ML022050150

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
External Meeting Summary Minutes 06-12-02-attachment 2
ML022050150
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 06/12/2002
From: Myers L
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:
NRC/RGN-III
References
Download: ML022050150 (40)


Text

NRC FORM 665S U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-2002)

ADAMS DOCUMENT SUBMISSION Single Document Originated By Telephone Mail St LAN ID Date 1Document No.

Document Title or Accession No.

Is this a brief title that can be changed by DPC according to template instructions?

Is this an exact title formatted according to template instructions that should not be changed by DPC?

ument AVAILABILITY (selectone) Document SENSITIVITY (select ne)

Publicly Available [J Sensitive AV Non-Sensitive (Indicate release date) U Sensitive-Copyright "U Non-Sensitive Copyright

/ Immediate Release Document SECURITY ACCESS LEVEL (select one)

Normal Release X Document Processing Center = Owner Delay Release Until NRC Users = Viewer Limited Document Security (Defined by User)

= Viewer Date = Viewer r- Non-Publicly Available = Viewer ADAMS Template No. RIDS Code (ifapplicable) Other Identifiers Special Instructions Actesod BoM Tel0hone Mai5 St O LAN ID Date submitted to DPC Accession go. ML020170281

  • JL 23 :

U. S. NRC DAVIS-BESSE RESTART OVERSIGHT PANEL PUBLIC MEETING June 12, 2002 INTRODUCTIONS FIRST ENERGY PRESENTATION OF DAVIS-BESSE RETURN TO SERVICE PLAN NRC STAFF QUESTIONS ADJOURN NRC MEETING WITH FIRST ENERGY NRC RESPONSE TO PUBLIC QUESTIONS ADJOURN MEETING

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit I Return To Seice Plan June 12, 2002 FENOC I

Introduction Lew,Myers FENOC Chief Operating Officer FENOC 2

Desired Outcome

"* Demonstrate a comprehensive recovery plan

"* Demonstrate that management will take the strong actions needed to:

- Resolve technical i es

- Operate the plant.pbSafdl nd reliably

- Improve employAt"onfidence. and trust

- Regain regulatoryconfidence

  • Receive feedback on.our actions FENOC

-Bsi B-uifldi~ng Bloc-ReuntIeriePa Reak6r'. Head Reso i "onPla' Bob, s6`4rau er I "0 prog ........

c m cal:.ýý,",, Res aft.Ac'Vdh`,VIa'h',""

Com fip'_cePIa'h,-,ý:

"'Howard Hergendahl MP ers,-.I. SI-.1,1111, Urnan D6ve E'Whiiih--,

FENOC

-Ractor~u Hea. u Reouio Planm T

Bob Schrauder Reactor Head Resolution Oversight FENOC

WORKING

,Reacto r~Head'* STRUCTURE FENOC

-Raco Head~

Res.lutionr Plarnm FENOC 7

Reco Head Reouto Plan

  • Replace existing reactorvessel head with the Midland-head:

- Unused head

- Designed to same requirements as Davis-Besse

- Built to same design codes with same materials

- Temporary Containmentopening is necessary

- Completion expected 4th quarter2002 FENOC

Reco HeadT~!1 Resoulutio Plarniu~

FENOC

Reactor Head Resolution Plan Cladding M"of Flange C.RDM NOZZLE to Dome Weld UT a nd ET of CRD Nozzle FENOC 10

Containment Building Extent of Condition Plan Ran Plant FENOC I1I

W n 0 i

to?,-IýeA

.1 Z

uj:

j(

LC ,'

  • Field walkdowns performed by qualified (VT-2) personnel to identify:

- boric acid degradation

- other materialconditions

  • Scope includes:

- Reactor Coolant System

- Safety Related Structures, Systems and Components inside containment FENOC 13

Ce B FENOC 14

Cotimn Buldn Extent of CodtonPa FENOC 15

C nu Etn ofCniinPa Magnetic Crawler FENOC 16

Continmet Buldin o0*

FENOC 2"0" 17

Program Technical Compliance' Plan Jim Powers Director -Enfgineering FENOC 18

  • Systematic review of Plant Programsfor ownership and industry standardsof excellence:

- 60 major programs to be evaluated priorto restart

- 5 programsinvolved in head degradationto have detailed review (Boric Acid Corrosion Control, Inservice Inspection, CorrectiveAction, Operating Experience, Modification)

FENOC 19

"* Identify program documents and commitments

"° Review implementing procedures

"*Identify key interfaces

  • Review known problems and resolutions

"* Review industry requirements and industry experience

"*Provide actions for program changes and upgrades FENOC 20

System Health Assurance Plan Jim Powers Director -r gineergn FENOC 21

  • Phase I - OperationalReadiness Review of safety and reliability systems
  • Phase /I- Comprehensive Review of 30 systems based on risk and performance

FENOC 22

System Health Assurance Plan High Pressure Injection Pump Replacement Project FENOC 23

  • Phase II- Comprehensive Review

- Look back 7 - 12 years

° Modifications

  • Condition Reports
  • Industry and operating experience reports
  • Maintenance history

- Includes system walkdowns FENOC 24

  • Phase 1 m- Latent Issues Review

- To ensure selected systems are in compliance with design basis documents

- Identify design and functional requirements and confirm required functions are met

- Provide actions for system and documentation improvements

- Independently review results

- Completion prior to restart FENOC 25

Restart nd Postmest Randy Fast Plant Manager FENOC 26

Restrt ad Pot=Retar

- Identify industry best practices

- Make program proactive and conservative

- Develop leakage inspection plan for future outages FENOC 28

,-.M ngm n and Hu-man*l*JiTl]r PefraceEclenePa Dave Director rvices

-- 1* r FENOC 29

  • Actions that must be addressedto enhance employee and public confidence
  • Sponsored by Chief OperatingOfficer
  • Actions to Strengthen Management - Complete
  • Initial Root Cause. Complete
  • Industry Review - Complete
  • Management Root Cause - Discovery FENOC 30

Our

Conclusions:

"Managementineffectively implemented processes, and thus failed to detect and addressplant problems as opportunitiesarose" FENOC 31

Manaemen an Huan FourKey Focus Areas Identified:

"* Ownership

"* Oversight

"* Standards

"* Decision-making FENOC 32

Dais es Howard.ergendahI Vice President - Nuclear

DavismBesse Restart Acti"on Plan

  • Create a Restart Overview Panel and and EngineeringAssurance Board

"*Manage and control restart action items

"* CoordinateIMC 0350 Restart Items with NRC

  • Review and approve the closure of all restartitems FENOC 34

DavismBesse Restart Action Plan Discovery E>'tent of Condition System Health Building Block Teams and Program Plans Technical Compliance Management and Human Performance Excellence Head Resolution Restart and Post- Restart Testing Other Sources l- lll ---- ------------ - - - ll --1 - - ---

Restart Senior Restart Station Review Board Engineering Assessment Validation Management Team Board Team Restart Overview Restart Overview Panel Restart Senior Panel (for Management and Management Human Performance Team Excellence)

Restart Overview Panel FENOC 35

Conclusions We are committed to a comprehensive approachto ensure Davis-Besse is ready for safe and reliableoperation and improved performance.

FENOC 36

Closing Remarks Le FENOC Chie Officer FENOC 37

Today we hope to have demonstratedthat our Management Team will take the actions needed to assess technicalissues, ensure safe and reliable operations, improve employee trust, regain public and regulatory confidence.

FENOC 38

FENOC 39