1 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 unit 102 com='bundle on -x side of container' array 2 -10.82040 -10.82040 -250.19 K)

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C20 of C45 unit 501 com=' separator block' mrin dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0

' 6 in. w x 7.5 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 x 0.3125 in. thk 2 6 8 6 cubo 7 1 2 p . 6 22 25 2p8.73125 2p10.795 2

cubo 3 1 p7. p9.525 2p10.795

' place on 39.4 in. centers 6 2 cubo 7 1 2p7. 2p9.525 2p50.038 unit 502 com='lxlx5 array of separator blocks' Smin of 5 blocks required in 51032-1 y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.82040 -250.19

' match the bundle height cubo 7 1 2p7.62 2p10.82040 2p250.19 unit 601 com='single undamaged container' I center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

2 3 9 3 cubo 5 1 p 1.1 4 7 18.54835 -10.82040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 undamaged spacing between containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2p250.43303 unit 701 com='single damaged container - strongback centered' I center fuel in container array 6 -29.26080 -10.82040 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=ll.5625 in.

3 4 7 cubo 7 1 2p 1.19 3 18.54835 -10.82040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4pS5.7525 2p250.43303 unit 702 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y' shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -23.51725 -3.20040 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=ll.5625 in.

cubo 7 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.16835 -3.20040 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.4762S 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2S0.43303 damaged 4 spacing 7 5 between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 p51. 25 2p250.43303 unit 703 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, +y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -35.00435 -3.20040 -250.19

' match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=I1.5625 in.

cubo 7 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.16835 -3.20040 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 N

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C21 of C45

• im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19

' steel shell 50 4 3 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2 . 03

• damaged spacing between 4 containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

33 03 cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p25O.

unit 704 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -23.51725 -18.44040 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 5 0 in.

cubo 7 1 35.00437 -27.38437 10.92835 -18.44040 2p2 .19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 I im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 I damaged spacing between 4 3containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.'

7 2 3 cubo 5 1 4p51. 525 2p SO. 03 unit 705 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y' shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -18.44040 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=ll.5625 2

in.

cubo 7 1 27.38437 -35.00437 10.92835 -18.44040 2p 50.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 I im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 3 03 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.'4 3 I damaged spacing between 4 containers 41.75 40.75 in.

7 cubo 5 1 4p51. 525 2p250. 3303 unit 801 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - centered, array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 802 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 901 com='12xl2x2 array of undamaged containers' array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 902 com='12xl2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 10 0.0 0.0 0.0

. add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 global unit 903 com='12x12x2 array of damaged containers - shifted, array 11 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom read array ara=l nux=15 nuy=15 nuz=l fill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 KU

EMF-527, Revision Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Page C22 of C45.

Model 51032-1 Shipping Container ' mixture 3

• carbon steel in separator blocks carbonsteel 3 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 4 carbon steel in container shell carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end

' mixture 5

' interspersed moderator h2o 5 den=1.0 0.07 293.0 end

• mixture 6

• reflector water h2o 6 den=l.0 1.00 293 end

' mixture 7

' pe as im inside container arbmpe 0.92 2 0 1 1 6012 1 1001 2 7 0.01 end end comp squarepitch 1.25984 0.82093 1 0 0.94488 0 END 51032-1 read param tme=120 gen=515 npg=2500 nsk-15 nub=yes pwt-yes run=yes end param read geom unit 1 com-Ifuel rod' cyli 1 1 0.41047 2p250.19 cyli 0 1 0.47244 2p250.19 4 62 99 2 cubo 0 1 pO. 2p250.19 unit 2

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C30 of C45 com='location in assy with no rod' 6 2 992 4

cubo 0 1 p0. 2p250.19 unit 101 com='bundle on +x side of container' array 1 -10.70864 -10.70864 -250.19 unit 102 com='bundle on -x side of container' array 2 -10.70864 -10.70864 -250.19 unit 501 com='separator block' I min dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0

. 6 in. w x 7.5 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 x 0.3125 in. thk 6 5 cubo 7 1 2p6.82 7 6 2 2p8.73125 2p10.795 cubo 3 1 2p . 2 2p9.525 2plO.795 I place on 39.4 in. centers 7 62 cubo 7 1 2p . 2p9.S2S 2p50.038 unit 502 com='lxlxS array of separator blocks' I min of 5 blocks required in 51032-1 1 y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.70864 -250.19 I match the bundle2 height cubo 7 1 2p7.6 2pi0.70864 2p250.19 unit 601 com-'single undamaged container' center fuel in container array 6 -29.03728 -10.70864 -250.19 match strongback 94 3 7 width=24.5625 in. and height=11.562S in.

cubo 7 1 2p31.1 18.66011 -10.70864 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2r0.O 1 1im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell 4

cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2SO. 3303 undamaged spacing between containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2p250.43303 unit 701 com-'single damaged container - strongback centered' center fuel in container array 6 -29.03728 -10.70864 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=ll.5625 in.

94 3 cubo 5 1 2p31.1 7 18.66011 -10.70864 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2S0.43303 damaged 4 spacing 7

between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 pSl. 52S 2p250.43303 unit 702 com.'single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y' shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -23.07021 -3.08864 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.28011 -3.08864 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.S3 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p25O.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.7S in.

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Frarnatome ANP, Inc., Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page 031 ofC45 7 52 5 cubo 5 1 4p51. 2p250.43303 unit 703 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, +y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -35.00435 -3.08864 -250.19 I match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.28011 -3.08864 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

7 52 5 3 cubo 5 1 4p5l. 2p25O.43 03 unit 704 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -23.07021 -18.32864 -250.19

• match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=1l.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 11.04011 -18.32864 2p250.19

' add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 I am to inside of steel shell 2

cyli 5 1 49.53 2p 50.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 7 5 2 5 between 4 t damaged 4 spacing containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 p51. 2p250. 3303 unit 705 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -18.32864 -250.19

_ match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

9 cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 11.04011 -18.32864 2p250.1 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 I damaged spacing 75 5 between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51. 2 2p250.43303 unit 801 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 802 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 global unit 901 com='15xl5x3 array of undamaged containers' array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 902 com='12xl2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 903 com='12x12x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 11 0.0 0.0 0.0

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C32 of C45

• add 30 cm water reflector repi 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom read array ara-i nux=17 nuy=17 nuz-1 fill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 end fill ara=2 nuxl17 nuy-17 nuz=1 fill 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 1 1 1 f11111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1111 1211211 1 1 1 1 1112 1111111 1 2 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1121 1211211 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 1 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1121 1211211 1 1 1 1 1111111 I11 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1121 1211211 1 1 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1112 1111111 1 2 1 1 1111 1211211 1 1 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1111 1111111 1 1 1 1 end fill ara=S nux-i nuy-l nuz-S fill f501 end fill ara=6 nux=3 nuy=l nuz-1 fill 102 502 101 end fill ara-7 nux-15 nuy=15 nuz=3 fill f601 end fill ara=8 nux=2 nuy-2 nuz=2 fill f7ol end fill ara-9 nux=2 nuy=2 nuz=2 fill 702 703 704 705 702 703 704 705 end fill ara.lO nux=6 nuy=6 nuz=1 fill f8ol end fill ara=-l nux=6 nuy-6 nuz-1 fill f802 end fill end array

<9

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C33 of C45 read start nst=1 end start read bounds all=vacuum end bounds read bias id=500 2 11 end bias end data end Case "D288C100 IN': 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Fully Flooded (see Table 28)

=csas25 parm=size=l00000 51032-1 238groupndf5 latticecell

• mixture 1

' uo2 pellets uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.050 92238 94.950 end

• mixture 2

• carbon steel in strongback carbonsteel 2 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 3

_ carbon steel in separator blocks carbonsteel 3 1.0 293.0 end

' mixture 4

, carbon steel in container shell carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end

' mixture 5

• interspersed moderator h2o 5 den=1.0 1.00 293.0 end

' mixture 6

' reflector water h2o 6 den=1.0 1.00 293 end end comp squarepitch 1.25984 0.82093 1 5 0.94488 0 END 51032-1 read param tme=120 gen=515 npg=2500 nsk=15 nub=yes pwt=yes run=yes end param read geom unit 1 com='fuel rod' cyli 1 1 0.41047 2p250.19 cyli 0 1 0.47244 2p250.19 cubo 5 1 4pO.62992 2p250.19 unit 2 com='location 6 in assy with no rod, 2 992 cubo 5 1 4p0. 2p250.19 unit 101 com='bundle on +x side of container'

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C34 of C45, array 1 -10.70864 -10.70864 -250.19 unit 102 com='bundle on -x side of container' array 2 -10.70864 -10.70864 -250.19 unit 501 cor-'separator block' Smin dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0

• 6 in. w x6 7.5 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 7 x9 0.3125 in. thk 82 6 25 cubo 5 1 2p . 2p8.73125 2plO. 7 9 55 5 5 cubo 3 1 2p7.62 2p9. 2 2plO.

I place on 39.4 in. centers cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 2pSO.038 unit 502 com='1xlx5 array of separator blocks' min of 5 blocks required in 51032-1

• y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.70864 -250.19 I match the bundle height 62 7 64 cubo 5 1 2p7. 2pi0. 08 2p250.19 unit 601 com='single undamaged container' center fuel in container array 6 -29.03728 -10.70864 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=ll.562S in.

94 3 7 9 cubo 5 1 2p31.1 18.66011 -10.70864 2p2SO.1 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell 4 33 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2SO. 03 undamaged spacing between containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2p250.43303 unit 701 com='single damaged container - strongback centered' center fuel in container array 6 -29.03728 -10.70864 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=ll.562S in.

cubo 5 1 2p31.19437 18.66011 -10.70864 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 in to inside of steel9 shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.1 steel shell 3 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.4 03 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 40.75 in.

4 33 cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250. 03 unit 702 com-'single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y' shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -23.07021 -3.08864 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.28011 -3.08864 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell 4 33 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250. 03 damaged spacing between 4 containers 3 3 41.75 - I = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p5l.7525 2p25O. 03 unit 703 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, +y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. -Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C35 of C45 array 6 -35.00435 -3.08864 -250.19 I match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.28011 -3.08864 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1

• im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.S3 2p250.19 I steel shell 2 4 3 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p SO. 03 I damaged spacing between 4 containers 41.75 - 1 - 40.75 in.

33 03 cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.

unit 704 com=1single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y'

, shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -23.07021 -18.32864 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 11.04011 -18.32864 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 I im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p2S0.19 I steel shell 4 3 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2SO. 03

' damaged spacing between 2

containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

4 33 cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p 50. 03 unit 705 com= single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -18.32864 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.56259 in.

cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 11.04011 -18.32864 2p250.1 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 4 3 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2SO. 03 I damaged spacing between 2

containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

4 33 cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p 5O. 03 unit 801 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 802 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 901 com=112x12x2 array of undamaged containers' array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 global unit 902 com='12x12x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 903 com='12x12x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C36 of C45 read array ara=l nux-17 nuy-17 nuz-1 fill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 111111111111 1 1 1 11 111112112112 1 1 1 11 111211111111 1 2 1 11 111111111111 1 1 1 11 112112112112 1 1 2 11 111111111111 1 1 1 11 111111111111 1 1 1 11 112112112112 1 1 2 11 111111111111 1 1 1 11 111111111111 1 1 1 11 112112112112 1 1 2 11 111111111111 1 1 1 11 111211111111 1 2 1 11 111112112112 1 1 1 11 111111111111 1 1 1 11 111111111111 1 1 1 1 1 end fill ara=2 nux=17 nuy=17 nuz=1 fill1 1 1 1 11111111 1 1 111 1111 11111111 1 1 111 1111 12112112 1 1 111 1112 11111111 1 2 111 1111 11111111 1 1 111 1121 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 211 12112112 1111 11111111 1 1 111 1111 11111111 1 1 111 1121 12112112 1 1 211 1111 11111111 1 1 111 1111 1 1 111 1121 12112112 1 1 211 1111 11111111 1 1 111 1112 11111111 1 2 111 1111 12112112 1 1 111 1111 11111111 1 1 111 1111 11111111 1 1 1 1 1 end fill K' ara-5 nux-1 nuy-1 nuz=5 fill f501 end fill ara=6 nux=3 nuy=l nuz-l fill 102 502 101 end fill ara-7 nux=12 nuy=12 nuz-2 fill f601 end fill ara-8 nux-2 nuy-2 nuz-2 fill f701 end fill ara-9 nux-2 nuy=2 nuz=2 fill 702 703 704 705 702 703 704 705 end fill ara-lO nux=6 nuy=6 nuz=1 fill f801 end fill ara=ll nux=6 nuy=6 nuz=1 fill f802 end fill end array read start nst=l end start read bounds K-

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application 'Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C37 of C45 all=vacuum end bounds read bias id=500 2 11 end bias end data end Case D288S100 IN*: 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Shifted Inside Containers, IM (Inside and Between Containers) Fully Flooded (see Table 29)

=csas25 parm=size=1000000 51032-1 238groupndfS latticecell mixture 1

• uo2 pellets uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.050 92238 94.950 end

' mixture 2

• carbon steel in strongback carbonsteel 2 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 3

• carbon steel in separator blocks carbonsteel 3 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 4

' carbon steel in container shell carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end

' mixture 5

• interspersed moderator h2o 5 den=1.0 1.00 293.0 end

• mixture 6

• reflector water h2o 6 den=1.0 1.00 293 end end comp squarepitch 1.25984 0.82093 1 5 0.94488 0 END 51032-1 read param tme=120 gen=515 npg=2500 nsk-15 nub=yes pwt=yes run=yes end param read geom unit 1 com='fuel rod' cyli 1 1 0.41047 2p250.19 cyli 0 1 0.47244 2p250.19 cubo 5 1 4p0.62992 2p250.19 unit 2 com='location in assy with no rod' cubo 5 1 4p0.62992 2p2S0.19 unit 101 com='bundle on +x side of container' array 1 -10.70864 -10.70864 -250.19 unit 102 com='bundle on -x side of container' array 2 -10.70864 -10.70864 -250.19

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C38 of C45 unit 501 com7' separator block' Smin dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0

' 6 in. w x 7.5 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 x 0.3125 in. thk 79 cubo 5 1 2p6.82625 2p8.73125 2plO. 5 2 79 5 cubo 3 1 2p7.62 2p9.525 plO.

. place on 39.4 in. centers 7 6 cubo 5 1 2p . 2 2p9.525 2p50.038 unit 502 com='lxlx5 array of separator blocks' Smin of S blocks required in 51032-1

• y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.70864 -250.19

, match the bundle height cubo 5 1 2p7.62 2pl0.70864 2p250.19 unit 601 com='single undamaged container' I center fuel in container array 6 -29.03728 -10.70864 -250.19 I match strongback width-24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 2p3l.19437 18.66011 -10.70864 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.o 1 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 I undamaged spacing between containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2p250.43303 unit 701 com='single damaged container - strongback centered' I center fuel in container array 6 -29.03728 -10.70864 -250.19 match strongback 2 3 94 3 7 width-24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in. i cubo S 1 p 1.1 18.66011 -10.70864 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli S 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo S 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 unit 702 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y' shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -23.07021 -3.08864 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=l1.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.28011 -3.08864 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 damaged spacing 7 52 between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4pSl. 5 2p250.43303 unit 703 com-'single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, +y'

' shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -35.00435 -3.08864 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.28011 -3.08864 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container .Page C39 of C45

• im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p2SO.19 I steel shell 50 4 33 cyll 4 1 49.77303 2p2 . 03

• damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

7 525 2 43 3 cubo 5 1 4p5l. 2p SO. 03 unit 704 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -23.07021 -18.32864 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

2 cubo 5 1 35.00437 -27.38437 11.04011 -18.32864 2p 50.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 4 33 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2SO. 03 I damaged spacing between 4 containers 41.75 40.75 in.

3 3 cubo 5 1 4pS1.7S2S 2p250. 03 unit 705 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -18.32864 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

2 cubo 5 1 27.38437 -35.00437 11.04011 -18.32864 2p 50.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli S 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 4 3 3 cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p25O. 03 I damaged spacing between 4 containers 33 41.75 - 1 . 40.75 in.

7 2 5 cubo 5 1 4p51. 5 2p250. 03 K> unit 801 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 802 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 901 com=112xl2x2 array of undamaged containers, array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 902 com='12x12x2 array of damaged containers - centeredt array 10 0.0 0.0 0.0

. add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 global unit 903 com='12xl2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted, array 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom read array ara=1 nux=17 nuy=17 nuz=1 fill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111 1 11 11 1 1 11

EMF-527 Revision Consolidated License Application Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc. Page C40 of C45 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container 11111 2 1 1 2 11 1 2 1 1 1 1 11 11121 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 11211 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111 11211 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 211 11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 11111 11211 2 1 11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 11121 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 111 ii111 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 111 11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 end fill i1111 ara=2 nux=17 nuy=17 nuz=1 1111111111111 fill 1 1 1 1 1111111111111 1111 1211211211111 1 1 1 1 1111111112111 1112 1111111111111 1111 1211211211211 1121 1111111111111 1111 1111 1211211211211 1121 1111111111111 1111 1111 1111111111111 1211211211211 1121 1111 1111111112111 1112 1 1 1 1 1211211211111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 end fill 1111 ara.5 nux-1 nuy=l nuz=5 fill fS01 end fill ara=6 nux=3 nuy-l nuz=1 fill 102 502 101 end fill ara-7 nux-12 nuy=12 nuz=2 fill f6Ol end fill ara=8 nux=2 nuy=2 nuz=2 fill f701 end fill ara=9 nux=2 nuy=2 nuz=2 fill 702 703 704 705 702 703 704 705 end fill ara-lO nux=6 nuy=6 nuz=l fill f8fl end fill ara=li nux=6 nuy-6 nuza fill f802 end fill end array read start nst-l end start read bounds all=vacuum end bounds read bias id=500 2 11

<9j

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container 'Page C41 of C45 end bias end data end Case "D288P001 .IN": 12x12x2 Array of Damaged 51032-1 Containers Loaded with L4 Fuel Assemblies, Strongbacks and Assemblies Centered Inside Containers, Fully Flooded Conditions, PE Inside Containers but Outside Assemblies at I vol% (see Table 30)

=csas25 parm=size=1000000 51032-1 238groupndf5 latticecell mixture 1 uo2 pellets uo2 1 0.98 293.0 92235 5.050 92238 94.950 end mixture 2

• carbon steel an strongback carbonsteel 2 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 3

• carbon steel in separator blocks carbonsteel 3 1.0 293.0 end mixture 4

• carbon steel in container shell carbonsteel 4 1.0 293.0 end

• mixture 5 moderator Sinterspersed h2o 5 den=l.0 1.00 293.0 end

• mixture 6 reflector water h2o 6 den=l.0 1.00 293 end

• mixture 7 pe + h2o as im inside container h2o 7 den=1.0 0.99 293.0 end arbmpe 0.92 2 0 1 1 6012 1 1001 2 7 0.01 end end comp squarepitch 1.25984 0.82093 1 5 0.94488 0 END 51032-1 read param tme=120 gen=515 npg=2500 nsk=15 nub=yes pwt=yes run=yes end param read geom unit 1 com='fuel rod' cyli 1 1 0.41047 2p250.19 cyli 0 1 0.47244 2p250.19 cubo 5 1 4p0.62992 2p250.19 unit 2 com='location in assy with no rod' cubo 5 1 4p0.62992 2p250.19 unit 101 com='bundle on +x side of container' array 1 -10.70864 -10.70864 -250.19

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C42 of C45 unit 102 com='bundle on -x side of container' array 2 -10.70864 -10.70864 -250.19 unit 501 com='separator block' min dims per emf-309,813 rev. 0 m

' 6 in. w x 87.56 in. h x 8.5 in. 1 x 0.3125 in. thk cubo 7 1 2p6. 6 2 25 2p8.73125 2p10.795 cubo 3 1 2p7. 2 2p9.525 2p10.795 I place on 39.4 in. centers 6

cubo 7 1 2p7. 2 2p9.525 2p50.038 unit 502 com='lxlxS array of separator blocks' rmin of 5 blocks required in 51032-1 y-coord matches 1/2 of bundle height array 5 -7.62 -10.70864 -250.19 match the bundle height 6

cubo 7 1 2p7. 2 2pi0.70864 2p250.19 unit 601 com='single undamaged container' center fuel in container array 6 -29.03728 -10.70864 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

cubo 5 1 2p31.19437 18.66011 -10.70864 2p250.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 rimto inside of steel shell cyli 5 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2S0.43303 undamaged spacing between containers 41.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p53.0225 2p250.43303 unit 701 com.'single damaged container - strongback centered' center fuel in container array 6 -29.03728 -10.70864 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

4 3 5 cubo 7 1 2p31.19 7 18.66011 -10.70864 2p2 0.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 Iim to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell 2 cyli 4 1 49.77303 p250.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 40.75 in.

7 5 cubo 5 1 4p51. 52 2p2S0.43303 unit 702 com-'single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, +y' shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -23.07021 -3.08864 -250.19 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

2 5 cubo 7 1 35.00437 -27.38437 26.28011 -3.08864 p2 0.19 add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 damaged 4 spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 p51.7525 2p25O.43303 unit 703 coms'single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, +y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. +y in container array 6 -35.00435 -3.08864 -250.19

• match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height=11.5625 in.

K

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc PageAppendx VIII C43 ofC45 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container cubo 7 1 27.38437 -35.00437 26.28011 -3.08864 2p250.19

• add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 1 im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell 5

cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p2 0.43303 I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 unit 704 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted +x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. +x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -23.07021 -18.32864 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height.11.5625 in.

cubo 7 1 35.00437 -27.38437 11.04011 -18.32864 2p250.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O I im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 I damaged spacing between containers 41.75 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 unit 705 com='single damaged container - strongback shifted -x, -y' I shift fuel 1.5 in. -x and 3.0 in. -y in container array 6 -35.00435 -18.32864 -250.19 1 match strongback width=24.5625 in. and height-ll.5625 in.

2 25 cubo 7 1 27.38437 -35.00437 11.04011 -18.32864 p 0.19 I add strongback steel repl 2 1 2r0.47625 0.0 0.47625 2rO.O 1 I im to inside of steel shell cyli 7 1 49.53 2p250.19 I steel shell cyli 4 1 49.77303 2p250.43303 damaged spacing between containers 41.75 - 1 = 40.75 in.

cubo 5 1 4p51.7525 2p250.43303 unit 801 coma'2x2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 802 com='2x2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 unit 901 com= 12xl2x2 array of undamaged containers' array 7 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 global unit 902 com='12xl2x2 array of damaged containers - centered' array 10 0.0 0.0 0.0

' add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 unit 903 com='12xl2x2 array of damaged containers - shifted' array 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 I add 30 cm water reflector repl 6 2 6r3.0 10 end geom read array K>

EMF-52 Consolidated License Application Revision 7 for Framatome ANP, Inc. "Appendix VIII Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C44 of C45 Ku ara=1 nux=17 nuy=17 nuz=1 fill 1 1 1 1 11111111 11111 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 11 1 1 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 12 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 11 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 I11 1 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 end fill ara=2 nux=17 nuya17 nuz=1 fill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 end fill ara-5 nux-i nuy=1 nuz-5 fill f5Ol end fill ara-6 nux=3 nuy-1 nuz=1 fill 102 502 101 end fill ara=7 nux=12 nuy=12 nuz=2 fill f601 end fill ara=8 nux=2 nuy=2 nuz=2 fill f701 end fill ara-9 nux-2 nuy=2 nuz=2 fill 702 703 704 705 702 703 704 705 end fill ara-1l nux=6 nuy=6 nuz=1 fill f8oo end fill ara=li nux=6 nuy=6 nuz=1 fill f802 end fill end array read start nst-1 end start read bounds all=vacuum end bounds KJ

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application

,Appendix VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc Model 51032-1 Shipping Container Page C45 of C45 read bias id=500 2 11 end bias end data end

'\-ýI

EMF-52 Revision 7 Consolidated License Application Appendix'VIII for Framatome ANP, Inc.

Page D1 of D1 Model 51032-1 Shipping Container APPENDIX D -COPIES OF REFERENCES, This appendix may include electronically scanned copies of any non-standard references, e.g letters, unissued drawings, etc.

Table 5. Empirical Percentage Points of the Approximate W' Test.

.01 .05 .10 .15 .20 .50 .80 .85 .90 .95 .99 35 0.919 0.9q3 0.952 0.956 0.g51 0.976 0.982 0.985 70.. 0.989 0.992 50 .935 .953 .963 .968 .971 .981 .997 .958 .990 .991 -994 51 .0.935 0.954 0.9to1 0.968 0,911 0.98 -0.188 o.109 0.9900.912 b.99*

43 .938 .957 .964 -969 .972 .982 .980 .989 .990 .992 .994 55 .9Ab .95T .965 .971 .973 .983 .988 .990 ..991 .992 .99M S7 -944 ;961 .96 .97" .-4 .983 .9 .5'M ."91 .99-2 .9W 59 -.9.5 .962 .96T .972 .975 .983 .989 .990 .991 .992 .994l S1 '0.9"?7 0.-963 .696a *.0.3 0.175 *."04 e.99 6.1"0 bi I 0.092 0.9941 463 .07 .961 .970 .973 .976-- .981 .990 ý991 .992 .993 .994 65 .948 .965 .971 .974 .976 .985 .990 .991 .992 .993 .995

.9 .

-W .971 .174 .V77 -S W .19 ."rZ .993 .995 69 .951 .966 .972 .976 .978 .986 .990 .991 .9W, .993 .995 1 0."3 1 0.972 0.1?6 0.M97 0.91A 0.90o 0.991 0.992 0.99q 0.995 73 .956 W- ..

.973 .976 .979 .986 .991 .9 .993 99"4 .995 75 .956 .969 .973 .976 .979 .986 .991 .9%2 .993 .991 .995 T7 .91* .96 .9?* .977 .90 .9W .997 .992 .993 .994 .996 79 .957 .970 .975 .4768 -90 9987 .911 .99W .993 .M914 .996 84 1 .958 0.970 0.9"7 0.9T9 0.981 0.98T 0.992 0.992 0.993 0.994 0.996 83 .960 .971 .976 -.*9 94S .9M8 .992 .92 .'9*3 ." .996 85 .961 .912 .9T7 .gao .981 .988 .992 .992 .993 .994 .996

$7 .96¶" .972 .977 .980 .982 .988 .992 .993 .994 .994 .996 89 .!961 .972 ý977 >-98% .9W2 .908 -992 V993 .99* V95 3986 91 0.962 0.973 0.9W$ o.981 0.983 0.989 0.992 0.993 0.99" 0.995 0.996 93 .963 .973 ;979 .981 .983 .89 .992 .V93 .49" .99S . 06 95 .965 . .979 .981 .983 .989 .993 .993 4994 .995 .996 IT .165 M5 .979 .982 .984 .989 .993 .993 .994 .995 , .996 99 967 .916 .980 .982 .91% ;089 .993 .99* .994 .995 .996 Souxcm ShAsro and Francia E119723. Reprm om the Jwunia oti Aw4mkn Starimcl Rwtln WOn. Vol. 67. with th, Pcnmnition of the ASA.

Figure 23 W Test Percentage Points when Number of Cases, n, Exceeds 50