ML022590260

Final Qa/Related Forms

ML022590260
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	08/12/2002
From:	Wilson M Dominion Nuclear Connecticut
To:	Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
50-423/02301 50-423/02301
Download: ML022590260 (19)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: M/,j j Date of Examination:s/- - W'/(

Examinations Developed by: Facility / NRC (circle one)

Target Chief Date* Task Description I Reference Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l.a; C.2.a & b) 12

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.l.e; C.3.c)]

-75 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1.e & f; C.3.d)

-70 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

-45 8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g & h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1 .1; C.2.g; ES-202) _ ___

-14 10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1 .j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g)

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with

-7 facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions (7.

distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[ ] Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility. /:\s(VA'SIOV. ov",A 13 Date of Examination: */I2jta Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401.

W R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

T T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.- r~.

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

S I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*,

and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination,

/ (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance based activities.

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days._ _

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.1 E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

NA _

E c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. _____

R A d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. "

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. k14_ _

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

P nted Name/Signure A Date

a. Author &

b. Facility Reviewer (*) C, L J W A S/ X /a

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) "L" W114 I

d. NRC Supervisor Note: Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required. I 23 of 24 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

/ ( (

Form ES-201-3 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement

1. Pre-Examination -

licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of A oft I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC to any persons who have" ot 6een authorized about these examinations date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be by the NRC chief examiner. I understand of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not during the week(s) of AA.0 1'- . From the date that I entered into this security administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically instruct, evaluate, or provde performance feedback to those applicants who were noted below and authorized by the NRC.

SIGNATURE (1 DATE SIGNATUR (2) DATENOTE PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY 4.

5. ----- - --- - --_ __. _, _- , , . ---- - ----

4..

- -__--- --- 0.L -o 5

14- O _ ..-. 7a 14.

_* 4_L/*, -- ____-- _ __**

10..

15.

• WA Or ... Askf' [*----- 'Q--

NOTES:

24 of 24 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

( (

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination Pa~-.ý 2-acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 11 - J as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) ofl p-From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or proieperformance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY IG ATUR-(.1)/7 DATE SIGNA URE 2) D NOTE 4.,._ ,,,_ 3.. _+ +*_*,

-- _* ~1~-

---

- -- - -- -- ,-dZ,**._--* --

5 6.

5._*.__+* -- ___i; *4*+........ ---- "Z---?--<

._.7-, 0t_.. -I+

7.------ - --

8.--------------------- -- C------------ ------- - --------- - -_.

9.g--------------------

7.- -- - - -- - -----  : -- - ------- -----

F---- -----

10. /14^

11.---- - -------- ------------------------

12. ---------------

13.----------------------

14. ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ----

15.------------ ------------------------------

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 2

Facility: M N12- } "* 3 Date of Examination: A L', I Z1 ZWOperating Test Number-.

Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b* C#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with *. 4 sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination. ,A

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1 .a).

d. Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent 4..'

applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions

• initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures

- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

- specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet thenE criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301. '

c. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

d. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA

a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name/Signqt/* I. Date

a. Author C ( (1- *~ 6AJ

b. Facility Reviewer(*) L I 6 /0L

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) I NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required. I 23 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility:ik,[lS*r'*.. - 3 DateofExam:Al2 072 Scenario Numbers: I- /Z 3 Operating est No.:

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b c#

I

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ___

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary cleariy so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events ,7 specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. J I TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D) Actual Attributes I

-z I

1. Total malfunctions (5-8)

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2- /2/ Z t I9

3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 / /Lf A  !

4. Major transients (1-2) 2/a/Z , I

5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2_ / I ___

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) Z. //? .

7. Critical tasks (2-3) I31 3/ 2. T V NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 26

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: !Vh , /V-L ,, A

• Date of Exam: A-. . O'2Scenado Numbers: Al I Operatinr Test No.:

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c# I

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. A

3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario 9 without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. . _,_

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301. ,_

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). mi

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios)./ ___

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. ____

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D) Actual Attributes I1. Total malfunctions (5-8)

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 /

3. Abnormal events (2-4) t /

Z / /77.-_

_/"

4. Major transients (1-2)

5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 / t%

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1/ / 9

7. Critical tasks (2-3) /

1_,. / ,______ /

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 26

SECTION 8 MILLSTONE UNIT 3 SIMULATOR SCENARIO ATTRIBUTES CHECKLIST FORM ES-301-4 Exam

Title:

ATWS with Faulted S/G ID Number: 2K2 NRC-001 Revision: 0 Assessor: Steve Jackson QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Y_1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the crew into expected events.

Y_2. The scenario consists mostly of related events.

Y_3. Each event description consists of:

- the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

- the malfunctions(s) that are entered to initiate the event

- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

- the expected operator actions (by shift position)

- the event termination point (if applicable)

Y_4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

Y__5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

Y_6. Sequencing/timing of events is reasonable, and allows for the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

_N/A__7. If time compression techniques are used, scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

_Y_8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

N_9. The scenario has been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure functional fidelity is maintained while running the scenario.

_Y_10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered lAW Section D.4 of ES301

_Y_11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using form ES-301-6.

_Y_12. Each operator will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5. (Form submitted with simulator scenarios).

_Y_13. Level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Section 8 Page 1 of 2

SECTION 8 MILLSTONE UNIT 3 SIMULATOR SCENARIO ATTRIBUTES CHECKLIST FORM ES-301-4 Exam

Title:

SGTR WITHOUT PZR PRESSURE CONTROL ID Number: 2K2 NRC-002 Revision: 0 Assessor: Steve Jackson QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Y 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the crew into expected events.

Y_2. The scenario consists mostly of related events.

Y_3. Each event description consists of:

- the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

- the malfunctions(s) that are entered to initiate the event

- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

- the expected operator actions (by shift position)

- the event termination point (if applicable)

Y_4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

_Y_5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

__Y_6. Sequencing/timing of events is reasonable, and allows for the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

_N/A_7. If time compression techniques are used, scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

_Y_8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

N_9. The scenario has been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure functional fidelity is maintained while running the scenario.

_Y_10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered lAW Section D.4 of ES301

__Y_11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using form ES-301-6.

_Y__12. Each operator will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5. (Form submitted with simulator scenarios).

Y_13. Level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Section 8 Page 1 of 2

SECTION 8 MILLSTONE UNIT 3 SIMULATOR SCENARIO ATTRIBUTES CHECKLIST FORM ES-301-4 Exam

Title:

STEAM LINE BREAK AND FR-H.1 ID Number: 2K2 NRC-003 Revision: 0 Assessor: Steve Jackson QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Y_1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the crew into expected events.

Y_2. The scenario consists mostly of related events.

Y_3. Each event description consists of:

- the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

- the malfunctions(s) that are entered to initiate the event

- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

- the expected operator actions (by shift position)

- the event termination point (if applicable)

Y_4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

_Y_5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

_Y_6. Sequencing/timing of events is reasonable, and allows for the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

_N/A_7. If time compression techniques are used, scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

_Y_8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

_N_9. The scenario has been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure functional fidelity is maintained while running the scenario.

_Y__10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered lAW Section D.4 of ES301

_Y__11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using form ES-301-6.

_Y__12. Each operator will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5. (Form submitted with simulator scenarios).

_Y__13. Level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Section 8 Page 1 of 2

SECTION 8 MILLSTONE UNIT 3 SIMULATOR SCENARIO ATTRIBUTES CHECKLIST FORM ES-301-4 Exam

Title:

INTER-SYSTEM LOCA ID Number: 2K2NRC-004 (SPARE) Revision: 0 Assessor: Steve Jackson QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Y 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the crew into expected events.

_Y_2. The scenario consists mostly of related events.

_Y_3. Each event description consists of:

- the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

- the malfunctions(s) that are entered to initiate the event

- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

- the expected operator actions (by shift position)

- the event termination point (if applicable)

_Y_4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

_Y_5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

_Y_6. Sequencing/timing of events is reasonable, and allows for the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

_N/A_7. If time compression techniques are used, scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

_Y_8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

_N_9. The scenario has been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure functional fidelity is maintained while running the scenario.

_Y__10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered lAW Section D.4 of ES301

_Y_11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using form ES-301-6.

_Y_12. Each operator will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5. (Form submitted with simulator scenarios).

_Y__13. Level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Section 8 Page 1 of 2

SECTION 8 MILLSTONE UNIT 3 SIMULATOR SCENARIO ATTRIBUTES CHECKLIST FORM ES-301-4 Lesson

Title:

ATWS ID Number: 2K2 NRC-001 Revision: 0 Note: Following criteria list scenario traits that are numerical (QUANTITATIVE) in nature.

01. Total Malfunctions (TM) - Include EM's- 5 to 8 required Total: 7 Loss of RCP B Cooling water Supply, Charging Flow Control Failure, MSI Fails to Auto Actuate, Main Steam Line D Rupture Inside CTMT, Loss of Instrument Bus VIAC-3, A S/G Feed Reg Valve Failure, SIH Fails to Align on SIS

02. Malf's after EOP entry (EM's)- 1 to 2 required Total: 2 SIH Fails to Align on SIS, MSI Fails to Auto Actuate,

03. Abnormal Events (AE)-2 to 4 required Total: 3 Loss of RCP B Cooling water Supply, Loss of Instrument Bus VIAC-3, A S/G Feed Reg Valve Failure

04. Major Transients (MT)-1 to 2 required Total: 2 ATWS/32N Fails to De-energize, Main Steam Line D Rupture Inside CTMT

05. EOP's (EU) entered/requiring substantive actions 1 to 2 required Total: 2 E-0, E-2

06. EOP Contingencies requiring substantive actions [ECAs/FRs](EC) 0 to Total: 2 2 required FR-S.1, FR-Z.1

07. Critical Task (CT) - 2 to 3 required Total: 3 E---J: Establishflow from at least one SI pump before completion of the check of E-0, steps 1-14 in FR-S. 1.

E-0-P: Manually actuate MSI or close MSIV's before completion of FR-S. I step 10.

E-2-A: Isolate the faulted SIG before transition out of E-2

08. Approximate Scenario Run Time: 45 to 60 min. (One scenario may Total: 70 min approach 90 minutes)

09. EOP run time: Total: 40 min

10. Technical Specifications are exercised during the scenario. (Y/N) Y.

NOTES: Reactivity Manipulation: Rapid Downpower to Remove RCP Section 8 Page 2 of 2

SECTION 8 MILLSTONE UNIT 3 SIMULATOR SCENARIO ATTRIBUTES CHECKLIST FORM ES-301-4 Lesson

Title:

SGTR WITHOUT PZR PRESSURE CONTROL ID Number: 2K2 NRC-002 Revision: 0 Note: Following criteria list scenario traits that are numerical (QUANTITATIVE) in nature.

01. Total Malfunctions (TM) - Include EM's- 5 to 8 required Total: 8 PORV failed closed, CTMT IAS valve will not open, S/G Tube Leak / Rupture, DPRI Data A Failure, Continuous Rod Insertion, Service Water Pumps Fail to Auto Start, Loss of Offsite Power, MSIV Fails Closed

02. Malf's after EOP entry (EM's)- 1 to 2 required Total: 2 PORV failed closed, MSIV Fails Closed

03. Abnormal Events (AE)-2 to 4 required Total: 4 Service Water Pumps Fail to Auto Start, S/G Tube Leak, DPRI Data A Failure, Continuous Rod Insertion

04. Major Transients (MT)-1 to 2 required Total: 2 S/G Tube Rupture / Loss of Offsite Power

05. EOP's (EU) entered/requiring substantive actions 1 to 2 required Total: 2 E-0, E-3

06. EOP Contingencies requiring substantive actions [ECAs/FRs](EC) 0 to Total: 1 2 required ECA-3.3

07. Critical Task (CT) - 2 to 3 required Total: 3 E-3-A: Isolate feedwater flow to and steam flow from ruptured S/G before a transition to ECA-3.1 occurs at step 3 of E-3. (MSIV fails)

E-3-C: Identify and Isolate ruptured S/G before narrow range level reaches 29%.

ECA-O.O--F: Manually start the A Train Service Water Pump before transitioning from E-0.

08. Approximate Scenario Run Time: 45 to 60 min. (One scenario may Total: 60 min approach 90 minutes)

09. EOP run time: Total: 30 min

10. Technical Specifications are exercised during the scenario. (Y/N)-Y-NOTES: Reactivity Manipulation: Rapid Downpower due to S/G Tube Leak Section 8 Page 2 of 2

SECTION 8 MILLSTONE UNIT 3 SIMULATOR SCENARIO ATTRIBUTES CHECKLIST FORM ES-301-4 Lesson

Title:

STEAM LINE BREAK AND FR-H.1 ID Number: 2K2 NRC-003 (SPARE) Revision: 0 Note: Following criteria list scenario traits that are numerical (QUANTITATIVE) in nature.

01. Total Malfunctions (TM) - Include EM's- 5 to 8 required Total: 8 Main Generator Overheating, PT-505 failed "as-is", 3CHS*MV8104 Fails to Open, "B" CCP Pump Trips, Main Steam Break, AFW Malfunctions (AFW Pump B Fail to auto start, AFW Pump A discharge valve shut, Terry Turbine Trip), CDA Auto Actuation Failure, RCP Fails to Trip from MB4

02. Malfs after EOP entry (EM's)- 1 to 2 required Total: 2 CDA Auto Actuation Failure, RCP Fails to Trip from MB4

03. Abnormal Events (AE)-2 to 4 required Total: 4 Rapid Downpower,, Main Generator Overheating, Instrument Failure Response (PT 505), AFW Malfunctions

04. Major Transients (MT)-1 to 2 required Total: 2 Main Steam Break, Loss of Auxiliary Feed

05. EOP's (EU) entered/requiring substantive actions 1 to 2 required Total: 1 E-0

06. EOP Contingencies requiring substantive actions [ECAs/FRs](EC) 0 to Total: 2 2 required FR-H.1, FR-Z.1

07. Critical Task (CT) - 2 to 3 required Total: 2 FR-H.1--E: Establish 530 gpm AFW flow to the SGs before bleed and feed is required.

E-O-E: Manually actuate CDA or start at least one Quench Spray Pump before transition out of E-0 to FR-H.1.

08. Approximate Scenario Run Time: 45 to 60 min. (One scenario may Total: 60 min approach 90 minutes)

09. EOP run time: Total: 30 min

10. Technical Specifications are exercised during the scenario. (Y/N) Y_

NOTES: Reactivity Manipulation: Downpower directed by Main Gen. ARP Section 8 Page 2 of 2

SECTION 8 MILLSTONE UNIT 3 SIMULATOR SCENARIO ATTRIBUTES CHECKLIST FORM ES-301-4 Lesson

Title:

INTER-SYSTEM LOCA ID Number: 2K2NRC-004 Revision: 0 Note: Following criteria list scenario traits that are numerical (QUANTITATIVE) in nature.

01. Total Malfunctions (TM) - Include EM's- 5 to 8 required Total: 5 Power Range NI Fails High, Leak in LP Feedwater Heater, RCP Hi Motor Temp (CCP Leak to Oil Reservoir), Inter-System LOCA,, ESF Auto Actuation Failure (ESF Bldg Ventilation)

02. Malf's after EOP entry (EM's)- 1 to 2 required Total: 2 ESF Auto Actuation Failure (ESF Bldg Ventilation), Inter-System LOCA

03. Abnormal Events (AE)-2 to 4 required Total: 4 Power Range NI Fails High, Operation with One Feedwater String Isolated, RCP Hi Motor Temp (CCP Leak to Oil Reservoir), ESF Auto Actuation Failure (ESF Bldg Ventilation)

04. Major Transients (MT)-1 to 2 required Total: 2 Rapid Downpower/Plant Trip, Inter-system LOCA

05. EOP's (EU) entered/requiring substantive actions 1 to 2 required Total: 1 E-O

06. EOP Contingencies requiring substantive actions [ECAs/FRs](EC) 0 to Total: 1 2 required ECA-1.2, LOCA Outside CTMT

07. Critical Task (CT) - 2 to 3 required Total: 2 ECA-1.2 -- A Isolate the LOCA outside containment before transition out of ECA-2.1 E.1-C Trip all RCPs before Orange Path

08. Approximate Scenario Run Time: 45 to 60 min. (One scenario may Total: 60 min approach 90 minutes)

09. EOP run time: Total: 30 min

10. Technical Specifications are exercised during the scenario. (Y/N)-Y-NOTES: Reactivity Manipulation: Power Range High Failure/RCP High Temp Section 8 Page 2 of 2

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Applicant Evolution Minimum Type Type Number Scenario Numbers 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO Instrument / 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 1 1 1 Normal 0 1 1 0 1 As RO Instrument 2 4 4 5 4 Component Major 1 2 2 1 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 1 1 1 1 Normal 1 1 1 0 1 As SRO Instrument 2 6 5 7 4 Component Major 1 2 2 1 1 Reactivity 0 0 0 1 1 Normal 1 1 1 0 1 SRO-U Instrument / 2 6 5 7 4 Component Major 1 2 2 1 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; oply those that reg,4're verifiable actions that provide insight to the applica'-tompete~ce cy$'A toVyM the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewe r:

25 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Applicant #1 Applicant #2 Applicant #3 SRO-U SRO-I RO Competencies Scenario Scenario Scenario 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Understand and Interpret 2,2a 2, 3, 2,2a 2, 3, 1, 2, 2, 3, 1, 3, Annunciators and Alarms 3, 3a, All All ,3, 3a, All All 2a, 3a, 4, 6, All 4,5, 4,5, 4,5, 4,5, 3,5, 5,6, 8 6,7, 6,8 6,7, 6,8 7,8, 8 8,9 8,9 9 Diagnose events and 2,3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 2, 2, 3, Conditions 4,5, 4,5, All 3, 4,5, 4,5, All 4,5, 5,6, 4,5, 3,4, 4,5, 6,7, 6,7, 4, 6,7, 6,7, 6 7,8, 6,8 6,8, 6 8,9 8 5,6 8,9 8 9 9 Understand Plant and 1,2, System Response All All All All All All All All All All 3, 4, All 6,7, 8,9 Comply With and Use 1,2, 1,2, Procedures (1) All All All All All All All All All 3, 3, 4, All 3a 6,7, 4,5, 8,9 6,8 Operate Control Boards 1,2, 1,2, (2) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All 3,3a 3,4, All

,4, 6,7, 5,6, 8,9 8

Communicate and Interact W ith the Crew All All All All All All All All All All All All Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) All All All All All All All All N/A N/A N/A N/A Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 3,4 2,3 3 2 3,4 2,3 3 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO (2) Optional for an SRO-U (3) Only applicable to SROs Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license examiners to evaluate every Author:

NRC Reviewer:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 26 of 26

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: /V s3 3 Date of Exam: A 4R x- l*"t)2Exam Level: RO(sRO Initial a b* c#

Item Description

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility / ____

2. a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available

3. RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate / Iii per Section D.2.d of ES-401

4. Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

_/the examinations were developed independently; or

- the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

_ other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question L96 -39 distribution at right0_

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A 7.

the exam (including 10 new questions) are (

written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right

8. References/handouts provided do not*give away answers __ ____

9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines r___

11. The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Name / Si nature Date

a. Author .... / , /

b. Facility Reviewer(*) -- .. ,.

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) -,/f ', a.

d. NRC Regional Supervisor .- C

a Note: The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: M M.AIjv.-, _3 Date of Exam: 3 ? Exam Level: ROi6')J Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading i 9 /*

I

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades ,VA M4 are justified

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of ._"

questions missed by half or more of the applicants _ _ _

Printed Name I Signature Date

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*) >/L6i. 5,zu~s/ (*..i6 ____I 0

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) zy5(1 DZdro*pd .

d. NRC Supervisor(*) - c(2 7_ ____

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1