ML030280427

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Init Exam - 8/2002 - Public Forms
ML030280427
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/25/2002
From: Gody A
Division of Reactor Safety IV
To: Denise Wilson
Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
References
50-298/02-301 50-298/02-301
Download: ML030280427 (25)
v • d • e


Text

Operations Branch Assignment Check Sheet: as of: 10/15/2001 (Includes ES-201-1 & ES-501-1 Rev. 8, Supplement 1 information)

Chief: T. McKernon Facility/Task: CNS IN EX Task Start Date: 8/5/2002 ITEM DESCRIPTION DUE DATE INIT DATE 0 Exam/Inspection Schedule Agreement (C. 1.a;C.2.a&b) Feb 6, 2002 /JATG 10/15/2001 1 NRC Staff & Fac. Contact Assigned (C. 1.c;C.2.e) Feb 6, 2002 'G 10/15/2001 2 Facility contact briefed on security & other issues (C.2.c) Feb 6, 2002 3 Corp. Notification Letter Sent (C.2.d) (Exams only) Feb 6, 2002 z 3a Inspection Announcement Letter Sent (PIR & LORT if req'd) Jun 21, 2002 .-

4 Task Expectations, Issues, & Standards Discussed w/ BC May 7, 2002 5# [Reference Material Due (C.l.d;C.3.c)] Apr 7, 2002 o:.

6# Integrated Exam Outlines Due (C.l.d&e;C.3.d) Ap__,_2002_ .1 7# Outlines reviewed by NRC & Feedback Sent (c.2.h;C.3.e) Apr,3, 2002 JulS, 2002 if I 8# Preliminary Applications Due (C.I.j;C.2.g;ES202) 9# Draft Exams w/ Doc./Ref. Due (C.1.d/e/f;C.3.d) Jun 6, 2002 10# Peer Reviewer Initials As Reviewed All Parts* Jun 1*, 2002

  • o2 11' NRC Supervisor. Initials Approving for Fac. Rev. (C.2.h;C.3.f)* Jun 1., 2002 12# Exams Reviewed w/ Fac. (C.l.h;C.2.f&h;C.3.g) JunJi6, 2002

,o 13# Final Appl. Due & Assign. Sheet Prepared (C.2.j;C.2.h;ES202) Jul 22, 2002 (ah /0; Jul 29, 2002 , 1 . "

14# NRC Supervisor Approved Final Exams (C.2.i;C.3.h)*

15' Final Appl. Rec'd & Waivers Sent (C.2.g) Jul 29, 2002 16# Proctor Rules Reviewed w/ Fac. & Written Authorized (C.3.k) Jul 29, 2002 17 Exam/Insp Material to Team (C.3.i) Jul 29, 2002 9,i 7 4.

18# Fac. graded exam & Comments Rec'd Aug 17, 2002 19# NRC Written Grading Completed Aug 20, 2002, 20# Examiners Finished Grading Op. Tests Aug 20, 2002

  • 9yr 21# NRC Ch. Ex. Review Completed Aug 30, 2002 j *//44j2.

22 NRC BC Review Completed* Aug 31, 2002 23' RPS/IP # Examinees Updated Before Report Issued Sep 5, 2002 6 7' 24 License/Denials Signed & Report Issued Sep 5, 2002 04 A 25 Package Closed Out Sep 26, 2002 - AD Final Inspection Report Issued, Exam Package to OLA, Facility. Contact Notified of Results

  1. Not required for inspections, except as noted.
  • Note Supervisor/Peer initials required.

[]Required NRC-auth. exams only.

When complete, for exams, add to pkg & fwd copy to BC, for insp, fwd orig'l to BC.

Last revised 10/15/01 S:\DRS\OB\EXAMS\CNS\August 2002 Exam\exam assignment sheet.wpd

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 (R8,S)

Facility: Cooper Nuclear Station Date of Examination: 8i5/2002 Initials Item Task Description

_ _a

  • c#
1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401.

W R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section I D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled. r/  !

T T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

E N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal I evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

S I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix M of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*, and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described inAppendix D.
3. a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination,

/ I(3)*no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an altemate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities.
d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section. 7 G

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N E c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

R A d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. OVA
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). TI.,.1 t l S_Printed Name / Sign~ature.
a. Author <; a., - , . e -3. ..
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Z d.NCSupervisor Note:
  • Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations. I
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: C00 ,LOeCAef f Date of Exam: 5'

/'2OZ., ExamLevel: RO R Initial Item Description a pes p rt

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility
2. a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions la
b. Facility leamina objectives referenced as availablentl;
3. RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401 F~
4. Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process
5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

Sindcated

_the below audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or writhe audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or et the examinations were developed independently; or 9Quthe licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or apother (explain)

6. Bank use meetsmlimits (no more thana75 Bank Modified New percent and the from the bank at least 10 percent new, rsmoiid;etrteataqution ka4-3 24) ;O to,°*

distribution at right SRO SV *:*

s o qj G1f ,O

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A /** /)"

the exam (including 10 new questions) are ca written at the comprehension/analysis to level; '43 Ro 51 enter the actual question distribution at rinht Name / Sg5natur

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers
9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previouslyA 'L approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assiglned; deviations are justified*1
10. Question psychometric quality 2nd format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines ME-.* 7
11. The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and -\ / _

agrees with value on cover sheet 1ý4 1 r, SPrinted Name /Signature Date

a. Author ._ r1'_ _* _._i#t) *"kII/i6C_j__,7", Sf3?)l
b. Facility Reviewer (* _a** **__ = _,*_[**_*_*_ *.'/*
c. N R C C hief Exam iner (#]-- *-- _* / -'-& *
  • 7a__
d. NRC Regional Supervisor __ _

Note:

  • The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items inColumn "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 (R8, Si)

Facility: Cooper Nuclear Station Date of Examination: 8,52002 Operating Test Number: 1 Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b* c#
a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). ;4
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
o. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.I.a).
d. Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. -i
2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA - -
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
  • initial conditions
  • initiating cues

- references and tools, including associated procedures

- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

  • specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the criteria in Attachment I of ES-301.

C. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

d. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.
3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA
a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

P_ý ýignature Date

a. Authore r77. ,/ .
b. Facility Reviewe(*) t0
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) ,z -z d.NRC Supervisor 2F NOTE:
  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column -c;-chief examiner concurrence required.

I

ES-301 Simulator Scenado Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 (R8, S1)

Facility: Cooper Nuclear Station Date of Exam: 8542=02 Scenario Numbers: 1/ 2 / 3 / A Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* .# I

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) - 4
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seism~ric event. .3
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have N) sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.
8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10. do have been altered inaccordnce wihScinD.4 of ES-0.'Vv Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other
11. All individual operator competencles can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). .3u &i
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support Lcensin decisions for each crewpoiin TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D) Actual Attributes . . .
1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 618/6/5 Q 2!*tl
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1/2/2/2/2_ .32
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 4/3/4/4
4. Major transients (1-2) 1 /2/ 1/1
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 21 21313 3sz
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 I Ili 1/
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 213 13/3

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, S)

OPERATING TEST NO.: 1, RO-1, ISRO-1, USRO-1 (CNS)

Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 3 Normal 1 1 RO #1 Instrument/ 4 4,5 3,5,7 Component Major 1 6 6 RO BOP Reactivity 1 3 3 Normal 0 1 As RO Instrument I 2 4,5 3,5,7 Component Major 1 6 6 I

SRO-I #1 Reactivity 0 3 Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument I 2 2,4,6,7 Component Major 1 6 Reactivity 1 3 2 Normal 1 1 1 SRO-U #1 Instrument I 2 2,4,5,7 3,4,5,7 Component Major 1 6 6 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewe r:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, S)

OPERATING TEST NO.: 1, RO-2, ISRO-2, USRO-2 (CNS)

Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 3 Normal 1 1 RO #2 Instrument 4 4,5 3,5,7 Component Major 1 6 6 RO BOP Reactivity 1 2 Normal 0 1 As RO Instrument / 2 4,5 2,6,7 Component Major 1 6 5 SRO-I #2 Reactivity 0 3 Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument / 2 2,4,5,7 Component Major 1 6 Reactivity 0 3 2 Normal 1 1 1 SRO-U #2 Instrument / 2 2,4,5,7 3,4,5,7 Component Major 1 6 6 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, S)

OPERATING TEST NO.: 1, RO-3, ISRO-3 (CNS)

Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 2 Normal 1 1 RO#3 Instrument 4 2,5,7 4,5 Component Major 1 6 6 BOP RO Reactivity 1 3 Normal 0 1 As RO Instrument 2 2,5,7 2,4,6 Component Major 1 6 5 SRO-I #3 Reactivity 0 2 Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument 2 3,4,5,7 Component Major 1 6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument / 2 Component I Major 1 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: ~ZCL, 7L NRC Reviewe r: hd

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Si)

OPERATING TEST NO.: 1, RO-4(CNS)

Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 2 1 1 Normal RO #4 Instrument/ 4 2,5,7 4,5 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO Instrument / 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component Major Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument / 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

?

7JIZ7 J" vz--

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, S)

OPERATING TEST NO.: 1, RO-5 (CNS)

Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 3 Normal 1 1 RO#5 Instrument / 4 4,5 3,5,7 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO Instrument / 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument / 2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument / 2 Component I Major 11 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: v -77A,-' G Ih *,

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, SI)

OPERATING TEST NO.: 1, RO-6 (CNS)

Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 2 1 1 Normal RO #6 Instrument! 4 2,5,7 4,5 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument / 2 Component Major Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument! 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

1b-Ml Uompetencies IecKlst-orm _b-3U1-6 (K8,

- 1)

Cooper Nuclear Station Applicant RO #1 Applicant RO #2 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 1 2 RO BOP RO BOP Understand and Interpret 4,5 3,5 4,5 3,5 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events 4,6 3,5,6 4,6 3,5,6 and Conditions 7 7 Understand andeSstem Plant Pons 2,5 3,5,7 2,5 and System Response 3,5,7 Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control 3,4,5 1,3,5 3,4,5, 1,3,5 Boards (2) ,6 ,6,7 6 ,6,7 Communicate and 3,5,6 3,5,6 3,5,6 3,5,6 Interact With the Crew 7 7 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: 0 NRC Reviewer:

Cooper Nuclear Station Applicant RO #3 Applicant RO #4 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 1 2 BOP RO BOP RO Understand and Interpret 2,5 4,5 2,5 4,5 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events 2,5,7 4,5,6 2,5,7 4,5,6 and Conditions Understand Plant 1,2,6 3,4,5 1,2,6 3,4,5 and System Response ,6 ,6 Comply With and Use Procedu 1,2,6 2,4,5 Use Procedures (1) 1,2,6 2,4,5 Operate Control 1,2,5 2,4,6 1,2,5, 2,4,6 Boards (2) ,6,7 ,7 6,7 ,7 Communicate and 1,2,5 2,3,4 1,2,5, 2,3,4 Interact With the Crew 6,7 5,6 6,7 5,6 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer: I A-I

Cooper Nuclear Station Applicant RO #5 Applicant RO #6 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 1 2 3 RO BOP BOP RO Understand and Interpret 4,5 3,5 2,5 4,5 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events 4,6 3,5,6 2,5,7 4,5,6 and Conditions 7 Understand Plant 2,5 3,5,7 1,2,6 3,4,5 and System Response ,6 Comply Use ProcedWith and 4,5 1,3 1,2,6 2,4,5 Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control 3,4,5 1,3,5 1,2,5, 2,4,6 Boards (2) ,6 ,6,7 6,7 ,7 Communicate and 3,5,6 3,5,6 1,2,5, 2,3,4 Interact With the Crew , ,7 6,7 25,6 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

Cooper Nuclear Station Applicant ISRO #1 Applicant ISRO #2 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 1 2 3 RO BOP SRO SRO RO BOP Understand and Interpret 4,5 3,5 2,4,5 1,2,5,6 4,5 2,5 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events 1,2,5,6, anoseiEvens 4,6 3,5,6,7 2,5,7 7 4,5,6 2,5,6,7 and Conditions Understand Plant 2,5 3,5,7 2,3,5 2,5,6 3,4,5,6 2,4,5 and System Response Comply With and Use Proced 4,5 1,3 2,3,4,5, 1,2,3,4 Use Procedures (1) 7 2,4,5 1,2,5,7 Operate Control 3,4,5,6 1,3,5,6, 2,4,6,7 1,2,5,6, Boards (2) 7 7 Communicate and 3,5,6 3,5,6,7 2,3,4,5, 1,2,3,5, 2,3,4,5, 1,2,3,5, Interact With the Crew 6,7 6 6 7 Demonstrate Supervisory 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,5, Ability (3) 5,6,7 6 Comply With and 2 2,4 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: -- Q.

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 (R8, S)

Cooper Nuclear Station Applicant SROU #1 Applicant SROU #2 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 1 2 Understand and Interpret 1,2,5,6 3,4,5,6 1,2,5,6 3,4,5,6 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events 1,2,5,6, 1,2,5,6, and Conditions 3,5,6 7 3,5,6 Understand Plant 2,5,6 3,4,5,6, 2,5,6 3,4,5,6, and System Response 7 7 Comply With and Use Procedu 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4, Use Procedures (1) 5,6 5,6 Operate Control Boards (2)

Communicate and 1,2,3,5, 2,3,4,5, 1,2,3,5, 2,3,4,5, Interact With the Crew 6 6 6 6 Demonstrate Supervisory 1,2,3,5, 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,5, 1,2,3,4, Ability (3) 6 5,6 6 5,6 Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: f L ý sn ,

NRC Reviewer: - --7 144

Cooper Nuclear Station Applicant ISRO #3 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 BOP SRO RO Understand and Interpret 2,5 3,4,5,6 2,4,5 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events 2,5,7 3,5,6 2,4,5,6 and Conditions Understand Plant 1,2,6 3,4,5,6, 2,3,4 and System Response 7 Comply With and 1,2,6 1,2,3,4, 3,4,5,6 Use Procedures (1) 5,6 Operate Control 1,2,5,6, 2,3,4,5, Boards (2) 7 6 Communicate and 1,2,5,6, 2,3,4,5, 2,3,4,5, Interact With the Crew 7 6 6 Demonstrate Supervisory 1,2,3,4, Ability (3) 5,6 Comply With and 4 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: , '

NRC Reviewer: '"

NRC Reviewer:

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO/SRO Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 'd ,
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented _ _
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) _ ___
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail _, '
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified _
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date
a. Grader _
b. Facility Reviewer(*) _ttb*_ _6_/)_e_/
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) ___ ____ ,-/__4,_ _
d. NRC Supervisor (*)- _" /

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

Page 1 of 4 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 10102/2002 13:45:37 From 07/01/2002 To 09/30/2002 Report 21 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 Operational

[Exam Week 1Site/Docket No./insp Rpt # # Candidates .e Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned k 07/15/2002 Cooper / 05000298 / 2002301 Prep MCKERNON, THOMAS 0. MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

TAC #: X02229 STETKA, THOMAS F.

I WERNER, G E.

SRO' R 08/05/2002 Cooper / 05000298 / 2002301 RO* Admin FFF MCKERNON, THOMAS 0. MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

TAC #: X02229 SROýU7 SANCHEZ, ALFRED STETKA, THOMAS F.

Sites: CNS Orgs: 4620 Exam Author:ALL

'1 l-3nt o 1-3 Fo..rmES-251re..-

to*.a SeCR rn 0 CM scheduled for the week(s) ofoti~ as of the Wcuired specisibod lcnoWldge about toe NRC 3moonulfg examinafions to any persons who fit at been~ authozed I ackntowledge tial I have that vAI not knowingly divulge any inforainUabotAthese exemikaions those applicants scheduled to be dateformysgnstue. I agree evaluate, or provide peformance feedback to understand that I am not to insb-uot, by the NRC chief eaxwner. Iexarnlatiorns completion of examlrdwtof adminlstratllon, except as specietllky inoted below and administered thse" licensing frm this date until (as documented in the feaclity licensee's by sh NRC.Furtemniorn I am aware of the, physical security measures and requirements of the examInstions andcor an enforcement ihe oondltions; of tlhs agreement may result In aulhiotzed caoellalon suggestions that procedures) and undeuuiantd that violation of Immedtately report to facility managemedt or the NRC "Ielexaminer any indioedols or aco-n against me or the fadllty ik*msee. I wil exerninaIO securelwy maV have been o~mpromised. I licensing exeminSUtons administired I did rnot divulge to any unauthorized persons any Information concerning the NRCof examriation admi~nistraton, I did not To the best of my knowledge. unti doe coi*pletio__

,ft*hes.k1 during oU&tL-.4 ',w ,*FroF m the date that I entered Into this security agreemenut administered Coese licensing e*aminatUons, except as specifically feedback to those applicants who were Instruc,,evaluate-.or paMprfomance ,'37 noted below and authorhod by the NRC. DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE

. m.. -rv RIANATURE (1) 40 T1.~IL PFiNTED NAME -301BTITLEIi i ESPturOP=4-.

  • SAW").' 1,.:
2.  ;*-*

3.

4.

5. cJ) a' Cu lo.

ll:

11I9MM~

NOTES:

24 of 24 "0 "Y NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

0

- -.1 0

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201--3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ____02__ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized to be by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and administered these licensing authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's I-.

procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement 0 or suggestions that action against me or the facility licensee, I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any Indications examination security may have been compromised. U'

2. Post-Examination administered To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any Information concerning the NRC licensing examinations during the week(s) of A.JS From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, except as I did not specifically instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, noted below and authorized by the NRC. .

14.-_________

15.

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24 0

0

08/27/02 TUE 11:28 FAX 14028255584 NPPD I1j1004

'"W wr-ý ý-w .0 a- r. a ZOd -Y4JOIL I'Is Ai A-V LI "IfAI' 21 I

I 0

I

!E*-Jg-mm~P 9d 2 IT 5

TO-FM EL-261 I - -M minew Security Agreement

1. EWEardOM ol 54toWA "Offis sMired SpGQWMd Xnm*dge aboul tha NRC licensifig GNM"Inglialig Wwdujod kr fte wask(BI I q&wwjj*a thit I have aboiAtkw sumMallon to my PUMI tppNcwft WhO hSv*"6s6n suibuft"d Woof IMS1911011M. ISgfw met Iwig not knowingly Outgo arri 110fonallm not b inatmal. swarms*. or pravide porklmemm bedUck ja lha#e schoddlaill Idbe ty so 1MRC cW examiner. Iumlaffland that Iam L411 dMa urtill camilftlen d suminagan adrninisballon, excapt me apeffally MOM below NvW Ihm licepifimp eurOations 11rom clocuffleflud IMft [Malty RMASSIS adintioleWred suftrito by Obe NPOwdismie, Iam wivan or the p1tysicel secoftf on wres end asquirernern ("at Ihs exandnalom andw an edorcentont caWMWs d this SW earnerdmay resultim canciAlelion procedures) and undsrstand 11ho vlolition, of Meamass* any koftagm at suggiesUm lhat I WMA fewto OuNtymsm9emeid ot Me NRC chief exacnIner scae"Spillet. mom he %Wily &MMOM ex- danalcuftmaybevatmancOMPFOMIS*&
2. &MUMkift OWWft " NRC Taftbestdrnyk dr,(w Rol dWdp tO Aq VMkftMmd pvMWM on WOMINOW wS Us cun*llom efsawnholion odmMMIM. IdW nut dukv 11he welka) of Ram the date, thel Ientered into jW11 secWtvagratmara Pad diew in PA Inj oneMin 91111Wd. simpt so tpecillico rLION In*ad. sows in,cirr arms feadbuA 10 Owe applIcarb VAW we fa aft fieladbelowand'auilicritatilbyllvNIFIC, , I 'd Ajil-I - -

PRWED NAME joB Tinei RESPONSMILITY im 113MOMMANd.i Ln NOTIES.-

w4 24of24 NUREG-1021, Wbion e, SUIVIOMOMI 11 D

Cc CD CD CA

POI 08-22-02 12:42PM To "Cl z

a IR lp satulag P3- Oss;so go I-d z-q2p--sa8-*PMs.

ý - r46 9000 11922299ZOtT ifi 9Z.'iT TIT zo LZ'

08/23/02 FRI 11:44 FAX 1402825SS84 NPPD QOO00 LU as amS z:~j. M.-6T-0-W U

w E

8 IIri ca 0

0 I -d ZSSE-.5am-086 91ma Mao Iv~d WEI* lad 90,'g/8O?

To ~

R)0 LOO 18 UidAN V9222MOTT lYV 6Z:TT MUI ZO/LZ/90

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML030280427&oldid=2697574"