AECM-81-483, Forwards Responses to 810728-30 Audit Questions Re Seismic Qualification

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Responses to 810728-30 Audit Questions Re Seismic Qualification
ML20062M451
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/1981
From: Dale L
MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20062M453 List:
References
AECM-81-483, NUDOCS 8112170236
Download: ML20062M451 (4)


Text

f O

s E MISS!SSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

(

P. O. B O X 16 4 0. J A C K S O N, MIS SIS SIP PI 3 9 2 0 5 Helping Build Mississippi December 15, 1981 O

f*

B d

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission g

d g IO8/A1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 9

Washington, D. C.

20555 7,

Attention:

Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director N

Dear Mr.

m k

SUBJECT:

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-416 and 50-417 File 0260/L-814.;/M-001.0 Response to Audit of Seismic Qualification Review Team AECM-81/483 Mir.aissippi Power & Light Company (MP&L) is providing the following responses addressing the questions raised by the Seismic Qualification Review Team (SQRT) during the audit of Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (GGNS) held on July 28-30, 1981. These questions were identified as open items in the SQRT

. trip report, an internal NRC document, Chang to Rosztoczy, dated

' October 22, 1981. This report was provided informally to MP&L.

s This submittal reprcsents follow-up information to that previously

' submitted to the NRC by MP&L letter AECM-81/391, dated October 9, 1981.

1.

Concern:

[

Provide a comparison of fatigue on seismically qualified BOP equipment.

(,D L

Response

~

The 'comparisoa for BOP equipment is provided as Attachment 1.

g

  • s
?,

,C,opce rn :

o

,7,

_i

=

>;. Provide assurance that retesting and redesign on Limitorque Motor

\\

Operators for the hydrodynamic loading is completed prior to fuel load.

Provide confirmation when retesting, redesign, and installation have been 4

% [;\\(

completed.

,y 6

.. '. R_dspf_nse : u,

.x i

The only Limitorque actuators requiring modification for seismic consideration are the SMB/HBC models mounted on butterfly valves and subject to hydrodynanic loado. Limitorque test report No. B0084 (includes AGTON LAB,rbport No. 15780) indicates special high frequency x

brackets were installed prior to testing to replace the stock bracket j\\

which conr.ectslthh motor and gear box.

l 3

0112'170236 811215 I

PDR ADOCK 05000416

~f Member Middle South Utilities System 4 ll 6

> h PDR et t

.l

.3 AECM-81/483

~

MISSISSIPPI POWER O Ll!HT COMPANY Pcg3 2 The test consisted of a resonance search at 0.75g (2 octaves / minute) and

n multi-frequency biaxial vibration test to envelope a required response lq/

spectrum to 6g in 2.5 Uz and continuous 6g through 100 Hz with 5% damping s.-

(30 sec/ level).

The actuators performed properly through all natural frequencies. All modification brackets are.at GCNS with 50% installed and the remaining 50% to be installed prior to fuel load.

The Limitorque actuators for gate and globe valves did not require modification and successful hydrodynamic loads vibration testing is documented in Limitorque test report No. B0085 (includes ACTON LAB report No. 15780-1).

l 3.

Concern:

l' For the control room pansi (Model No. H13-P601), provide a response to the operational / integrity concerns identified in the NRC SQRT trip report l

dated October 22, 1981.

h rponse:

A discussion of Control Room Panel H13-P601 is provided as Attachment 2.

4.

Concern:

The motor and fan support channels for the Farr Company 40 MW fans must l

be modified to reduce flexibility in the horizontal direction.

Response

Additional structural members will be placed perpendicular to the existing channels. These new members will then be welded to the existing channels. This modification ensures that there will be no natural frequencies below 33 Hz.

Since the higher frequency response has never been a concern, this modification will result in complete qualification of the fans.

The design of this modification and supporting analysis is expected to be completed by December 24, 1981. The required modification will be implemented prior to fuel load.

5.

Concern:

l The mounting plate for the solenoid valve, Q1Z77-F002A (switchgear and battery room ventilation system), must be modified to reduce the flexibility in the mounting plate. This flexibility might, during a seismic event, impact against a nearby air-cctuator thereby introducing i

an unanticipated loading for which the solenoid has not been qualified.

l l

Response

The flexibility will be removed by stif fening the existing plates or by

[

replacing the existing plates with more rigidly designed plates.

Regardless of the final design, the result will be such that the solenoid plates will be sufficiently rigid to prevent impact with the 4

air-actuators.

'}

, hi l

^ t

.Y e

AECM-81/483 MississlPPI POWER O LCHT COMPANY P,rga 3 The design of this modification and supporting analysis is expected to be completed by December 24, 1981. The required modification will be implemented prior'to fuel load.

6.

Concern:

.i Several problems were encountered during qualification of the Reactor

-Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) turbine. The mounting studs loosened after-several OBE runs. During retesting at a lower g level, a turbine trip occurred due to mounting bolts loosening. Excessive deflection of the Juc a oil piping was also observed so additional restraint was provided foc the lube oil piping to complete the test.

Therefore,' seismic qualification of the RCIC turbine is delayed pending resolution of the items mentioned above.

Response

The concerns noted above are addressed in a General Electric Field Disnosition Instruction (FDI). This FDI is provided for your review as.. Upon completion of the work proposed by the FDI, the RCIC turbine will be in complete compliance of SQRT qualification. This work will be completed prior to fuel load.

7.

Concern:

The applicant is committed to provide documentation describing what means or procedure will be used to assure that the fuel transfer tube closure is closed and latched during reactor operation.

Respoase:

The CGNS Technical Specifications require verification that the horizontal fuel transfer tube closure, which is part of the horizontal fuel transfer system (F11-E015), is closed every 31 days during power operation. This requirement is provided for under 4.6.1.1 of the GGNS Technical Specifications. To comply with this GGNS Technical Specification requirement, surveillance instructions are in place to perform this verification.

If you have any questions or require further information, please contact this office.

r truly.

-L. F. Dale Manager of Nuclear Services JilS/JGC/JDR:ph Attachments:

1.

Fatigue Analysis for B0P Equipment 2.

Discussion of Control Room Panel H13-P601 3.

Field Disposition Instruction ec:

(See Next Page)

r

,; o AECM-81/483 MISSISSIPPI POWER Q LIZHT COMPANY P gg 4 cc:

Mr. N. L. Stampicy (w/a)

Mr. R. B. McCchee (w/a)

Mr. T. B. Conner (w/a)

Mr. G. B. Taylor (w/a)

Mr. Richard C. DeYoung, Director (w/a)

Office of Inspection & Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555