L-88-332, Forwards mgt-on-shift Weekly Summary Rept,Per 871019 Order
| ML17347A837 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 08/03/1988 |
| From: | Conway W FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| L-88-332, NUDOCS 8808170097 | |
| Download: ML17347A837 (57) | |
Text
gg CELEBRATED '1STRIBUTJON DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8808170097 DOC.DATE: 88/08/03 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET g FACIL:50-250 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 3, Florida Power and Light C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 4, Florida Power and Light C 05000251 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CONWAY,W.F.
Florida Power
& Light Co.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION GRACE,J.N.
Region 2, Ofc of the Director
SUBJECT:
Forwards mgt-on-shift weekly summary rept.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
D036D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: Turkey Point Management Onshift Program NOTES:
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME DRP/ADR-2 PD2-2 PD INTERNAL: AEOD NRR DEPY NRR MORISSEAU,D NRR/ADT 12-.G-18 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2 RGN2 FILE 0 (
EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
.1 1
'1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR/DRP-1/2 EDISON,G DEDRO NRR DIR NRR/ADP 12-G-18 NRR/DLPQ/PEB NRR/DRIS DIR 9A TEBERMAN,J REG FI C
NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 2
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 A
D S
D TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 23 ENCL 23
~ "
07 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AUGUS3i 5
1S88 L-88-332 Dr. J.
Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N. W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323
Dear Dr. Grace:
Re:
Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251 ana ement-on-Shift Weekl Re ort Pursuant to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Order dated October 19,
- 1987, the attached summary of Management-on-Shift (MOS) reports is submitted.
The Plant Supervisor-Nuclear Shift Reports are also being submitted.
Should there be any questions on this information, please contact us.
Very truly yours, W. F.
Con ay Senior Vice President Nuclear WFC/SDF/gp Attachment cc:
Z. Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcement, USNRC Dr.
G. E. Edison, Project Manager,
E. Talion, President, FPL a
mos001 8808i70097 SSOS03 PDR ADOCK 0 000250 R
PDC pod@
PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
t t
MANAGEMENT ON SHIFT (MOS)
WEEKLY SUMARY REPORT WEEK STARTING:
07/22/88 PAGE 1
OF 2
Six MOS Observers were on shift:
Peter L. Walker, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (07/22-25/88, nights);
Richard Coulthard, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (07/22-24/88, days);
Terry L.
-Fulkerson, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (07/25-28/88, days);
Andrew P.
- Drake, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (07/25-29/88, nights);
Jose
- Donis, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Project Supervisor (07/22-24/88, nights);
Clyde D. Kelly, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Maintenance/Specialty Training Supervisor (07/24-29/88, nights).
Both Units 3
and 4 operated in Mode 1 for the duration of the reporting period.
No immediate safety problems were identified by any Observer.
No questionable work practices were noted by either the Independent Observers or the Turkey Point Observers.
The Independent Observers noted three areas of improvement, as follows:
A recommendation to test the plant alarm horns
- weekly, during the day.
A comment that two hearing protection supply boxes were found empty.
A question on the status of data collection on Waste Gas System leaks.
The Turkey Point Observers noted two areas for improvement, as follows:
An apparent conflict between two procedures used when cleaning Component Cooling Water heat exchangers.
A followup inspection of the temporary water treatment
- plant, with two additional recommendations for control of the area.
ATTACHMENT: MOS DAILY REPORTS
MANAGEMENT QN SHIFT (MOS)
'EEKLY SUMARY REPORT WEEK STARTING:
07/22/88 PAGE E
OF Two questionable work practices and six areas for improvement were noted by the Plant Supervisors Nuclear (PSNs).
One questionable work practice involved a possible violation of the procedure used to determine the need to clean a
CCW heat exchanger.
A related
- concern, under areas for improvement, involved an apparent improvement in heat exchanger efficiency which was not expected since the heat exchanger had not been cleaned.
These two concerns were echoed by the Independent Observers and the Turkey Point Observers, with a total of eight recommendations made between them.
The second questionable work practice concerned the labelling of the Gas Bottle Storage House areas.
The remaining five areas for improvement are as follows:
A repeat question on auxiliary building roof leaks.
A conflict between information tags on the Intake Cooling Water strainers, and the operator's log instructions.
A recommended increase in the frequency of PSN reviews of the logs of Fire Detection Panel trouble alarms.
Two recommendations resulting from a
failure of the generator hydrogen pressure regulator.
ATTACHMENT: MOS DAlLY REPORTS
'-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page !P~ig To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
07/ZZ/88 From:
Richard Coulthard (M
bserver)
Shift:
Qx Day Q Night A.
Plant evolutions Observed Units 3 and 4 at 100'~ power 0715 Plan of the Day meeting 1535 shift turnover meeting Conduct of Unit Power Range Channel N-43 tests in accordance with 4-OSP-59.4 and 4-PH1-59.10 B.
C.
Immediate Safety Problems Z:one Questionable Work Practices
'tlone D.
Areas for Improvement
'tione Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments l.
2.
Allshift operations conducted in a professional manner.
During preparations for transferring boric acid between storage
- tanks, a Control Room operator started discussing with ne methods to improve procedure O-OP-046, "Chemical Volune Control System (CVCS), Boron Concentration Control."
Rather than become technically involved and turn the issue into a
liOS item, I suggested he contact the PUP representative on shift.
PUP was quite responsive in researching the issue and coming to the Control Room to review the alternate nethods with the operator.
The availability of PUP representatives on shift can facilitate operator feedback and irput to the procedure effort.
Completed By:
Richard Coulthard M S bserver Date:
07/22/88 Reviewed By:
0 erations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Date:
Management Review By:
M-te C'
7.~
Date
'VI 07/22/88
'-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Pag<<
To Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
07 22-23 88 From:
Peter L. Vialker (I
bserver Shift:
Lj Day EI Night A.
Plant Evolutions Observed Units 3 and 4, 100'i power operation B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Questionable Work Practices None D.
Areas for Improvement None E.
Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments e
Smooth ouiet shift.
Good disposition of a crack found in 381 Circulating 7/ater Pump.
Attention was paid in a timely fashion and a decision was made to have it evaluated by Vaintenance and Quality Control in the morning.
Completed By:
Peter L. V/alker I
bserver Date:
07/22-23/88 Reviewed By:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Management Review By:
/ ~a<
te I~7ZSiK ate
'Vl
'14 07/22-23/88
'-ADM-019 M
agement on Shift (MOS) ~
MOS DAILYREPORT Ptt g<<
To Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
07/22-23/88 From:
J. li. Donis (M
bserver)
Shift:
Q Day g Night Plant Evolutions Observed Units 3 anc 4 at 100oo power Shift turnover meeting
~ roubleshooting 4B Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) seal leakoff B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Questionable Work Practices None D.
Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Good PSN response to report of a crack in the 3B1 Circulating Water Pump.
Iramediate action tal:en:
PS%1 inspection
~tlechanical haintenance alerted PYRO written Evaluation/investigation ongoing.
Completed By:
M bserver Date:
07 22-23 SS Reviewed By:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date Management Review By:
ate ate
/
'Vp ll 07/22-23/88
I t
f)ate 07 Z3/80 Shift Report Da PSN Jones Shift Management AI'N t:urphy/Reese N~p. Vetromile A.
Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. 'reas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.
Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations Reviewed B Date 7 a hetions Cote pleted Date
Date 07/23/88 Shift Report Hid PSN Schimkus Shift Management A17SN 1iurphy Spence A.
Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.
Areas for lrnprovement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.
Good Practices/Professionalism Observed h construction employee working on 3Bl Circulating Water pump informed midshift ANPO there appears to be cracking in the upper pump housing that he noticed while performing his duties.
The ANPO immediately notified PSN after he personally investigated the problem and felt a concerr, that there may be a problem.
The crack is located under the deck plating in an extremely tight area.
Both individuals mentioned above should be commended for their actions to identify a potential problem which could degrade unit reliability. PSN commended the ANPO for his correct actions and excellent observations.
Reviewed B Date hctione Completed Date
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOB)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date:
07/23/88 From:
h.
Ric,".ard Coulthard (M
bserver)
Plant Evolutions Observed Shift:
Qx Day Q Night 100~a power level operation on Units 3 and 4 0735 and 1535 shift turnover meetings Conduct of TP-461 on Unit 3 to leak-test valves FCV-113A and FCV-113B B.
C.
Immediate Safety Problems None Puestionable Work Practices
?'ne D.
Areas for improvement At the start of the shift's Reactor Coolant System (RCS) leak rate test, the Volune Control Yank (VCT) pressure was about 24 psi and would rise a few psig when the VCT level was raised.
A discussion on maintainirg 20 psig in the tank ensued, but it was decided rot to vent the tank.
This process is done by OSP-47.1,,and involves using 2 operators in the Auxiliary Building collecting data, and risks a gaseous release to the Auxiliary Building. The above procedure
~vas overhauled in October, 1987, to obtain data to determine the problems associated with the waste gas system.
The Operations group's desire to avoid ver.ting the VCT in this instance appeared justified.
V.'hat is the progress in obtaining data to resolve the waste gas system leakage problems?
Unit 4 shutdown is only about two months away and the VCT vent is used extensively for degassing.
Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Ouiet shift.
Completed By:
server Date:
Reviewed By:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Dat: 7ZC Management Review By:
M-ate
/
1gs'te VP lf 07/23/88
0-A'DM-019 Ma agesnenton Shift(MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Pag<<
To Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
07 23-24 88 From:
J. 1:. Donis (M
bseruer Shift:
Q Day Night A.
Plant Evolutions Observed Units 3 ar.d 4 at 1000~ pov.'er Shift turnover meeting B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement None E.
Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments None Completed By:
J. M. Donis M
bseroer t
Date:
07/23-24/88 Reviewed By:
Management Review By:
0 erations Superintendent-Nuclear Dat: 7~V VP 1k 07/23-24/88 ate ate
0-ADM-0>9 M
agement on Shift(MOS)
MOB DAll.YREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
07/23-24/88 From:
Peter L. Walker bserver)
Shift:
Q Day g Night Plant Evolutions Observed Units 3 and 4, 100"~ steady state operations B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Questionable Work Practices None D.
Areas for Improvement None E.
Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Ouiet shift.
Completed By:
Peter L. ~valker M
bserver Date:
07/23-24/SS Reviewed By:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
7 25 Management Review By:
M-
/Was ae te VP 1k'7/23-24/SS
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page TQ Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date.
07 24 88 From:
Richard Coulthard (M
bserver Shi ft:
Qx Day Night A.
Plant Evolutions Observed 1004 power operations on Ur.its 3 and 4 0735 and 1535 shift turnover meetings Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Quiet shift with routine operations Completed By:
Richard C'oulthard M
bserver 07/24/88 Reviewed By:
h Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
2 (
Management Review By:
/7 z0 ate
(~~zr
/
VP 14 07/24/SS
~0-ABM-0]9 Ma gement on Shift(MOS)
MOS DAILYRE I'0RT
'I'o:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
From:
P. L. V alker (M
bseruer)
Shift:
Q Day Night P3ant Evolutions Observed 100",o Steady state operations, both units B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift,.Comments Both units are running smoothly.
P.outine.operations are in progress.
Completed By:
P, L. Walker seruer Date:
07/24-25/GS Reviewed By:
Management Review By:
Operations S uperi ntendent-Nuclear
/
7 Da~:
M-ate Date ae 07/24-25/80
O-ADM-Oi9 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAlLYRE)'ORT To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
07 24-25 88 From:
C. D. Kelly (M
bseruer)
Shift:
Q Day E Night, Plant Evolutions Observed Peak and mid shift operations, Units 3 and 4 at 100% power Peak shift Mechanical Maintenance, ¹4 Component Cooling Water (CCW)
Heat Exchanger Shift turnover meeting at 11:40 PM B.
C.
D.
Immediate Safety Problems None Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement During the cleaning of ¹4A CCW Heat Exchanger on the peak shift, the Hydroblaster became inoperative due to plunger rod problems which prevents the unit from developing pressure.
Because of repair time and the fact that Maintenance Instruction ¹030002 still reflects 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> LCO time frames, the peak shift foreman contacted QC and received permisssion to shift over to Maintenance Procedure No.
4-PMM-030.1 "Component Cooling Water Heat Exchange Cleaning" in order to clean ¹4A CCW HX using section 6.3.6 which covers Conco cleaning.
Several actions need to be presented to clarify proper work controls to be used.
2.
3.
Procedures
- -Phihi-030.1 have sections (6.3.5) which cover the hydroblast cleaning method.
Because of this, Maintenance Instruction No. 030002 should not be used.
Maintenance Instruction No.
030002 has not been updated to reflect the 72 LCO upgrade, nor does it reference PhiM-030.1.
Procedures
- -PhiM-030.1 need to be revised to reflect proper sequence and closure based on which method is used for cleaning.
The mid shift Mechanical Supervisor will be bringing this item to his supervisors at tention.
0-AD M-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT E'u ge E.
Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments
-Both peak and mid operations personnel conducted themselves in a very orderly fashion.
-I observed very good pre-task communications between an RO and an NTO prior to the work being performed.
-Excellent use of "Plan of the Shift" by all departments.
'-All Security and Firewatch personnel encountered during several walkdowns were alert and very aware of my presence.
Completed By:
C. D. Kell M
bserver Date:
07 24-5 88 Reviewed By:
Management Review By:
perations Superintendent-Nuclear
/7 ss te Date:
Date 07tr'24-25/88
l)ate 07/24/S8 Shift Report Da I'N Jones'hiftManagement AI'N
?.iurphy/Reese N~I; Uetromile A.
Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.
Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.
Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations Reviewed B
,J Date
-2h hotiona Completed Date
l)ate 07/24/88 Shift Repor't Mid I'N Shift Management Schimkus Al SN Murphy Spence A.
Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.
Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken In the recent weeks heavy rainstorms have been occurring and all Operators, NWEs, PSNs, plus various support personnel have been calling about large puddles of water in Electrical Switch'ear rooms, etc.
The Auxiliary Building has some of the worst rain leakage.
Wet floors are also a safety hazard.
Recommendation:
Have Construction tour all switch gear rooms and Auxiliary Building during the next few weeks to document puddles of water or actual leakage during storms.
Then set up a program to seal roof leaks.
Feedback requested.
C.
Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Nuclear Turbine operators have been supplying PSN with several lists of all PWO'd steam and water leaks on the secondary with their own evaluation if the leaks are propogating or staying essentially the same.
They request I forward these lists to the Mechanical Maintenance Department to allow them to schedule the worst leaks for maintenance.
Reviewed B r
Date 7 a) hctlons Completed Date
/
I
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
From:
.errv L. Fulkerson (M
bserver)
Shift:
Qx Day Night Plant Evolutions Observed 1CO'.b steady state, Units 3 and 4 Shift turnover, day to peak 1 iorning meeting B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Duestionable Work Practices hone D.
Areas for Improvement None E.
Profesisonalisrn, Summary of Shift, Comments l.
Beginning of shift meeting was very informative and professional.
Z.
IGC was not present at meeting.
Completed By:
Terr L. Fulkerson bserver Date:
07/25/88 Reviewed By:
I Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Da~:
7'anagement Review By:
~K~I 14 I te V
Date Date 07/Zs/88
0-ADM-0] 9 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILY RE l'0RT Vsse Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
07 25-26/88 From:
C. D. Kelly (M
bseruer)
Shift:
Q Day Qx Night Plant Evolutions Observed Peak shift and midnight operations, Units 3 and 4 at 100% power Shift meeting at 11:40 PM Plant area walkdowns:
-Condenser areas 0 3 and 4
-Temporary Water Treatment Plant {WTP) facilities at MOS Coordinators request General maintenance activities
-Battery charger preventive maintenance
-Clearance and PWO preparation by Mechanical B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement At the request of the MOS Coordinator, a follow-up walkdown of the temporary WTP facilities was made.
Reference MOS items 888-1155 and 88-1356.
Comments:
The area in and around the temporary WTP facilities certainly is not set up or maintained in a safe manner.
I consulted the peak shift Maintenance
- Foreman, who inspected the area. with me, as well as Operations personnel.
Both groups did not approve of the conditions but also indicated there was no reason for FPL personnel to be in that area, except for an access path to the Intake which was fairly clear.
Therefore, the following recommendations are made for consideration.
1.
Rope off the entire area to prevent access by FPL personnel.
2.
If this in'stallation will be a long term facility, request the contractor to set up the equipment, cables and hoses in a safer, more professional manner.
This includes a drain hose for waste water down to the Intake versus the present waterfall Gown the embankment.
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT aug'rofessionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments l.
2.
Excellent communications between Operations and Maintenance personnel.
Observed some Security personnnel making their rounds checking access points.
They appear to be sharp and taking care of business.
Comments:
A definite appreciation is being vocalized by Operations personnel on the Maintenance effort in clearing out repairs and reducing some of their headaches.
This message needs to be passed on to the
'aintenance groups.
Completed By:
C. D. Kelly
. M bseroer Date.
07/25-26/88 Reviewed By:
Opera ions Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
Managemen Review By:
-N Dt ate ate 4 M(N I IIIIII'/bh 07/25-26/88
0
O-AD,M-O>9 Mar;em'ent on Shift(MOS) ~
MOS l)AILYRVI'ORT
'i'o:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
07 25-26 88 From:
bseruer)
Shift:
Q Day
~x Night Plant Evolutions Observed Units 3 and 4 at 100'h power Peak to mid shift turnover Mid shift briefing Normal operation and logs Immediate Safety Problems None observed C.
Questionable Vork Practices None observed D.
Areas for Improvement No comments Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments No comments Completed By:
Andrew P. Drake bseruer D:~/
Reviewed By:
Operations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Date:
Man ageme Review By:
r<> <+
te 2R/~u ss ate
/ +~6 07/25-26/88
I)ate 07 25 88 Shift Report Days I'N Jones Shift Management AI'N Murphy/Guyer NWE A.
Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.
Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.
Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations Reviewed 8 hctions Completed Date
Date 07/25/88 Shift Report Peaks PSN Salkeld Shift Management AI'N Guyer Eddinger A.
Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.
Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken The Fire Protection group is doing a study of the frequency and duration of trouble alarms on the Fire Detection panel (C39A).
During this study the trouble alarm is silenced and a Fire Watch records each trouble alarm.
The log of these trouble alarms are given to the PSN at midnight each day.
This is not frequent enough to determine if an alarm point should be PWO'd and a Fire impairment tag hung.
The Fire Watch and Fire Protection Supervisor were instructed to inform the PSN any time a trouble alarm remains in for greater than 30 minutes or comes in repeatedly over a period of time, and to give their logs to the PSN for review each shift rather than daily.
C.
Good Practices/Professionalism Observed reviewed 8 Date ~XI/
hctions Com pleted Date
Date 07 25 Shift Report hiid I'N Shift Management Schimkus Murphy Spence A.
Questionable Vork Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations huxiliary Building gas house 'has 2 bins which are dedicated for full or empty nitrogen bottles.
There are no placards on wall designating which bin is for empty or full bottles.
There is magic marker writing over each bin sayng full or empty, however the bin marked "empty" has all the full bottles in it and vice-versa.
In order to accomodate the required 50 full bottles, the configuration must be this way.
Action: Requested Operations support to obtain placards for bottle designation.
Recommend:
Writing be, cleaned from walls (notified Mechanical at 0415 for this)
B.
Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken Found Operator information tags on 3A/3B, 4A/4B Intake Cooling Water (ICIV) strainers give information on what pressure differential a strainer must be backwashed or P'iVO'd.
This conflicted with operator log reading instructions.
Log readings indicate greater than 3.0 psid for PRO initiation. Operator aid indicates greater than 1.2 psid, for some action.
Action: 'Reviewed operator aid logbook and found no log entries for the tag numbers being used.
Had Yuclear Operator remove the operator aid information sheets off strainers.
C.
Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations - no unprofessional behavior observed.
Reviewed Date 3t I hctlons Completed Date
4 O.ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOB DAILYREPORT PIsi Tp 0
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Datel 07 26/88 From:
Terr y L. R ulkerson server Shift'I Day Q ¹ight Plant Bvolutions Observed 100O'o steady state on Units 3 and 4 Day so peaks turnover B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
~
Questionable Work Practices None Di Areas for Improveinent None Professionalism, 8ummary of 8hift, Comments Shift turnovers a>ere very informative.
Completed By:
r Terr L, Fulkerson server Date; 07/26/88 Reviewed By:
peratione uperinten nt.
uc ear Date:
Management Review By:
ta ate
/ ac%7 g
at
0 ADM.oie Management on Shift (MOB)
MOB DAllY RE)'ORT 0
Pl>>I'o:
Operations Superintendent. Nuclear Date:
07/26-27/88 From:
Andrew P. Drake server PlanC Evolutions Observed Shift:
g Day g Night B.
Cs Unite 3 and 4 at 100% power peak ta mid shifC turnaver Mfd shift brieffng Repairs on Unit 4 hydrogen panel Wa1kdown af Turbine buflding 4
intake Coolfng Water (ICV) discussion with Shift Technfcal Advisor (STA) and PSN Immediate Safety Problems None observed Questionable Work Practices None observed Areas for Improvement 1.
The latest results on the lCW heat exchangers caused a significant amount of concern by che STA and PSN.
The STA platted che data and found that the heit exchangers improved their performance even though none had been
- cleaned, The STA braught thfs ta the attention of the PSN who called the Lead Bngineer ior an explanation The Lead Engineer stated that Che data showed t'e heat exchangers had not experienced any fouling versus improved heat transfe~
by cleaning.
Purther investigatfon into che method af collecting, analyzing and reporting data has led to the following recommendations:
a, b.
Cs es h tolerance band based on the previous data should be determined for a retest criterion (t,e., if the new test data is
+ I degree P
trom the previous, a second test should be pertormsd by another individual),
Any mgJor veririsd ditterences from previous ot expected ttends should be explained to the STii instead of Just sending the data.
Scrfct controls should be in place far collecting (f.e.,
- method, frequency) and verifying the data.
Bach person taking data must do it exactly the same way or the trend data willnot be valid.
Por at least the pact 3
day>>
(and probably longer) the ICW temperature has been above the 2
degree R
- margin, but heat exchangers have noC been cleaned.
TP-440 states that the heat exchanger their be cieaned when you exceed the 2 degree p margin, on iatest data two difterent sets oy heat exchangers were test'ed et the same time (11:00 logged on both sheets).
This does noc seem physically possible given their dfstance from each other.
0-ADM-019 Management Qn Shift (1509)
MOB DAILYREPORT 2.
The site evacuation and fire horn tests do not seem to be on a regular test schedule.
The tests are also always at nfght.
The only time plant personnel get to hear the alarms are General Bmployee Training (once a year).
A weekl.y or monthly daytime test would help maintain familiarity with the horns.
This can be accomplfshed fairly easily.
a) Perform the test at the same time and same date/day (f.e., every Friday at 9 AM),
b) Inform everyone on site of the regular test schedule so they will be aware of the test when it occurs, B.
Protessfonalfsm, Summary of Shftt> Comments The mfd shift PSN and STA worked well together to resolve the ICW heat exchanger questions.
Both shifts vrere well run and operated smoothly.
Completed By; Andrew P. Drake server Date.
07/26-27/88 Reviewed By:
Management Review By:
perat<ons uperinteo eat-uc ear ate Date:
ate
0 ADM 019 abasement on shift (Mos
. MOS l)hlLYREPORT Operations Superintendent,. Nuclear Date:
07/26-27/1 8 From:
h.
C, D. Kelt server Plant Evolutions Obaetved Shift; g
Day
'I Night 4
Peak end mid ehtfc operations, Unite 3 and 4 aC 100% power Mechantcal Peak/mid shift turnover meeting at 10<40 PM Shift meeting at 11>40 PM 4
03 and 4
Component Cooltng
%'stet (CCV)
Heat Exchanger (HX) performance monfcoring process Immedfate 8afety Problems Nane C.
Dt Questfonable Work Practices Had to temfnd cwo IQC Specialists to put on hard hats.
Spoke ta midnight IAC Supervisor - problem taken cate of.
hteas fot Improvements Ae a fatlowup co my prevtous MOO shift concerns on the administration process being used fn CCV Hx. petformance, ic appears there fe eti11 reason for concecn, Last night chere wae a 3 to 4 degree "inctease" in che h and B CCV Hxs on both unite and no.cleaning had tsLken place, (See attached MOS report dated 3/9-3/10 and recammendatfans).
After dfscusstons wich che
- STA, FSN and A. Drake (MOS), chete appears to be several areas of concern which are similar to those reported befare, (See h. Drake and T. hndeteon LfOS reports),
Commence~
Aside from the technfcal aspects of che CCV HX performance monftaring process, chete lies an obligation to provtde the PSN with logtcal results in order fax him to make decisions leading into plane equipment being placed in or taken aut of service.
Thfs item and the concerns should be looked at wtth thts thought fn mtnd.
Professionalism, Summary of Shtft, Comments Excellent shifts, very qutet and dtecusetons an CCV HX concerns were very productive, The PSN cook a very high level of ownership.
Completed By.
C D. Hell server Pate; 07/26-27/88 Revievred By:
Management Retie~ Sy;
/
perations upcnnten n$.
uc ear DaM: 7>
a/e 07/26-27/88
~
w.
~ I
~ '
~ I..
I
~
I
~
~ I
~
I
~
~
I
~
I 1
~ I
~
~
~
I
~
I
~
~
~
~ I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~ ~
~
~ I
~
~
I
~
~
~
. ~-
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
I-
~-
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I I
~
~
~
~
~
ADM-019
~agement on Shift(MOS)~
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear 07/22/88 Date:
07/27/88 From:
Terr L. Fulkerson (M
bseruer)
Shi ft:
Qx Day Q Night Plant Evolutions Observed 100% power, units 3 and 4 Shift turnover, mids to days Shift turnover, days to'peaks High temperature problems on Unit 3 B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The temperatures on the Unit 3 Containment and the intake temperatures began to rise.
The intake temperature exceeded the 95 F limit as delineated in ADM-021. The Containment temperature rose to 118 F.
There was a great deal of discussion generated on how to handle the problem.
The coordination between Operations, Management, and Engineering was excellent.
Completed By: Terr L. Fulkerson M
bserver Date:
07/27/88 Reviewed By:
perations Superintendent-Nuclear D.~:
7>fanagement Review By:
e M(et i n I IIIee M-N ate
(~>/~~w Date 07/27/88
~
~
~
~ -
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~ I. ~
~.
0
~
~
~
~
I I 'i
~ ~
~
~
'I
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
o
~
~
I
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
e,
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
. 0-ADM-Ol9 Management on Shift(MOS) ~
% OS l)A)LYREPORT
'I'o:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
07/27-28/88 From:
Andrew P. Drake
(
bseruer)
Shift:
Q Day Qx Night A.
Plant Evolutions Observed Units 3 and 4 at 100% power Peak to mid shift turnover Mid shift briefing Normal operations/logs B.
C.
D.
Immediate Safety Problems No comments Questionable Work Practices No comments Areas for Improvement No comments Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Quiet night, both shifts (peak and mid) well run.
Completed By:
Andrew P. Drake bseruer Date:
07/27-28/88 Reviewed By:
perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Date:
Management Review By:
/7 ate i~>>8<
ate at 07/27-28/88
D'ate 7 28 Shift Report' Shift 4 /~c8 Peak PSN Salkeld Shift Management AI'N Guyer NWY Eddinger A.
Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.
Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.
Good Piactices/Professionalsm Observed Routine operations evieered B Date Z.
PhctioneCeetp!eted Dale
0-ADM-019 a
nagement on Shift(MOS+
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
07/28/88 From:
Terry L. Fulkerson bseruer)
Shift:
Qx Day Q Night A.
Plant Evolutions Observed 100% power, Units 3 and 4 Shift turnovers, days - peaks, mids - days Analog Rod Position Indication (ARPI) indicator changeouts on Unit 4
control bank D B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Questionable Work Practices None D.
Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments 1.
Shift turnovers were good and complete.
2.
Coordination betwen IGC and Operations was very good for ARPI change out.
Completed By:
seruer DI:~
Reviewed By:
perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Date: 7 Management Review By:
ate
> ~7'4 IR ate
'Vl 07/28/88
.,U-AOlH-01 8 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS I)AILYREPORT
'l'o:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
07/28-29/88 From:
Andrew P. Drake
(
bseruer)
Shift:
g Day E Night A.
Plant Evolutions Observed Units 3 and 4 at 100I5%I power Peak to mid shift turnover Unit 3 control/shutdown rods operability test Unit 4 Component Cooling Water (CCW) heat exchanger performance test Normal operations/logs B.
C.
D.
Immediate Safety Problems None observed Questionable Work Practices None observed Areas for Improvement No comments Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments 2.
3.
1 observed Kevin Greaves collect the data for the 4A CCW heat exchanger performance test.
During this time we discussed the techniques used to collect the data and the effects they had on the test accuracy.
Kevin performed several checks during the data collection which are not required by procedure but verify the static stability of the heat exchanger during the test.
He also adjusted the pressure difference (dp) gage used to measure flow to reduce the large fluctuations on the indicator.
These checks should be proceduralized so all tests are performed the same way and errors are minimized.
Both shifts (peaks and mids) were well run.
Both (north and south) ear protection boxes on the ground floor of the turbine building are empty.
Please fill. No response necessary.
Completed By:
server Date:
07 28-29 88 Reviewed By:
perat ons uperi ntendent-Nuclear Date.
Management Review By:
ate eh< 5 te VP 1h 07/28-29/88
O'- A'DM-019 M
agement on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAJLY REl'ORT Vsg<<
To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
07 28-29 88 From:
C. D. Kell (M
bseruer)
Shift:
Q Day Qx Night A.
Plant Evolutions Observed Peak and mid shift operations - both units at 100% power 11:40 PM shift meeting General IGC maintenance activities Component Cooling Water (CCW) heat exchanger
'- review/discuss data with engineer CCW heat exchanger - review/discuss mechanical PWO work package B.
Immediate Safety Problems None C.
Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement None
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (Mo~<
NlOS DAlLYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Quiet shifts, all personnel were alert and conducted activities in a professional manner.
Had a very constructive discussion with the CCW heat exchanger test engineer, (MOS) A. Drake, and STA concerning indentified items ln MOS reports early in week.
The procedure
- changes, when implemented, will ensure consistent trending and also aid in having better work controls for the test engineers.
I suggested that it would be very positive if the test engineers met with the PSNs and STAs to establish better communications so that the PSN would have a better understanding of the tests as well as control over activities affecting his plant equipment.
This was agreed to and understood.
Comment:
The improvements in the conduct of Operations and Backshift Maintenance between my MOS assignments have been excellent.
The most improved area is that of cross-functional communications.
When it takes
- place, problems are solved or avoided which equates to success.
l really believe our personnel are realizing this fact based on the effort they are putting out.
Completed By:
server Date:
Reviewed By:
perations uperinten nt-uc ear Date: 7 Management Review By:
IM(L'iI lllhle' ate
,~<8 ae ate o7/zs-z9/99
Date
Ã/27/88 Shift Report Q)t))t Mtd I'N Anderson Shift Management Af'SN Reese Dallau A.
Qaeecfanable Vork Practtcee/Actions Taken/Recommeadattone During subsequent discussions on CCW HX toultng I wae informed by che STA thac a policy change was made as to when a heat exchanger should be caken ouc-of-service for cleaning.
Tp 440 scares "Heac Exchanger cloantng s'hall be requested (normally'by the STA) when the actual ICW temperature rises within 2 degree F of the limit for che worst CCW HX pair operation wtthouc a valve watch".
In the lasc four to five weeks, as per the STA and the foultng charts, the heat exchangers aze being cleaned when the foulfng line foz the besc twa heac exchangers wich a valve watch reaches around che 95 degree ca 96 degree value.
The STA has Just received a proposed procedure change for TP 440 chat the heac exchanger shall be caken out for cleaning when the ICW temperature reachee che worst cwa heat exchanger touting lfne with a valve watch.
Thfe seems to me we have the cart before the horse.
The procedure should have been changed prior to changing the actions taken.
B.
Areas far Improvement/Recammendatfons/hccton!
Taken The STA showed me a concern he had wfth the CCW HX fouling prediction curves.
All heat exchangezs were just tested and che data showed the curves co Jump up to a hfgher degree F value than they were on the previous test although there had been no cleaning since the prevfous tesc.
Thte was explained by the Lead System Bngtneer tn chac he checked on the experimental tube they were using down at che intake and found that tc had had no fouling in the last seven days showing that tn fact aur heat exchangers may noc have experienced foultng since the last test.
He also explained Chat the reason the Lemperatures limits were even higher chan the last test could have been due ca small discrepancies fn che data taken tn etcher test.
We have experienced a problem tn wrong data foz thfe cesctng tn the past whfch caused ue co ga into an LCO when we dtd noc have to, This cauld also cause us to not go fnto an LCO when we should, Recommendacfon:
I think a ltmtC should ba puc on che data gathered fn these tests as to how they compare with what wae.expected.
Wtth a three degree P rtse greacez than
- expected, such ae vre experienced this ttmo, I think the teste should be done again and maybe by another engineer to validate ft.
C, Oaod Praccfces/Prafeeeianslfszn Observed evieweci B DaCe 72~
Act)one Comp)etet)
Date