IA-86-470, Ballot Approved in Part & Disapproved in Part Re SECY-85-381, Insider Safeguards Rules. Approves of Miscellaneous Amends,But Rule Too Broad & Vague
| ML20214L853 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/09/1986 |
| From: | Asselstine NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20214L519 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-470 NUDOCS 8609100414 | |
| Download: ML20214L853 (2) | |
Text
. J >,:
AFFIRMATI0N RESPONSE SHEET T0: SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION FROM: COMMISSIONER AS$ELSTINE
SUBJECT:
SECY-85-381 - INSIDER SAFEGUARDS RULES APPROVED xx in part DISAPPROVED XX in Part ABSTAIN -
NOT PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION COMMENTS:
YES NO - - C j Entered on "AS" // / / / ,/ bIbNb1URE 91 4 860904 -((j ROBINSOB6-470 PDR UAll SECRETARIAT NOTE: PLEASE ALSO RESPOND TO AND/OR COMMENT ON OGC/0PE MEMORANDUM IF ONE HAS BEEN ISSUED ON THIS PAPER.
NRC-SECY FORM DEC. 80 [j h ik'
.Qk la
- e SECY-85-381 (1) I approve the miscellaneous amendments and the search rule.
(2) I do not approve the access authorization rule as now written.
There should be a rule,,but this one is too broad and vague. I would prefer a rule that is more specific and that does not leave quite so much to be spelled out in the reg guide.
(3) I would not merely endorse the NUMARC policy statement. It has several flaws among the most important of which are:
(a) It is not clearly enforceable.
(b) The policy statement does not contain adequate protection against misuse and for the rights of individuals.
(c) Since it is not mandatory, it does not guarantee nationwide consistency.
9