ENS 41725
ENS Event | |
|---|---|
21:47 May 23, 2005 | |
| Title | Manual Scram Due to Condenser Hotwell Chemistry |
| Event Description | Based on increasing conductivity in the reactor vessel and condenser hotwell, a power reduction was initiated from 100 percent power. A manual scram was inserted at 57 percent RTP and 49 percent Core Flow based on Chemistry recommendations due to sulfates and chlorides in the hotwell. Following the scram a reduction in reactor water level to -28 inches resulted in a Primary Containment Group 2 Isolation (ESF) occurring. All isolations and systems responded as expected.
Current plant status is Hot Shutdown with plans to proceed to cold shutdown. All control rods fully inserted and decay heat is being removed with the bypass valves into the condenser. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.
After further review and evaluation it has been determined that the four hour call made May 23, 2005 per the guidance of 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B) should be retracted. A review of the event with respect to NUREG 1022 Revision 2 determined that: The manual scram was part of a pre-planned sequence to shut the plant down due to an equipment problem. The manual scram was part of a pre-planned sequence. The guidance to scram the reactor was established by the plant's Abnormal Operating Procedure addressing a condenser tube leak and was part of a preplanned sequence to prevent future equipment and component failures. The Manual Scram was not inserted to protect the plant against an event that presented a challenge to an FSAR analyzed event. In other words, this was not an Anticipated Operational Occurrence, an Accident, or a Special Event as defined in section 15.1.3 of the Unit 2 FSAR. Rather it was part of a plan to shutdown the reactor to protect against future potential equipment problems due to out of limits chemistry parameters. Further justification is provided by the fact that the manual scram was not initiated in anticipation of an automatic scram. Per NUREG 1022 Rev. 2: 'The staff also considers intentional manual actions, in which one or more system components are actuated in response to actual plant conditions resulting from equipment failure or human error, to be reportable because such actions would usually mitigate the consequences of a significant event. This position is consistent with the statement that the commission is interested in events where a system was needed to mitigate the consequences of the event.' However, the reporting requirement itself indicates that actuations that result from pre-planned sequences are not reportable. An example is provided in the NUREG of an equipment problem involving the loss of recirc pumps. In this example it is stated that: 'Even though the reactor scram was in response to an existing written procedure, this event does not involve a preplanned sequence because the loss of the recirc pumps and the resultant off-normal procedure entry were event driven, not pre-planned.' This is similar to our event, however, in the NUREG example, the reactor is scrammed to protect against the possibility of a stability event and stability is an FSAR analyzed event. In our case we were shutting down for chemistry reasons, not an FSAR type event. It is concluded that when the RPS is used to shutdown the reactor as part of a plan for the resolution of equipment problems, and the RPS is not needed to mitigate the consequences of an FSAR analyzed event, i.e., one which threatens a fission product boundary (i.e., fuel cladding, RCPB, primary and secondary containments), the RPS actuation is not reportable under 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B). The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R2DO (Haag).
On May 23, 2005 a four hour report was made per the guidance of 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), 'Any event or condition that results in an actuation of the RPS when the reactor is critical except when the actuation results from and is part of a pre-planned sequence during testing or reactor operation.' This was made per event # 41725. The report was made within the four hour time frame of 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2). The four hour report for event # 41725 was retracted on June 6, 2005. After further consideration, the retraction made on June 6, 2005 is being cancelled and the original report re-instated. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R2 DO (K. Landis) |
| Where | |
|---|---|
Hatch  Georgia (NRC Region 2) | |
| Reporting | |
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation | |
| Time - Person (Reporting Time:+-1.67 h-0.0696 days <br />-0.00994 weeks <br />-0.00229 months <br />) | |
| Opened: | Doug Simkins 20:07 May 23, 2005 |
| NRC Officer: | John Knoke |
| Last Updated: | Jun 8, 2005 |
| 41725 - NRC Website
Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"mappingservice":"leaflet","width":"350px","height":"250px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":6,"defzoom":14,"layers":["OpenStreetMap"],"image layers":[],"overlays":[],"resizable":false,"fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":true,"cluster":false,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clustermaxradius":80,"clusterspiderfy":true,"geojson":"","clicktarget":"","imageLayers":[],"locations":[{"text":"\u003Cb\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Ca class=\"mw-selflink selflink\"\u003EENS 41725\u003C/a\u003E - \u003Ca href=\"/Hatch\" title=\"Hatch\"\u003EHatch\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E\u003C/b\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003EManual Scram Due to Condenser Hotwell Chemistry\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E","title":"ENS 41725 - Hatch\n","link":"","lat":31.93298888888889,"lon":-82.34381666666667,"icon":"/w/images/1/14/Southern_Nuclear_icon.png"}],"imageoverlays":null} | |
Unit 2 | |
|---|---|
| Reactor critical | Critical |
| Scram | Yes, Manual Scram |
| Before | Power Operation (57 %) |
| After | Hot Shutdown (0 %) |
Hatch with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation | |
WEEKMONTHYEARENS 570212024-03-11T17:37:00011 March 2024 17:37:00
[Table view]10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation - ECCS Discharge Manual Reactor Trip ENS 568262023-11-01T10:48:0001 November 2023 10:48:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation - ECCS Discharge Manual Reactor Trip Due to Trip of Reactor Feed Pump ENS 564462023-03-31T18:32:00031 March 2023 18:32:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Manual Reactor Scram and Automatic Actuation of Containment Isolation Valves (Civs) ENS 556792021-12-29T20:52:00029 December 2021 20:52:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Manual Reactor Trip and Automatic Actuation of Containment Isolation Valves ENS 553942021-08-03T14:26:0003 August 2021 14:26:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Automatic Reactor Trip ENS 539532019-03-24T05:59:00024 March 2019 05:59:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Manual Reactor Scram Due to Degrading Condenser Vacuum ENS 538932019-02-23T07:12:00023 February 2019 07:12:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Automatic Actuation of 2C Emergency Diesel Generator ENS 527002017-04-21T03:45:00021 April 2017 03:45:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Valid Reactor Protection System Actuation While Shutdown ENS 526962017-04-20T07:02:00020 April 2017 07:02:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation Automatic Reactor Scram During Startup ENS 525582017-02-16T18:20:00016 February 2017 18:20:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Unexpected Autostart of an Emergency Diesel Generator ENS 519502016-05-23T14:09:00023 May 2016 14:09:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Plant Hatch Unit 2 Containment Isolation Valve Actuation ENS 487602013-02-16T08:10:00016 February 2013 08:10:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Reactor Protection System Scram Signal Due to Scram Discharge Volume High Level ENS 487382013-02-10T12:00:00010 February 2013 12:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Manual Reactor Scram Inserted Due to Degrading Reactor Water Chemistry ENS 473692011-10-24T20:11:00024 October 2011 20:11:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Manual Reactor Scram Due to Erratic Irm Indications During Startup ENS 458502010-04-16T23:17:00016 April 2010 23:17:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Loss of Cooling Accident Signal Due to High Drywell Pressure Signal ENS 451482009-06-23T07:51:00023 June 2009 07:51:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Automatic Reactor Scram Due to High Reactor Water Level ENS 451452009-06-20T18:17:00020 June 2009 18:17:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation Automatic Reactor Scram from High Reactor Pressure Scram Signal ENS 450712009-05-15T09:19:00015 May 2009 09:19:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Group 1 Isolation of All Main Steam Valves While Performing a Special Procedure ENS 450522009-05-10T14:41:00010 May 2009 14:41:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Intermediate Range Reactor Scram During Transition to Run ENS 450492009-05-08T19:15:0008 May 2009 19:15:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Inadvertant Main Steam Isolation While Performing Maintenance ENS 446792008-11-22T15:18:00022 November 2008 15:18:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation - ECCS Discharge Manual Reactor Scram After Feed Pump Trip ENS 443372008-07-04T12:39:0004 July 2008 12:39:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Automatic Reactor Scram on Turbine Trip ENS 440462008-03-07T19:46:0007 March 2008 19:46:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation - ECCS Discharge Automatic Reactor Scram with Hpci/Rcic Actuation Due to Loss of Condensate Feedwater ENS 435522007-08-07T19:06:0007 August 2007 19:06:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Reactor Scram on Low Reactor Water Level Following Partial Loss of Condensate Feedwater Flow ENS 424712006-04-05T04:16:0005 April 2006 04:16:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation - ECCS Discharge Reactor Scram Following Main Turbine Control Valve Fast Closure ENS 420962005-10-29T17:25:00029 October 2005 17:25:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(a)(1)(i), Emergency Class Declaration, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Unusual Event - Main Transformer Fire ENS 417252005-05-23T21:47:00023 May 2005 21:47:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Manual Scram Due to Condenser Hotwell Chemistry ENS 410702004-09-25T05:06:00025 September 2004 05:06:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Group 2 Containment Isolation Actuation ENS 405652004-03-03T18:45:0003 March 2004 18:45:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation Swing Diesel Generator Auto Started from a Bus Undervoltage Valid Signal 2024-03-11T17:37:00 | |