IR 05000250/2013503
| ML13192A039 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 07/11/2013 |
| From: | Brian Bonser NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1 |
| To: | Nazar M Florida Power & Light Co |
| Linda K. Gruhler 404-997-4633 | |
| References | |
| IR-13-503 | |
| Download: ML13192A039 (11) | |
Text
July 11, 2013
SUBJECT:
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - NRC EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000250/2013503 AND
Dear Mr. Nazar:
June 21, 2013
SUBJECT:
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - NRC EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000250/2013503 AND
Dear Mr. Nazar:
On June 21, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an emergency preparedness inspection at the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 and 4. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results that were discussed on June 21, 2013, with Mr. M. Kiley and other members of plant staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
No findings were identified during this inspection.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's
"Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Brian Bonser, Chief
Plant Support Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 License Nos. DPR-31 and DPR-41
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 2013-503 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
REGION II==
Docket Nos:
05000250 and 05000251
License Nos:
Report No:
05000250/2013503 and 05000251/2013503
Licensee:
Florida Power and Light Company
Facility:
Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 and 4
Location:
Florida City, FL
Dates:
June 17 - 21, 2013
Inspectors:
M. Speck, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector
W. Loo, Senior Health Physicist
R. Baldwin, Senior Operations Engineer
T. Hoeg, Senior Resident Inspector
Approved by:
Brian Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000250/2013503 and 05000251/2013503; 06/17/2013 - 06/21/2013; Turkey Point Nuclear
Power Plant, Units 3 and 4; Exercise and Baseline Inspection
The report covered an announced inspection by one emergency preparedness inspector, one senior health physicist, one senior operations engineer, and one senior resident inspector. No findings were identified.
REPORT DETAILS
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
Prior to the arrival onsite, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)using Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation, Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b)(14).
The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment:
- The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on June 18, 2013, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards (RSPS) in 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(4), (5), (9), and (10)which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
- The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations Support Center (OSC), and Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
- Other performance areas, such as: the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
- Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports, to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
- The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on June 20, 2013, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g.
The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the Performance Indicators (PI)listed below for the period January 1, 2012, through March 31, 2013. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.
Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone
- Emergency Response Organization Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
- Emergency Response Organization Readiness (ERO)
- Alert and Notification System Reliability (ANS)
For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the ERO PI for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area are listed in the Attachment.
The inspectors reviewed various documents and are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for each of the three Emergency Preparedness PI, i.e., DEP, ERO, and ANS, on an annual basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
On June 21, 2013, the lead inspector presented the inspection results to Mr. M. Kiley, Site Vice President, and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided during the inspection.
ATTACHMENT:
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- M. Epstein, EP Manager
- J. Garcia, Engineering Director
- O. Hanek, Licensing Engineer
- M. Jones, System Engineering
- M. Kiley, Site Vice-President
- D. Mothena, Emergency Preparedness Corporate Functional Area Manager
- M. Wayland, Operations Director
- J. Wingate, EP Coordinator
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
None