05000529/LER-1999-006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER-1999-006,
Event date: 9-9-0909
Report date: 0-0-0529
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)
5291999006R00 - NRC Website

1. REPORTING REQUIREMENT:

This LER 529/99-006-00 is being submitted pursuant to 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) and 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii) to report a condition prohibited by the Technical Specifications (TS) and a condition that was outside the design basis of the plant. Contrary to the requirement of TS LCO 3.3.1 and 3.3.5, from approximately 1454 MST on July 15, 1999 to 1410 MST on July 21, 1999 the channel D plant protection system parameters had been inoperable due to a personnel error, and TS required actions to restore the equipment to an operable status or place the channel in bypass or trip were not performed. The condition was immediately corrected when it was identified on July 21, 1999.

2. EVENT DESCRIPTION:

Prior to the event, at approximately 1316 MST on July 15, 1999, Control Room personnel placed the PPS (JC) D channels in bypass for the performance of the bistable relay response time test by Instrumentation and Control (I&C) maintenance personnel. Control Room personnel entered condition A of LCO 3.3.1 and Condition A of LCO 3.3.5. I&C maintenance personnel commenced testing of the PPS Channel D parameters. Upon successful completion of the response time test, at approximately 1454 MST, control room personnel removed the PPS Channel D parameters from bypass and exited TS Condition A of LCO 3.3.1 and Condition A of LCO 3.3.5.

Investigation of this event has revealed that I&C maintenance technicians did not reinstall the seismic fasteners that were removed to perform the response time test in accordance with the restoration steps of the surveillance test. APS Engineering had previously evaluated this condition and determined that at least four of the eight seismic fasteners are required to be fully engaged to maintain operability of the control panel.

Contrary to the requirement of TS LCO 3.3.1 and 3.3.5, from approximately 1454 MST on July 15, 1999 to 1410 MST on July 21, 1999 PPS channel D parameters had been inoperable for greater than the one hour allowed by TS.

There were no safety system actuations during this time and none were required.

3. ASSESSMENT OF THE SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS OF

THIS EVENT:

Bi-stable trip units, mounted in the Plant Protection System (PPS) cabinet, contain four channels of bi-stables for each RPS parameter. The bi-stable panel is attached to the steel frame inside the cabinet with eight captive screws. The captive screws are designed to keep the panel chassis from sliding forward in the event of an safe shutdown earthquake (SSE). An engineering evaluation of the condition where all eight screws were not installed, concluded that the outer door to the cabinet, when closed, would maintain the panel chassis from movement in the forward direction thereby preventing the cabinet chassis from becoming a missile and mitigating any damage to nearby equipment. However, Engineering had previously determined that at least four of the eight captive screws are required to be fully engaged to meet the seismic qualification of the chassis. In this event, the eight captive screws were not engaged which resulted in the panel being declared inoperable.

The quarterly PPS bi-stable trip unit functional test for PPS channel D was performed on July 15, 1999. The PPS channel D parameters performed satisfactorily. At approximately 1454 MST on July 15, 1999 the PPS channel D parameters were declared OPERABLE. The satisfactory surveillance test performance demonstrated that the PPS channel D parameters met the surveillance requirements of SR 3.3.3.2 and that the channel D parameters would perform their intended design function for the reactor protection system.

The PPS channel D panel chassis was not returned to its proper configuration to meet its seismic qualification requirements following the surveillance and remained in that condition until July 21, 1999. There were no seismic events while this condition existed. The condition did not result in any challenge to fission product barriers or result in the release of radioactive materials. There were no adverse safety consequences or implications as a result of this event. This event did not adversely affect the safe operation of the plant or health and safety of the public.

4. CAUSE OF THE EVENT:

An independent investigation of this event is being conducted in accordance with the APS Corrective Action Program. A preliminary evaluation has determined that the apparent root cause is personnel error in that I&C maintenance personnel did not restore the PPS panel chassis to its required configuration upon completion of the quarterly surveillance test.

The captive screws are removed by I&C personnel to perform testing of the PPS parameters. The captive screws are required to be re-installed when all applicable testing is complete in accordance with the surveillance test procedure. A review of work documents indicated that the captive screws were removed during testing on July 15, 1999 and were not reinstalled until July 21, 1999 when discovered by operations personnel.

The disengaged captive screws resulted in inoperability of the PPS Channel D parameters, resulting in non-compliance with TS LCO 3.3.1 and 3.3.5, from approximately 1530 MST on July 15, 1999 to 1410 MST on July 21, 1999 because PPS channel D parameters had been inoperable for greater than the one hour allowed by TS.

An ongoing evaluation is in progress to determine the adequacy of procedures and work practices. If the final evaluation results differ from this determination, a supplement to this report will be submitted to describe the final root cause determination. No unusual characteristics of the work location (e.g., noise, heat, poor lighting) appear to have directly contributed to this event.

5. STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, OR COMPONENTS INFORMATION:

Although the PPS channel D panel chassis did not have the eight captive screws engaged, the system was capable of performing its plant protection system function provided there was no seismic event. There are no indications that any structures, systems, or components were inoperable which contributed to this condition. No component or system failures were involved. No failures of components with multiple functions were involved.

No failures that rendered a train of a safety system inoperable were involved.

6. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:

A transportability review was conducted for Unit 1 and 3 and the captive screws were fully engaged in these PPS cabinets. This condition was isolated to Unit 2 PPS cabinet D. The condition was not transportable to any other Unit or system train.

Actions to prevent recurrence will include placing this event in the Industry Events Training for I&C personnel which will be completed by November 30,1999. I&C management has coached personnel on the importance of proper restoration of equipment following surveillance or maintenance testing.

7. PREVIOUS SIMILAR EVENTS:

A previous similar event was reported in LER 50/528-98-001 for not bypassing or placing in trip within the TS required action time. However the causes discussed in the previous events were not similar to this event.

Therefore, the corrective actions taken as a result of LER 50/528-98-001 would not have prevented this event.

APS

William E. Ide Mail Station 7602 Palo Verde Nuclear Vice President TEL (623) 393-6116 P.O. Box 52034 Generating Station Nuclear Production FAX (623) 393-6077 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034 192-01053 - WEI/DGM/RJH August 20, 1999 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Station P1-37 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Dear Sirs:

Subject: Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS) Docket No. STN 50-529 License No. NPF-51 Licensee Event Report 99-006-00 Attached please find Licensee Event Report (LER) 99-006-00 prepared and submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73. This LER reports a condition where the loss of seismic qualification for one channel of reactor protection and ESFAS instrumentation resulted in an inoperable condition that exceeded TS required action times.

There are no commitments stated or implied as a result of this event.

In accordance with 10CFR50.73(d), a copy of this LER is being forwarded to the Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV. If you have any questions, please contact Daniel G. Marks, Section Leader, Regulatory Affairs, at (623) 393-6492.

Sincerely, WEI/DGM/RJH/rlh Attachment cc: E. W. Merschoff (all with attachment) N. Kalyanam J. H. Moorman INPO Records Center *** END OF DOCUMENT ***