BVY 03-041, Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Changes

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Changes
ML031290288
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/2003
From: Tkaczyk L
Entergy Nuclear Northeast
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
References
BVY 03-041
Download: ML031290288 (53)
v • d • e


Text

Entergy Nuclear Northeast Vermont Yankee PO Box 0500 185 Old Ferry Road a- Entergy Brattleboro, VT 05302-0500 Tel 802 257 5271 April 30, 2003 BVY 03-041 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License No. DPR-28 (Docket No. 50-27 1)

Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Changes In accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), enclosed are the latest changes to the following Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures including the change memos and the 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Evaluation Checklists:

OP 3506, Rev. 42, LPC#1 OP 3525, Rev. 10 OP 3712, Rev. 17 These changes were determined to not need prior NRC review and approval.

If you have any questions, please contact Audra Williams, Emergency Planning Coordinator, in our Brattleboro office at (802) 258-4177.

Sincerely, ENTERGY NUCLEAR NORTHEAST VERMONT YANKEE Lori Tkaczyk Emergency Planning Manager Attachments cc: USNRC Region 1 Administrator USNRC Resident Inspector - VYNPS USNRC Project Manager - VYNPS (no attachments)

David M. Silk, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist, USNRC Region 1 Vermont Department of Public Service \,QLq5

S -

S S To: E-Plan Implementing Procedure Controlled Set Holders From: Technical Support - DCC - Angela M. Hogan Date: 04/30/03 Re: Entergy Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Change 216, Instruction Sheet A new Table of Contents is included.

LPCs: The following LPC should be incorporated into the appropriate procedures:

Proc/Rev # LPC# Procedure Title OP 3506/42 1 Emergency Equipment Readiness Check K>y REVISIONS: The following Revs should replace the appropriate procedures:

Proc/Rev # Procedure Title OP 3525/10 Radiological Coordination OP 3712/17 Emergency Plan Training

Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures Table of Contents April 30, 2003 =

Title Number Revision LPC # Use Emergency Plan Classification and Action Level Scheme AP 3125 Rev. 19 "Reference" Emergency Communications OP 3504 Rev. 36 "Reference" Emergency Preparedness Exercises and Drills OP 3505 Rev. 24 1 "Information" Emergency Equipment Readiness Check OP 3506 Rev. 42 1 "Reference" Emergency Radiation Exposure Control OP 3507 Rev. 30 "Reference" On-Site Medical Emergency Procedure OP 3508 Rev. 23 "Reference" Environmental Sample Collection During an Emergency OP 3509 Rev. 17 "Reference" Off-Site and Site Boundary Monitoring OP 3510 Rev. 27 "Reference" Off-Site Protective Action Recommendations OP 3511 Rev. 12 "Reference" Evaluation of Off-Site Radiological Conditions OP 3513 Rev. 21 "Reference" Emergency Actions to Ensure Initial Accountability and Security OP 3524 Rev. 20 "Reference"

Response

Radiological Coordination OP 3525 Rev. 10 "Reference" Emergency Call-In Method OP 3531 Rev. 16 "Reference" Emergency Preparedness Organization AP 3532 Rev. 11 "Information" Post Accident Sampling of Reactor Coolant OP 3533 Rev. 6 1 "Continuous" Post Accident Sampling of Plant Stack Gaseous Releases OP 3534 Rev. 4 "Continuous" Post Accident Sampling and Analysis of Primary Containment OP 3535 Rev. 4 "Continuous" In Plant Air Sample Analysis with Abnormal Condition OP 3536 Rev. 1 "Continuous" Control Room Actions During an Emergency OP 3540 Rev. 3 "Reference" Activation of the Technical Support Center (TSC) OP 3541 Rev. 2 "Reference" Operation of the Technical Support Center (TSC) OP 3542 Rev. 2 "Reference" Activation of the Operations Support Center (OSC) OP 3543 Rev. 0 "Reference" Operation of the Operations Support Center (OSC) OP 3544 Rev. 3 "Reference" Activation of the Emergency Operations Facility/Recovery Center OP 3545 Rev. 2 "Reference" (EOF1RC)

Operation of the Emergency Operations Facility/Recovery Center OP 3546 Rev. 3 "Reference" (EOFIRC)

Security Actions During an Emergency OP 3547 Rev. 1 1 "Reference" Emergency Plan Training OP 3712 Rev. 17 "Information" Page 1of 1

TO: i CC t) b 0 VERMONT YANKEE CONTROLLT ED DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM SECTION 1 DOCUMENT TITLE: Entergy Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures COPY NUMBER: 51/

CHANGE NUMBER: 216 ISSUE DATE: April 30, 2003 INSTRUCTIONS:

a. Attached is an authorized controlled copy to the above listed document for retention as your assigned copy.
b. Review the revised material.
c. Incorporate new change into the controlled document by document issue date, if applicable.
d. Ensure that those who use the document are aware of the change.
e. Destroy all superseded pages.
f. Destroy obsolete forms and insert new forms into the files.
g. Sign and date this form and return to the Procedures Administrative Assistant (PAA) or Document Control Center (DCC).
h. Complete appropriate change information on VY Controlled Document Record of Changes.

TRANSMITTED BY: Angela M. Hogan - MC 1220 PAA or DCC Signature AFIER COMPLYING WITH THE ABOVE INSTRUCTIONS, PLEASE RETURN TO THE PAA OR DCC WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ISSUE DATE.

SECTION 2 The undersigned acknowledges completion of the preceding instructions.

</ Signature of Recipient: Date:_

VYAPF 6805.01 (Sample)

AP 6805 Rev. 19 Page 1 of 1

I.7 VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION iPERATINlNG ROEDURE OP 3506 REVISION 42 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT READINESS CHECK USE CLASSIFICATION: REFERENCE LPC Effective Affected Pages No. Date 1 04/30/03 VYOPF 3506.02 Pgs 14,18 & 19 of 28; VYOPF 3506.07 Pg 1 of 1; VYOPF 3506.09 Pg 1 of 2; VYOPF 3506.10 Pg 1 of 1; VYOPF 3506.12 Pg 1 of 1 IImplementation Statement: N/A Issue Date: 04/02/03 OP 3506 Rev. 42 Pagel of 16 -

I EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST (Continued)

ITEMS INITIALS

4. RM-14 with HP-210 Probe (4)
a. Battery check OK
b. Calibration up-to-date Calibration Due Date Calibration Due Date
5. Gamma Dose Rate Meter (5)
a. Battery check OK
b. Calibration up-to-date Calibration Due Date Calibration Due Date
6. Inspect respirators (16) per DP 4579
a. Check expiration date on filter canisters (16)
b. VYDPF 4579.04 completed and submitted for review D. Site Boundary Team Kit
1. Site Boundary clipboard
a. Implementing procedure checklist (OP 3510) (2 copies) Rev. LPC#

I Current Rev. #

I LPC#_

b. Paper pad
2. High range dosimeters (4)
a. Calibration up-to-date (Cal. Due Date)
b. Dosimeter charger operational check
3. Check Source
a. Strength >1 mR/hr. and

<4mR/hr VYOPF 3506.02 OP 3506 Rev. 42 Page 14 of 28 LPC #i

EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST (Continued)

ITEMS INITIALS F. All equipment and materials returned to the kits and the kits sealed G. RP Checkpoint

1. OSC Dosimetry Kit
a. Dosimeters
1) 20 Self Reading Dosimeters (SRDs)
2) 1 SRD Charger (AC)
3) 20 TLDs
4) 2 TLD Controls
5) 6 Extremity TLDs
6) 2 Extremity Controls
b. Procedures
1) AP 0506, Personnel Monitoring Rev. LPC#
2) AP 0525, Dosimetry Processing Rev. LPC#

I

3) AP 0546, Planned Special Exposure Rev. LPC#

I

4) OP 3507, Emergency Radiation Exposure Control Rev. LPC#

I

5) General Access RWP
c. Forms
1) NRC Form 4
2) Exposure History Release Forms
3) VYAPF 0525.06, Pregnant Woman Declaration Form Rev. LPC#

I

4) VYAPF 0506.08, Multibadge TLD Location Form Rev. LPC#

VYOPF 3506.02 OP 3506 Rev. 42 Page 18 of 28 LPC #1

EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST (Continued)

TmSTMC TITNPTIAL

5) VYOPF 3507.01, Personnel Exposure Log pR-e LPC#
6) VYAPF 0506.07, Administration Radiation Exposure Control Change Request Rev. LPC#

I

7) VYAPF 0525.09, Lost, Damaged or Misused Dosimetry Report Rev. LPC#

I

8) VYAPF 0525.08, Visitor/Tour Member Logsheet Rev. LPC#

I

9) AF.01, PADs Consent Form
10) VYAPF 0525.07, Reg. Guide 8.13 1 Logsheet Rev. LPC#
11) VYAPF 0525.11, RWP Sign-In Sheet Rev LPC #
2. Medical Team Emergency Electronic Dosimeters (5)

Lpc I

a. Calibration Cal Due DAte up-to-date
b. Replace batteries
3. Computer w/Rtime operational (Checkpoint)

H. Maintenance Shop Entrance

1. Medical Team Emergency Electronic Dosimeters (5)

LPc4 Cal Due DAte

a. Calibration up-to-date
b. Replace batteries I

Performed by: Date:

(Print/Sign)

VYOPF 3506.02 OP 3506 Rev. 42 Page 19 of 28 LPC #1

PROCEDUREIFORM COPY UPDATE WORKSHEET BRATTLEBORO PROCEDUREIFORM LOCATIONS VERNON LOCATIONS OSC Off-Site Gate II No. Rev. LPC# #1 #2 #3 S. Rm TSC Kits Kits Kit 0506 __-=_A __

0506.07 .

0506.08 0 5 2 5_ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __

0525.06 __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _

0525.07 .

0525.08 l .

0525.09 _ _.

0525.11 ____ _= _

05376 0546 _

3507 3507.010 351000 3525 _ _ __

3542.01 4533.01 7019 _ X

______ -__ __A VYP:317 __ ___

VYOPF 3506.07 OP 3506 Rev. 42 Page 1 of 1 LPC#1

EOF EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES AND STATUS FORMS BOOK UPDATE Change #

Initials A. Emergency Equipment Cabinet #1 for use by the Site Recovery Manager

1. Update Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures per the Procedure Change Memo
2. Update ERF Directory (OP 3504, Emergency Communications)
3. Update status forms book for any changes to the following:
a. AP 3125, Emergency Plan Classification and Action Level Scheme (4 large copies of appendices for Sprinkler Room)
b. OP 3511, Off-Site Protective Action Recommendations
c. VYOPF 3511.01, Protective Action Recommendation Worksheet
d. VYOPF 3546.02, Emergency Classification and PAR

]II.C I Notification Upgrade Form

e. VYOPF 3546.01, Plant Status Briefing Form TC f. OP 3546, Appendices: A,B,C,E,F,I,J,K,M,N,O,P,Q B. Emergency Equipment Cabinet #2 for use by the EOF Coordinator
1. Update Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures per the Procedure Change Memo
2. Update ERF Directory (OP 3504, Emergency Communications)
3. Update status forms book for any changes to the following:
a. VYOPF 3542.01, Personnel Accountability Log
b. VYOPF 3504.02, Plant Parameters
c. OP 3511, Off-Site Protective Action Recommendations VYOPF 3506.09 OP 3506 Rev. 42 Page 1 of 2 LPC #1

OSC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES AND STATUS FORMS BOOK UPDATE Change #

Initials A. Update Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures per the Procedure Change Memo B. Update status forms drawer for any changes to the following:

1. OP 3507, Emergency Radiation Exposure Control
2. OP 3544, Appendix A - Alert - Radiological Habitability Assessment
3. OP 3544, Operation of the Operations Support Center
4. VYOPF 3544.01, Emergency Conditions Radiological Assessment Form
5. VYOPF 3544.02, OSC Team Work Status Form
6. VYOPF 3507.01, Personnel Exposure Log
7. VYOPF 3507.02, Emergency Radiation Exposure Briefing/Debriefing K> 8. VYOPF 3507.03, Potassium Iodide Administration Record
9. VYOPF 3524.02, Initial Site Accountability Check-In Form Lpc 10. OP 3543, Table 1 - Personnel Assignment List
11. VYOPF 3542.01, Personnel Accountability Log Discrepancies or Comments:

Performed By /

(Print/Sign) Date Reviewed By /

EPC (Print/Sign) Date VYOPF 3506.10 OP 3506 Rev. 42 Page 1 of 1 LPC #1

TSC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES AND IFC( IMPLEMENTING FORMS BOOK UPDATE 11-Change #

A. Update Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures per the Procedure Change Memo B. Update status forms book for any changes to the following:

1. OP 3542, Operation of the Technical Support Center I 2. VYOPF 3542.01, Personnel Accountability Log
3. VYOPF 3524.02, Initial Site Accountability Check In Form
4. VYOPF 3504.02, Plant Parameters
5. VYOPF 3540.06, Emergency Classification and PAR Notification Form C. Update five (5) clipboards for any changes to the following:
1. VYOPF 3542.01 Personnel Accountability Log.

L D. Update (1) clipboard for any changes to the following:

1. VYOPF 3524.02, Initial Site Accountability Check In Form Discrepancies or Comments:

Performed Bly.1, I (Print/Sign) Date trv Reviewed '- -7 l EPC (Print/Sign) Date VYOPF 3506.12 OP 3506 Rev. 42 Page 1 of 1 LPC #1

PREAPPROVED LPC FORM 1 PART 1 - Initiation F] Converted to Admin. Revision # LPC No: /

A. Procedure No.: OP 3506 Current Revision #: 42

Title:

Emergency Equipment Readiness Check B. Description of Change:

Changed the number of RM-14's and Gamma Dose Rate Meters due to the elimination of GHH team.

S Increased the number of TLDs in the OSC Dosimetry Kit. A d&eA

  • - metc Advisor Iorj b%oL f CCIA 4 1.

0 Removed the line requiring a RevJLPCN for the AF.01 forms.

Added Medical Team Emergency Electronic Dosimeters to Check Point area and Maintenance Shop Entrance. (ER-2003-0619_01) 0 Removed AF.01 form from VYOPF 3506.07.

0 Added OP 3546 Appendices to VYOPF 3506.09 for the EOF status forms book.

Added OP 3543, Table I and VYOPF 3542.01 to VYOPF 3506.10 for the OSC status forms drawer.

- VYOPF 3506.12 - changed the (5) clipboards to VYOPF 3542.01 forms and added (1) clipboard with VYOPF 3524.02 forms.

C. Reason for Change: C Result of Design Change, Minor Mod, EDCR Li Related ER No._-

3 Other: Identified during RP surveillance & ER-2003-0619 01 LI Editorial D. Duration: 3 Permanent R One Time Only I. Originator (Print/Sign/Date)

E. Surveillance Database Change? E] Yes, change submitted E No (Use AP 0096, App. A as a reference)

F. Procedure Type: 3 Technical Li Admin. (AP,PP) (Complete & attach AP 0096 App. C, G. AP 0091, Risk Assessment El Yes N No unless editorial)

H. Page(s) affected: VYOPF 3506.02 pgs 14, 18. 19: VYOPF 3506 07 Pg 1: Audra Williams 4/15/03 VYOPF 3506 09 pv 1: VYOPF 3506 10 pgl: VYOPF 3506 12 pg 1. Lt PART 2 - Review/Approval (Refer to LPC Criteria of Apendix A)

A. Technical Verification Review (Print/Sign/Date) (Use B. Cross-Discipline Review(s) (Print/Sign/Date)

AP 0096, Appendix B asLIce3e n N/A LI N/A

/ 4/*3 Audra Williams 4/15/03 (May perform QualifiedReview) (N/A if editorial change)

C. Qualified Review (Print/Sign/Date) (Use AP 0096, D. 50.59 review completed type:

Appendix D, as a reference) El N/A El AD/Screen LI Evaluation z N/A IUC'ttv W JI (N/A if editorial change)

(N/A if editorial change) 3 50.54(q) (EPIP only)

ER(Le-.d1 E. RPO Approval (Print/Sign/D3) '/// 5 F. IF 50.59 Evaluation: 3 N/A

.8Ctc-ti1l til /PORC Mtg. Date:

G. Plant Manager (Print/ gnlDate) (SPs only)

N/A H. Training: (Required for Admin Procedures, unless editorial) LI NIA E-Mail Notification to RP I. Effective Date: 4/30/03 CDS Initials L...'

VYAPF 0097.01 AP 0097 Rev. 3 Page 1 of I

APPENDIX C CROSS-DISCIPLINE REVIEW CHECKLIST Required to be completed for new procedures, procedure revisions, and LPCs unless they are designated as Editorial.

Procedure Number/Revision 0 P 350 ( E eq. q p, Ut I Reviewer/Date (Print) Avdra f ;1;i o m 5 V// 5/>r GENERAL REVIEW GUIDELINES/SPECIAL REVIEW REQUIREMENTS

  • The Cross-Discipline Review Guidelines below constitute minimum review requirements; other reviews may apply.
  • Determination of reviews should focus on changesmade to a procedure and the potential impact of those changes on the affected group. Changes that are minimally or nonimpacting do not need review by the potentially affected group.

If change impact is unclear, the procedure should be routed to the potentially affected group for review.

. New or revised Administrative or Program Procedures that significantly impact other departments, shall be reviewed by the appropriate Superintendent or Senior Manager. The PAA maintains a list of these Administrative and Program Procedures.

. ALL noneditorial changes to Special Process procedures (WP, NE, heat treating, etc.), including Vendor Procedures that address Special Processes, shall be reviewed by: a Welding Engineer (welding procedures) ora NDE Level III certified in the method addressed by the procedure (nondestructive examination procedures), AND the Quality Assurance Manager, AND submitted to the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector (ANII) prior to use.

  • A "YES' indicates that a Cross Discipline Review shall be done by the indicated Department. Document the review on VYAPF 0096.01, VYAPF 0097.01, or VYAPF 0097.02, as applicable.

APPLICABLE YES I NO Chemistry:

  • Potentially affects condensate, feedwater, or reactor water chemnistry, or chemistry instruments.
  • Procedures that implement the requirements of the VY Environmental Program.

(see PP 7603, Appendix A) V

  • Produces/affects effluents or effluent monitoring (VY/QA 01-015).
  • Affects NPDES limits or method of compliance. .

Maintenance (Mech, Elec, I&C):

  • Requires Maintenance personnel to perform activities, such as performance of maintenance procedures, installation of M&Th, lifting and landing of leads and 7/

connectors.

Operations:

  • Changed requirements for entry into a Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) or v significantly changes duration of LCO.
  • Requires Operations alignment/restoration of systems or components.
  • Specifies surveillance or post maintenance testing by Operations.

EOPISAG Coordinator: '/

  • Procedures that have the potential to affect the EOPs/SAGs. .

Appendix C AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page I of 3

APPENDIX C (Continued) r Quality Assurance:

  • Changes to procedures that implement the requirements of the VOQAM. (see PP 7802, Appendix B)
  • New procedures that have a potential for reduction of VOQAM commitments.

Radiation Protection:

  • Involves work that breaches contaminated systems or components.
  • Changes in radwaste or hazardous waste generation.

Emergency Plan Coordinator:

Software Quality Assurance Administrator

  • Procedures that define how software is developed.

Reactor Engineering:

  • Could affect core reactivity, thermal power, reactor heat balance, or fuel integrity.
  • Involves refueling operations.

Systems/Project/Design Engineering:

  • Maintenance Rule in-scope systems unavailability time.
  • Involves infrequently performed test or evolution.
  • Changed requirements for entry into a Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) or significantly changes duration of LCO.
  • Significant changes in system test or operation methodology.

Appendix J Coordinator:

  • Changes that affect App. J leakrates or containment boundaries, or boundary valve mnanipulation.

Appendix R Coordinator:

  • Apoendix R implementing procedures.

Environmental Qualification (EQ) Coordinator:

  • Change in EQ test methodology or component lifetime.

. Potentially affects area EQ component environment.

Fire Protection Coordinator (FPC):

  • Fire Protection procedures.
  • Affects fire loading
  • Affects fire protection systems or component functionality.

IST Program Coordinator:

  • Inservice Testing Program implementing procedures.
  • All surveillance procedures.

ISI Program Coordinator:

  • Inservice Inspection Program implementing procedures.

Appendix C AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 2 of 3

APPENDIX C (Continued)

APPLICABLE YES NO.

Setpoint Coordinator:

  • Changes that impact setpoints, as-found/as-left tolerances, M&TE or testing V methodology.

I Nuclear & P1A

  • Potentially affects PHEEE or ORAM Sentinel Risk Models.
  • Potentially affects plant SSCs reliability.
  • Potentially affects Nuclear or Radiological Safety Analysis.

Security:

  • Proceures that implement the requirements of the VY Physical Security and Training and Qualification Plans.
  • Changes that have a potential for reduction of the VY Physical Security and Training and Qualification Plan commitments.

Appendix C AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 3 of 3

10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist List of Emergency Plan Section(s)/Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure(s) or any other document to be evaluated. (Include Title and Revision No.):

OP 3506, Emergency Equipment Readiness Check, Rev. 42, LPC #I A. Screening Evaluation Based on a review of the following questions, determine if the change has the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.

A "YES" answer to any part of the questions requires that a written evaluation be done to determine whether the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan was decreased as specified in Section B of this checklist.

A "NO" answer to all questions requires no written evaluation as specified in Section B of this checklist.

YES NO

1. Could the proposed change affect our ability to meet the following standards of IOCFR50.47(b):

(1) Assignment of Emergency Response Organization responsibilities X (2) Assignment of on-shift Emergency Response Organization personnel X (3) Arrangements for Emergency Response Support and Resources X (4) Emergency Classification and Action levels, including facility system X and effluent parameters (5) Notification Methods and Procedures X (6) Emergency Communications among principal response organizations X and the public (7) Public Education and Information X (8) Adequacy of Emergency Facilities and Equipment X (9) Adequacy of Accident Assessment methods, systems and equipment X (10) Plume exposure pathway EPZ protective actions X (11) Emergency Worker Radiological Exposure Control X (12) Medical Services for contaminated injured individuals X (13) Recovery and Reentry Plans X (14) Emergency response periodic drills and exercises X (15) Radiological Emergency Response Training X (16) Plan development, review and distribution X VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 11 Page I of 3

10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)

. I: & . -- _ -I- I" ' -- 1i'A rth Tn CA rP

-2. Cculd the ehange attcct cur ability to meet the flcew.ing requir-emenis ef -Appefndix E toIdGr l1 I YES NO

2. Could the change affect our ability to meet the following requirements of Appendix E to I OCFR50 (1) Section IV. A - Organization X (2) Section IV. B - Assessment Actions X (3) Section IV. C - Activation of Emergency Organizations x (4) Section IV. D - Notification Procedures x (5) Section IV. E - Emergency Facilities and Equipment x (6) Section IV. F - Training X I (7) Section IV. G - Maintaining Emergency Preparedness (8) Section IV. H - Recovery X B. Effectiveness Determination For each applicable (i.e., a "yes" answer specified) standard to 10CFR50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10CFR50 identified from Section A above, complete the evaluation form below to determine whether the change decreases the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and whether it continues to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.

A facsimile of the evaluation form may be used as needed and attached to this checklist.

For applicable item IOCFR50.47 (b) (8). (11). (12) & Appendix E.Section IV. E of Section A above, this change

[II DOES Z DOES NOT decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and X DOES LI DOES NOT continue to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.

BASIS FOR ANSWER:

Changes to the procedure were to properly identify the number of RM-14's, gamma dose rate meters and TLDs that now reside in the RP area since the removal of the GHH team kit. The medical team emergency electronic dosimeters and their locations were added. Other procedure changes identify the proper procedure forms located in various status forms books.

VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 11 Page 2 of 3

10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)

' C. Conclusion (Fill out appropriate information)

Z The changes made do not decrease the effectiveness 6f the Emergency Plan and continue to meet the standards of 10CFR50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10CFR50.

Li The changes made do decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and decrease our ability to meet the standards of 10CFR50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10CFR50. The following course of action is recommended:

n Revise proposed changes to meet applicable standards and requirements.

El Cancel the proposed changes.

[1 Process proposed changes for NRC approval prior to implementation in accordance with 10CFR50.54(q).

D. Impact on Other Documents (TRM, Tech Specs)

Keywords used in search: dosimeters, electronic dosimeters This change does not affect any other documents.

%3 This change does affect other documents.

Document(s) affected: OP 3508 Section(s) affected:_

E. Impact on the Updated FSAR Use AP 6036 to determine if the proposed E-Plan change modifies existing UFSAR information or requires the addition of new UFSAR information and initiate UFSAR change(s) as required.

Keywords used in UFSAR search: dosimeters. electronic dosimeters Additional Comments:

Prepared By:&r!14,aq )M. 0 / (.L le ate: 4/16/03 (Print/Sign)

. Reviewed By: Audra Williams (- (LiaDn 2 Date: 4/16/03 (Emergency Plan Coordinator) (Print/Sign)

VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 11 Page 3 of 3

VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPRATTING -,PROCEDURE h>.

OP 3525 REVISION 10 RADIOLOGICAL COORDINATION USE CLASSIFICATION: REFERENCE LPC Effective No. Date Implementation Statement: N/A I Issue Date: 04/30/2003 OP 3525, Rev. 10 Page 1 of 5

TABLE OF CONTENTS PUR P OSE .......................................................................................................................................................... ..............

3 DISCUSSION .............. ,

ATTEACHMENTS .4.. ........................ 4 REFERENCES AND C.............................

PROCEDURE .............. 4 FINAL CONDITIONS ........................... 5 OP 3525, Rev. 10 Page 2 of 5

PURPOSE To direct VY Off-Site and Site Boundary Monitoring Teams and Environmental Radiation Sampling Teams, evaluate results obtained by these teams, and coordinate and verify teams' results with off-site agencies' monitoring data.

DISCUSSION OFF-SITE AND SITE BOUNDARY MONITORING TEAMS The task of each monitoring team is to collect radiological data and air samples downwind of the plant in order to determine the extent and magnitude of any release of radioactive material. Prior to the EOF becoming operational, the OSC assigns personnel to the monitoring teams. When radio communication is established with the TSC, the TSC will assume responsibility for and direct the teams as needed until the EOF becomes operational. When the EOF becomes operational and radio contact has been established with the teams, the Radiological Coordinator assumes responsibility for the overall direction of the monitoring teams.

Teams transmit initial data to the Radiological Coordinator to facilitate rapid dose assessment of accident conditions. Samples taken are provided to the Radiological Coordinator for further radionuclide verification. Results obtained from the VY teams are immediately analyzed and the results reported to the Radiological Coordinator.

The Radiation Protection Superintendent or the Supervisor, Radiation Control determines and arranges for additional counting equipment if needed.

VY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION SAMPLING TEAMS As personnel availability and emergency conditions permit, the Radiological Coordinator, located at the EOF/RC, directs the collection of air filters and TLDs from the Off-Site Environmental Monitoring Program in downwind locations. At the discretion of the Radiological Coordinator, other environmental samples such as milk, ground water, and vegetation are collected according to methods prescribed in OP 4605, Environmental Radiation Sampling and Analysis.

OFF-SITE AGENCIES' TEAMS VY off-site teams' results are compared to off-site agencies' results for consistency and accuracy. If discrepancies are noted, the Radiological Assistant is notified by the Radiological Coordinator. To ensure consistency of information released to the public, the Radiological Coordinator attempts to resolve the inconsistent data with the off-site agencies.

OP 3525, Rev. 10 Page 3 of 5

In accordance with AP 6002, Preparing 50.59 Evaluations, the results of an Applicability Determination (AD) has determined that an AD is not required for future changes provided the scope of the procedure or program is not revised to include a different type of activity. The basis for this conclusion is that this document is an Emergency Implementing Procedure and is subject to 10CFR50.54(q) to determine if the changes decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and if they have the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10CFR50.47(b) and the requirements of 10CFR50 Appendix E.

ATTACHMENTS

1. VYOPF 3525.01 Radiological Coordinator's Log REFERENCES AND COMMITMENTS
1. Technical Specifications and Site Documents
a. None
2. Codes, Standards, and Regulations
a. None
3. Commitments
a. None
4. Supplemental References
a. OP 3509, Environmental Sample Collection During an Emergency
b. OP 3510, Off-Site and Site Boundary Monitoring
c. OP 3513, Evaluation of Off-Site Radiological Conditions
d. OP 4605, Environmental Radiation Sampling and Analysis PROCEDURE A. GENERAL
1. Obtain equipment from the Radiological Coordinator's Emergency Equipment Cabinets located in the EOFIRC.

B. OFF-SITE AND SITE BOUNDARY MONITORING TEAMS

1. When the EOF becomes operational and radio communications have been established with the teams, inform the Radiological Assistant, teams, and TSC Radio Operator, that you are assuming responsibility for the direction and coordination of the teams, consistent with OP 3510.
2. If conditions warrant, activate a third (black) off-site monitoring team.

OP 3525, Rev. 10 Page 4 of 5

3. Ensure that the appropriate field monitoring data reported to the EOF, are recorded on VYOPF 3513.03 and VYOPF 3513.04.
4. Ensure that monitoring teams are informed of pertinent information (e.g.,

escalations, when to don respirators, or take KI, if necessary).

5. Coordinate the dispatching and location of off-site monitoring teams with appropriate State representatives located at the EOF.

C. ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION SAMPLING TEAMS

1. Coordinate the implementation of OP 3509, and prioritize the assignment of desired environmental samples to be collected and analyzed.
2. Direct and coordinate the activities of the VY sampling teams in the collection of the desired environmental samples.
3. Record the appropriate information of all incoming environmental samples on VYOPF 3525.01 (e.g., TLDs, water, silage, grass, etc.).
4. Report sample results to the Radiological Assistant.
5. Compare the results of environmental samples with the results obtained by off-site agencies (if available and on similar samples).
6. Ensure that calculations are reviewed and that the results obtained are representative and accurate.
7. Keep the Radiological Assistant informed of other significant results obtained by off-site agencies.

FINAL CONDITIONS

1. Return equipment to the appropriate emergency equipment cabinets.
2. Submit completed copy of log sheets and calculations to the Radiological Assistant.
3. Close out with off-site agencies.

OP 3525, Rev. 10 Page 5 of 5

( (

RADIOLOGICAL COORDINATOR'S LOG DATE.

SMPL # TYPE TIME SAMPLE LOCATION ANALYST TIME RESULTS REVIEWER(S) TIME REPORTED P OR 0

  • iiIIII I I
  • - Preliminary, or 0 - Official VYOPF 3525.01 OP 3525 Rev. 10 Page 1 of 1

REVISED PROCEDURE CONTROL FORM PART 1 - Initiation A. Procedure No. New Revision Title OP 3525 l No. 10 I Radiolo gical Coordination l B. Review Criteria: LI Partial LI Editorial C. Periodic Review Cycle: X 2 Year (Event Driven)

X Complete EJ N/A D. List DIs & LPCs: N/A E. Description and Reasons for Procedure/Changes:

. Added text to control the need for future Applicability Determinations.

Br41c Ckobrys F. Originator Name: (App. A was used as references to create this revision, App. C is Telephone completed and attached unless Part L.B above is "Editorial".) Extension:

(Print/sign/date) Audra Williams c ,5. 1/6/03 x4177 PART 2 - Reviews A. Walk-Through Validation: L] Required Z N/A B. Technical Verification Reviewer F] N/A (App. B used as a reference)

F[] Field Walk-Through (Print/Sign/Date)

L] Table-Top L1 Simulator Validation Lwi Al7L tg C. Cross-Discipline Reviews: [I N/A Department Name Signature Date Rad Protection o3 t Mtl A D. 50.59 Review Per AP 6002, Preparing 50.59 Evaluations L N/A l 50.59 AD previously performed and documented in the text of this procedure and is still applicable.

3 50.59 Applicability Determination completed and attached; 50.59 Screening NOT required.

L] 50.59 Review Screening completed and attached, 50.59 Evaluation NOT required.

F] 50.59 Evaluation completed and attached.

E. QUALIFIED REVIEWER: Use App. D as a reference (May perform 50.59 Applicability Determination)

(Part 2.D) 2, la 02 (Print/Sign/Date) /AL(Lra WIIIWLrmS F. ORIGINATOR: Pe Comments Resolved Re-verify All DIs & LPCs Considered frinal Type (CDS or STC (SPs only)) Initial/Date muvWe 4OW l 25 roofradfter Final Type (Print/Sign/Date) Att.ar W T1'&ams lt W W Ld e 3 VYAPF 0096.01 AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 1 of 2

PART 3 - Training/Notification Requirements HA. Indicate training or notifications required to implement procedure: (Required for Administrative Procedures)

D Include in formal training (TCR submitted):

I E-Mail notification:

LI Crew Briefings:

I LI Other: A N/A PART 4-PORC Plant Operation Review Committee: L] Required X N/A Meeting No: PORC Secretary: Date: Plant Manager:

PART 5 - Approval A. Responsible Procedure Owner: (Print/Signature/Date)

Fnl-r/P/ 1v l go Gneel,4i3 B. Plant Manager (Print/Sign/Date) (For SPs Only)

~jIlk C. Special Instructions: LI N/A LI Approved for Training g Issue on DATE: 4 30 -

L Submit Surveillance Database Change per AP 4000 1 Other:

PART 6 - Issuance Procedure Change No.: ,; ) (-° Date procedure issued: G/ 3o/0 3 Notes:

VYAPF 0096.01 AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX C CROSS-DISCIPLINE REVIEW CHECKLIST Required to be completed for new procedures, procedure revisions, and LPCs unless they are designated as Editorial.

Procedure Number/Revision OP 3525. Rev. 10 Reviewer/Date (Print) Audra Williams 1/6/03 GENERAL REVIEW GUIDELINES/SPECIAL REVIEW REQUIREMENTS

  • The Cross-Discipline Review Guidelines below constitute minimum review requirements; other reviews may apply.
  • Determination of reviews should focus on changes made to a procedure and the potential impact of those changes on the affected group. Changes that are minimally or nonimpacting do not need review by the potentially affected group.

If change impact is unclear, the procedure should be routed to the potentially affected group for review.

  • New or revised Administrative or Program Procedures that significantly impact other departments, shall be reviewed by the appropriate Superintendent or Senior Manager. The PAA maintains a list of these Administrative and Program Procedures.
  • ALL noneditorial changes to Special Process procedures (WP, NE, heat treating, etc.), including Vendor Procedures that address Special Processes, shall be reviewed by: a Welding Engineer (welding procedures) or a NDE Level III certified in the method addressed by the procedure (nondestructive examination procedures), AND the Quality Assurance Manager, AND submitted to the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector (ANII) prior to use.
  • A "YES" indicates that a Cross Discipline Review shall be done by the indicated Department. Document the review on VYAPF 0096.01, VYAPF 0097.01, or VYAPF 0097.02, as applicable.

APPLICABLE YES NO Chemistry:

  • Potentially affects condensate, feedwater, or reactor water chemistry, or chemistry instruments.
  • Procedures that implement the requirements of the VY Environmental Program.

(see PP 7603, Appendix A)

  • Produces/affects effluents or effluent monitoring (VY/QA 01-015).
  • Affects NPDES limits or method of compliance. X Maintenance (Mech, Elec, I&C):
  • Requires Maintenance personnel to perform activities, such as performance of maintenance procedures, installation of M&TE, lifting and landing of leads and connectors. X Operations:
  • Changed requirements for entry into a Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) or significantly changes duration of LCO.
  • Requires Operations alignment/restoration of systems or components.
  • Specifies surveillance or post maintenance testing by Operations. _ X EOP/SAG Coordinator:
  • Procedures that have the potential to affect the EOPs/SAGs. X Appendix C AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 1 of 3

APPENDIX C (Continued)

APPLICABLE YES l NO Quality Assurance:

  • Changes to procedures that implement the requirements of the VOQAM. (see PP 7802, Appendix B)
  • New procedures that have a potential for reduction of VOQAM commitments.
  • Obtain and attach a I OCFR50.54(a)(3) evaluation. X Radiation Protection:
  • Involves work that breaches contaminated systems or components.
  • Changes in radwaste or hazardous waste generation. X Emergency Plan Coordinator:
  • Affects Emergency Plan personnel, facilities or equipment. X Software Quality Assurance Administrator
  • Procedures that define how software is developed. X Reactor Engineering:
  • Could affect core reactivity, thermal power, reactor heat balance, or fuel integrity.
  • Involves refueling operations. X Systems/Project/Design Engineering:
  • Maintenance Rule in-scope systems unavailability time.
  • Involves infrequently performed test or evolution.
  • Changed requirements for entry into a Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) or significantly changes duration of LCO.
  • Significant changes in system test or operation methodology. X Appendix J Coordinator:
  • Changes that affect App. J leakrates or containment boundaries, or boundary valve manipulation. X Appendix R Coordinator:
  • Appendix R implementing procedures. X Environmental Qualification (EQ) Coordinator:
  • Change in EQ test methodology or component lifetime.
  • Potentially affects area EQ component environment. X Fire Protection Coordinator (FPC):
  • Fire Protection procedures.
  • Affects fire loading
  • Affects fire protection systems or component functionality. X IST Program Coordinator:
  • Inservice Testing Program implementing procedures.
  • All surveillance procedures. X ISI Program Coordinator:
  • Inservice Inspection Program implementing procedures. X Appendix C AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 2 of 3

APPENDIX C (Continued)

Setpoint Coordinator:

  • Changes that impact setpoints, as-found/as-left tolerances, M&TE or testing methodology.

l Nuclear & PRA

  • Potentially affects IPEEE or ORAM Sentinel Risk Models.
  • Potentiallyaffects plant SSCs reliability.
  • Potentially affects Nuclear or Radiological Safety Analysis.

Security:

  • Proceures that implement the requirements of the VY Physical Security and Training and Qualification Plans.
  • Changes that have a potential for reduction of the VY Physical Security and Training and Qualification Plan commitments.
  • Obtain and attach a IOCFR50.54(P) Evaluation.

Appendix C AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 3 of 3

10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist List of Emergency Plan Section(s)/Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure(s) or any other document to be evaluated. (Include Title and Revision No.):

OP 3525, Rev 10, Radiological Coordination A. Screening Evaluation Based on a review of the following questions, determine if the change has the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.

A "YES" answer to any part of the questions requires that a written evaluation be done to determine whether the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan was decreased as specified in Section B of this checklist.

A "NO" answer to all questions requires no written evaluation as specified in Section B of this checklist.

1. Could the proposed change affect our ability to meet the following standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b):

(1) Assignment of Emergency Response Organization responsibilities YES NO (2) Assignment of on-shift Emergency Response Organization personnel YES NO (3) Arrangements for Emergency Response Support and Resources YES NO (4) Emergency Classification and Action levels, including facility system and effluent parameters YES NO (5) Notification Methods and Procedures YES NO (6) Emergency Communications among principal response organizations and the public YES NO (7) Public Education and Information YES NO (8) Adequacy of Emergency Facilities and Equipment YES NO (9) Adequacy of Accident Assessment methods, systems and equipment YES NO (10) Plume exposure pathway EPZ protective actions YES NO (11) Emergency Worker Radiological Exposure Control YES NO (12) Medical Services for contaminated injured individuals YES NO (13) Recovery and Reentry Plans YES NO (14) Emergency response periodic drills and exercises YES NO (15) Radiological Emergency Response Training YES NO (16) Plan development, review and distribution YES NO VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 1 of 3 RT No. lQ.E06.171

10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued) l 2. Could the change affect our ability to meet the following requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.

(1)Section IV. A - Organization YES NO (2)Section IV. B - Assessment Actions YES NO (3)Section IV. C - Activation of Emergency Organizations YES NO (4)Section IV. D - Notification Procedures YES NO (5)Section IV. E - Emergency Facilities and Equipment YES NO (6)Section IV. F - Training YES NO (7)Section IV. G - Maintaining Emergency Preparedness YES NO (8)Section IV. H - Recovery YES NO B. Effectiveness Determination For each applicable (i.e., a "yes" answer specified) standard to 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR 50 identified from Section A above, complete the evaluation form below to determine whether the change decreases the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and whether it continues to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.

A facsimile of the evaluation form may be used as needed and attached to lthis checklist.

For applicable item 10 CFR 50 N/A of Section A above, this change DOES NOT decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and DOES continue to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.

BASIS FOR ANSWER:

Added a statement to control the need of an Applicability Determination. No other changes made.

VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 2 of 3

10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)

C. Conclusion (Fill out appropriate information) 0 The changes made do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and continue to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.

0 The changes made do decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and decrease our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50. The following course of action is recommended:

o Revise proposed changes to meet applicable standards and requirements.

o Cancel the proposed changes.

O Process proposed changes for NRC approval prior to implementation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q).

D. Impact on Other Documents (TRM, Tech Specs)

Keywords used in search:

0 This change does not affect any other documents.

O This change does affect other documents.

Document(s) affected:

Section(s) affected:

E. Impact on the Updated FSAR Use AP 6036 to determine if the proposed E-Plan change modifies existing UFSAR information or requires the addition of new UFSAR information and initiate UFSAR change(s) as required.

Keywords used in UFSAR search:

Additional Comments:

-adrniniSitLth\ ca llv oy%(b.

Prepared By: Audra Williams & &Cun Date: 1/6/03 (Print/ Si n)

Reviewed By: Lon, A. .

.YoL (Emergency Plan Coordinator)(Print/SiW)

Date: _h ___

VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 3 of 3

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION K ~tivityIDocument Number: OP 3525 Revision Number: 10

Title:

Radiological Coordination Provide or attach a brief description of activities (section 6.3 of RM):

Added text to control the need for future Applicability Determinations.

Address the questions below for all aspects of the activity. If the answer is "YES" for any portion of the activity, apply the identified process to that portion of the activity. It is not unusual to have more than one process apply to a given activity. For example, a change to a door that is a fire door, a security door and a secondary containment door would require an evaluation to the Fire Protection license condition, I OCFR50.54 (p) and a 50.59 screen. See Section 4 of the "50.59 Resource Manual" (RM) for additional guidance.

1. Does the proposed activity involve a change to the: Section 4.2.1 of the RM
1. Technical Specifications or Operating License (IOCFR50.90)? Note that stand-alone changes to the TS Bases are evaluated in (If YES process per AP 0063) accordance with IOCFR50.59 per AP 0063. ER NO [E YES
2. Quality Assurance Plan, related implementing procedures (If YES contact QA for identified in PP 7802 or facility changes (10CFR50.54(a))? F3 NO M YES 4 10CFR50.54(a)(3) assessment)
3. Security Plan, related implementing procedures or facility changes (If YES contact Security for (IOCFR50.54(p))? ONO E YES 10CFR50.54(p) assessment)
4. Emergency Plan, related implementing procedures or facility (If YES contact E-Plan for changes (IOCFR50.54(q))? E NO E YES IOCFR50.54(q) assessment per AP 3532)
5. IST Program Plan, related implementing procedures or facility (If YES, and a deviation from the code changes (1 OCFR50.55a(f))? Z NO E YES requirement is required, contact Licensing to ensure applicable NRC approval is obtained per AP 0058)
6. ISI Program Plan, related implementing procedures or facility (If YES, and a deviation from the code changes (IOCFR50.55a(g))? 3 NO [E YES requirement is required, contact Licensing to ensure applicable NRC approval is obtained per AP 0058)
7. Fire protection program, related implementing procedures or (If YES provide an evaluation that facility changes (License Condition 3.F)? I3 NO [1 YES satisfies License Condition 3.F )

VYAPF 6002.03 AP 6002 Rev. 8 Page 1 of 3

II. Does the proposed activity involve: I _I Section 4.2.2 of the RM

1. Maintenance which restores SSCs to their original condition. ZN6 flyEs (If YES perform maintenance in accordance with plant procedures (e.g.

AP 0021. AP 0049. AP 0050)

2. A temporary alteration supporting maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less that has been (If YES process in accordance with (or will be) evaluated under I OCFR50.65(a)(4) prior to O NO El YES AP 0091.)

implementation?

111. Does the proposed activity involve a change to the UFSAR (including Section 4.2.3 of the RM documents incorporatedby reference) excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Review (NEI 96-07 or NEI 98-03)? O NO D YES (If YES, process FSAR change per AP 6036 "FSAR Revision Process".

Include basis for excluding IOCFR50.59 evaluation below.)

IV. Does the proposed activity involve a change to the: Section 4.2.4 of the RM I. Managerial or administrative procedures governing the conduct of Facility operations, maintenance and training (subject to the control of IOCFR50, Appendix B) (RM section 4.2.4). Some procedures (If YES process per procedure change may be VOQAM implementing procedures requiring evaluation ( AP 0095 AP 0096 per IOCFR50.54(a)(3) (prompted above). Also, Maintenance process e9g. ,

procedure changes that include changes to Design Information, not evaluated under a design change process, shall be evaluated in accordance with IOCFR50.59 0NO El YES

2. Regulatory commitment where changing commitment is not (If YES process per AP 0055 covered by another regulation based change process (NEI 99-04)? N NO El YES "Regulatory Commitment Management".)

V. Does the activity impact other plant specific programs (e.g., The ODCM and PCLRTP controlled per TS 6.7 and the PCP controlled per (If YES process per the procedure(s) for TRM Section 6 ) which are controlled by regulations, the Operating the appropriate activity.)

License, the Technical Specifications or TRM ? ONO El YES VI. Is the activity covered by any other specific regulatory change process not discussed above that would preclude the need to evaluate under (If YES document below and process per 10CFR50.59 ? (e.g., 10CFR50.46 for changes to ECCS models and applicable regulatory requirements.)

PCT changes, I OCFR50.12 for Exemption Requests, etc) 1 NO EC YES VII Does the activity require a 50.59 Screen based on the following Generic NRC correspondence? GL 95-02 for performing Analog-to-Digital upgrades, IEB 80-10 for Contamination of non-radioactive systems, IEC 80-18 for changes to radioactive waste systems and GL 91-18 for (If YES complete 50.59 Screen for the compensatory actions including using manual actions in-lieu of subject activity.)

automatic actions or use-as-is dispositions affecting the FSAR. GL 95-02 assessments need to look at both system and component level failures (ER20000558 01) ED NO E:]YES VYAPF 6002.03 AP 6002 Rev. 8 Page 2 of 3

.r.

0 All aspects of the activity are controlled by one or more of the processes above, therefore a 50.59 Screen is not required. If

-hecked, provide any additional comments below and sign and date below.

K' 1 1 Any portion of the activity is not controlled by one or more of the processes ab6ve, therefore a 50.59 Screen or 50.59 Evaluation is required. If, checked, provide any additional comments below, sign and date below and complete 50.59 Screen for identified activities.

Additional Applicability Considerations:

Applicability Signoffs: Preparer: Audra Williams :2dkLLa Date: I / 06/ 03 (Print name) (Sign)

Reviewer. Lo'cA L LYC&l'Date: Z/ 7 /3 VYAPF 6002.03 AP 6002 Rev. 8 Page 3 of 3

VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION l 't < " - " "-' OPEATING ,PROCEDURE -'

OP 3712 REVISION 17 EMERGENCY PLAN TRAINING USE CLASSIFICATION: INFORMATION LPC Effective No. Date Affected Pages I Implementation Statement: N/A Ij Issue Date: .- 04/30/2003 OP 3712 Rev. 17 Page 1 of 6

TABLE OF CONTENTS PU RP O SE .......................................................................................................................................................... ..............

3 D IS C U SSIO N .................................................................................................................................................... ..............

3 ATTACHMENTS .............. 4 H MM[EN T S ......................................................................................................... ................................

REFRENESA NDC 4 RESPONSIBILITIES ............................ 4 PROCEDUaRE ..............

I. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING .. 5 A. Medical Response Team .5 B. Fire Brigade .5 II. SPECIAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING GROUPS.............................................5 A. Local Medical Support Personnel .5 B. State and Local Governments .6 C. Local Fire Department .6 FINAL CONDITIONS ............... 6 OP 3712 Rev. 17 Page 2 of 6

PURPOSE To specify the Emeigency Plan training requirements for the Vermont Yankee staff and supporting contractors and to outline the training provided for local medical support personnel, local fire department, the news media, and state and local government emergency assistance personnel in support of the emergency response.

DISCUSSION Vermont Yankee staff and supporting contractors annually receive a general overview training module covering the Emergency Plan and the Implementing Procedures to the Emergency Plan as part of GET. Additionally; some personnel receive Emergency Response Organization (ERO) position specific training to qualify them for their respective assignments during an Emergency. These position specific training modules and assignments to them are specified by the Emergency Planning Training Program Description (EPTPD). The Emergency Assistance Personnel List (EAPL), which is formulated by the Emergency Plan On-Site Coordinator, identifies individuals assigned to ERO positions.

The Emergency Plan Manager, in conjunction with the Supt. Nuclear Training will evaluate changes to the Emergency Plan and the Implementing Procedures to the Emergency Plan to determine if the change or changes require additional training (MOO ID 8714). Similarly, the Emergency Plan Manager and the Supt. Nuclear Training review and approve applicable Emergency Plan training materials for use (INS8707CPE2).

Critiques will be held following all drills and exercises. A formal management debrief will be held following all graded exercises. Identified weaknesses and/or deficiencies requiring further corrective action will be forwarded to the Emergency Plan Manager for resolution in accordance with OP 3505, Section C. (MOO ID 8914)

In accordance with AP 6002, Preparing 50.59 Evaluations, the results of an Applicability Determination (AD) has determined that an AD is not required for future changes provided the scope of the procedure or program is not revised to include a different type of activity. The basis for this conclusion is that this document is an Emergency Implementing Procedure and is subject to 10CFR50.54(q) to determine if the changes decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and if they have the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10CFR50.47(b) and the requirements of 10CFR50 Appendix E.

OP 3712 Rev. 17 Page 3 of 6

ATTACHMENTS

1. None REFERENCES AND COMMITMENTS
1. Technical Specifications and Site Documents
a. Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan
2. Codes, Standards, and Regulations
a. Appendix E, IOCFR50
3. Commitments
a. None
4. Supplemental References
a. Vermont Yankee Implementing Procedures to the Emergency Plan
b. Training Department Directives
c. Emergency Plan Training Program Description
d. AP 0700, Vermont Yankee Staff Training
e. AP 0840, Medical Response Team Training
f. AP 6807, Collection, Temporary Storage and Retrieval of QA Records RESPONSIBILITIES
1. The Emergency Plan Manager has the overall responsibility to ensure all training is completed in accordance with Emergency Plan Training Program Description.

(SSCA0983, IFI932401)

2. The Emergency Plan Drill/Exercise Coordinator is responsible for coordinating the training of the local medical support personnel, state and local government personnel, and personnel from the Vernon fire department and other Southwestern Fire Mutual Aid District fire departments within the VY 10 mile EPZ. The Training Department will, upon request, assist in this effort (Section ll.A, B, C of this procedure) (SSCA 0539 and SSCA 0618).
3. The Director, Public Affairs is responsible for providing subject matter experts to assist in the annual training of the news media and Joint News Center Staff.
4. The Training Department is responsible for completion of training in accordance with the EPTPD under the direction of the Supt. Nuclear Training.

OP 3712 Rev. 17 Page 4 of 6

I

5. Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Training as provided in the EPTPD is based upon Appendix E to 10CFR50, Vermont Yankee's Emergency Plan, and the Implementing Procedures to the Emergency Plan. Personnel are assigned to a specific ERO position through the Emergency Assistance Personnel List. The Emergency Plan On-Site Coordinator maintains the Emergency Assistance Personnel List
6. On a quarterly basis, the Emergency Plan On-Site Coordinator will publish an updated Emergency Assistant Personnel List. The list will show who has completed emergency response training. (MOO ID 8714)
7. The Emergency Assistance Personnel List assignments will be audited annually by the Emergency Plan Manager in conjunction with the Vice President, Operations, and General Manager to ensure continued concurrence with emergency response assignments.

(MOO ID 8714)

PROCEDURE Emergency Plan training will be provided for the following groups.

I. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING Emergency Response Organization training is required for initial qualification and annual (calendar year) refresher/continuing training.

_ The initial position specific emergency response training and the continuing training is defined in the EPTPD for all but the following personnel.

A. Medical Response Team Medical Response Team training requirements are specified in AP 0840.

B. Fire Brigade Fire Brigade Training requirements are specified in AP 3700.

II. SPECIAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING GROUPS A. Local Medical Support Personnel Selected local Medical Support Personnel are offered annual training in the following areas as specified in the EPTPD:

1. basic radiation protection,
2. personnel and equipment decontamination,
3. use of radiation instruments, OP 3712 Rev. 17 Page 5 of 6
4. establishing radiation and contamination control areas,
5. biological sampling, and
6. plant access and reporting requirements.

B. State and Local Governments Annually (defined as per calendar year), selected state and local emergency response personnel will be offered training in the following areas as specified in the EPTPD:

1. emergency classification system and EALs,
2. off-site dose projection methodology,
3. plant protective action recommendation criteria and its relationship to plant conditions, and
4. plant access and reporting requirements.

These officials will also be provided instructions concerning the operation of the EOF/RC. These state and local officials will be requested to participate in the biennial emergency exercise (SSCA 0539 and SSCA 0618).

C. Local Fire Department

1. The Vernon fire department shall annually be trained in the following areas:
a. plant layout and fire hazards,
b. basic radiation protection needed for fire fighting,
c. fire protection system orientation, and
d. plant access and reporting requirements.
2. Other Southwestern Fire Mutual Aid District fire departments within the VY 10 mile EPZ are annually offered training in the above mentioned areas.

FINAL CONDITIONS

1. All training attendance will be documented in accordance with AP 0700.
2. All documentation will be retained in accordance with AP 6807.

OP 3712 Rev. 17 Page 6 of 6

REVISED PROCEDURE CONTROL FORM PART 1 - Initiation A. Procedure No. New Revision lTitle OP 3712 l No. 17 l EmerRency Plan Training l B. Review Criteria: DI Partial Li Editorial C. Periodic Review Cycle: X 2 Year (Event Driven) 0 Complete LI N/A D. List DIs & LPCs:

E. Description and Reasons for Procedure/Changes:

  • Referenced the EPTPD as containing specific training requirements for the ERO.
  • Identified the EP Training Coordinator's responsibilities.

. Redefined the Director of PA responsibilities for training news media.

  • Removed those groups of personnel that were previously not covered by the EPTPD and are now covered from the procedure.

F. Originator Name: (App. A was used as references to create this revision, App. C is Telephone completed and attached unless Part 11.B above is "Editorial".) Extension:

(Print/sign/date) Audra Williams . e 2/20/03 x4177 PART 2 - Reviews A. Walk-Through Validation: El Required 3 N/A B. Technical Verification Reviewer LI N/A lI (App. B used as a reference)

LI Field Walk-Through (Print/Sign/Date)

L Table-Top Simulator Validation AlIf/

C. Cross-Discipline Reviews: ElNIA l _

Department Name , S atu, Date Training s . //;I z D. 50.59 Review Per AP 6002, Preparing 50.59 Evaluations LI N/A l 50.59 AD previously performed and documented in the text of this procedure and is still applicable.

3 50.59 Applicability Determination completed and attached; 50.59 Screening NOT required.

EL 50.59 Review Screening completed and attached, 50.59 Evaluation NOT required.

F] 50.59 Evaluation completed and attached.

E. QUALIFIED REVIEWER: Use App. D as a reference (May perform 50.59 Applicability Determination)

(Part 2.D) ACk,,n (Print/Sign/Date) 4Ltd ral //WI / -

F. OIGINATOR: omments Resolved L1Me-verify All DISH& LPCs Considered II Spit for Final Type (CDS or STC (SPs only)) Initial/Date Vq/9 3)

LProofread after Final Type (Print/Sign/Date) /AUCLA Wl(W/I I CMml E5# l&u 0a2cL9f VYAPF 0096.01 AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page I of 2

PART 3 - Training/Notification Requirements Indicate training or notifications required to implement procedure: (Required for Administrative Procedures)

El Include in formal training (TCR submitted):

Z E-Mail notification:

El Crew Briefings:

I l Other: Z N/A PART 4- PORC Plant Operation Review Committee: L Required Z N/A Meeting No: PORC Secretary: Date: Plant Manager:

PART 5 - Approval A. Responsible Procedure Owner: (Print/Signature/Date)

O3ln ,inz /2I B. Plant Manager (Print/Sign/Date (ForSPs Only)

C. Special Instructions: El N/A L1 Approved for Training

[Issue on DATE: L1'3> 0 3 EL Submit Surveillance Database Change per AP 4000 El Other:

PART 6 - Issuance Procedure Change No.: J / C Date procedure issued: YJ/3 O/h 3 Notes:

VYAPF 0096.01 AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 2 of 2

10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist List of Emergency Plan Section(s)/Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure(s) or any other document to be evaluated. (Include Title and Revision No.):

OP 3712, Rev. 17, Emergency Plan Training A. Screening Evaluation Based on a review of the following questions, determine if the change has the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.

A "YES" answer to any part of the questions requires that a written evaluation be done to determine whether the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan was decreased as specified in Section B of this checklist.

A "NO" answer to all questions requires no written evaluation as specified in Section B of this checklist.

1. Could the proposed change affect our ability to meet the following standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b):

(1) Assignment of Emergency Response Organization responsibilities YES NO (2) Assignment of on-shift Emergency Response Organization personnel YES NO (3) Arrangements for Emergency Response Support and Resources YES NO (4) Emergency Classification and Action levels, including facility system and effluent parameters YES NO (5) Notification Methods and Procedures YES NO (6) Emergency Communications among principal response organizations and the public YES NO (7) Public Education and Information YES NO (8) Adequacy of Emergency Facilities and Equipment YES NO (9) Adequacy of Accident Assessment methods, systems and equipment YES NO (10) Plume exposure pathway EPZ protective actions YES NO (11) Emergency Worker Radiological Exposure Control YES NO (12) Medical Services for contaminated injured individuals YES NO (13) Recovery and Reentry Plans YES NO (14) Emergency response periodic drills and exercises YES NO (15) Radiological Emergency Response Training YES NO (16) Plan development, review and distribution YES NO VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 1 of 3 RT No. 10.EO6.171

10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)

2. Could the change affect our ability to meet the following requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.

(1)Section IV. A - Organization YES NO (2)Section IV. B - Assessment Actions YES NO (3)Section IV. C - Activation of Emergency Organizations YES NO (4)Section IV. D - Notification Procedures YES NO (5)Section IV. E - Emergency Facilities and Equipment YES NO (6) Section IV. F - Training YES NO (7)Section IV. G - Maintaining Emergency Preparedness YES NO (8) Section IV. H - Recovery YES NO B. Effectiveness Determination For each applicable (i.e., a "yes" answer specified) standard to 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR 50 identified from Section A above, complete the evaluation form below to determine whether the change decreases the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and whether it continues to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.

A facsimile of the evaluation form may be used as needed and attached to this checklist.

For applicable item 10 CFR 50 Appendix E, Section IV. F of Section A above, this change DOES NOT decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and DOES continue to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.

BASIS FOR ANSWER:

The Emergency Planning Training Program Description has been completely arRt Awn

meiin t rs efor tC ERU. I ----

or the

- LU _V.LJrem m anl rA ainin m irements "-:

arouns that were not previously covered in the EPTPD have been addedFire to rit and Iqaa removed from procedure as an exception to the training program. Fire Brilqaae t-rainina was added to procedure and identified as being covered in AP 3700.

Trhis4 rhnnae is a maior improvement to the procedure and to the Emergency EP an an and n _d g a_ _ _t nd

_eas n decr__ e f c ih la TrainingProgram and does not decrease the effectiveness of-the continues to meet the requirements.

VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 2 of 3

10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)

C. Conclusion (Fill out appropriate information) 0 The changes made do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and continue to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.

o The changes made do decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and decrease our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50. The following course of action is recommended:

o Revise proposed changes to meet applicable standards and requirements.

o Cancel the proposed changes.

o Process proposed changes for NRC approval prior to implementation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q).

D. Impact on Other Documents (TRM, Tech Specs)

Keywords used in search:

O This change does not affect any other documents.

0 This change does affect other documents.

Document(s) affected: EPTPD Section(s) affected:

E. Impact on the Updated FSAR Use AP 6036 to determine if the proposed E-Plan change modifies existing UFSAR information or requires the addition of new UFSAR information and initiate UFSAR change(s) as required.

Keywords used in UFSAR search:

Additional Comments:

Prepared By: Audra Williams i dat te: 2/20/03 (PIE~rtSSE/Si)K Reviewed By: LCr A.(ECAL , Date: ___Cl13 (Emergency Plan Coordinator)(Print/Sign)

VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 3 of 3

APPENDIX C CROSS-DISCIPLINE REVIEW CHECKLIST Required to be completed for new procedures, procedure revisions, and LPCs unless they are designated as Editorial.

Procedure Number/Revision OP 3712, Rev 17 Reviewer/Date (Print) Audra Williams 2/20103 GENERAL REVIEW GUIDELINES/SPECIAL REVIEW REQUIREMENTS

  • The Cross-Discipline Review Guidelines below constitute minimum review requirements; other reviews may apply.
  • Determination of reviews should focus on changes made to a procedure and the potential impact of those changes on the affected group. Changes that are minimally or nonimpacting do not need review by the potentially affected group.

If change impact is unclear, the procedure should be routed to the potentially affected group for review.

  • New or revised Administrative or Program Procedures that significantly impact other departments, shall be reviewed by the appropriate Superintendent or Senior Manager. The PAA maintains a list of these Administrative and Program Procedures.
  • ALL noneditorial changes to Special Process procedures (WP, NE, heat treating, etc.), including Vendor Procedures that address Special Processes, shall be reviewed by: a Welding Engineer (welding procedures) or a NDE Level III certified in the method addressed by the procedure (nondestructive examination procedures), AND the Quality Assurance Manager, AND submitted to the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector (ANII) prior to use.
  • A "YES" indicates that a Cross Discipline Review shall be done by the indicated Department. Document the review on VYAPF 0096.01, VYAPF 0097.01, or VYAPF 0097.02, as applicable.

APPLICABLE YES l NO Chemistry:

  • Potentially affects condensate, feedwater, or reactor water chemistry, or chemistry instruments.
  • Procedures that implement the requirements of the VY Environmental Program.

(see PP 7603, Appendix A)

  • Produces/affects effluents or effluent monitoring (VY/QA 01-015).
  • Affects NPDES limits or method of compliance. X Maintenance (Mech, Elec, I&C):
  • Requires Maintenance personnel to perform activities, such as performance of maintenance procedures, installation of M&TE, lifting and landing of leads and connectors. X Operations:
  • Changed requirements for entry into a Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) or significantly changes duration of LCO.
  • Requires Operations alignment/restoration of systems or components.
  • Specifies surveillance or post maintenance testing by Operations. X EOP/SAG Coordinator:
  • Procedures that have the potential to affect the EOPs/SAGs. X Appendix C AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 1 of 3

APPENDIX C (Continued)

APPLICABLE YES NO Quality Assurance:

  • Changes to procedures that implement the requirements of the VOQAM. (see PP 7802, Appendix B)
  • New procedures that have a potential for reduction of VOQAM commitments.
  • Involves work that breaches contaminated systems or components.
  • Changes in radwaste or hazardous waste generation. X Emergency Plan Coordinator:
  • Obtain and attach a IOCFR50.54(q) Evaluation.
  • Affects Emergency Plan personnel, facilities or equipment. X Software Quality Assurance Administrator
  • Procedures that define how software is developed. X Reactor Engineering:
  • Could affect core reactivity, thermal power, reactor heat balance, or fuel integrity.
  • Involves refueling operations. X Systems/Project/Design Engineering:
  • Maintenance Rule in-scope systems unavailability time.
  • Involves infrequently performed test or evolution.
  • Changed requirements for entry into a Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) or significantly changes duration of LCO.
  • Significant changes in system test or operation methodology. X Appendix J Coordinator:
  • Changes that affect App. J leakrates or containment boundaries, or boundary valve manipulation. X Appendix R Coordinator:
  • Appendix R implementing procedures. X Environmental Qualification (EQ) Coordinator:
  • Change in EQ test methodology or component lifetime.
  • Potentially affects area EQ component environment. X Fire Protection Coordinator (FPC):
  • Fire Protection procedures.
  • Affects fire loading
  • Affects fire protection systems or component functionality. X IST Program Coordinator:
  • Inservice Testing Program implementing procedures.
  • All surveillance procedures. X ISI Program Coordinator:
  • Inservice Inspection Program implementing procedures. X Appendix C AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 2 of 3

APPENDIX C (Continued)

APPLICABLE YES 1 NO Setpoint Coordinator:

  • Changes that impact setpoints, as-found/as-left tolerances, M&TE or testing methodology. X Nuclear & PRA
  • Potentially affects LPEEE or ORAM Sentinel Risk Models.
  • Potentially affects plant SSCs reliability.
  • Potentially affects Nuclear or Radiological Safety Analysis. X Security:
  • Proceures that implement the requirements of the VY Physical Security and Training and Qualification Plans.
  • Changes that have a potential for reduction of the VY Physical Security and Training and Qualification Plan commitments.
  • Obtain and attach a IOCFR50.54(P) Evaluation. X Appendix C AP 0096 Rev. 3 Page 3 of 3

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION Activity/Document Number: OP 3712 Revision Number: 17

Title:

Emergency Plan Training Provide or attach a brief description of activities (section 6.3 of RM):

  • Referenced the EPTPD as containing specific training requirements for the ERO.
  • Identified the EP Training Coordinator's responsibilities.
  • Redefined the Director of PA responsibilities for training news media.
  • Removed those groups of personnel that were previously not covered by the EPTPD and are now covered from the procedure.

Address the questions below for all aspects of the activity. If the answer is "YES" for any portion of the activity, apply the identified process to that portion of the activity. It is not unusual to have more than one process apply to a given activity. For example, a change to a door that is a fire door, a security door and a secondary containment door would require an evaluation to the Fire Protection license condition, IOCFR50.54 (p) and a 50.59 screen. See Section 4 of the "50.59 Resource Manual" (RM) for additional guidance.

i. Does the proposed activity involve a change to the: Section 4.2.1 of the RM
1. Technical Specifications or Operating License (IOCFR50.90)? Note that stand-alone changes to the TS Bases are evaluated in (If YES process per AP 0063) accordance with IOCFR50.59 per AP 0063. 0 NO El YES
2. Quality Assurance Plan, related implementing procedures (If YES contact QA for identified in PP 7802 or facility changes (IOCFR50.54(a))? O NO [: YES 10CFR50.54(a)(3) assessment)

K_/ 3. Security Plan, related implementing procedures or facility changes (If YES contact Security for (i1nAFrpp ;atnW9 5I NO M YES I OCFR50.54(tr) assessment)

4. Emergency Plan, related implementing procedures or facility (If YES contact E-Plan for changes (10CFR50.54(q))? E1 NO 0 YES IOCFR50.54(q) assessment per AP 3532)
5. IST Program Plan, related implementing procedures or facility (If YES, and a deviation from the code changes (IOCFR50.55a(f))? 0 NO E YES requirement is required, contact Licensing to ensure applicable NRC approval is obtained per AP 0058)
6. ISI Program Plan, related implementing procedures or facility (If YES, and a deviation from the code changes (IOCFR50.55a(g))? 0 NO E YES requirement is required, contact Licensing to ensure applicable NRC approval is obtained per AP 0058)
7. Fire protection program, related implementing procedures or (If YES provide an evaluation that facility changes (License Condition 3.F)? E NO E YES satisfies License Condition 3.F )

VYAPF 6002.03 AP 6002 Rev. 8 Page 1 of 3

II. Does the proposed activity involve: I _I Section 4.2.2 of the RM

1. Maintenance which restores SSCs to their original condition. ED NO [- YES (If YES perform maintenance in accordance with plant procedures (e.g.

AP 0021, AP 0049, AP 0050)

2. A temporary alteration supporting maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less that has been (If YES process in accordance with (or will be) evaluated under IOCFR50.65(a)(4) prior to E NO E YES AP 0091.)

implementation?

III. Does the proposed activity involve a change to the UFSAR (including Section 4.2.3 of the RM documents incorporatedby reference) excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Review (NEI 96-07 or NEI 98-03)? ED NO El YES (If YES, process FSAR change per AP 6036 "FSAR Revision Process".

Include basis for excluding 10CFR50.59 evaluation below.)

IV. Does the proposed activity involve a change to the: Section 4.2.4 of the RM

1. Managerial or administrative procedures governing the conduct of Facility operations, maintenance and training (subject to the control of I0CFR50, Appendix B) (RM section 4.2.4). Some procedures (If YES process per procedure change may be VOQAM implementing procedures requiring evaluation process per procedurePchange per IOCFR50.54(a)(3) (prompted above). Also, Maintenance AP 0097)r procedure changes that include changes to Design Information, not evaluated under a design change process, shall be evaluated in accordance with 10CFR50.59 O NO El YES K> 2. Regulatory commitment where changing commitment is not (If YES process per AP 0055 covered by another regulation based change process (NEI 99-04)? [2]No El YEs "Regulatory Commitment Management".)

V. Does the activity impact other plant specific programs (e.g., The ODCM and PCLRTP controlled per TS 6.7 and the PCP controlled per (If YES process per the procedure(s) for TRM Section 6 ) which are controlled by regulations, the Operating the appropriate activity.)

License, the Technical Specifications or TRM ? NO [1 YES VI. Is the activity covered by any other specific regulatory change process not discussed above that would preclude the need to evaluate under (If YES document below and process per IOCFR50.59 ? (e.g., 10CFR50.46 for changes to ECCS models and applicable regulatory requirements.)

PCT changes, 10CFR50.12 for Exemption Requests, etc) 0 NO El YES VII Does the activity require a 50.59 Screen based on the following Generic NRC correspondence? GL 95-02 for performing Analog-to-Digital upgrades, IEB 80-10 for Contamination of non-radioactive systems, IEC 80-18 for changes to radioactive waste systems and GL 91-18 for (If YES complete 50.59 Screen for the compensatory actions including using manual actions in-lieu of subject activity.)

automatic actions or use-as-is dispositions affecting the FSAR. GL 95-02 assessments need to look at both system and component level failures (ER20000558.0l) ONO DEYES VYAPE 6002.03 AP 6002 Rev. 8 Page 2 of 3

[1 All aspects of the activity are controlled by one or more of the processes above, therefore a 50.59 Screen is not required. If checked, provide any additional comments below and sign and date below.

Any portion of the activity is not controlled by one or more of the processes above, therefore a 50.59 Screen or 50.59 Evaluation is required. If, checked, provide any additional comments below, sign and date below and complete 50.59 Screen for identified activities.

Additional Applicability Considerations:

Applicability Signoffs: Preparer: Audra Williams (Print name)

- Q/L&IL( (O(L& C (Sign)

Date: 2/20 03 Reviewer: U,; p.br, c 2 1L b. . Date: ZI 2t/Ca VYAPF 6002.03 AP 6002 Rev. 8 Page 3 of 3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=BVY_03-041,_Emergency_Plan_Implementing_Procedure_Changes&oldid=2659989"