IR 05000305/1985004

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safeguards Insp Rept 50-305/85-04 on 850408-11.Major Areas Inspected:Security Plan & Procedures,Testing & Maint & Weaknesses Identified in Previous SALP Rept.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
ML20128K893
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 05/21/1985
From: Creed J, Knicely J, Madeda T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128K867 List:
References
50-305-85-04, 50-305-85-4, NUDOCS 8505310246
Download: ML20128K893 (2)


Text

~_ s 3' .

/

u U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION

. ,

REGION'III

' Report No.~50-305/85004(DRSS)

.

Docket'No. 50-305 License No. DPR-43 Safeguards ~Grotp IV-Licensee: -Wisconsin Pubite Service Corporation Post Office Box 1200 Green Bay, WI 54305 Facility Name: Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant

'

Inspection'At: Kewaunee' Site, Kewaunee, WI Inspection Conducted: ' April.8-11, 1985

--Date of .Last Physical Security Inspection: May 7-11, 1984 ft:adtd<-

Inspectors: T. J. Madeda 5/E/k8 Physical Securit I spector Date

, 'J. A..Knic f/lb Physica1 Security Inspector Date Approved By: . Chief kW[Bf Sa guards Section Date

-

Inspection Summary Inspection on April 8-11, 1985 (Report No. 50-305/85004(DRSS))

Areas Inspected: Included a review of security plan and implementing procedures; management effectiveness; testing and maintenance; compensatory measures; access control personnel and packages; detection aids protected area; alarm stations; physical barriers protected and vital areas and followup on.noncompliances and unresolved item Reviewed weaknesses / concerns in the above areas which were identified as a result of a Region III analysis of

previous' inspection findings, 10 CFR 73.71 security event reports, and the

, previous SALP repor The inspection involved 52 inspector-hours by two NRC )

~ inspector The inspection began during a day shift perio '

-Results:- Previously identified concerns / weaknesses were found to have been :

satisfactorily corrected. Additional concerns were noted in the areas of l compensatory measures and access control to vital areas. (Refer to Sections !

.6 and 8). The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the areas examined during the inspection except for the following

. item:

Enclosure contains h50m N k NPDR G . Upon~ separation this

'

i Page is Decontrolled

_ i

. _ . .

=

.. ; .

.

,- _

Access Control ' Personnel: ' Background screening was not adequately cospleted

~for some. unescorted personnel; (Details: UNCLASSIFIED,. )

,

Enclosure contains Upon'soparation this page is Decontrolled >

e.