IR 05000566/1980006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-06 & 50-567/80-06 on 800319-21.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Inspector Followup items,10CFR50.55(e) Item,Observation of safety-related Work Activities & Warehouse Insp
ML19317H408
Person / Time
Site: Yellow Creek  
Issue date: 04/11/1980
From: Cantrell F, Matt Thomas
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19317H407 List:
References
50-566-80-06, 50-566-80-6, 50-567-80-06, 50-567-80-6, NUDOCS 8006050103
Download: ML19317H408 (3)


Text

-

UNITED STATES e

,

~

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p$

o V

E REGION 11 g'['

o, 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100

,

,*

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 3o3o3

APR 11 1880

-

Report Nos. 50-566/85-06and50-567/80-06

.

Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority 500A Chestnut Street Chattanooga, TN 37401 Facility Name: Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Docket Nos. 50-566 and 50-567 License Nos. CPPR-172 and CPPR-173 Inspection at Yellow Creek site near Iuka, Mississippi

'M i M

h' /d hO Inspector:

M. Thomas

/ Datd Signed

'

Approved by:

_

Er h //

F. '$. Cantrell, Sectiohyp/CES Branch

' 4) ate ' Signed SUMMARY Inspection on March 19-21, 1980 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 24 inspector-hours on site in the areas of inspector followup items, 50.55(e) item, observation of safety related work activities, and warehouse inspection.

Results

Of the four areas inspected, no items of nonecmpliance or deviations were identi-fied.

.#j I

i e

I 8008050 l&

$

. * _.

._

...

_. _ _.

.

__ t

.

L D2 TAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees M. M. Price, Project Manager

  • L. S. Cox, Construction Engineer C. G. Wages, Assistant Construction Engineer (QC)
  • J. N. Holladay, Supervisor, Project QA Unit
  • R. G. Delay, Supervisor, QC Materials & Civil Unit
  • S. E. Alge, Supervisor, DCU
  • S. P. Watson, DCU C. M. Freeman, QC Materials & Civil Unit G. B. Alexander, QC Material & Civil Unit F. Williamson, Training Officer J. B. Nelson, Project QA Unit

~ L. B. Parker, Project QA Unit J. D. Shanlever, Supervisor, Material Services QC

  • Attended exit interview 2.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on March 21, 1980 with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.

p 4.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.

5.

Licensee Identified Item (50.55(e))

(Open) Item 50-566 and 50-567/79-18-01, Defective Metal Conduit (NCR# YC-034)

The inspector reviewed the licensee's final response dated February 22, 1980, and discussed this item with site personnel. TVA has not completed its inspec-tion of all the suspect conduit. This item remains open pending completion of the inspection by TVA.

,

')

a

_

J

.

-2-(

_

6.

Inspector Followup Item (Closed) Item 50-566 and 50-567/79-16-01, Resolution of Site QA Audit YC-G-79-16 Deficiencies The inspector reviewed the response to deficiency number 8 of the subject audit which involves design interface in the resolution of a QCIR, the use of a field change request to resolve a QCIR, and the appropriateness of a QCIR in lieu of a nonconformance report (NCR) to resolve certain design oriented deficiencies. The resolution of this item was discussed with site QA personnel and the deficiency has been closed.

7.

Independent Inspection Effort (Units 1 and 2)

The inspector conducted a walk-through inspection of Units 1 and 2 reactor buildings, the auxiliary building, warehouses A and B, and the concrete lab. Areas inspected included:

calibration of concrete testing equipment a.

b; concrete slump, air, unit weight, and cylinder molding for Category I concrete placements C1-B22, PC-A4&A10, Al-R11, and W-C45 c.

batch plant operations d.

moisture tests for fine and 3/4" aggregates l

placement, vibrating, and finishing activities for pour Al-R11 e.

f.

cadwelding in Unit I reactor building g.

setting of component cooling heat exchanger in the auxiliary building Safety-related activities observed were conducted in accordance with applic-able requirements and procedures.

Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

n.g

,

~

-,,-n..,,-,.,

.. -,,. - - -

,,.-.w--n,

-

-

.. - - -,,,,,., - -, - - -

-e-.

~ - - - - -, - --- -,