05000389/LER-2004-003, Re Panel Display Failures Caused Loss of Technical Specification Required Range
| ML050540600 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 02/14/2005 |
| From: | Jefferson W Florida Power & Light Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-2005-028 LER 04-003-00 | |
| Download: ML050540600 (5) | |
| Event date: | |
|---|---|
| Report date: | |
| Reporting criterion: | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications |
| 3892004003R00 - NRC Website | |
text
FPL Florida Power & Light Company, 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 February 14, 2005 L-2005-028 10 CFR § 50.73 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Re:
St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389 Reportable Event: 2004-003-00 Date of Event: December 16, 2004 Panel Display Failures Caused Loss of Technical Specification Required Range The attached Licensee Event Report 2004-003 is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR § 50.73 to provide notification of the subject event.
William Jefferson, Jr.
Vice President St. Lucie Nuclear Plant WJ/KWF Attachment r% n I j:"04 OS an FPL Group company
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 0613012007 (6-2004)
, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor.
and a person Is not required to respond to. the information collection.
- 1. I-ACIL lI Y NAMt r.
DOCKET NUMBER J. PIAUL St. Lucie Unit 2 05000389 Page 1 of 4
- 4. lilL-l Panel Display Failures Caused Loss of Technical Specification Required Range
- 5. EVENT DATE
- 6. LER NUMBER
- 7. REPORT DATE
- 8. OTHER FACIUTIES INVOLVED MOYEARBERYARMBERMONT H
DAY YEAR M
j YARA;I r4UMttK 12 16 2004 2004 003 0
102 14 120051
- 9. OPERATING MODE
- 11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMIlTED PURSUANTTOTHE REQUIREMENTS OF10 CFR§: (Check all thatapply) o 20.2201(b) 0 20.2203(a)(3)(i) 0 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C) 0 50.73(a)(2)(vii) l 20.2201(d) 1 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)
O 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) lO 20.2203(a)(1) 0 20.2203(a)(4) 0 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) o 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 0 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(i)()
0 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)
- 10. POWER LEVEL l 0 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 0 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(x) l00 lO 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 0 50.36(c)(2) 0 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A) 0 73.71 (a)(4) o 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 0 50.46(a)(3)(ii) 0 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B) 0 73.71(a)(5) o 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 0 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C) 0 OTHER Specify In Ab~streact below or In 0
20.2203(a)(2)(vi)
E 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) 0 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D) MANFACURE RERTUN I A CS I
STUM I
MTlb LE NAME I t.tHHUnt -UMUtK
{l=U0 PJ e sa e)
Kenneth W. Frehafer, Licensing Engineer (772) 467 - 7748
- 14. G;UMFILttI UNL UNLt-U Pt:
LASH L;UMPUNLN I t-AILUt ItKb;Ktt N
l KtU
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT TO EPO X NENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE E
CB FI V153 YES E
BP TI V153 YES
- 14. bUI.FMLt=MNIAL KFUKI IAi`It;Ilzu
- 15. EXPECTED I
IAI I LAM IYESSUBMISSION II (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
X NO r
DATE
[
l ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewnitten lines)
On December 16, 2004, St. Lucie Unit 2 was in Mode 1 at 100 percent reactor power.
FPL completed an evaluation that determined that past operation with faulty Versatile indicators for charging flow/pressure and shutdown cooling temperature at the hot shutdown panel constituted a reportable condition.
In January 2004, these displays were identified as degraded and the condition was erroneously judged to only be an equipment degradation issue and not a loss of Technical Specification required range.
The displays remained in service beyond Technical Specification allowed outage times.
Corrective actions include replacement of the subject displays, verification that the remaining Versatile work scope did not pose any current or past operability issues, and modification of the model work order to provide additional guidance on Technical Specification range requirements.
. rU1-
- - U
%--WlU.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (6-2004)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION
- 1. FACILITY NAME l
NUMBER
- 6. LER NUMBER
- 3. PAGE Y
SQUENTIAL REVISION YEAR NUMBER NUMBER St. Lucie Unit 2 05000389 Page 2 of 4 2004 003 00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additonal copies of NRCForm 366A) (17)
Description of the Event On December 16, 2004, St. Lucie Unit 2 was in Mode 1 at 100 percent reactor power.
FPL completed an evaluation that determined that past operation with faulty Versatile indicators constituted a reportable condition.
Versatile Instruments Measuring 2000 Bar graph Indicators consist of a front display board that includes the actual indicator bar graph and associated front board calibration components.
The Versatile is configured to accept a representative input signal on the front display board for the required range.
Versatile displays are equipped with a digital backup display.
Therefore, the loss of bar graph sections would not result in a complete loss of the instrument since the parameter value could be verified by the associated digital readout.
However, in selected St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 applications the display is mounted horizontally.
In these applications the digital backup display is hidden to prevent its use because there is no way to rotate the digital display to correct its orientation.
In these cases, continued degradation of or losses to the upper and/or lower sections of the bar graph could cause a reduction in the instrument's range.
In 1995, FPL discovered that Versatile displays can experience degradation due to gas contamination in the vacuum-florescent display.
A preventive maintenance (PM) activity was established to identify Versatile display loss and degradation.
In January and February of 2004 ongoing semi-annual Versatile PM activities identified that a large quantity of instruments (over 100) had inoperative upper or lower display sections.
Furthermore, immediate repairs could not be completed due to the unavailability of parts.
Among the population of degraded instruments were two horizontally mounted displays associated with St. Lucie Unit 2 hot shutdown panel instrumentation.
From a Technical Specification (TS) perspective, hot shutdown panel instrumentation is unique in that the required ranges are stated as part of the TS Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO).
The two instruments were:
- FI-2212, charging flow/pressure at the hot shutdown panel [EIIS:CB:FI], with no indication at the upper 10 percent.
The display was replaced under work order 34002013 on December 3, 2004.
- TI-3351Y, shutdown cooling temperature at the hot shutdown panel [EIIS:BP:TI],
with no indication at the upper 10 percent.
The display was replaced under work order 34002755 on December 3, 2004.
These instruments lacked a digital backup for the lost sections of the bar graph displays.
At the time of the PMs, the effect of the lost bar graph display on TS operability requirements was not recognized nor documented. On December 16, 2004, all open Versatile indicator work orders were reviewed and no operability or reportability issues were found with the other discrepant indicators.
In view of the above repairs and reviews, no present operability condition exists.
Cause of the Event
The apparent cause of this event is the acceptance of longstanding equipment issues coupled with less than adequate detail in the PM process and a desensitization of Operators to these type issues leading to the failure to recognize that these PM failures constituted a loss of Technical Specification instrumentation.U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (6-2004)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION
- 1. FACILITY NAME
- 6. LER NUMBER lYEAR SELQUELNTIAL IREVISION R
NUMBER NUMBER 2004 003 00 St. Lucie Unit 2 When the instrument displays were replaced it became apparent that these bar graph displays had failed sections, not dimmed sections, and that backup digital displays were not available to compensate for the lost display ranges.
Furthermore, the monthly channel check TS surveillances that the operators performed would not have identified the failed display sections because the process variables were not in the upper 10 percent of the display.
As discussed earlier, FPL created a PM to identify premature Versatile display degradation as a compensatory measure until the condition could be resolved.
Over the years, detection and repair of the Versatile displays became the accepted resolution to the reliability issue.
However, now Versatile displays are being phased out by plant modifications that will replace a majority of the Versatile instruments with a new OTEK design. These displays utilize a long life LED display instead of the contamination prone vacuum-fluorescent display.
Analysis of the Event
This event is reportable under 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (i) (B) as 'A ny operation or condition which was prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications... 0 FI-2212 and TI-3351Y are located on the St. Lucie Unit 2 hot shutdown panel and are required to be operable to satisfy TS 3.3.3.5.
TS Table 3.3-9 specifies the instrument ranges and the number of channels required to satisfy TS 3.3.3.5.
The actual instrument range of both FI-2212 and TI-3351Y is equal to that specified in Table 3.3-9.
With the top 10 percent of the display segments of FI-2212 and TI-3351Y not illuminating and no backup digital display available, these instruments did not satisfy the LCO range requirements specified in Table 3.3-9 and as such, were inoperable.
The identified deficiencies were documented by work requests starting in January of 2004 until the replacement of these instruments in December of 2004.
Thus, the condition existed for a period of time greater than that allowed by TS 3.3.3.5.a (the period of inoperability was approximately 10 months versus the 30-day allowed outage time).
Analysis of Safety Significance A review of procedure IMP-77.01 'Versatile Indicator Repair and Calibration,"
indicates that there are approximately 200 Versatiles on Unit 1 and 300 on Unit 2. Of these, Unit 1 has four instruments that have no digital display and Unit 2 contains
- 47.
Sixteen of the 47 Unit 2 indicators are associated with hot shutdown panel instrumentation that have required ranges associated with their TS LCOs.
For the two subject instruments of this LER, the displays in question are only used for operator information; no automatic safety or control functions are derived from the display.
The displays were only missing the extreme upper end of the required instrument range, and the subject systems would be expected to operate within the operational portions of the display.
A 6-month PM presently exists to identify failures of the indicators however the failure rate remains high.
These Versatile indicators are being replaced with the OTEK design, therefore, the existing PM and frequency is deemed adequate for detecting failures until the indicators are replaced.
In addition, plant modifications have been approved to replace a majority of the Versatile instruments(6-2004)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION
- 1. FACILITY NAME St. Lucie Unit 2 2004 003 00 TEXT with a new OTEK design.
As instruments are replaced, display failure rates should decrease and the PM eliminated.
Based on the above, this event had no significant impact to the health and safety of the public.
Corrective Actions
- 1. On December 3, 2004, work orders 34002755, and 34002013 replaced the Versatile displays associated with TI-3351Y, and FI-2212, respectively.
- 2. The model PM work orders for the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Versatile PM's have been be revised via PM change request 05-0025 to add specific direction for declaring degraded Versatiles out of service when portions of the bar graph display are out and a digital display is not present.
- 3. This event has been included in the Operations required reading program.
Other Information Although the Versatile display phased replacement to the OTEK design is part of a planned on-going plant upgrade, this information was provided as background for the event.
The upgrades are not a credited corrective action for this event.
Failed Components Identified Equipment:
Manufacturer:
Model:
Vacuum-Florescent Display Versatiles Measuring Instruments 2000-01-D
Similar Events
None NRC CnDU I&CA i4_1.A1f