IR 05000305/1985004

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safeguards Insp Rept 50-305/85-04 on 850408-11.Major Areas Inspected:Security Plan & Procedures,Testing & Maint & Weaknesses Identified in Previous SALP Rept.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
ML20128K893
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 05/21/1985
From: Creed J, Knicely J, Madeda T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128K867 List:
References
50-305-85-04, 50-305-85-4, NUDOCS 8505310246
Download: ML20128K893 (2)


Text

~_

s 3'

.

/

u U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION

.

,

REGION'III

' Report No.~50-305/85004(DRSS)

.

Docket'No. 50-305 License No. DPR-43 Safeguards ~Grotp IV-Licensee: -Wisconsin Pubite Service Corporation Post Office Box 1200 Green Bay, WI 54305 Facility Name:

Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant

'

Inspection'At:

Kewaunee' Site, Kewaunee, WI Inspection Conducted: ' April.8-11, 1985

--Date of.Last Physical Security Inspection: May 7-11, 1984 ft:adtd<-

Inspectors:

T. J. Madeda 5/E/k8 Physical Securit I spector Date

'J. A..Knic f/lb

,

Physica1 Security Inspector Date Approved By:

J.

Chief kW[Bf

.

Sa guards Section Date Inspection Summary

-

Inspection on April 8-11, 1985 (Report No. 50-305/85004(DRSS))

Areas Inspected:

Included a review of security plan and implementing procedures; management effectiveness; testing and maintenance; compensatory measures; access control personnel and packages; detection aids protected area; alarm stations; physical barriers protected and vital areas and followup on.noncompliances and unresolved items.

Reviewed weaknesses / concerns in the above areas which were identified as a result of a Region III analysis of

previous' inspection findings, 10 CFR 73.71 security event reports, and the previous SALP report.

The inspection involved 52 inspector-hours by two NRC

)

,

~ inspectors.

The inspection began during a day shift period.

'

-Results:- Previously identified concerns / weaknesses were found to have been satisfactorily corrected. Additional concerns were noted in the areas of compensatory measures and access control to vital areas.

(Refer to Sections

.6 and 8).

The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the areas examined during the inspection except for the following

. item:

Enclosure contains h50m N k N s._ G

.

Upon~ separation this

'

PDR Page is Decontrolled

_

i

. _..

=

.. ;.

.

,- _

Access Control ' Personnel: ' Background screening was not adequately cospleted

~for some. unescorted personnel; (Details:

UNCLASSIFIED,. )

,

Enclosure contains Upon'soparation this page is Decontrolled

>

e.