IR 05000002/1979002
| ML19260A563 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Michigan |
| Issue date: | 10/10/1979 |
| From: | Boyd D, Charles Brown NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19260A562 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-002-79-02, 50-2-79-2, NUDOCS 7911210532 | |
| Download: ML19260A563 (3) | |
Text
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
.
REGION III
Report No. 50-002/79-02 License No. R-28 Licensee: University of Michigan Phoenix Memorial Laboratory Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Facility Name:
Ford Nuclear Reactor I@spection At:
Ford Nuclear Reactor Inspection Conducted:
September 18-20, 1979 f
-
Inspector:
C. H. Br wn
/d~/O~
Approved By:
D. C. Boy, Chief
/W-/O '7f Reactor Projects, Section 3 Inspection Summary Inspection on September 18-20, 1979 (Report No. 50-002/79-02)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of organizatior. logs and records, procedures review and audit. A tour of the facility was conducted and normal operations were observed. The inspection involved 16 inspector hours onsite by one NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in these areas.
1382 292 (
.
>
L.
7 911210 5725 2t_
DETAILS
.
1.
Persons Contacted
- Mr. R. Burn, Reactor Manager
- Mr. G. Cook, Assistant Reactor Manager
- Denotes licensee representatives attending the Management Interview.
2.
Organization, Log, and Records The inspector verified with discussion and by observation that the organization was consistent with the facility Technical Specifications and the licensee requirements. The review was made on approximately one half of the plant logs and records for the time period since the previous inspection.
No items of noncompli_.nce or deviations were identifL'd in this area.
2.
Procedures The inspector reviewed the following Administrative Procederes for the facility:
AP-1 Procedure Preparation reviewed 4/79 AP-2 Ford Nuclear Reactor Modification reviewed 5/79 AP-15 Fuel Cutting Procedure reviewed 4/79 AP-16 Spent Fuel Shipment orig. 3/79 AP-17 Disposal of Contaminated Heavy Water, reviewed 4/79 The procedure AP-1, Procedure Preparation, does not provide for temporary change or temporary procedures. All procedures are reviewed as stated in the review paragraph, normally annually, by the review subcommittee and signed by the Reactor Manager on the review sheet contained in each procedure.
No items of noncouplicance or deviations were identified in this area.
4.
Quality Assurance The inspector reviewed the Quality Assurance Program submitted of May 1978. All the necessary areas appeared to have been addressed sufficiently for the facility.
[))
-2-
.
5.
Tour
A tour was conducted of the facility. The cleaness appeared satisfactory and no fire hazards were noted. The inspector commented on the deposits on the sheild walls. The licensee has examined samples, and found no activity. No likely failure of any of the beam tube liners (which are aluminum buried in the concrete sheild) would result in draining the pool.
The leakage and evaporation losses has remained approximately constant.
6.
Management Interview A management interview was conducted with the licensee representatives as denoted in Paragraph 1. at the conclusion of the inspection on September 20, 1979. The scope and results of the inspection were discussed with the licensee.
1382 294-3-