IR 05000331/1991004

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-331/91-04 on 910204-08 (Ref 10CFR73.21(c)(2)).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Security Program Plans,Audits, Protected & Vital Area Physical Barriers & Testing
ML20029B322
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/1991
From: Creed J, Madeda T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20029B320 List:
References
50-331-91-04, 50-331-91-4, NUDOCS 9103070056
Download: ML20029B322 (2)


Text

,

,

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM'SSION REGION 111 Report No. 50-331/91004(0055)

Licerce No. DPR-49 Licensee:

lowa Electric Light and Power Company P. O. Box 351 Cedar Rapids, IA 52406 Ir:spection At: Duane Arnold Energy Center, Polo, Iowa Inspection Conducted:

February 4-8, 1991 Inspector:

N-Mh

~

Date M

T. J. HaTedi v

Physical Security Inspector Ch t il Approved By:

f Qames R. CrEB' MIET Dale

~

%feguards Section Inspection Summary Inspection on February 4-8 1991 (Report No. 50-331/91004(DRSSM

ArEai Insp~ecleBi-~REutT6E unannouhccTphysiciTIEcurity inspection TE31vliig: ilihagement Support, Security Program Plans, and Audits; Protected and Vital Area Physical Barriers, Detection and Assessment Aics; Protected and Vital Area Access Control of Personnel, Packeges and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and Communications; Power Supply;- Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures; Security Training and Qualification; Security Audit; Physical Barriers-Protected Area; Security Power Supply System; Lighting; Compensatory Measures; Assessment Aids; Detection Aids-Protected Area; Alarm Stations and Training and Qualification-General Requirements.

Results: The licensee was -f ound to be in compliance with NRC requirements in The areas examined.

Three weaknesses in the implementation of the security program were identified.

The weaknesses involved poor search practices; control of personnel access to vital areas; and implementation of physical agility requirements.

Management support for the program was good as demonstrated by the procurement and installation of upgraded protected area barriers; intrusion detection and assessment systems; end plans to install new computer equipment.

Management's involvement in assuring the identification and resolution of technical security AttachmMt 9

~

Oli SAIE{

gg

,

9103070056 910228 i peas JM*d

~"

PDR ADOCK 05000331.

h60

PDR t

.

..-

-.

_ - - - -..

-

--..

.

..

.. _ _ _.

..

-

.

issues was weak as evidenced by the identified program weaknesses. Security interface with maintenance support was adequate.

Staffing and training of the security organization was adequate.

(DETAILS )

r

'

Enclomiro Contatna SAFEGUGDS Ilif'0DIATI0Y Upon 5:p.*rctica Thia Pago In Id o 2t olled

'

-,

- -