IR 05000361/1994019

Corrected Pages 1 & 2 to App of Insp Repts 50-361/94-19 & 50-362/94-19

ML20149H354
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	10/31/1994
From:	Murray B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149H341	List: IR 05000361/1994019 ML20149H338
References
50-361-94-19, 50-362-94-19, NUDOCS 9411220142
Download: ML20149H354 (2)

Text

.

.-

.

APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Inspection Report: 50-361/94-19 50-362/94-19 Operating Licenses: NPF-10 NPF-15 Licensee: Southern California Edison C Parker Street Irvine. Californla Facility Name: San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. Units 2 and 3 Inspection At: San Onofre Site San Diego County. Californla inspection Conducted: July 25-29. 1994 Inspectors: J. B. Nicholas. Ph.D. Senior Radiation Specialist Facilities Inspection Programs Branch W. L. Holley. CHP, Senior Radiation Specialist Facilities Inspection Programs Branch Approved: 19, h///dL/

Ellaihe Murray. Cthef. Faci' ties Inspection DJte '

Programs Branch inspection Summary Areas Inspected (Units 2 and 3): Routine. announced inspection of the licensee's water chemistry and radiochemistry programs including water chemistry and radlochemistry confirmatory measurement Results Units 2 and 3):

. Organizational structure and staffing of the chemistry department met i Technical Specification requirements (Section 1.1).

. The chemistry department had experienced no personnel changes during the past two years (Section 1.1).

. The chemistry department was fully staffed with qualified personnel (Section 1.1).

. The chemistry department had implemented a good chemistry program (Section 1.1).

941122034p 941109 hDR ADOCK 05000361 PDR

---

. _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ .

,

.

.

.

-2-

. Excellent technically comprehensive quality assurance audits and quality assurance surveillances of the chemistry / radiochemistry program had been performed and were considered a strength (Section 2.1).

. A good water chemistry program had been implemented (Section 3.1).

. The water chemistry confirmatory measurements performance was outstanding and showed improved performance (Section 3.1).

. An excellent radiological analytical measurement program had been implemented (Section 4.1).

. State-of-the-art radiological counting instrumentation was calibrated and maintained (Section 4.1).

. The radiological confirmatory measurements performance was excellent and consistent with the high quality performance achieved during the previous NRC inspection of this area (Section 4.1).

Attachments:

. Attachment 1 - Persons Contacted and Exit Meeting

. Attachment 2 - Water Chemistry Confirmatory Measurements Results (Secondary Chemistry Laboratory)

. Attachment 3 - Water Chemistry Confirmatory Measurements Results (Primary Chemistry Laboratory)

. Attachment 4 - Criteria for Comparing Water Chemistry Analytical Measurements

. Attachment 5 - Radiological Confirmatory Measurement Results

. Attachment 6 - Criteria for Comparing Radiological Analytical Measurements i

!

l l