05000247/LER-2001-002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER-2001-002,
Docket Number
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B), System Actuation
2472001002R00 - NRC Website

FACILITY NAME (1)

DOCKET

(I

SEQUENT REVISI

IAL � ON LER NUMBER6)

PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION

Westinghouse 4-Loop Pressurized Water Reactor

EVENT IDENTIFICATION

Personnel Error Results in Loss of 480V Bus and Automatic Start of Emergency Diesel Generators

EVENT DATE

February 14, 2001

REFERENCES

Condition Reporting System Number(s): 200101617, 200101621, 200101646

PAST SIMILAR EVENTS

None

EVENT DESCRIPTION

On February 14, 2001, at about 0150 hours0.00174 days <br />0.0417 hours <br />2.480159e-4 weeks <br />5.7075e-5 months <br />, during surveillance testing of 480 volt Bus 3A, and with the reactor at 100 percent power, 480-volt Bus 3A was lost due to the trip of Breaker 52/3A. A technician performing the test was required by procedure PT-M48 to simultaneously hold a switch in the bypass position while two test buttons are pressed. The switch was not held in the correct position. As a result, an undervoltage signal was inserted on the bus when the test button was pushed. This resulted in the loss of Bus 3A, automatic start of all three emergency diesel generators (as designed), and the loss of loads that were powered by Bus 3A. This is a reportable system actuation as listed in 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B)(8). The loss of Bus 3A placed the plant in a shutdown action statement of Technical Specification (TS) 3.0.1. However, the operators failed to enter the 72-hour Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) per TS Table 3.5-3, item 3.b, column 5, regarding the inoperable undervoltage relays during the conduct of surveillance test PT-M48.

Abnormal Operating Instruction (A0I) 27.1.13, "Loss of a 480V Bus" was entered to re-energize the bus. In addition, Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) were entered for the de-energized Engineered Safety Features (ESF) equipment, including the 21 Auxiliary Boiler Feedwater Pump, 22 Service Water Pump, 22 Safety Injection System Pump, and the 21 Residual Heat Removal Pump. Power was restored within 25 minutes (0215 hours0.00249 days <br />0.0597 hours <br />3.554894e-4 weeks <br />8.18075e-5 months <br />), satisfying the Technical Specification 3.0.1 action statement. At 0219 hours0.00253 days <br />0.0608 hours <br />3.621032e-4 weeks <br />8.33295e-5 months <br />, all ESF equipment powered by Bus 3A was returned to AUTO and all LCOs were exited.

FACILITY NAME (1)

DOCKET

SEQUENT REVISI

IAL I ON

EVENT DESCRIPTION (Continued) All equipment functioned as designed in response to the loss of the 480-volt bus. One anomalous condition noted during the event was that the crankcase exhauster for Emergency Diesel Generator 22 had to be manually started. With the successful start of the emergency diesel generators, and the prompt return of power to the bus, there were no adverse safety implications to the public associated with the event. There was no injury to plant personnel or damage to plant equipment. In accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(iv), the NRC was notified of this event at 0251 hours0.00291 days <br />0.0697 hours <br />4.150132e-4 weeks <br />9.55055e-5 months <br /> on February 14, 2001.

EVENT ANALYSIS

Two Instrumentation and Control (I&C) technicians had been assigned to perform the 480-volt undervoltage alarm test on Bus 3A. Prior to performance of the test, the Control Room Supervisor, Reactor Operator, and I&C technicians discussed the 480-volt undervoltage alarm test, and "touch-the-tag" during the performance of the test. The Control Room part of the test was completed without incident. The technicians then proceeded to the 480-volt switchgear room to complete the remainder of the test. The test procedure required that the "UV Test" switch (spring return) be held in the "test" position during several test steps. That particular switch was not held in the "test" position as required by the procedure, resulting in a trip of the breaker feeding the bus under test and the autostart of the emergency diesel generators.

Interviews were conducted of the technicians performing the surveillance test, I&C personnel and Operations personnel. A barrier analysis was performed. It was determined that human error was directly responsible for the bus trip. The root cause was attributed primarily to the following:

  • The pre-job briefing emphasized the Control Room aspects of the test rather than the switchgear room portion of the test, and the I&C technicians were not being properly engaged (queried) during the briefing.
  • The technicians did not read verbatim from the test procedure, although that is the expected method.
  • Three point communications were not utilized, although that is the expected method.

Other contributing factors included: overconfidence by the senior technician with respect to performing the test, a walk/talk-through was not conducted prior to executing the 480-volt bus section of the test, one technician had never performed the test, confusing nomenclature in the test procedure, the switches were not functionally labeled, and the format of the test procedure used had not been updated to current station standards.

FACILITY NAME (1)

DOCKET

(1 SEQUENT REVISI IAL � ON 2001 -002 00 05000247 Indian Point, Unit 2 4 OF

EVENT SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

This event resulted in an unnecessary challenge to plant safety systems (i.e., start of the emergency diesel generators), the temporary loss of power to certain engineered safety features equipment, and entry into a Technical Specification shutdown action statement. The 480-volt system, however, is designed to provide three independent power trains to supply safeguard system equipment such that in the event of design basis accidents occurring coincident with loss of offsite power, reliable power sources will be available to ensure safe shutdown of the plant. The effect on operation of the plant (other than the loss of the Bus 3A) was the momentary loss of the Group 21 Backup Pressurizer Heaters, which resulted in a small decrease in primary system pressure. The pressure was restored to normal by energizing Group 22 Backup Pressurizer Heaters.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

The corrective actions included the following:

  • On February 16, 2001, the I&C department conducted a stand-down to specifically discuss this event. In addition, a plant-wide human performance stand-down was conducted for station personnel during the week of March 1 through March 8, 2001. The purpose of this stand-down was to 1) assess the human performance aspects of this event, and 2) to refocus personnel on expectations for operational performance and personnel accountability.
  • Labeling for the undervoltage test by-pass switches was added to ensure components are easily identifiable.
  • Test & Performance Procedure PT-M48, "480 Volt Undervoltage Alarm" was revised to include additional information for the technician regarding specifically how to perform the undervoltage test.
  • The Control Room Supervisor's database was updated to include the requirement to enter the 72-hour Limiting LCO per TS Table 3.5-3, item 3.b, column 5.