05000446/LER-2012-002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER-2012-002, COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B), System Actuation

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function
4462012002R00 - NRC Website

I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REPORTABLE EVENT

A. REPORTABLE EVENT CLASSIFICATION

10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), Any event or condition that resulted in manual or automatic actuation of any of the systems listed in paragraph (a)(2)(iv)(B) of this section including:

10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B)(1), Reactor protection system including: reactor scram or reactor trip 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B)(6), PWR auxiliary or emergency feedwater system B.PLANT CONDITION PRIOR TO EVENT On November 17, 2012, CPNPP Unit 2 was in Mode 1 operating at 100% power.

C. STATUS OF STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, OR COMPONENTS THAT WERE INOPERABLE AT THE START

OF THE EVENT AND THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT

There were no structures, systems, or components that were inoperable at the start of the event that contributed to the event.

D. NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF THE EVENT, INCLUDING DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES

On November 17, 2012, Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) Unit 2 was in Mode 1 operating at 100% power. At 10:19, the fitting between the Unit 2 Heater Drain Pump Discharge Valve Pressure Regulator [El IS: (SM)(P)(V)(RG)] and the adjacent in-line filter failed. The loss of air caused the Heater Drain Pump Discharge Valve to close as designed. This resulted in a total loss of Heater Drain Flow. The loss of flow resulted in a lowering feed pump suction pressure. The Condensate Low Pressure Feedwater Heater Bypass Valve and the Condensate Polishing Filter Bypass Pressure Control Valve opened on low feed pump suction pressure. At 1020 hours0.0118 days <br />0.283 hours <br />0.00169 weeks <br />3.8811e-4 months <br />, Operators (Utility, Licensed) in the Unit 2 Control Room received several secondary alarms indicating a decrease in main Feedwater pump suction pressure. The control room operators properly responded to the plant indications per ABN-302, "Feedwater, Condensate, Heater Drain System Malfunction", and initiated a runback to 900 MWe. Prior to reaching 900 MWe at 10:21, Main Feed pump 2A tripped and auto initiated a runback to 700 MWe. Once Unit 2 was at 700 MWe, Steam Generator (SG) water levels were at approximately 43% and appeared to be stabilizing. The Reactor Operator (RO) noted a mismatch in steam flow and feed flow. The RO attempted to initiate an additional 100 MWe runback when the steam dumps closed as expected for the plant response. The closure of the steam dumps lowered steam flow and resulted in shrink in the Steam Generators causing all four Steam Generator water levels to decrease. When SG 2-03 reached 35.4%, an automatic reactor trip occurred at 10:23. All control rods fully inserted, and both Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps and the Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump started as expected as a result of the reactor trip.

E.THE METHOD OF DISCOVERY OF EACH COMPONENT OR SYSTEM FAILURE, OR PROCEDURAL

PERSONNEL ERROR

Operators (Utility, Licensed) in the Unit 2 Control Room received alarms indicating a loss of main feedwater pump suction pressure.

II. COMPONENT OR SYSTEM FAILURES

A. CAUSE OF EACH COMPONENT OR SYSTEM FAILURE

Not applicable — there were no component failures associated with this event. The valve functioned as expected with the loss of instrument air.

B.FAILURE MODE, MECHANISM, AND EFFECTS OF EACH FAILED COMPONENT Not applicable — there were no component failures associated with this event.

C. SYSTEMS OR SECONDARY FUNCTIONS THAT WERE AFFECTED BY FAILURE OF COMPONENTS

WITH MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS

Not applicable - there were no component or system failures associated with this event.

D.FAILED COMPONENT INFORMATION Not applicable — there were no component failures associated with this event.

III. ANALYSIS OF THE EVENT

A. SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES THAT OCCURRED

Both Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps and the Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump started as expected as a result of the reactor trip.

B.DURATION OF SAFETY SYSTEM TRAIN INOPERABILITY Not applicable - No safety system trains were inoperable during this event.

C. SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE EVENT

This event is bounded by the CPNPP Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) accident analysis which assumes conservative initial conditions which bound the plant operating range and other assumptions which reduce the capability of safety systems to mitigate the consequences of the transient.

A loss of normal Feedwater resulting from pump failure, valve malfunction, or loss of offsite power leads to a reduction in the capability of the secondary system to remove heat generated in the reactor core. These events are analyzed in Section 15.2.7 of the CPNPP FSAR which uses conservative assumptions in the analysis to minimize energy removal capability of the Auxiliary Feedwater system.

The event of November 17, 2012, occurred at 100 percent reactor power, and all safety systems functioned as designed. The event is bounded by the FSAR accident analysis that assumes an initial power level of 102 percent and the worst single failure in the Auxiliary Feedwater system for a loss of Feedwater event.

There were no safety system functional failures associated with this event. The FSAR analysis shows that a loss of normal Feedwater does not adversely affect the core, the reactor coolant system, or the steam system. Therefore, this event posed no threat to the health and safety of the public.

Based on the above, it is concluded that the health and safety of the public were unaffected by this condition and this event has been evaluated to not meet the definition of a safety system functional failure per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(v).

IV.CAUSE OF THE EVENT The cause of this event was that the planning process did not provide instructions for mounting the air pressure regulator for the Heater Drain pump discharge valve. The valve was reassembled without properly supporting the pressure regulator which allowed vibration to occur in the tubing. This eventually caused a swage-lok fitting fatigue failure which resulted in the loss of air and closure of the Heater Drain pump discharge valve. This resulted in the loss of one main Feedwater pump and an automatic reactor trip on steam generator low level.

V. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

Immediate corrective actions included replacement of the broken fitting and mounting of the air pressure regulator to the actuator of the Heater Drain pump discharge valve.

A comprehensive walkdown of Unit 1 and Unit 2 secondary system air operated valves was conducted by a multi-disciplined team to identify other potential issues with the mounting of valve operator sub-components.

One other condition was found with the regulator installed without direct mounting. If the valve was to fail due to loss of air the condition would not result in a reactor trip. This issue is being addressed in the CPNPP Corrective Action Program.

As a part of the CPNPP Corrective Action Program, procedures will be revised to ensure that the planning process contains specific instructions for the installation of an alternate part as appropriate.

VI. PREVIOUS SIMILAR EVENTS

There have been no previous similar reportable events at CPNPP in the last three years.