05000220/FIN-2015001-01
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Failure to Declare Notice of Unusual Event Following Sodium Bisulfite Spill in Unit 1 Screenhouse |
Description | The inspectors documented a Green NRC-identified NCV of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(q)(2) when Exelon failed to declare a Notice of Unusual Event Emergency Action Level (EAL) (HU3.1) when entry conditions were met. Specifically, on February 4, 2015, between 9:55 a.m. and 11:15 a.m., access to the Screenhouse was prohibited due to the release of a toxic gas that adversely affected normal plant operations following a spill of sodium bisulfite. Immediate corrective actions included Exelon entering the issue into their corrective action program (CAP) as issue report (IR) 02474142, formally evaluating the decision-making process used during the incident, and clarifying responsibilities for air sampling and the reporting of samples during incidents in the future. This finding is more than minor because it was associated with the Emergency Preparedness cornerstone attribute of Emergency Response Organization Performance, and affected the cornerstone objective of ensuring that a licensee is capable of implementing adequate measures to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of a radiological emergency. Specifically, between 9:55 a.m. and 11:15 a.m., access to the Unit 1 Screenhouse was prohibited due to the release of sodium bisulfite to the Screenhouse, affecting normal plant operations of the station. This finding was evaluated using IMC 0609, Appendix B, Emergency Preparedness SDP, Section 4, Failure to Implement. The performance deficiency is associated with the emergency classification planning standard and is considered a Risk-Significant Planning Standard (RSPS). The failure to declare a Notice of Unusual Event when directed by the EAL Matrix is considered a lost or degraded RSPS in accordance with Section 4 of IMC 0609. Section 4.3.c and Attachment 1 of IMC 0609, Appendix B, provide the significance determination for a Failure to Implement, and the performance deficiency was determined to be of very low safety significance (Green). The inspectors determined that the cross-cutting aspect that contributed most to the root cause is Human Performance, Challenge the Unknown: Individuals stop when faced with uncertain conditions. Risks are evaluated and managed before proceeding. Specifically, during the event, an unknown substance was released and at no point was atmospheric analysis used in the EAL declaration decision-making process. Furthermore, although spill response personnel were experiencing symptoms that were not consistent with exposure to a spill of sodium bisulfite, this unexpected condition was not fully assessed by NMPNS for significance and reportability in accordance with procedures. |
Site: | Nine Mile Point |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000220/2015001 Section 4OA3 |
Date counted | Mar 31, 2015 (2015Q1) |
Type: | NCV: Green |
cornerstone | Emergency Prep |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71153 |
Inspectors (proximate) | A Rosebrook D Schroeder E Miller G Stock H Gray K Kolaczyk |
Violation of: | 10 CFR 50.54 10 CFR 50.54(q) |
CCA | H.11, Challenge the Unknown |
INPO aspect | QA.2 |
' | |
Finding - Nine Mile Point - IR 05000220/2015001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Nine Mile Point) @ 2015Q1
Self-Identified List (Nine Mile Point)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||