IR 05000267/1985023

Insp Rept 50-267/85-23 on 850826-30.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint,Operational Safety Verification & Periodic & Special Repts

ML20137V839
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Saint Vrain
Issue date:	09/20/1985
From:	Jaudon J, Skow M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137V818	List: IR 05000267/1985023 ML20137V815
References
50-267-85-23, NUDOCS 8510040139
Download: ML20137V839 (3)

Text

..

..

l

.

,

APPENDIX U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report: 50-267/85-23 License: DPR-34 Docket: 50-267 Licensee: Public Service Company of Colorado P.O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201 Facility Name: Fort St. Vrain Inspection At: Platteville,. Colorado Inspection Conducted: August 26-30, 1985 i

Inspectors: [ h M. E. Skow, Project Inspect f//9/97 Date Project Section A, Re o Projects Branch

Approved: - M// M d J.[.J don, Chie'f, Pr6jdct Section A

'

Da'te Peac or Projects Branch Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted August 26-30, 1985 (Report 50-267/85-23)

Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of maintenance, operational safety verification, and review of periodic and special reports. The inspection involved ~27 inspector-hours onsite and 11 inspector-hours offsite by one NRC inspecto Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie f ,

. . ... . - . - _ . ~ . _ . .

r, A

.

-2-

.

.- DETAILS '

~ . Persons Contacted

.

• J. W. Gabm, Manager Nuclear Power Operations

• C. H. Fuller, Station Manager

-

• F. J. Novachek, Technical / Administrative Services Manager

• L. W. Singleton, ' Manager, Quality Assurance (QA)

L -

• Pl. J. Ferris, QA Operations Manager

• D. Alps, Security Supervisor

• F. J. Borst, Support Services Manager

• T. Roberts, Nuclear Engineering Department

• W. D. Hart, Lead Security Officer

• J. M. Gramling, Nuclear Licensing

.

D. Evans, Superintendent, Operations-

• Denotes those present at exit intervie . Status of Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Violation (267/8506-01): Failure to provide timely corrective action. FSV Administrative Procedure G-2, "FSV Procedure Systems," has been revised. Issue 17 of G-2, Attachment G-2A, page 3, specifies that Administrative Procedures Q-2 through Q-18 are authorized solely under the signature of the Manager, Quality Assurance Division. Procedures Q-15 and Q-16, which were examples of delayed corrective action, have also been revised. This item is close . Operational Safety Certification The purpose of the inspection was to assure that the facility was being operated in conformance with regulatory ' requirements. The inspection was also to assure that the licensee's management control system was effec-tively discharging its responsibilities for continued safe operatio The NRC inspector observed Control Room activities, control room panels, reviewed operating logs, and toured the plant observing general conditions.and plant statu No violations or deviations were note . Maintenance Observation The purpose of. the inspection was to ascertain that maintenance activities of safety-related systems and components were being conducted in accordance with approved procedures, technical specifications and appropriate indus-trial codes and standard ,

n f

"

2.___

,

.-

-3-

-The NRC inspector observed portions of selected maintenance activities, including change out of a liquid waste demineralizer. The NRC inspector questioned compliance with administrative controls when a Maintenance )

Quality Control (MQC) hold point in Maintenance Procedure MP-2, Issue 1, was bypassed. However, the maintenance workers stated that SSR 85509746, which authorized the work, indicated that QC inspection was not require Quality Assurance personnel also stated that Administrative Procedure P-7 permits the QC requirements noted on the SSR to take precedence over QC hold / witness points in specified maintenance procedures. Although not a

_proce d ural violation, the NRC inspector pointed out to the licensee that this situation potentially serves to condition personnel to skip require-ments which may not, in another case, be exempted. The licensee did state that the Maintenance Procedures were in the process of being rewritte ~

The licensee further explained that the revised procedures will be more item-specific so that controls not required for a specific item will not be included in the procedur No violations or deviations were note . ' Review of Specific and Periodic Reports The inspector reviewed the annual 10 CFR 50.59 report (of changes, tests, and experiments not requiring prior NRC approval) for technical adequacy and for satisfaction of applicable reporting requirements. A portion of

'

this inspection was conducted at the Region IV office prior to the on-site inspection period. However, in order to more fully understand the basis.for some changes, the inspector had to refer to ten of the Change Notice packages on site. No violations or deviations were note . Exit Interview An exit interview was held on August 30, 1985, with Mr. Gahm and others as denoted in paragraph 1. At the meeting, the scope of the inspection was summarized.

<

e