Pages that link to "NG-91-1144, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Nrc Should Revise Proposed Schedule for Collection of Increased Fee for 1991"

The following pages link to NG-91-1144, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Nrc Should Revise Proposed Schedule for Collection of Increased Fee for 1991:

Displayed 20 items.

• ML20045F856 ‎ (← links)
• ML20086K043 ‎ (← links)
• ML20077C411 (redirect page) ‎ (← links)
• ML20195J900 ‎ (← links)
• NG-98-0926, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 on Codes & Standards:Ieee National Consensus Standard. Ies Utilities Believes Proposed Rule Will Impose Addl Costs & Vulnerabilities on Licensees W/No Substantial Improvement ‎ (← links)
• NG-99-1232, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.48, Fire Protection, & App R to 10CFR50, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to 790101 ‎ (← links)
• NG-99-1296, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Approves mark-up to Draft Revision 2 to NUREG-1022 with Description & Basis for Each Change for Review & Consideration ‎ (← links)
• NG-99-1263, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Change to 10CFR50.47, Emergency Plans & Endorsing L Hendricks Ltr Re Use of Potassium Iodide ‎ (← links)
• NG-99-0616, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Rev of Fee Structures ‎ (← links)
• NG-98-0329, Comments on Pr 10CFR50 Re Engineering Judgment for Activities or Evaluations of Components or Sys.Change to 10CFR50.55a Should Be Defined If NRC Concerned About Specific Application of Using Engineering Judgment ‎ (← links)
• NG-98-0065, Comment on Draft Standard Review Plan 3.9.8, for Review of Risked-Informed Inservice Insp of Piping & Draft Reg Guide DG-1063, Approach for Plant-Specific,Risked-Informed Decisionmaking:Inservice Insp of Piping ‎ (← links)
• NG-98-2056, Comment Supporting Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Author,However Have Some Concerns Re Proposed Rule Language Itself ‎ (← links)
• NG-98-2045, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes, Tests & Experiments ‎ (← links)
• NG-97-1213, Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Test or Experiments) ‎ (← links)
• NG-95-2723, Comment Supporting Revised NRC SALP Program ‎ (← links)
• NG-95-1404, Comment Supporting Nuclear Energy Inst Comments on Draft Policy Statement, Freedom of Employees in Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation ‎ (← links)
• NG-95-0464, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 for Shutdown & low-power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ‎ (← links)
• NG-91-1144 (redirect page) ‎ (← links)
• NG-97-2036, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55(h) Re Draft RG DG-1042, Criteria for Safety Sys. Amended Rule Not Clear Regarding Application to Plants That Received Their Const Permits Prior to 1971 ‎ (← links)
• NG-91-0222, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Secy 90-347 Re Regulatory Impact Survey Rept ‎ (← links)