IR 05000390/2015502

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Emergency Preparedness Inspection Report 05000390/2015502 and 05000391/2015502
ML15338A099
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar  
Issue date: 12/04/2015
From: Brian Bonser
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1
To: James Shea
Tennessee Valley Authority
Linda K. Gruhler 404-997-4633
References
IR 2015502
Download: ML15338A099 (12)


Text

December 4, 2015

SUBJECT:

WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000390/2015502 AND 05000391/2015502

Dear Mr. Shea:

On November 20, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. The enclosed inspection report (IR) documents the inspection results that were discussed on November 20, 2015, with you and other members of your staff.

No findings were identified during this inspection.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA by Adam Nielsen Acting for/

Brian R. Bonser, Chief

Plant Support Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-390 and 50-391 License Nos. NPF-90 and NPF-96

Enclosure:

IR 05000390 and 05000391/2015502 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information

REGION II==

Docket No:

05000390 and 05000391

License No:

NPF-90 and NPF-96

Report No:

05000390 and 05000391/2015502

Licensee:

Tennessee Valley Authority

Facility:

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 and Unit 2

Location:

Spring City, TN

Dates:

November 16-20, 2015

Inspectors:

Steven Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector

Christopher Fontana, Emergency Preparedness Inspector

Wade Loo, Senior Health Physicist

John Tornow, Physical Security Inspector

Jeff Hamman, Resident Inspector

Approved by:

Brian R. Bonser, Chief

Plant Support Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

SUMMARY

Inspection Report (IR) 05000390 and 05000391/2015502; 11/16/2015 - 11/20/2015; Watts Bar

Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 and Unit 2; Emergency Preparedness Exercise and Baseline Inspection

This report covers an announced inspection by two emergency preparedness inspectors, one physical security inspector, one senior health physicist, and one resident inspector. No findings of significance were identified. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process,

Revision 5.

No findings were identified during this inspection.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes

a. Inspection Scope

Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, some revisions were made to the Radiological Emergency Plan and associated implementing procedures. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the revisions, and sampled implementing procedure changes to evaluate potential reductions in the effectiveness of the Plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety.

The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114, 04, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The applicable planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and its related requirements in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, were used as reference criteria.

The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level and emergency plan changes on an annual basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP7 Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action Event

a. Inspection Scope

Title 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j, requires, in part, that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each 8-calendar-year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their emergency response organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a hostile action (HA) directed at the plant site. The licensee designed the November 18, 2015, exercise to satisfy that requirement, and the NRC inspected the HA event exercise to assess the licensees ability to effectively implement their emergency plan during a HA event, and adequately protect public health and safety.

The exercise evaluation consisted of the following reviews and assessments:

  • The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on November 18, 2015, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk-Significant Planning Standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10),which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
  • The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, the Central Alarm Station cell, the Incident Command Post, the Alternate Facility, and the corporate Emergency Operations Facility.
  • A review of other performance areas, such as the ERO recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff,

intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.

  • The adequacy of the licensees post-exercise critiques, to evaluate licensee self-assessment of its ERO performance during the November 18, 2015, exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g.

The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors also attended the FEMA-sponsored public meeting on November 20, 2015.

This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).

The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period July 1, 2014, through September 30, 2015. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.

Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone

  • Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
  • Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Readiness
  • Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability

For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed the licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area are listed in the Attachment. This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

On November 20, 2015, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. K. Walsh and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided during the inspection.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee personnel

J. Addison, Drills and Exercises Program Manager
G. Arent, Licensing Director
L. Belvin, Quality Assurance Manager
S. Connors, Plant Manager
T. Detchemendy, Emergency Preparedness Manager
B. Hufsteter, Security Shift Supervisor
W. Lee, Corporate Emergency Preparedness Director
J. Parshall, EP Program Planning and Implementation Manager
A. Phillips, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
G. Pry, Plant Support Director
J. Reidy, Nuclear Plant Projects Director
S. Schiel, Emergency Preparedness Training Program Manager
W. Smith, Nuclear Operations Training Manager
C. Snell, Protective Strategy Program Manager
R. Stroud, Site Licensing Senior Program Manager
K. Walsh, Site Vice President
M. White, Emergency Preparedness Specialist

ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, DISCUSSED, AND UPDATED

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED