ML022390040
| ML022390040 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 08/29/2002 |
| From: | Caruso J NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB |
| To: | Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB |
| Conte R | |
| References | |
| 50-410/02301 50-410/02301 | |
| Download: ML022390040 (16) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: JIM, iO-f*
Examinations Developed by:
Date of Examination:
749-77?/
a
/i NRC (circle one)
zofl/*/
ki4e,trj Target Date*
Task Description / Reference
-180
- 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a & b)
-120
- 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
-120
- 3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)
-120
- 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
S/2Z-X..
[-90]
[5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c)]
-75
- 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1.e & f; C.3.d)
-70
- 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRCagd feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)
-45
- 8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and /1 reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g & h; C.3.d) 6 1(U(O
ý.
-30
- 9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) 6"/*_V 7.
-14
- 10. Final license applications du and assignment st. ee* prelare (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) ar e L
-14
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility lHcensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
( /--i(
-14
- 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g)
-7
- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7
- 14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)
- 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with
-7 facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)
-7
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 22 of 24 7
Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.
They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.
1]
rl
ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility:
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Date of Examination: July 29,2002 Initials Item Task Description
"---"a b*
c#
- 1.
- a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-40 1.
w R
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D. 1 of I
ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
4 T
- c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
' t¢ N
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
o
- 2.
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal AA evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.
S I
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of M
applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*, and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative
,A criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appetfdix D.
- 3.
- a. Verify that:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, e),/
W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, AL
/
(3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T
(4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.
- b. Verify that:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.
- c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities.
YW
- d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.
A
- 4.
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.
E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
/
E
- c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
R A
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
2 L
d
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
- a. Author
(.*(}-
la
]?l
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
IL-,A 00 7tY-r,-*
,f.--)ýd M-u.--i-Y*"
- c. Chief Examiner 719t At¢6¢-
2/i"
- //
g-"
- d. NRC Supervisor
/
,],h¢.
Note:
- Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 0,e~o
ATTACGHIAENT 6: NRC EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMEN*
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1.
Pre-Examination ackmowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of "/LCL-as of the dale ol my signature. I agree 0hat I will nol knowingly divulge any Information aboul Ihese examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner-I understand that I am not to Instruct, evaluate, or provide perlormanoe feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until complaetion of examination administration, except as specifically noted belov/
and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical secur;ty measures and requirements (as documented in tIle facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of ile condilions ot this agreement may result in cancellation of ithe examinations andfor an enlorcemant action against, me or the facility license-. I will immediately report 1o facility management or Ihe NRC ch.af examiner any indications or suggestfons that examinalion security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examinalion To the best of my knowiefge,,f did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any informaion concerntng Ihe NRC licensing examinations administered during Ihe week(s) of.j.Z11. From the date that I entered into thls security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct. evaluate, or provide performar'ce feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specilically noted below and aulhorized by the NRC.
NOTES: 1. This note indicates that the individual was personally brieled as to hib/her responsibilities in complying with this security agreement.
e-nn TAnTn._qr Rev 04 CD
"'\\.)
I l
51R
ý6 C? ~~-
6 A-..
11-7 1
,7D
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 I.
Pre-Exam.iniaiori
( acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinatons schedued ;or the week(s) of ?/2i/az.- as of the date of my signature. I agree that I wili not knowingly divulge any infornation about these exanminations to any persons who have not been authorized by lhe NRC chief examiner. I understand 'hat I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furlhermore, I am aware of Ihe physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violat-on of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowld a, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of
. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by (he NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE 1./
Z-'
'CfS
- Al
,,w-6
- 2.
C-12_
z-S,
/,,,:
- 4.
a
- 7. _
eA 0, 0n._
V
- 9. 1
,_,,04 X.
yr-.11-4
_4rz_%.**
_S.*Z*-_
1 2.f it 14.* *,c:.,
4--*_
NOTES:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24
ES-201 Examination Securily Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1.
Pre-Exarnination rI I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of iZ_.*li._ as ol theCD date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized cN by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from Ihis date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below a, io authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that Co examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examinallon To the best of my knowl d gq. I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of -(7
. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE
- 3.
- 4.
-TI
- 6. _
- 8.
o
- 9.
lye
="*
110.
Co 12.
0 D__
-..-)
- 13.
- 14.
NOTES:
- ./
)*ao NUREG-1021, Revision 8 24 of 24_Co
I ci-)
AITACHMENT 6: NRC EXAMINATION SECURTY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examlnation Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1
Pre-Exarnination I acknowledge thai I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of
"_---as of the date of mny signature. I agree Mhal I will no! knowingly divulge any information about these examinatinns to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instrucl, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations fromthis date until compilation of examinatlon administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by t.e NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand thai violation of the cond'tions at this agreement may result in cancellation of the examirrnlions and!or an entorcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will Immediately report to fartlity management or the NRC chief examiner any indlcatinns or su.gesltIns that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examinalion To the best of my knowlldge,p did not divulge (o any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRG licensing examinations administered during the w'eek(s) of 2
~/_Z-_"
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instrucl, evaluate, or provide parfomiance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
-ti PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILI-IY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE
£% I
A-t 5
.4-'
2" L
-L
- 12.
13
- 14.
15.Nhdt ierhi yhy NOTES:
- 1. This note indicates that the individual was personalty briefed as to hislhar respons~ibiities in complying with thls security agreonrenL_
(Lu.)
IA&,.
Oh,
~Page 33 TAP-TQS-06
~
~wiwc~ tv~
~L~".Rev 04 46-,
- 12.
1,9,
AUG-22-2002 THU 01:39 PH NINE MILE POINT EP FAX NO, 315 349 4874 P. 06 riu{ 12 02 03129F RNI TeohnoloOies 912-576-7 3 4 AUG-12-200 2 MON 07730 A0l FAX NO.
P, 02 VrN)
.I
_i
-NA
.It 1ý3 A
.u
.6 UJ t
"~
P. 06 AUG-22-2002 14:52 315 349 4e74
ES-30 I
Operating Test Quality Checkltst Form ES-3 U 1-3 e-.a;,l,,
s..T,,-, TNAil. Pnit T I,,it ")
Flate nfF.yaminntion" hlyv 29 2002 Oneratina Test Number:
1 Initials
- 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a
b*
c#
- a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
- b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
I
- c.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D. 1.a).
_ k
- d.
Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.
- e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent t*y" applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA
- a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
- initial conditions
- initiating cues
- references and tools, including associated procedures
- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
- specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b.
The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the criteria in Attachment I ofES-301.
- c.
Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.
- d.
At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.
6'0
- 3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA
- a.
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with
/
di Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Printed Name / Signature DateJ
- a. Author G"4664L
/IL O
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
p
-1*,j
- c. NRCChiefExaminer(*)
7/
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
v-
- ].
676
ý NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial itemsin Column "c": chief examiner concurrence required.
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 Form ES-301-3 ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist
AUG-23-2002 FRI 02:31 AM FAX NO, P, 02 ES-3 01 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Date of Examination; July 29, 2002 Opcratin.S Test Numb*..=O Initials
- 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a
b*
i
- a.
The operating test conforms with thc previously approved outline; changes are consistent with samngping r2quirccrnts (e.g., 10 CFR 55,45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
- b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other opramting tests to be administcrod during A
this examination.
- c.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D. la).
- d.
Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable
/A limits.
V.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated liccnsc level.
- 72.
WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA
- a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
"* initial conditions
"* initiating cues
"* references and tools, including associated procedures
"* reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
"* specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps. if applic-abic
/
- b.
Thu prcscripted questions in Category A am* predominantly open reference and mee-t the criteria
/
in Attachment I ofrES-301.
- c.
R*epetition from opera ting tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise tm-t integrity.
1 0 l
- d.
At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test arc new or significantly modified.
- 3. SI1Y41JLATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA
- a.
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Printed Vame /Signature Dz
- a. Author ea
- b. Facility Rzcvicwer(*)
j?_____1__%/4
- e. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
0 A
- d. NRC Supervisor (1)
NOTE; 0 The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-dcvelopcd tests
- hidepcndcnt NRC reviewer initial itcmsin Column "C': chief exanlincr concurrence required.
ExZam Submittal Document (Unit 2). SRO Operatin,st A
//7 NURBG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement I P. 02 AUG-22-2002 15:51 96%
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Date of Exam: July 29,2002 Scenario Numbers: 4 / 3 / 2 / I /
Operating Test No.:
I QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of
,A service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
- 3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
- 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
t
- 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are
,)"
given.
Ai-k
- 8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
zr I
- 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All
&4A other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.
- 11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 A
(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
- 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events
/
specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
/tV
- 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
j, TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)
Actual Attributes I.
Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 /7 / 5 5
r ( t
- 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 / 3/ 2 1
- 3.
Abnormal events (2-4) 3/ 4/ 4 3
- 4.
Major transients (1-2) 1 / 1/ 1 1
- 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 /2 1 1 / 2
- 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1/ 1 02
/0
- 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) 2/3 / 3/2 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
AUG-23-2002 FRI 02:31 AM FAX NO, PE 03 ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 F36ility: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Date of Exam: July 29,2002 Scenario Numbcrs: 4 / 3 /2 1
Operating Test o:SR QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*
0#
I.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instramentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
- 3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cucs that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position)
"* the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated hito the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
- 5.
The events arc valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
- 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives,
- 7.
If time compression techniques arc used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues arc given.
- 8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
- 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficicncies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.
- 11.
All individual operator competcncies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-64 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
]L
- 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.0)
Actual Attribute I.
Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 / 7 / 5 / 5
- 2.
Malfunctions after LOP entry (1-2) 2 h5
- 3.
Abnormal events (2-4) 314/_4__3_A>_b___
- 4.
Major transients (1.-2)
____/__I/
- 5.
EOs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 /2 / 1 / 2 A-.
V
- 6.
EOP continge.cies requiring substantive actions (0-2) li )...
/-
- 7.
Critical tak6(2-3) 2/3/3 Eam u mritta Document (n it 2. SOIest.
W 5
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 RUG-22-2002 15:51 P. 03
OPERATING TEST NO.:SRO -U 1,2,3 RO 1 &2 SRO-I 1,2,3 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Sype Type Number 2
3 Reactivity 1
5 Normal 1
1 RO Instrument/
4 6,8 2,7 (R-1/2)
Component Major 1
7 8
3 Normal 0
As RO Instrument/
2 2,4 Component Major 1
7 RO SRO-I (1-1/2/3)
Reactivity 0
Normal 1
As SRO Instrument/
2 3A6 Component M ajor I
SRO SRO Reactivity 0
Normal 1
1 SRO-U Instrument/
2 2,4 (U-1/2/3)
Component Major 1
7 SRO Instructions:
Author:
Chief Examiner (1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to t applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
~~2~A 7b-
-1. 1.. -
I I ransient and1 Event Ch1ecklist Form ES-30 1-5 r:
WS-3 U I Competencies Checklist Form PS-301-4 Applicant Applicant Applicant RO-1 RO-2 I-1 1-2 1-3 U-1 U-2 U-3 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 2
3 2
3 2
BOP RO RO SRO SRO Understand and Interpret 5,6 2,8 2,4 2,3,6,7 2,4,7 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events 5,10 2,8 2,4 4,6,7 2,4,8 and Conditions Understand Plant andeSstem Pons 1,5,7,9 2,8 2,4,6,7 7,8,9 2,5,8 and System Response Comply With and Use Proce d
1,5 2,5 2,3,4 1,5,7 1,4,5,7,8 Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control 6,7,8 2,5,7 2,3,4,6 Boards (2) 7 Communicate and nte iat e
Cre 1,5,6,7,8 2,5,7,8 2,3,4,6 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4,5, nteract W ith the Crew75, 7678
,7__
5,6,7 6,7,8 Demonstrate Supervisory 1,3,4,6, 1-8 Ability (3) 7 Comply With and 3
45 Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency forevery a9 plicant.
Author:
Chief Examiner:
/7 k NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 Form ES-301-6 ESN-30O1 Competencies Checklist Form F,*q-*4 (I 1 -(1
Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-7 Facility:
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Date of Exam: 7/29/2002 Exam Level(
Item Description
- 1.
Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility
- 2.
- a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions
- b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available
- 3.
RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401
- 4.
Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process
- 5.
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain) rif
- 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question 13 distribution at right
- l. i//
- 7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are
/
written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right 6
}
- 8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers
- 9.
Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified
- 10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines
- 11.
The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet 10 Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. Author CiecA
,-A
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
JD/hJ
,/44-W'
/
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor(*)
Note:
- The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46 ES-401
Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-7 Facility:
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Date of Exam: 7/29/2002 Exam Level( SRO)
Initial Item Description a
b*
- 1.
Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility (V -7
- 2.
- a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions
- b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available
- 3.
RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate a
per Section D.2.d of ES-401
- 4.
Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process
- 5.
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or d
other (explain)
- 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question 12 distribution at right
- 7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level;,-
9 6
enter the actual question distribution at right _-___
- 8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers
- 9.
Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified
- 10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines
- 11.
The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. Author AL1L
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
2 3kVd
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
kL/ 6
/
07
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor(*)
(
Note:
- The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46 ES-401
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: *14 t*[ Q0,
- 2.
Date of Exam: ?12.102.-
Exam LevelLRa Initials Item Description a
b c
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades C4/
are justified S
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. Grader
_07
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
?1&-
2-...
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)--
Jo-/
J2Li
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1