Pages that link to "NG-98-2056, Comment Supporting Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Author,However Have Some Concerns Re Proposed Rule Language Itself"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following pages link to NG-98-2056, Comment Supporting Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Author,However Have Some Concerns Re Proposed Rule Language Itself:
Displayed 20 items.
- ML20045F856 (← links)
- ML20086K043 (← links)
- ML20195J900 (← links)
- ML20198J063 (redirect page) (← links)
- NG-98-0926, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 on Codes & Standards:Ieee National Consensus Standard. Ies Utilities Believes Proposed Rule Will Impose Addl Costs & Vulnerabilities on Licensees W/No Substantial Improvement (← links)
- NG-99-1232, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.48, Fire Protection, & App R to 10CFR50, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to 790101 (← links)
- NG-99-1296, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Approves mark-up to Draft Revision 2 to NUREG-1022 with Description & Basis for Each Change for Review & Consideration (← links)
- NG-99-1263, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Change to 10CFR50.47, Emergency Plans & Endorsing L Hendricks Ltr Re Use of Potassium Iodide (← links)
- NG-99-0616, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Rev of Fee Structures (← links)
- NG-98-0329, Comments on Pr 10CFR50 Re Engineering Judgment for Activities or Evaluations of Components or Sys.Change to 10CFR50.55a Should Be Defined If NRC Concerned About Specific Application of Using Engineering Judgment (← links)
- NG-98-0065, Comment on Draft Standard Review Plan 3.9.8, for Review of Risked-Informed Inservice Insp of Piping & Draft Reg Guide DG-1063, Approach for Plant-Specific,Risked-Informed Decisionmaking:Inservice Insp of Piping (← links)
- NG-98-2056 (redirect page) (← links)
- NG-98-2045, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes, Tests & Experiments (← links)
- NG-97-1213, Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Test or Experiments) (← links)
- NG-95-2723, Comment Supporting Revised NRC SALP Program (← links)
- NG-95-1404, Comment Supporting Nuclear Energy Inst Comments on Draft Policy Statement, Freedom of Employees in Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation (← links)
- NG-95-0464, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 for Shutdown & low-power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors (← links)
- NG-91-1144, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Nrc Should Revise Proposed Schedule for Collection of Increased Fee for 1991 (← links)
- NG-97-2036, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55(h) Re Draft RG DG-1042, Criteria for Safety Sys. Amended Rule Not Clear Regarding Application to Plants That Received Their Const Permits Prior to 1971 (← links)
- NG-91-0222, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Secy 90-347 Re Regulatory Impact Survey Rept (← links)