IR 05000361/1994019
| ML20149H354 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1994 |
| From: | Murray B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149H341 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-94-19, 50-362-94-19, NUDOCS 9411220142 | |
| Download: ML20149H354 (2) | |
Text
.
.-
.
APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
Inspection Report:
50-361/94-19 50-362/94-19 Operating Licenses:
NPF-10 NPF-15 Licensee:
Southern California Edison Co.
23 Parker Street Irvine. Californla Facility Name:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. Units 2 and 3 Inspection At:
San Onofre Site San Diego County. Californla inspection Conducted:
July 25-29. 1994 Inspectors:
J. B. Nicholas. Ph.D.
Senior Radiation Specialist Facilities Inspection Programs Branch W. L. Holley. CHP, Senior Radiation Specialist Facilities Inspection Programs Branch Approved:
19, h///dL/
Ellaihe Murray. Cthef. Faci' ties Inspection DJte
'
Programs Branch inspection Summary Areas Inspected (Units 2 and 3):
Routine. announced inspection of the licensee's water chemistry and radiochemistry programs including water chemistry and radlochemistry confirmatory measurements.
Results Units 2 and 3):
Organizational structure and staffing of the chemistry department met
.
i Technical Specification requirements (Section 1.1).
The chemistry department had experienced no personnel changes during the
.
past two years (Section 1.1).
The chemistry department was fully staffed with qualified personnel
.
(Section 1.1).
The chemistry department had implemented a good chemistry program
.
(Section 1.1).
941122034p 941109 hDR ADOCK 05000361 PDR
.
.
..
.
---
,
.
.
.
-2-Excellent technically comprehensive quality assurance audits and quality
.
assurance surveillances of the chemistry / radiochemistry program had been performed and were considered a strength (Section 2.1).
A good water chemistry program had been implemented (Section 3.1).
.
The water chemistry confirmatory measurements performance was
.
outstanding and showed improved performance (Section 3.1).
An excellent radiological analytical measurement program had been
.
implemented (Section 4.1).
State-of-the-art radiological counting instrumentation was calibrated
.
and maintained (Section 4.1).
The radiological confirmatory measurements performance was excellent and
.
consistent with the high quality performance achieved during the previous NRC inspection of this area (Section 4.1).
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Persons Contacted and Exit Meeting
.
Attachment 2 - Water Chemistry Confirmatory Measurements Results
.
(Secondary Chemistry Laboratory)
Attachment 3 - Water Chemistry Confirmatory Measurements Results
.
(Primary Chemistry Laboratory)
Attachment 4 - Criteria for Comparing Water Chemistry Analytical
.
Measurements Attachment 5 - Radiological Confirmatory Measurement Results
.
Attachment 6 - Criteria for Comparing Radiological Analytical
.
Measurements i
l
-
-.
-
-