ML020160213
| ML020160213 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 01/28/2002 |
| From: | Stang J NRC/NRR/DLPM |
| To: | Bakken A Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| Stang, JF, NRR/DLPM/LPD III-1, 415-1345 | |
| References | |
| TAC MB2455, TAC MB2556 | |
| Download: ML020160213 (11) | |
Text
January 28, 2002 Mr. A. Christopher Bakken III, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group 500 Circle Drive Buchanan, MI 49107
SUBJECT:
DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS (TAC NOS. MB2455 AND M2556)
Dear Mr. Bakken:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 263 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-58 and Amendment No. 245 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-74 for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated July 17, 2001.
The amendments revise TS 4.0.3 and its associated Bases to provide for a delay period in which to perform a surveillance which has been discovered not to have been performed within its specified frequency.
A copy of our related safety evaluation is also enclosed. A Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,
/RA/
John F. Stang, Senior Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate III Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316
Enclosures:
- 1. Amendment No. 263 to DPR-58
- 2. Amendment No. 245 to DPR-74
- 3. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page
- See previous concurrence.
OFFICE PM:PD3-1 LA:PD3-1 BC:RTSB OGC (A)SC:PD3-1 NAME JStang THarris WBeckner RWeisman*
WReckley DATE 01/23/2002 01/22/2002 01/28/2002 01/11/2002 01/28/2002
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 cc:
Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, IL 60532-4351 Attorney General Department of Attorney General 525 West Ottawa Street Lansing, MI 48913 Township Supervisor Lake Township Hall P.O. Box 818 Bridgman, MI 49106 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector's Office 7700 Red Arrow Highway Stevensville, MI 49127 David W. Jenkins, Esquire Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106 Mayor, City of Bridgman P.O. Box 366 Bridgman, MI 49106 Special Assistant to the Governor Room 1 - State Capitol Lansing, MI 48909 Joseph E. Pollock Plant Manager Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106 Drinking Water and Radiological Protection Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 3423 N. Martin Luther King Jr Blvd P.O. Box 30630, CPH Mailroom Lansing, MI 48909-8130 Scot A. Greenlee Director, Nuclear Technical Services Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group 500 Circle Drive Buchanan, MI 49107 David A. Lochbaum Union of Concerned Scientists 1616 P Street NW, Suite 310 Washington, DC 20036-1495 Site Vice President Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106 Michael W. Rencheck, Vice President Strategic Business Improvements Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group 500 Circle Drive Buchanan, MI 49107
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-315 DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 263 License No. DPR-58 1.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Indiana Michigan Power Company (the licensee) dated July 17, 2001, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-58 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2)
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 263, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
3.
This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 30 days of the date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/RA/
William D. Reckley, Acting Chief, Section 1 Project Directorate III Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: January 28, 2002
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 263 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-58 DOCKET NO. 50-315 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
REMOVE INSERT 3/4 0-2 3/4 0-2 B 3/4 0-4 B 3/4 0-4 B 3/4 0-4a
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-316 DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 245 License No. DPR-74 1.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Indiana Michigan Power Company (the licensee) dated July 17, 2001, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-74 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2)
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 245, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
3.
This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 30 days of the date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/RA/
William D. Reckley, Acting Chief, Section 1 Project Directorate III Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: January 28, 2002
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 245 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-74 DOCKET NO. 50-316 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
REMOVE INSERT 3/4 0-2 3/4 0-2 B 3/4 0-3 B 3/4 0-3 B 3/4 0-3a
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 263 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-58 AND AMENDMENT NO. 245 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-74 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-315 AND 50-316
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By application dated July 17, 2001, the Indiana Michigan Power Company (the licensee) requested amendments to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The proposed amendments would revise TS 4.0.3 and its associated Bases to provide for a delay period in which to perform a surveillance which has been discovered not to have been performed within its specified frequency.
2.0 EVALUATION The change proposed by the licensee is an adoption of the applicable requirements contained in NUREG-1431, "Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse Plants," modified to be consistent with the wording of the existing TS 3.0 and 4.0 requirements. This type of change has also been reviewed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff considering the limitations set forth in Generic Letter (GL) 87-09.
Specification 4.0.3 In GL 87-09, the staff stated that it is overly conservative to assume that systems or components are inoperable when a surveillance requirement has not been performed, because the vast majority of surveillances demonstrate that systems or components are operable.
Because the allowable outage time limits of some action requirements do not provide an appropriate time limit for performing a missed surveillance before shutdown requirements apply, the TS should include a time limit that would allow a delay of the required actions to permit the performance of the missed surveillance. This time limit should be based on considerations of plant conditions, adequate planning, availability of personnel, and the time required to perform the surveillance, as well as the safety significance of the delay in completion of the surveillance.
After reviewing possible limits, the staff concluded that, based on these considerations, 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> would be an acceptable time limit for completing a missed surveillance when the allowable outage time limit of the action requirements is less than this time limit or when shutdown requirements apply. This 24-hour time limit would balance the risks associated with an allowance of completing the surveillance within this period against the risks associated with the potential for a plant upset and challenge to safety systems.
The alternative to risks during the 24-hour time limit would be a shutdown to comply with action requirements before the required surveillance can be completed; however, that alternative is accompanied by other risks associated with an unplanned shutdown, and is a less desirable alternative.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds following licensee's proposed change to TS 4.0.3 is acceptable.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Michigan State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendments. The State official had no comments.
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
These amendments change the requirements with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 or change the surveillance requirements. The staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding (66 FR 44175 ). Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b),
no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.
5.0 CONCLUSION
The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor: John Stang Date: January 28, 2002