Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML0405703072002-03-0808 March 2002 Attachment 2, Ltr, Issuance of Amendments, MB3665 and MB3666 Project stage: Approval ML0207204142002-03-0808 March 2002 Technical Specification Pages for Amendments 228 & 170 for Edwin I. Hatch, Units 1 & 2 Project stage: Other ML0207108092002-03-0808 March 2002 Issuance of Amendments 228 & 170, Revises Surveillance Requirement 3.0.3, MB3665 and MB3666 Project stage: Approval ML0405702802004-02-20020 February 2004 Attachment 3, Technical Specifications Pages 3.0.3, SR Applicability 3.0, Amendments 228 & 170 Project stage: Other 2002-03-08
[Table View] |
Similar Documents at Hatch |
---|
Category:Technical Specification
MONTHYEARNL-23-0889, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times for Residual Heat Removal Service Water (RHRSW) and Plant Service Water (Psw) Systems2023-12-0606 December 2023 Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times for Residual Heat Removal Service Water (RHRSW) and Plant Service Water (Psw) Systems NL-23-0069, Correction of Technical Specification Omission and Typographical Error2023-01-20020 January 2023 Correction of Technical Specification Omission and Typographical Error NL-22-0316, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.2 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Plant Service Water (Psw) Pump Inoperable2022-11-30030 November 2022 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.2 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Plant Service Water (Psw) Pump Inoperable NL-22-0406, Request to Relax the Required Number of Fully Tensioned Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Closure Studs in Technical Specification Table 1.1-1, Modes2022-08-19019 August 2022 Request to Relax the Required Number of Fully Tensioned Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Closure Studs in Technical Specification Table 1.1-1, Modes NL-21-1037, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling2022-02-0404 February 2022 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling NL-22-0062, Supplement to License Amendment Request: Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-227 & TSTF-2972022-02-0101 February 2022 Supplement to License Amendment Request: Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-227 & TSTF-297 NL-21-0784, License Amendment Request: Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-227, Revision to EOC-RPT Pump Actions and TSTF-297, Enhancements to Required Actions for Feedwater and Main Turbine High Water Level Trip2021-12-13013 December 2021 License Amendment Request: Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-227, Revision to EOC-RPT Pump Actions and TSTF-297, Enhancements to Required Actions for Feedwater and Main Turbine High Water Level Trip NL-21-0984, Southern Nuclear Operating Company - Second Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.7, High Radiation Area, Administrative Controls2021-11-10010 November 2021 Southern Nuclear Operating Company - Second Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.7, High Radiation Area, Administrative Controls NL-21-0862, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.2 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Plant Service Water (Psw) Pump Inoperable - RAI Responses2021-09-23023 September 2021 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.2 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Plant Service Water (Psw) Pump Inoperable - RAI Responses NL-21-0613, Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.7, High Radiation Area, .2021-06-30030 June 2021 Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.7, High Radiation Area, . NL-21-0160, License Amendment Request to Remove Table of Contents from Technical Specifications2021-06-22022 June 2021 License Amendment Request to Remove Table of Contents from Technical Specifications NL-21-0423, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.5.1 Re One-Time Extension of Completion Time for 2D RHR Pump - PRA RAI Response2021-04-22022 April 2021 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.5.1 Re One-Time Extension of Completion Time for 2D RHR Pump - PRA RAI Response NL-21-0411, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.5.1 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for 2D RHR Pump2021-04-19019 April 2021 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.5.1 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for 2D RHR Pump NL-19-1455, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.1 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for RHRSW Pump Inoperable2019-11-29029 November 2019 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.1 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for RHRSW Pump Inoperable NL-19-1266, Supplement to License Amendment Request for Technical Specifications 3.3.8.1 and 3.8.1 Regarding Degraded Voltage Protection2019-10-17017 October 2019 Supplement to License Amendment Request for Technical Specifications 3.3.8.1 and 3.8.1 Regarding Degraded Voltage Protection NL-19-0355, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-566, Revise Actions for Inoperable RHR Shutdown Cooling Subsystems, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process2019-07-23023 July 2019 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-566, Revise Actions for Inoperable RHR Shutdown Cooling Subsystems, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process NL-19-0006, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-563, Revise Instrument Testing Definitions to Incorporate the Surveillance Frequency Control Program2019-07-15015 July 2019 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-563, Revise Instrument Testing Definitions to Incorporate the Surveillance Frequency Control Program NL-19-0250, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR2019-04-23023 April 2019 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR NL-19-0173, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.8.1 Regarding Voltage Limit Increase for Emergency Diesel Generator Load Rejection Surveillance Test2019-02-19019 February 2019 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.8.1 Regarding Voltage Limit Increase for Emergency Diesel Generator Load Rejection Surveillance Test NL-18-1132, Revision to Technical Specification 3.6.4.1 -Secondary Containment2018-10-17017 October 2018 Revision to Technical Specification 3.6.4.1 -Secondary Containment ML18226A0942018-08-0909 August 2018 Edwin I. Hatch, Units 1 and 2; and Vogtle, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.2.2.g and Update Emergency Plan Minimum On-shift Staff Tables NL-18-0601, Revision to Technical Specification End State for Residual Heat Removal Drywell Spray2018-08-0606 August 2018 Revision to Technical Specification End State for Residual Heat Removal Drywell Spray NL-17-0328, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-542, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control.2017-04-20020 April 2017 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-542, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control. NL-16-0091, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, TS Lnservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application.2016-07-28028 July 2016 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, TS Lnservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application. NL-16-0626, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Section 5.5.12 for Permanent Extension of Type a and Type C Leak Rate Test Frequencies2016-07-0101 July 2016 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Section 5.5.12 for Permanent Extension of Type a and Type C Leak Rate Test Frequencies NL-16-0827, E. I. Hatch, Units 1 and 2 - Withdrawal of TSTF-500 Request to Increase the Completion Time for the Station Service Batteries from 2 to 12 Hours2016-06-17017 June 2016 E. I. Hatch, Units 1 and 2 - Withdrawal of TSTF-500 Request to Increase the Completion Time for the Station Service Batteries from 2 to 12 Hours NL-15-2047, Response to Second Request for Additional Information Regarding SNC License Amendment Request for TSTF-523, Revision 22015-11-24024 November 2015 Response to Second Request for Additional Information Regarding SNC License Amendment Request for TSTF-523, Revision 2 NL-13-1773, Application for Amendment to Technical Specifications Regarding Relocation of Pressure and Temperature (P-T) Curves to the Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR) Consistent with TSTF-419-A (NL-13-1773)2015-04-0202 April 2015 Application for Amendment to Technical Specifications Regarding Relocation of Pressure and Temperature (P-T) Curves to the Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR) Consistent with TSTF-419-A (NL-13-1773) NL-13-1528, Response to Request for Information on the Plant Hatch License Amendment Request to Revise the Minimum Water Level in the Plant Service Water Pump Well2013-07-22022 July 2013 Response to Request for Information on the Plant Hatch License Amendment Request to Revise the Minimum Water Level in the Plant Service Water Pump Well NL-12-1078, Edwin I. Hatch, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise the Minimum Water Level in the Plant Service Water Pump Well2012-07-0505 July 2012 Edwin I. Hatch, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise the Minimum Water Level in the Plant Service Water Pump Well ML11320A1272011-10-24024 October 2011 Edwin I. Hatch, Units 1 and 2- Bases for Technical Specifications NL-11-0816, Supplement to Licensing Amendment Request for Adoption of TSTF - 425 - a, Rev. 3, Risk - Informed Justification for Relocation of Specific Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program Using the Consolidated..2011-05-27027 May 2011 Supplement to Licensing Amendment Request for Adoption of TSTF - 425 - a, Rev. 3, Risk - Informed Justification for Relocation of Specific Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program Using the Consolidated.. NL-09-1380, Revision to Technical Specifications LCO 3.1.2, Reactivity Anomalies2009-12-17017 December 2009 Revision to Technical Specifications LCO 3.1.2, Reactivity Anomalies NL-07-2111, Technical Specifications Revision Request to the Ventilation Filter Testing Program2008-07-15015 July 2008 Technical Specifications Revision Request to the Ventilation Filter Testing Program NL-08-0903, Request to Implement an Alternative Source Term Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Turbine Building Ventilation Exhaust System Fans2008-06-25025 June 2008 Request to Implement an Alternative Source Term Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Turbine Building Ventilation Exhaust System Fans ML0733203732007-11-26026 November 2007 Technical Specifications for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Issuance of Amendments Regarding Control Rod Scram Time Testing Frequency (TAC MD5722 and MD5723) NL-07-0277, Technical Specifications Bases Changes for 20062007-02-19019 February 2007 Technical Specifications Bases Changes for 2006 ML0624902532006-08-29029 August 2006 Enclosure 5, E. I. Hatch Request to Implement an Alternative Source Term - Marked-Up TS and Bases Pages ML0535500352005-12-12012 December 2005 Handout of Draft Proposed Change #2 Technical Specifications and Bases Changes from 12/12/05 Meeting on Safety Limit 2.1.1.1, Part 21 ML0535500322005-12-12012 December 2005 Handout of Draft Proposed Change #1 Technical Specifications Bases Changes from 12/12/05 Meeting on Safety Limit 2.1.1.1, Part 21 NL-05-0252, Technical Specifications Bases Revisions for 20042005-02-24024 February 2005 Technical Specifications Bases Revisions for 2004 NL-04-1001, Edwin 1. Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and 2 - Technical Specifications Amendment Request Appendix J Leakage Rate Test for Containment Purge Valves2004-08-23023 August 2004 Edwin 1. Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and 2 - Technical Specifications Amendment Request Appendix J Leakage Rate Test for Containment Purge Valves NL-04-0981, Transmittal of Quarterly Update for Hatch, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Bases2004-06-0202 June 2004 Transmittal of Quarterly Update for Hatch, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Bases NL-04-0564, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Application for Technical Specification Amendment to Eliminate Requirements for Hydrogen Recombiners and Hydrogen/Oxygen Monitors2004-05-21021 May 2004 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Application for Technical Specification Amendment to Eliminate Requirements for Hydrogen Recombiners and Hydrogen/Oxygen Monitors NL-04-0563, Technical Specification Revision Request Integrated Leakage Rate Testing Interval Extension2004-04-26026 April 2004 Technical Specification Revision Request Integrated Leakage Rate Testing Interval Extension ML0406905122004-03-0808 March 2004 Technical Specification for Amendment 239, 3/8/04 ML0406905022004-03-0808 March 2004 Technical Specification for Amendment 182, 3/8/04 NL-04-0233, Technical Specifications Bases Revisions for 20032004-02-24024 February 2004 Technical Specifications Bases Revisions for 2003 NL-03-2517, Application for Technical Specification Improvement to Revise TS 3.1.8, Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Vent and Drain Valves, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process2004-02-0202 February 2004 Application for Technical Specification Improvement to Revise TS 3.1.8, Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Vent and Drain Valves, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process NL-03-0488, 10 CFR 50.59 Changes to the Technical Specification Bases2003-02-28028 February 2003 10 CFR 50.59 Changes to the Technical Specification Bases 2023-12-06
[Table view] Category:Amendment
MONTHYEARNL-23-0889, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times for Residual Heat Removal Service Water (RHRSW) and Plant Service Water (Psw) Systems2023-12-0606 December 2023 Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times for Residual Heat Removal Service Water (RHRSW) and Plant Service Water (Psw) Systems NL-23-0069, Correction of Technical Specification Omission and Typographical Error2023-01-20020 January 2023 Correction of Technical Specification Omission and Typographical Error NL-22-0316, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.2 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Plant Service Water (Psw) Pump Inoperable2022-11-30030 November 2022 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.2 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Plant Service Water (Psw) Pump Inoperable NL-22-0406, Request to Relax the Required Number of Fully Tensioned Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Closure Studs in Technical Specification Table 1.1-1, Modes2022-08-19019 August 2022 Request to Relax the Required Number of Fully Tensioned Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Closure Studs in Technical Specification Table 1.1-1, Modes NL-21-1037, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling2022-02-0404 February 2022 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling NL-22-0062, Supplement to License Amendment Request: Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-227 & TSTF-2972022-02-0101 February 2022 Supplement to License Amendment Request: Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-227 & TSTF-297 NL-21-0984, Southern Nuclear Operating Company - Second Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.7, High Radiation Area, Administrative Controls2021-11-10010 November 2021 Southern Nuclear Operating Company - Second Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.7, High Radiation Area, Administrative Controls NL-21-0862, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.2 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Plant Service Water (Psw) Pump Inoperable - RAI Responses2021-09-23023 September 2021 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.2 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Plant Service Water (Psw) Pump Inoperable - RAI Responses NL-21-0613, Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.7, High Radiation Area, .2021-06-30030 June 2021 Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.7, High Radiation Area, . NL-21-0160, License Amendment Request to Remove Table of Contents from Technical Specifications2021-06-22022 June 2021 License Amendment Request to Remove Table of Contents from Technical Specifications NL-21-0423, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.5.1 Re One-Time Extension of Completion Time for 2D RHR Pump - PRA RAI Response2021-04-22022 April 2021 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.5.1 Re One-Time Extension of Completion Time for 2D RHR Pump - PRA RAI Response NL-21-0411, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.5.1 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for 2D RHR Pump2021-04-19019 April 2021 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.5.1 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for 2D RHR Pump NL-19-1455, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.1 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for RHRSW Pump Inoperable2019-11-29029 November 2019 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.7.1 Regarding One-Time Extension of Completion Time for RHRSW Pump Inoperable NL-19-1266, Supplement to License Amendment Request for Technical Specifications 3.3.8.1 and 3.8.1 Regarding Degraded Voltage Protection2019-10-17017 October 2019 Supplement to License Amendment Request for Technical Specifications 3.3.8.1 and 3.8.1 Regarding Degraded Voltage Protection NL-19-0250, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR2019-04-23023 April 2019 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR NL-19-0173, Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.8.1 Regarding Voltage Limit Increase for Emergency Diesel Generator Load Rejection Surveillance Test2019-02-19019 February 2019 Emergency License Amendment Request for Technical Specification 3.8.1 Regarding Voltage Limit Increase for Emergency Diesel Generator Load Rejection Surveillance Test ML18226A0942018-08-0909 August 2018 Edwin I. Hatch, Units 1 and 2; and Vogtle, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.2.2.g and Update Emergency Plan Minimum On-shift Staff Tables NL-17-0328, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-542, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control.2017-04-20020 April 2017 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-542, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control. NL-16-0827, E. I. Hatch, Units 1 and 2 - Withdrawal of TSTF-500 Request to Increase the Completion Time for the Station Service Batteries from 2 to 12 Hours2016-06-17017 June 2016 E. I. Hatch, Units 1 and 2 - Withdrawal of TSTF-500 Request to Increase the Completion Time for the Station Service Batteries from 2 to 12 Hours NL-13-1528, Response to Request for Information on the Plant Hatch License Amendment Request to Revise the Minimum Water Level in the Plant Service Water Pump Well2013-07-22022 July 2013 Response to Request for Information on the Plant Hatch License Amendment Request to Revise the Minimum Water Level in the Plant Service Water Pump Well ML0733203732007-11-26026 November 2007 Technical Specifications for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Issuance of Amendments Regarding Control Rod Scram Time Testing Frequency (TAC MD5722 and MD5723) NL-04-1001, Edwin 1. Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and 2 - Technical Specifications Amendment Request Appendix J Leakage Rate Test for Containment Purge Valves2004-08-23023 August 2004 Edwin 1. Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and 2 - Technical Specifications Amendment Request Appendix J Leakage Rate Test for Containment Purge Valves NL-04-0563, Technical Specification Revision Request Integrated Leakage Rate Testing Interval Extension2004-04-26026 April 2004 Technical Specification Revision Request Integrated Leakage Rate Testing Interval Extension ML0406905022004-03-0808 March 2004 Technical Specification for Amendment 182, 3/8/04 ML0406905122004-03-0808 March 2004 Technical Specification for Amendment 239, 3/8/04 NL-03-2517, Application for Technical Specification Improvement to Revise TS 3.1.8, Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Vent and Drain Valves, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process2004-02-0202 February 2004 Application for Technical Specification Improvement to Revise TS 3.1.8, Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Vent and Drain Valves, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process ML0306301082003-02-24024 February 2003 Tech Spec Pages for Amendment Nos. 236 & 178, Respectively, Revising the Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement SR 3.6.4.12 ML0234502762002-12-0202 December 2002 Technical Specifications Revision to Secondary Containment Access Door Surveillance ML0229802952002-10-23023 October 2002 Request to Revise Technical Specifications: Correction to Quarterly Surveillance Extension Technical Specifications Page ML0219601412002-07-0303 July 2002 Revision to Request to Revise Technical Specifications: Quarterly Surveillance Extension, Enclosure 7, Technical Specifications Page Change Instructions, Unit 2 ML0210603492002-04-11011 April 2002 TS Pages to Amendment 230 ML0210603572002-04-11011 April 2002 TS Pages to Amendment 171 ML0207204142002-03-0808 March 2002 Technical Specification Pages for Amendments 228 & 170 for Edwin I. Hatch, Units 1 & 2 ML0205700232002-02-20020 February 2002 Technical Specification Pages Amendment 226 Revising to Allow a one-timer Defferal of the Type a Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test 2023-12-06
[Table view] |
Text
SR Applicability 3.0 3.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT (SR) APPLICABILITY SR 3.0.1 SRs shall be met during the MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for individual LCOs, unless otherwise stated in the SR. Failure to meet a Surveillance, whether such failure is experienced during the performance of the Surveillance or between performances of the Surveillance, shall be failure to meet the LCO. Failure to perform a Surveillance within the specified Frequency shall be failure to meet the LCO except as provided in SR 3.0.3.
Surveillances do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment or variables outside specified limits.
SR 3.0.2 The specified Frequency for each SR is met if the Surveillance is performed within 1.25 times the interval specified in the Frequency, as measured from the previous performance or as measured from the time a specified condition of the Frequency is met.
For Frequencies specified as "once," the above interval extension does not apply. If a Completion Time requires periodic performance on a "once per . . ." basis, the above Frequency extension applies to each performance after the initial performance.
Exceptions to this Specification are stated in the individual Specifications.
SR 3.0.3 If it is discovered that a Surveillance was not performed within its specified Frequency, then compliance with the requirement to declare the LCO not met may be delayed, from the time of discovery, up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up to the limit of the specified Frequency, whichever is greater. This delay I period is permitted to allow performance of the Surveillance. A risk evaluation shall be performed for any Surveillance delayed > 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and the risk impact shall be I
managed.
If the Surveillance is not performed within the delay period, the LCO must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable Condition(s) must be entered.
When the Surveillance is performed within the delay period and the Surveillance is not met, the LCO must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable Condition(s) must be entered.
(continued)
HATCH UNIT I 3.0-4 Amendment No. 228
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES SR 3.0.3 period of up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up to the limit of the specified (continued) Frequency, whichever is greater, applies from the point in time that it is discovered that the Surveillance has not been performed in accordance with SR 3.0.2, and not at the time that the specified Frequency was not met.
This delay period provides adequate time to complete Surveillances that have been missed. This delay period permits the completion of a Surveillance before complying with Required Actions or other remedial measures that might preclude completion of the Surveillance.
The basis for this delay period includes consideration of unit conditions, adequate planning, availability of personnel, the time required to perform the Surveillance, the safety significance of the delay in completing the required Surveillance, and the recognition that the most probable result of any particular Surveillance being performed is the verification of conformance with the requirements.
When a Surveillance with a Frequency based not on time intervals, but upon specified unit conditions, operating situations, or requirements of regulations (e.g., prior to entering MODE 1 after each fuel loading, or in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, as modified by approved exemptions, etc.) is discovered to not have been performed when specified, SR 3.0.3 allows for the full delay period of up to the specified Frequency to perform the Surveillance.
However, since there is not a time interval specified, the missed Surveillance should be performed at the first reasonable opportunity.
SR 3.0.3 provides a time limit for, and allowances for the performance of, Surveillances that become applicable as a consequence of MODE changes imposed by Required Actions.
Failure to comply with specified Frequencies for SRs is expected to be an infrequent occurrence. Use of the delay period established by SR 3.0.3 is a flexibility which is not intended to be used as an operational convenience to extend Surveillance intervals. While up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or the limit of the specified Frequency is provided to perform the missed Surveillance, it is expected that the missed Surveillance will be performed at the first reasonable opportunity. The determination of the first reasonable opportunity should (continued)
HATCH UNIT 1 B 3.0-13 REVISION 24
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES SR 3.0.3 include consideration of the impact on plant risk (from (continued) delaying the Surveillance as well as any plant configuration changes required or shutting the plant down to perform the Surveillance) and impact on any analysis assumptions, in addition to unit conditions, planning, availability of personnel, and the time required to perform the Surveillance. This risk impact should be managed through the program in place to implement 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and its implementation guidance, NRC Regulatory Guide 1.182, "Assessing and Managing Risk Before Maintenance Activities at Nuclear Power Plants." This Regulatory Guide addresses consideration of temporary and aggregate risk impacts, determination of risk management action thresholds, and risk management action up to and including plant shutdown. The missed Surveillance should be treated as an emergent condition as discussed in the Regulatory Guide. The risk evaluation may use quantitative, qualitative, or blended methods. The degree of depth and rigor of the evaluation should be commensurate with the importance of the component.
Missed Surveillances for important components should be analyzed quantitatively. If the results of the risk evaluation determine the risk increase is significant, this evaluation should be used to determine the safest course of action. All missed Surveillances will be placed in the licensee's Corrective Action Program.
If a Surveillance is not completed within the allowed delay period, then the equipment is considered inoperable or the variable is considered outside the specified limits and the Completion Times of the Required Actions for the applicable LCO Conditions begin immediately upon expiration of the delay period. If a Surveillance is failed within the delay period, then the equipment is inoperable, or the variable is outside the specified limits and the Completion Times of the Required Actions for the applicable LCO Conditions begin immediately upon the failure of the Surveillance.
Completion of the Surveillance within the delay period allowed by this Specification, or within the Completion Time of the ACTIONS, restores compliance with SR 3.0.1.
(continued)
REVISION 24 HATCH UNIT I B 3.0-14
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES (continued)
SR 3.0.4 SR 3.0.4 establishes the requirement that all applicable SRs must be met before entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability. This Specification ensures that system and component OPERABILITY requirements and variable limits are met before entry into MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for which these systems and components ensure safe operation of the unit.
However, in certain circumstances, failing to meet an SR will not result in SR 3.0.4 restricting a MODE change or other specified condition change. When a system, subsystem, division, component, device, or variable is inoperable or outside its specified limits, the associated SR(s) are not required to be performed per SR 3.0.1, which states that surveillances do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment. When equipment is inoperable, SR 3.0.4 does not apply to the associated SR(s) since the requirement for the SR(s) to be performed is removed. Therefore, failing to perform the Surveillance(s) within the specified Frequency, on equipment that is inoperable, does not result in an SR 3.0.4 restriction to changing MODES or other specified conditions of the Applicability. However, since the LCO is not met in this instance, LCO 3.0.4 will govern any restrictions that may (or may not) apply to MODE or other specified condition changes.
The provisions of this Specification should not be interpreted as endorsing the failure to exercise the good practice of restoring systems or components to OPERABLE status before entering an associated MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability.
The provisions of SR 3.0.4 shall not prevent changes in MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability that are required to comply with ACTIONS. In addition, the provisions of SR 3.0.4 shall not prevent changes in MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability that result from any unit shutdown.
The precise requirements for performance of SRs are specified such that exceptions to SR 3.0.4 are not necessary. The specific time frames and conditions necessary for meeting the SRs are specified in the Frequency, in the Surveillance, or both. This allows performance of Surveillances when the prerequisite condition(s) specified in a Surveillance procedure require (continued)
HATCH UNIT 1 B 3.0-15 REVISION 24 I
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES SR 3.0.4 entry into the MODE or other specified condition in the (continued) Applicability of the associated LCO prior to the performance or completion of a Surveillance. A Surveillance that could not be performed until after enteriig the LCO Applicability would have its Frequency specified such that it is not "due" until the specific conditions needed are met. Alternately, the Surveillance may be stated in the form of a Note as not required (to be met or performed) until a particular event, condition, or time has been reached. Further discussion of the specific formats of SRs' annotation is found in Section 1.4, Frequency.
SR 3.0.4 is only applicable when entering MODE 3 from MODE 4, MODE 2 from MODE 3 or 4, or MODE 1 from MODE 2.
Furthermore, SR 3.0.4 is applicable when entering any other specified condition in the Applicability only while operating in MODE 1, 2, or 3. The requirements of SR 3.0.4 do not apply in MODES 4 and 5, or in other specified conditions of the Applicability (unless in MODE 1, 2, or 3) because the ACTIONS of individual Specifications sufficiently define the remedial measures to be taken.
HATCH UNIT I B 3.0-16 REVISION 24 1
SR Applicability 3.0 3.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT (SR) APPLICABILITY SR 3.0.1 SRs shall be met during the MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for individual LCOs, unless otherwise stated in the SR. Failure to meet a Surveillance, whether such failure is experienced during the performance of the Surveillance or between performances of the Surveillance, shall be failure to meet the LCO. Failure to perform a Surveillance within the specified Frequency shall be failure to meet the LCO except as provided in SR 3.0.3.
Surveillances do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment or variables outside specified limits.
SR 3.0.2 The specified Frequency for each SR is met if the Surveillance is performed within 1.25 times the interval specified in the Frequency, as measured from the previous performance or as measured from the time a specified condition of the Frequency is met.
For Frequencies specified as "once," the above interval extension does not apply. If a Completion Time requires periodic performance on a "once per . . ." basis, the above Frequency extension applies to each performance after the initial performance.
Exceptions to this Specification are stated in the individual Specifications.
SR 3.0.3 If it is discovered that a Surveillance was not performed within its specified Frequency, then compliance with the requirement to declare the LCO not met may be delayed, from the time of discovery, up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up to the limit of I
the specified Frequency, whichever is greater. This delay period is permitted to allow performance of the Surveillance. A risk evaluation shall be performed for any Surveillance delayed > 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and the risk impact shall be I
managed.
If the Surveillance is not performed within the delay period, the LCO must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable Condition(s) must be entered.
When the Surveillance is performed within the delay period and the Surveillance is not met, the LCO must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable Condition(s) must be entered.
(continued)
HATCH UNIT 2 3.0-4 Amendment No. 170
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES SR 3.0.3 period of up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up to the limit of the specified (continued) Frequency, whichever is greater, applies from the point in time that it is discovered that the Surveillance has not been performed in accordance with SR 3.0.2, and not at the time that the specified Frequency was not met.
This delay period provides adequate time to complete Surveillances that have been missed. This delay period permits the completion of a Surveillance before complying with Required Actions or other remedial measures that might preclude completion of the Surveillance.
The basis for this delay period includes consideration of unit conditions, adequate planning, availability of personnel, the time required to perform the Surveillance, the safety significance of the delay in completing the required Surveillance, and the recognition that the most probable result of any particular Surveillance being performed is the verification of conformance with the requirements.
When a Surveillance with a Frequency based not on time intervals, but upon specified unit conditions, operating situations, or requirements of regulations (e.g., prior to entering MODE 1 after each fuel loading, or in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, as modified by approved exemptions, etc.) is discovered to not have been performed when specified, SR 3.0.3 allows for the full delay period of up to the specified Frequency to perform the Surveillance.
However, since there is not a time interval specified, the missed Surveillance should be performed at the first reasonable opportunity.
SR 3.0.3 provides a time limit for, and allowances for the performance of, Surveillances that become applicable as a consequence of MODE changes imposed by Required Actions.
Failure to comply with specified Frequencies for SRs is expected to be an infrequent occurrence. Use of the delay period established by SR 3.0.3 is a flexibility which is not intended to be used as an operational convenience to extend Surveillance intervals. While up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or the limit of the specified Frequency is provided to perform the missed Surveillance, it is expected that the missed Surveillance will be performed at the first reasonable opportunity. The determination of the first reasonable opportunity should (continued)
HATCH UNIT 2 B 3.0-13 REVISION 30
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES SR 3.0.3 include consideration of the impact on plant risk (from (continued) delaying the Surveillance as well as any plant configuration changes required or shutting the plant down to perform the Surveillance) and impact on any analysis assumptions, in addition to unit conditions, planning, availability of personnel, and the time required to perform the Surveillance. This risk impact should be managed through the program in place to implement 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and its implementation guidance, NRC Regulatory Guide 1.182, "Assessing and Managing Risk Before Maintenance Activities at Nuclear Power Plants." This Regulatory Guide addresses consideration of temporary and aggregate risk impacts, determination of risk management action thresholds, and risk management action up to and including plant shutdown. The missed Surveillance should be treated as an emergent condition as discussed in the Regulatory Guide. The risk evaluation may use quantitative, qualitative, or blended methods. The degree of depth and rigor of the evaluation should be commensurate with the importance of the component.
Missed Surveillances for important components should be analyzed quantitatively. If the results of the risk evaluation determine the risk increase is significant, this evaluation should be used to determine the safest course of action. All missed Surveillances will be placed in the licensee's Corrective Action Program.
If a Surveillance is not completed within the allowed delay period, then the equipment is considered inoperable or the variable is considered outside the specified limits and the Completion Times of the Required Actions for the applicable LCO Conditions begin immediately upon expiration of the delay period. If a Surveillance is failed within the delay period, then the equipment is inoperable, or the variable is outside the specified limits and the Completion Times of the Required Actions for the applicable LCO Conditions begin immediately upon the failure of the Surveillance.
Completion of the Surveillance within the delay period allowed by this Specification, or within the Completion Time of the ACTIONS, restores compliance with SR 3.0.1.
(continued)
HATCH UNIT 2 B 3.0-14 REVISION 30
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES (continued)
SR 3.0.4 SR 3.0.4 establishes the requirement that all applicable SRs must be met before entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability. This Specification ensures that system and component OPERABILITY requirements and variable limits are met before en t ry into MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for which these systems and components ensure safe operation of the unit.
However, in certain circumstances, failing to meet an SR will not result in SR 3.0.4 restricting a MODE change or other specified condition change. When a system, subsystem, division, component, device, or variable is inoperable or outside its specified limits, the associated SR(s) are not required to be performed per SR 3.0.1, which states that
.surveillances do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment. When equipment is inoperable, SR 3.0.4 does not apply to the associated SR(s) since the requirement for the SR(s) to be performed is removed. Therefore, failing to perform the Surveillance(s) within the specified Frequency, on equipment that is inoperable, does not result in an SR 3.0.4 restriction to changing MODES or other specified conditions of the Applicability. However, since the LCO is not met in this instance, LCO 3.0.4 will govern any restrictions that may (or may not) apply to MODE or other specified condition changes.
The provisions of this Specification should not be interpreted as endorsing the failure to exercise the good practice of restoring systems or components to OPERABLE status before entering an associated MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability.
The provisions of SR 3.0.4 shall not prevent changes in MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability that are required to comply with ACTIONS. In addition, the provisions of SR 3.0.4 shall not prevent changes in MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability that result from any unit shutdown.
The precise requirements for performance of SRs are specified such that exceptions to SR 3.0.4 are not necessary. The specific time frames and conditions necessary for meeting the SRs are specified in the Frequency, in the Surveillance, or both. This allows performance of Surveillances when the prerequisite condition(s) specified in a Surveillance procedure require (continued)
HATCH UNIT 2 B 3.0-15 REVISION 30 I
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES SR 3.0.4 entry into the MODE or other specified condition in the (continued) Applicability of the associated LCO prior to the performance or completion of a Surveillance. A Surveillance that could not be performed until after entering the LCO Applicability would have its Frequency specified such that it is not "due" until the specific conditions needed are met. Alternately, the Surveillance may be stated in the form of a Note as not required (to be met or performed) until a particular event, condition, or time has been reached. Further discussion of the specific formats of SRs' annotation is found in Section 1.4, Frequency.
SR 3.'0.4 is only applicable when entering MODE 3 from MODE 4, MODE 2 from MODE 3 or 4, or MODE I from MODE 2.
Furthermore, SR 3.0.4 is applicable when entering any other specified condition in the Applicability only while operating in MODE 1, 2, or 3. The requirements of SR 3.0.4 do not apply in MODES 4 and 5, or in other specified conditions of the Applicability (unless in MODE 1, 2, or 3) because the ACTIONS of individual Specifications sufficiently define the remedial measures to be taken.
HATCH UNIT 2 B 3.0-16 REVISTON 30 I