IR 05000287/2012013
| ML13022A362 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 01/16/2013 |
| From: | Nease R NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1 |
| To: | Gillespie T Duke Energy Corp |
| References | |
| IR-12-013 | |
| Download: ML13022A362 (8) | |
Text
January 16, 2013
SUBJECT:
ERRATA OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 3 - REACTOR PROTECTIVE SYSTEM/ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (RPS/ESPS)
DIGITAL MODIFICATION - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INSPECTION REPORT 05000287/2012013 (ML12366A264)
Dear Mr. Gillespie:
October 9, 2012
SUBJECT:
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 3 - REACTOR PROTECTIVE
SYSTEM/ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (RPS/ESPS)
DIGITAL MODIFICATION - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INSPECTION REPORT 05000287/2012013
Dear Mr. Gillespie,
Jr.:
On November 21, 2012, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3 reactor facility. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed with you and/or other members of your staff on October 9, 2012, and December 20, 2012.
The inspection was performed in accordance with Inspection Procedure 52003, Digital Instrumentation and Control Modification Inspection, and also focused on the list of recommended Site Inspection Follow-Up Items outlined in the RPS/ESPS Safety Evaluation dated January 28, 2010, (ADAMS Accession Number ML100220016). The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety, compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The team reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. No findings were identified during this inspection.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, its Enclosures, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the
Attachment 3.8 Indication and Annunciation
a. Inspection Scope
The team reviewed procedures, performed walkdowns, and observed control room operations and testing; to verify proper indication and annunciation for system failures, and system bypass were functional, and met the licensing basis as stated in the SER.
b. Observations and Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit Meeting
Exit Meeting Summary
The inspection team presented the inspection results to the staff during an exit with members of licensee management and staff on October 9, 2012. Additional follow-up in-office review was conducted by the inspectors through November 21, 2012. The team leader contacted Oconee licensing staff on December 20, 2012, to inform them that there would be no changes to previous conclusions. The inspectors asked the licensee if any of the material examined during the inspection should be considered proprietary and no proprietary information was identified.
ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION