LIC-09-0028, Omaha Public Power District - 30-Day Report of a Significant Change/Error in the Loss of Coolant Accident (Loca)/Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) Models Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.46

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Omaha Public Power District - 30-Day Report of a Significant Change/Error in the Loss of Coolant Accident (Loca)/Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) Models Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.46
ML091060530
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/2009
From: Clemens R
Omaha Public Power District
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LIC-09-0028
Download: ML091060530 (6)


Text

m -l Omaha Public Power District 444 South 16th Street Mall Omaha NE 68102-2247 April 8, 2009 LIC-09-0028 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

References:

1. Docket 50-285
2. EMF-2328(P)(A), Revision 0, "PWR Small Break LOCA Evaluation Model, S-RELAP5 Based," Framatome ANP, Inc.,

March 2001

3. EMF-2103(P)(A), Revision 0, "Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodology for Pressurized Water. Reactors," Framatome ANP, Inc., April 2003
4. Letter from OPPD (R.P. Clemens) to NRC (Document Control Desk), Annual Report for 2008 Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA)/Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS)

Models Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.46, dated April 3, 2009 (LIC-09-0026)

Subject:

30-Day Report of a Significant Change/Error in the Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA)/Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) Models Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.46 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(ii), the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) is submitting a 30-day 10 CFR 50.46 report of a significant change/error in the Small Break (SB) Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) and Large Break (LB)

LOCA ECCS models and evaluations. 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3)(i) states that a significant change or error is one that results in a calculated peak fuel cladding temperature (PCT) different by more than 50'F from the temperature calculated for the limiting transient using the last acceptable model, or is an accumulation of changes and errors such that the sum of the absolute magnitudes of the respective temperature changes is greater than 50°F.

The attached report identifies an error in the SB LOCA portion and an accumulation of errors in the LB LOCA portion associated with the quantification of PCT associated with various code errors identified in the AREVA (formerly Framatome ANP) model for Fort Calhoun Station (FCS), Unit No. 1. References 2 and 3, respectively, describe the SB and LB LOCA analysis methodology used by AREVA for the FCS Analysis of Record (AOR).

ACrn.

Employment with Equal Opportunity 4171

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC-09-0028 Page 2 If you should have any questions, please contact Mr. Bill R. Hansher at (402) 533-6894.

Sincerely/,/

P. Clemens Division Manager Nuclear Engineering Attachments:

1. 30-Day Report of Significant Change/Error in LOCA/ECCS Models
2. Fort Calhoun Station Small Break LOCA Margin Summary Sheet
3. Fort Calhoun Station Large Break LOCA Margin Summary Sheet

LIC-09-0028 Page 1 30-Day Report of Significant Change/Error in LOCA/ECCS Models An issue was discovered during the development of a new radiation heat transfer model (for Revision 2 of the Realistic Large Break LOCA (RLBLOCA) methodology). A significant discrepancy between the currently used model in S-RELAP5 for the RLBLOCA methodology and other published models was discovered. A well-known industry model was documented and installed into TRAC-B. Part of the documentation for that model is a figure that shows radiation heat transfer data versus the TRAC-B model and the Thomson model.

This figure has also been copied and published in other journals and documents.

The radiation to fluid heat transfer model currently employed in S-RELAP5 for LOCA analyses used the flawed figure as the data basis for determining coefficients for the correlation of emissivity of water vapor. The result is that the S-RELAP5 radiation to fluid correlation under predicts the radiative heat transfer.

This issue has been caused by flawed data used within the industrial community.

An evaluation has been performed to determine the impact on PCT. For the Fort Calhoun SB LOCA analysis, the PCT impact was estimated to be -64°F. For the Fort Calhoun LB LOCA analysis, the PCT impact was estimated to be -27 0 F.

This error includes a change of greater than 50°F in the SB LOCA PCT. The accumulation of the sum of the absolute magnitude of the previous year errors and this error for the LB LOCA PCT results in a change of greater than 50 0 F.

These changes for the SB and LB LOCA Analyses are subject to the 30-day reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.46.

For previous years, the net change in the SB LOCA Analysis PCT 10 CFR 50.46 Model Assessment errors is -87F and the absolute change is +80 F (Reference 4).

For 2009, one error results in a net change in the SB LOCA PCT of -64°F. provides the SB LOCA Margin Summary Sheet for FCS. Because of the -72 0 F total errors, the SB LOCA PCT changed from the baseline value (reported in the FCS Updated Final Safety Analysis Report) of 1537°F to 1465 0 F.

The sum of the absolute values of the errors/changes in the SB LOCA analysis of record is +72°F.

For previous years, the net change in the LB LOCA Analysis PCT 10 CFR 50.46 Model Assessment errors is -13 0 F and the absolute change is +27°F (Reference 4). For 2009, one error results in a net change in the LB LOCA PCT of -27 F. provides the LB LOCA Margin Summary Sheet for FCS. Because of the -40°F total errors, the LB LOCA PCT changed from the baseline value (reported in the FCS Updated Final Safety Analysis Report) of 1636°F to 1596°F.

The sum of the absolute value of the errors/changes in the LB LOCA analysis of record is +54°F.

LIC-09-0028 Page 2 Since these results represent a quantification requiring no further analysis and FCS PCT values remain less that the 10 CFR 50.46(b)(1) acceptance criteria of 2200 0 F, no further analytical or operational mitigating strategies are required.

The Omaha Public Power District will be reanalyzing the SB LOCA and LB LOCA analyses for Extended Power Uprate (EPU), and the code changes will be incorporated. EPU is scheduled to be implemented beginning with Cycle 28 operations in the fall of 2012.

LIC-09-0028 Page 1 Small Break LOCA Margin Summary Sheet day Report Plant Name: Fort Calhoun Station Utility Name: Omaha Public Power District EvaluationModel: Small Break LOCA Net PCT Effect Absolute PCT Effect A. Prior 10 CFR 50.46 Changes or Error Corrections- APCT = -8*F 8°F Previous Years B. Prior 10 CFR 50.46 Changes or Error Corrections- APCT = 0°F 0°F This year C. Current 10 CFR 50.46 Changes: - This Report

1. S-RELAP5 radiation to fluid correlation under APCT = -64°F 64*F predicts the radiative heat transfer Absolute Sum of 10 CFR 50.46 Changes APCT = 72°F The sum of the PCT from the most recent analysis using an acceptable evaluation model and the estimates of the PCT impact for changes and errors identified since this analysis is less than 2200 0 F.

LIC-09-0028 Page 1 Large Break LOCA Margin Summary Sheet - Annual Report Plant Name: Fort Calhoun Station Utility Name: Omaha Public Power District Evaluation Model: Large Break LOCA Net PCT Effect Absolute PCT Effect A. Prior 10 CFR 50.46 Changes or Error, Corrections- APCT = -13'F 27F Previous Years B. Prior 10 CFR 50.46 Changes or Error Corrections- APCT = 0TF 0°F This year C. Current 10 CFR 50.46 Changes: - This Report

1. S-RELAP5 radiation to fluid correlation under APCT = -27F 27*F predicts the radiative heat transfer Absolute Sum of 10CFR 50.46 Changes APCT = 54TF The sum of the PCT from the most recent analysis using an acceptable evaluation model and the estimates of the PCT impact for changes and errors identified since this analysis is less than 2200 0 F.