IR 05000267/1986035
| ML20215N595 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 11/04/1986 |
| From: | Jaudon J, Skow M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215N593 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-267-86-35, NUDOCS 8611070051 | |
| Download: ML20215N595 (5) | |
Text
.
..
APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION REGION IV-
-NRC Inspection Report:
50-267/86-35 License: DPR-34 Docket: 50-267 Licensee: Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC)
P.O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0804 Facility Name:
Fort St..Vrain Nuclear Generating Station (FSV)
Inspection At:
Platteville, Colorado Inspection _ Conducted: October 6-10, 1986 O
h 4 d Inspector:
e:<
E.
kow Project Engineer, Project Date
Sec ion A, Reactor Projects Branch Vh Approved:
rgw h/1
. P/. Jau on, Chief, Project Section A Date Readtor rojects Branch
,
Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted October 6-10, 1986 (Report 50-267/86-35)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of licensee event reports (LERs), surveillance procedures and records, surveillance testing and calibration control program, and previous inspection findings.
Results: Within the four areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8611070051 861104 PDH ADOCK 05000267 G
.s.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted.
- M. J. Ferris, Quality Assurance Operations Manager
- R. L. Craun, Nuclear Site Engineering Manager
- C. H. Fuller, Station Manager
- F. J. Novachek, Technical / Administrative Services Manager
.
- J. R. Reesy, Staff Assistant
- R. 'S. Burchfield, Superintendent, Nuclear Betterment Engineering
- A. L. Greenwood, Supervisor, QA Auditing
- M. Lehr, QA Engineering Supervisor J. W. Gahm, Manager, Nuclear Production Division G. L. Redmond, QC Supervisor K. A. Purnell, Licensing Specialist B. Cross, I&C Supervisor R. Burgess, I&C Supervisor K. Odenbaugh, Instrument Technician J. O' Conner, Results Engineer D. Horihan, Scheduling Technician J. Pinner, Sr. Instrument Technician
~
The NRC inspector also contacted other licensee personnel including administrative, clerical, and operations personnel.
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Status of Previously' Identified Open Items The following items were reviewed and closed:
i l
(Closed) Violation 267/8501-01, Failure to Follow Procedure. Tije violation concerned receiving inspection of control rod drive parts. The' parts had been required to be inspected to MRIM-2.4, however, since the licensee had planned to delete MRIM-2.4, it was not used. MRIM-1 ha.d been intended to replace the MRIM-2.4 requirements; however, revisions had not been completed. The NRC inspector reviewed procedure MRIM-1, Issue 7, dated April 28,1986. Clarification had been made to the section covering receiving inspections. MRIM-2.4 has also been deleted.
(Closed) Violation 267/8533-01, Failure to Perform Safety Evaluation for.
The NRC inspector reviewed procedure SMAP-18, Issue 2, temporary gages.
dated July 11, 1986.
SMAP-18 had been revised to require a safety evaluation be performed on Temporary Configuration Requests. The gage noted in NRC Inspection Report 50-267/85-33 has been calibrated'and placed on the Master Calibration Schedule and a Safety Evaluation has been complete._
.
,
-
w
-
,
i
,
!
f
.~,
,
. :.. ;..
,
7.'
g
,
,
.
-
-.
w
,
- ..
,s
-
-
,
-
,
>-
.
-
.
-
.
,
,
(Closed) Violation 267/8533-02, Failure to Review Design Changes.'-The
'
violation concerned review of suitability of consumables such as
'
lubricating oil when the selected material is changed....The NRC inspector.
reviewed procedures Q-4.. Issue 8, dated July 9, 1986, and MAP 20, Issue 1, dated April 22, 1986. Q-4 requires that off-the-shelf consumables be controlled in accordance with MAP-20. MAP-20 provides a mechanism for establishment and maintenance of an Allowable Consumables and Equivalents List.
Closed Violation 267/8608-01, Failure to Follow Procedures.
Closed Violation 267/8608-02, Failure to follow Technical Specifications.-
Closed Deviation 267/8608-03, Onsite Review Comittee Attendance.
The three items above are related to the Plant Operations Review Comittee (PORC) and its makeup and review requirements.
Procedure NPAP-2, Issue 2, dated August 15, 1986, was reviewed by the NRC inspector. The scope of the PORC Charter has been redefined and clarified in NPAP-2.
(Closed)' Violation 267/8608-04, Failure to Control Design Changes. The design change that was to have been included in Change Notice CN-1798A as directed by Deviation Request DR 85-35-1-H has been included and completed by CN-1902C.
In addition, personnel have been reinstructed in CN reissue procedures.
.
(Closed) Violation 267/8608-05, Failure to Follow Technical Specifications.
The NRC inspector reviewed procedure NLF-8, Issue 1, dated July 21, 1986, Procedure for 10 CFR 50.59 Annual Report. NLF-8'provides the date by which the annual report shall be submitted to the NRC.
The following item was reviewed and remains open.
(0 pen)OpenItem 267/8605-01, Reevaluation of functional test and performance.
The concern noted in the open item was that the testing of CN 1576 appeared inadequate.
Functional Test FT-1576 performed a test or 6 change to inhibit a steam water dump at less than 20 percent feedwater flow.
Functional Test FT-1576 has been rewritten and appears to be adequate.
However, the portion of the revised test that verified that a steam water dump is not inhibited when feedwater flow is greater than 20 percent of rated flow had been completed prior to power operations requiring greater than 20 percent feedwater flow. This item remains open until NRC inspection verifies that FT-1576 has been completed.
3.
Review of LERs The following LERs were reviewed and closed. Discussion is included in paragraph 4.86-013 Operation Prohibited by Technical Specifications86-016 Hydraulic Power System Surveillance Not Completed Within Specified Time
'
,
_
....
4.
Surveillance Procedures and Records The purpose of this portion of the inspection was to ascertain whether the surveillance of safety-related systems and components is being conducted in accordance with approved procedures as required by the Technical Specifications.
In this regard, the NRC inspector reviewed'the following documents:
Document Number Rev.
Date Title Q-11 Issue 6 06-02-86 Test Control SMAP-1 Issue 5 09-02-86 Technical Specifications Surveillance Testing Program 09-30-86 Surveillance Past Scheduled Date and Approaching Late Date From the Technical Specifications, the.NRC inspector selected 27 surveillance requirements for review.
The surveillance procedures were reviewed to verify conformance to the Technical Specification requirements. The scheduling report was reviewed.
Any overdue surveillances appeared to.be because plant conditions in the outage could not support their accomplishment.
Discussions were held with various personnel concerning performance, processing, scheduling, and rescheduling of surveillances.
The licensee stated that all required surveillances would be current prior to start up.
A potential area for problems was the test equipment requirements listed in the surveillance procedures.
Examples noted include:
"Heise Gauge, Calibrated Torque Wrench, Test Gauge, and Pressure Supply." These appeared to be vague requirements in that the range, accuracy, and readability, or pressure medium (such as a gas or water) requirements were not included in the procedure.
Nine completed surveillance procedures were selected from the 27 procedures
. reviewed above for additional follow up. The equipment used during those surveillances appeared to have been adequate.
During the inspection, the NRC inspector watched for any specific programmatic area which may led to the events described in the LERs noted in paragraph 3.
However, no violations or deviations were noted, and the LERs are considered closed.
5.
Surveillance Testing and Calibration Control Program The purpose of this portion of the inspection was to ascertain whether the licensee has developed programs for control and evaluation of surveillance testing and safety related instrumentation not specifically controlled by Technical Specifications.
In this regard, the NRC inspector reviewed the following documents:
.....
Document Number Rev.
Date Title Q-12 Issue 5 07-07-86 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment RP-A-04 Issue 3 09-25-86
' Requirements Governing the Control and Calibration of Test Equipment and Standards SMAP-15 Issue 1 02-28-85-Maintenance Department Calibrated Tools, Test Equipment and Standards -
MQCIM-1 Issue 5 10-07-86 Maintenance Quality Control-Inspection Program QCIM-1 Issue 7 11-20-85-Calibration of Measuring and Testing Equipment MP 102-2 Issue 7 09-03-85 Calibration of Micrometers MPC 1000 Issue 2 08-01-86 Calibration Check of Torque Wrenches Procedure Q-12 described the controls employed to assure required accuracy of measuring, test and control equipment.
Procedures RP-A-04, SMAP-15, MQCIM-1, and QCIM-1 all are implementing procedures for different parts of the licensee's organization.
Of those four organizations, the NRC inspector concentrated on the Results program as described in RP-A-04.
The nine completed surveillance procedures discussed in paragraph 4 were also used during this portion of the inspection.
The calibration records for the specific test equipment used during performance of the surveillances were reviewed.
Records for selected items of calibration equipment were also reviewed.
However, at the time of the inspection, the -
licensee stated that except for thermometers, calibration of test equipment was performed by a vendor offsite.
Records appeared adequate and complete.
Personnel from the other parts of the organization could use the Results test equipment but were required to conform to RP-A-04.
If a person using the Results equipment was familiar with and normally under one of the other three procedures, the potential exists for procedural violation.
However, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Exit Interview An exit interview was held on October 10, 1986, with those personnel denoted in paragraph 1 of this report.
The NRC resident inspector also attended this meeting.
At the meeting, the scope of the inspection and findings were summarized.